Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

The Role of the House of Representatives in Guarding Government Policies to Resolve the Covid-19 Pandemic Bayu Dwi Anggono; Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no4.2314

The responsibility to handle the Covid-19 Pandemic is not only carried out by the President as the highest leader of the government, but also the House of Representatives which holds the legislative branch of power, so far the public has questioned the seriousness of Parliament in handle the Pandemic, through its functions should be able to assist and especially to monitoring policy government to work together to handle this pandemic and as an effort to prevent potential abuse of power. The writing of this article uses the Juridical Normative method which will produce recommendations on how the House of Representatives should optimize its function during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Menimbang Kewenangan DPR dalam Penggunaan Hak Angket Pada Kasus Korupsi KTP Elektornik Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus; Bayu Dwi Anggono
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.9545

In Indonesia, the control function of the House of Representatives (DPR) includes interpellation rights, inquiry rights and the right to express opinions. In 2017, the DPR's inquiry rights to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) were considered unconstitutional because the law did not include the KPK as the object of the inquiry mechanism. However, the Constitutional Court (MK) in Decision Number 36 / PUU-XV / 2017 defined KPK as an executive so that this institution can be monitored through the inquiry mechanism. This court's decision, however, contradicts to the four previous decisions which classified KPK as an independent institution. This article examines the validity of the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK by considering the DPR's inquiry rights as a form of a mechanism for mutual checks and balances to the other state institutions. In practice, there are both formal and material rules that must be fulfilled so that their implementation is legally valid and the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK in cases of the electronic KTP corruption ignore these conditions. This article recommends that the DPR be careful when using inquiry rights as a monitoring mechanism. Keywords: Inquiry rights, House of Representatives, Corruption Eradication Commission

Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland Bayu Dwi Anggono; Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
Lentera Hukum Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.19895

Recently, omnibus law has become a critical discourse in Indonesia, both academically and practically. This discourse emerges from the relatively fast drafting and ratification of the Job Creation Law. This law's formation uses the omnibus law method because it contains many laws' substance into one law. One of Indonesia's fundamental issues is the absence of rules, methods, and techniques for forming the omnibus law. On the other hand, the techniques and methods of forming these omnibus laws have been practiced in various countries to accelerate the legislative process and organize regulations. However, public participation becomes one of the fundamental shortcomings to draft the legislation under omnibus law. This article aims to review and compare the omnibus law concept applied in selected countries, referencing the United States and Ireland as the model. This article also analyzes how to form the ideal omnibus law by learning from the omnibus law application in other countries that have successfully implemented it first. This study finds that omnibus laws in the United States and Ireland contribute to ushering hyper-regulation symptoms that are vulnerable and hamper economic development. The above comparison needs to be adjusted to the Indonesian context to enact the omnibus law. KEYWORDS: Omnibus Law, Indonesian Law, Comparative Omnibus Law.

PENCEGAHAN KORUPSI LEGISLASI MELALUI PENGUATAN PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM PROSES PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 17, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2020
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.679

AbstrakSebagai negara hukum formil (rechtstaat), peraturan perundang-undangan merupakan salah satu instrumen fundamental bagi Indonesia. Peraturan perundang-undangan mengatur dan membatasi penguasa atau pemerintah untuk bertindak dalam rangka mewujudkan tujuan negara sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh konstitusi. Nyatanya masih terdapat permasalahan undang-undang, salah satunya yakni korupsi legislasi, dimana proses pembentukan undang-undang tidak sesuai prosedur yang secara normatif diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan undang-undang dibuat untuk kepentingan tertentu sehingga menghasilkan produk undang-undang yang buruk dan melanggar hak masyarakat. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana partisipasi publik diakomodasi dalam pembentukan undang-undang berdasarkan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta apa saja bentuk korupsi legislasi di Indonesia dan bagaimana pencegahannya melalui penguatan partisipasi publik. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah pendekatan konseptual, berdasarkan pada bagaimana negara memberikan ruang dalam pembentukan undang-undang bagi publik agar aspirasinya dipenuhi. Selain itu tulisan ini menggunakan metode pendekatan perbandingan, dengan membandingkan dan mempelajari peran partisipasi publik dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang di beberapa negara. Tulisan ini memberikan gambaran praktik korupsi legislasi yang terjadi antara lain keberadaan pasal siluman dan jual-beli pasal dan merumuskan model ideal partisipasi publik yang bisa mencegah korupsi legislasi. AbstractAs a formal legal state (rechtstaat), laws and regulations is one of the fundamental instruments for Indonesia. laws and regulations, regulates and limits the authorities or government to act for realizing the objectives of the state as mandated by the constitution. Indonesia’s laws and regulations still have problem, one of which is corruption legislation, where the process of forming laws is not accordance with procedures that normatively regulated in Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations then made for certain interests so that the laws created are bad and violate public rights. The problem discussed in this paper is how public participation is accommodated in the formation of laws based on applicable laws and what forms of corruption legislation in Indonesia and how to prevent them through strengthening public participation. The method of approach used in this paper is a conceptual approach, based on how the state provides space in the formation of laws for the public so that their aspirations are fullfillled. Besides, this paper uses a comparative approach method, by comparing and studying the role of public participation in the process of law making in several countries. This paper provides an overview of corrupt legislation practices that occur which is the existence of stealth articles and article buying and formulating an ideal model of public participation that can prevent corruption in legislation.

PERLINDUNGAN KEBIJAKAN DISKRESI DALAM PENANGANAN COVID-19 MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 2 TAHUN 2020 Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus; Anna Erliyana
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Volume 6, Nomor 2 Juli-Desember 2020
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

AbstrakPandemi Covid-19 telah melanda lebih dari 200 negara sehingga mengancam perekonomian global dan nasional tak terkecuali Indonesia. Sebagai negara hukum formil (rechtstaat), Indonesia memerlukan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai dasar bertindak untuk mengatasinya. Pada bulan Maret 2020, presiden mengeluarkan Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi COVID-19 yang kemudian disahkan oleh DPR menjadi undang-undang, banyak pihak mengkritik Perppu tersebut karena dianggap memberikan absolutisme penguasa, namun sesungguhnya Perppu tersebut memberikan kepastian hukum guna mencapai tujuan dan kemanfaatan yang lebih luas yakni pemulihan dari krisis ekonomi akibat Covid-19. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah, bagaimana penggunaan serta pengawasan diskresi yang dikeluarkan untuk penanganan pandemi Covid-19 dan bagaimana perlindungan terhadap diskresi yang dilaksanakan Pemerintah berdasarkan Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2020 dalam rangka penanganan Covid-19. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah pendekatan konseptual, berdasarkan pada asas kepastian dan kemanfaatan hukum, serta menjelaskan penggunaan diskresi berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014.Kata Kunci: Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Kepastian Hukum, Covid-19AbstractCovid-19 pandemic has affect more than 200 countries so that it is threatening global and national economic, including Indonesia. As a formal legal state (rechtstaat), Indonesia need laws and regulation as a basis for handle it. In March 2020, the president issued Perppu No. 1 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling the COVID-19 Pandemic which was then passed by the House of Representative into law, many parties criticized the Law providing leadership absolutism, but in fact this Law provides legal certainty to recovery from the economic crisis caused by Covid-19. The problem discussed in this paper is about how to protect the implementation of the release of discretion issued for handling the Covid-19 pandemic and protection against discretion by the Government based on Perppu No. 1 of 2020 in the context of handling Covid-19 and. The method used in this paper is about conceptual, based on the legal certainty and utilities, and explains the use of discretion based on Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.Keywords: Laws and Regulations, Legal Certainty, COVID-19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

HANDLING OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC BY THE GOVERNMENT IN VIEW FROM THE LEGAL PRODUCTS FORMED Bayu Dwi Anggono; Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 1: FERUARY
Publisher : Faculty of Law University of Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v5i1.19410

It's been almost a year since WHO declared Covid-19 to be a pandemic, this outbreak has infected almost all countries in the world and has affected various sectors. As a rule of law, Indonesia issued various legal products to deal with the impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic, especially from the health and economic sectors. This article will explain what legal products the government has formed to deal with pandemics and discuss the problems of legal products that apply in dealing with pandemics. The research method used in this study is Normative Juridical with a conceptual approach, statutory approach and comparative approach. This research will evaluate the legal products formed by the government because there are problems such as disharmony, in addition to another problem, namely the formation of laws formed by the House of Representatives together with the government which have no connection with the acceleration of the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and are considered to be negligent. to the sense of crisis. One of the recommendations that can be implemented by the Government is to focus on establishing laws and regulations related to the handling of the Pandemic and evaluating the laws and regulations made in the context of handling the Pandemic in the past year.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search