Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Teknomekanik

Quantitative Risk-Based Inspection on Gas Riser Pipelines at Offshore Facilities Mhd. Ibkar Yusran Asfar; Johny Wahyuadi Soedarsono; Arie Wijaya; Taufik Aditiyawarman; Dony Soelistiyono; Romal Ramadhan
Teknomekanik Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.201 KB) | DOI: 10.24036/teknomekanik.v4i2.11172

Abstract

Numerous pipeline failures have occurred due to the drastic increase in oil and gas product distribution pipelines over the last three decades. Corrosion is a significant factor in the failure of offshore gas pipelines. It is necessary to maintain the integrity of the offshore transmission system, one of which is the riser, for the product to be adequately distributed. The purpose of this study is to ensure the riser's reliability by conducting a risk assessment of the probability and consequences of equipment failure, mitigating the impact of failure risk, and developing a more optimal inspection plan. The API 5L Grade X60 gas riser pipe is the subject of this study. The quantitative Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) technique was used in 2016 following the API 581 standard. This quantitative approach is founded on a numerical value model constructed using validated operational data and inspection results. The risk assessment indicates that the gas riser pipelines will have a high-risk level (5D) for the splash zone segment and a medium-risk level (2D) for the above-and below-water segments. The recommended inspection plan for the gas riser pipeline is one year after the risk-based inspection assessment.
The Risk Identification On 3" GL BO3-52520 Process Pipelines Using a Risk-Based Inspection Method Angga Pratama Putra; Johny Wahyuadi Soedarsono; Azizah Intan Pangesty; Muhammad Ibkar Yusran asfar; Aprizal Aprizal; Romal Ramadhan
Teknomekanik Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (253.874 KB) | DOI: 10.24036/teknomekanik.v5i1.12772

Abstract

The oil and gas industry can contribute significantly to sustainable development by mitigating negative environmental impacts, such as equipment failure. Numerous pipeline failures have occurred due to the dramatic expansion of the oil and gas product distribution pipeline network, which is a significant factor in the offshore gas pipeline network's failure. In general, compared to other equipment types in the industry, planning inspections presents more challenges. Due to a lack of jurisdictional requirements regarding inspection intervals and piping methods. This research aims to ensure the reliability by conducting a risk assessment of the likelihood and consequences of equipment failure, mitigating the impact of that risk, and developing a more optimal inspection plan. This study is focused on API Class 5L Pipe 3" GL BO3-52520. The Routine Inspection Technique (RBI) was implemented in 2016 following the API 581 standard. This semi-quantitative approach is built based on operational data and validated inspection results. According to the risk assessment, the pipeline will have a Medium risk level, with metal losses occurring in each segment. Four years after the risk-based inspection assessment, the recommended inspection plan for gas pipelines is four years.
Material selection for raw gas pipeline at SBR#2 gas field Rado Riady; Johny Wahyuadi Soedarsono; Rini Riastuti; Iman Adipurnama
Teknomekanik Vol 5 No 2 (2022): Regular Issue
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (298.975 KB) | DOI: 10.24036/teknomekanik.v5i2.13372

Abstract

In engineering design, material selection is the process of choosing the best material for a specific process via a systematic material selection approach. This article described the material selection process for SBR#2 pipeline, which will be installed to flow raw gas from SBR#2 field to the nearest tie-in point. The material selection process starts with design requirement analysis to generate primary function and objectives, including its constraints, determine primary criteria to be evaluated, screen materials candidates based on criteria evaluation, and select the most suitable materials based on very specific requirements. The criteria were evaluated by performing value engineering with the performance criteria matrix tool. Materials selection, in this case, was determined by two main criteria: corrosion resistance and construction ability. Corrosion resistance was evaluated semi-quantitatively by applying NORSOK M-506 2005 spreadsheet, and construction ability were evaluated qualitatively based on field experience. Solid Corrosion Resistance Alloy (CRA)-Stainless Steel 316L pipe is the most suitable for this case.