Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning-Based Electronic Modules to Improve Student’s Analytical Skills Muhammad Noris; Margiyono Suyitno; Setria Utama Rizal; Adin Lazuardy Firdiansyah; Sukamdi Sukamdi
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 3 (2023): March
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.3401

Abstract

This type of research is Research and Development (R&D) with the 4D development model (Define, Design, Development, and Disseminate). The research subjects were 70 Grade VII students of SMPN, NTB. The results of the Guided Inquiry-based E-Module feasibility test ranged from 89.56% to the very feasible category. This shows that the E-Module can be used as an instrument or learning media. Meanwhile, the results of the practicality test of the E-Module based on Guided Inquiry Learning based on student responses ranged from 88.32% in the very practical category, while the teacher's responses ranged from 93.04% to the very practical category. The test results for the effectiveness of using the Guided Inquiry-based E-Module are shown by the Gain-Score obtained by students after using the E-Module. This can be seen from the Gain score obtained by the experimental class ranging from 78.03% which indicates that the media is quite effective in learning. This can be seen from the Asymp value. Sig. (2-Tailed) ranges from 0.000 <0.05, meaning that there is a significant difference in the analytic abilities of students using guided inquiry learning-based E-Modules.
Investigasi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Kategori Adversity Quotient pada Siswa Kelas XII Dewi Rosikhoh; Adin Lazuardy Firdiansyah; Riskiyatul Hasanah
Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2: September 2023
Publisher : Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37905/jmathedu.v4i2.20302

Abstract

In this manuscript, our research purpose was to describe how high school students solved geometry problems in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This research was qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were five students in grade 12 science divided into one climber student, one camper-climber student, two camper students, and one quitter-camper student. In this research, we used some instruments, namely the ARP questionnaire, problem-solving test questions, and interview guidelines. The qualitative data were analyzed by using the principles or steps of the Polya method in solving problems. The results showed that the climber and camper-climber students could understand the problem, make plans, carry out plans, and check back in solving the geometry problems. However, the camper-climber student in re-checking answers had not been equipped with other strategies or methods. The camper student could understand the problem, make plans, and carry out plans in solving the problems. It was just that the camper student making plans was not more complex than the plans made by the climber student. Meanwhile, the quitter-camper student could only understand the problem. Therefore, AQ categories of students could be used as one of the teacher considerations in forming groups when learning mathematics in class, especially in trying students’ problem-solving skills.