Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh Abdi Dosen : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Abdimas Galuh : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Rokhiyah, Isti
Universitas Terbuka
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh

 1 
KESENJANGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI DAN HARAPAN MAHASISWA PADA KEGIATAN TUTORIAL TATAP MUKA MATA KULIAH PRAKTIKUM IPA SD Adji, Sandra Sukmaning; Rokhiyah, Isti
Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh Vol 12 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Learning subject such as Natural Sciences (IPA) is not only learns about science concepts but also experiencing the real nature. This study aims to obtain information about students perceptions on the content of science laboratory practices, the preparation of students in tutorials, as well as expectations for practical implementation of IPA. Questionnaires were administered by mail and direct delivery. A total of 399 students from Medan, Jakarta, Jakarta, Samarinda, Surabaya, Bangka Belitung, Mataram, Palu, which registered to the course at Universitas Terbuka (UT) in the first semester of 2009 had answered. Observation was carried out at 4 locations in Sukabumi, Depok, Tangerang, and Cibarusa. The results indicated that independent laboratory practices were done more compared to the formal tutorial practices. Perceptions of students towards science laboratory activities of the of 4 scale (poor (1), fair (2), average (3) and good (4)), were respectively X = 3.34 for student involvement in laboratory practices, X = 3.01 for the content material, X = 3.27 for the presence of tutors, and X = 2.61 for the availability of facilities and infrastructure. While the gap between the conditions and expectations of students in consecutive tutorial activities was 0.71 for the availability of facilities and infrastructure, 0.41 for to the availability of laboratory practice materials, 0.31 for the competence of tutors, and 0.33 for student involvement in laboratory practice activities.
KESENJANGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI DAN HARAPAN MAHASISWA PADA KEGIATAN TUTORIAL TATAP MUKA MATA KULIAH PRAKTIKUM IPA SD Sandra Sukmaning Adji; Isti Rokhiyah
Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh Vol. 12 No. 2 (2011)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3470.808 KB)

Abstract

Learning subject such as Natural Sciences (IPA) is not only learns about science concepts but also experiencing the real nature. This study aims to obtain information about students' perceptions on the content of science laboratory practices, the preparation of students in tutorials, as well as expectations for practical implementation of IPA. Questionnaires were administered by mail and direct delivery. A total of 399 students from Medan, Jakarta, Jakarta, Samarinda, Surabaya, Bangka Belitung, Mataram, Palu, which registered to the course at Universitas Terbuka (UT) in the first semester of 2009 had answered. Observation was carried out at 4 locations in Sukabumi, Depok, Tangerang, and Cibarusa. The results indicated that independent laboratory practices were done more compared to the formal tutorial practices. Perceptions of students towards science laboratory activities of the of 4 scale (poor (1), fair (2), average (3) and good (4)), were respectively X = 3.34 for student involvement in laboratory practices, X = 3.01 for the content material, X = 3.27 for the presence of tutors, and X = 2.61 for the availability of facilities and infrastructure. While the gap between the conditions and expectations of students in consecutive tutorial activities was 0.71 for the availability of facilities and infrastructure, 0.41 for to the availability of laboratory practice materials, 0.31 for the competence of tutors, and 0.33 for student involvement in laboratory practice activities.
Co-Authors Amalia Sapriati Astri Dwi Jayanti Suhandoko Hartingsih Hartingsih Kristanti Ambar Puspitasari Mestika Sekarwinahyu Puryati Puryati Sandra Sukmaning Adji Sembiring, Gorky Sendi Ramdhani Sri Dewi Nirmala Sutriyana Jodi Tian Belawati Tita Rosita