Articles
<![CDATA[A comparative study on spatial configuration of human settlements in Riparian Area (Case studies : Old Kampoong and Colonial Settlements in Palembang ]]>
<![CDATA[Adiyanto, Johannes]]>;
<![CDATA[Romdhoni, M. Fajri]]>;
<![CDATA[Warlika, Hendi]]>
<![CDATA[ IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series No 3 (2017): 8th International Conference on Architecture Research and Design 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.12962/j23546026.y2017i3.2437
<![CDATA[Palembang is the city which is divided by Musi River. Palembang is also one of the oldest city in Indonesia. Many old settlements were built in riparian area. This geographic condition of Palembang becomes background of this research. The research questions are: what is the discrepancy between Kampoong and Colonial Settlements in spatial configuration? Does the Musi River have influence in spatial configuration on that case? This research using the space syntax analysis with the following three steps of analysis: convex map analysis, axial map analysis and visibility graph analysis. For case studies, this research names two different settlements: old Kampoong (3-4 Ulu and 10 Ulu) and Colonial settlements (Komperta Plaju and Komperta Bagus Kuning) and we use Kampung Kapitan (7 Ulu) for the comparation. As the result of this research shows that between Kampoong and Colonial Settlements have some discrepancies in spatial configuration. In Kampoong, they have a small ‘void space’, many streets between houses and the organic patterns. In Colonial settlements, the spatial configuration is planned well with grid pattern. In context influences of Musi River to the settlements, only Bagus Kuning complex that has a closed relationship with rivers because those settlements have a connection between inner ‘void space’ with riparian ‘void space’.]]>
<![CDATA[Genealogi arsitektur modern Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 5 No 3 (2020): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | September 2020 ~ Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v5i3.465
<![CDATA[Architectures in Indonesia are often identified as 'unique' compared to European and American constructions. They are referred to as Wastuwidya by Mangunwijaya and Nusantara by Prijotomo. This paper, therefore, aimed to examine the reasons for the perceived similar principles between the Indonesian architectures and those in Europe or America and also reviewed the architecture in the country beyond the identity. This involved the application of a historical approach with synchronous-diachronic methods to determine the significance of a historical timeline and its architectural content. The results showed the country’s modern architecture is associated with the foreign entry, its climate, and socio-cultural conditions, and also perceived as a sign of certain political powers presented during the Daendels and Sukarno era. Indonesian and European/American architectural designs were also observed to have different entry processes. Therefore, modern architecture should be perceived as a process rather than a product. © 2020 Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[Identifikasi Konfigurasi Geometri Bangunan Tahan Gempa ]]>
<![CDATA[Livian Teddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Husnul Hidayat]]>
<![CDATA[ ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur Vol 6 No 2 (2021): ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur | Mei 2021 ~ Agustus 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30822/arteks.v6i2.839
<![CDATA[Indonesia is an earthquake-prone area because it is located at the world's most active tectonic plates and hundreds of local faults. Obviously, there have been many earthquake victims caused by collapsed buildings, hence the need for earthquake-resistant construction. However, there is not much guidance for architects to design earthquake-resistant buildings. This research proposes guidance for architects on how to design building forms relatively able to resist earthquakes. The simulation experiment method involving 32 building models in various forms was employed. The experimental results were then analyzed with modal analysis in ETABS and SVA for architectural design. Based on the analysis report, some guidelines were proposed: 1). Avoid buildings that are too slender, use the slenderness ratio H/D ≤ 2, 2). Avoid soft stories where the ratio of the top column height (h) to the bottom column height (h1) ≤ 0.8, 3). Use symmetrical shapes with 1 or 2 axes and avoid shapes with random compositions, 4). Use the additive and subtractive mass transformation ≤ 15%, 5).Strengthen the structural elements, install shear walls, or use dilatation to minimize potential torsional irregularities and non-parallel system irregularities of L, T, U, +, and Z forms6). Avoid using non-axial asymmetrical forms.]]>
<![CDATA[Pendampingan Konservasi Arsitektur Tradisional Melalui Pengembangan Desa Wisata ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Fitri Oktarini]]>;
<![CDATA[Harini Mutiara Hapsari]]>;
<![CDATA[Meivirina Hanum]]>;
<![CDATA[Nando Al Farizi]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyayu Arista Mahdalena]]>
<![CDATA[ JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) VOL. 6 NOMOR 1 MARET 2022 JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Publikasi Ilmiah dan Penerbitan (LPIP) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (383.251 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30595/jppm.v6i1.7319
<![CDATA[Rumah Baghi ditemui pada desa-desa perbukitan di Sumatera Selatan. Arsitekturnya merupakan satu kepaduan dengan kehidupan keseharian masyarakat tradisional. Kurangnya pengenalan akan arsitektur ini menyebabkan banyak rumah ditelantarkan. Kegiatan pendampingan bertujuan memperkenalkan, mempresentasikan, dan mensosialisasikan potensi arsitektur lokal kepada masyarakat di Desa Perapau, salah satu desa perbukitan. Pembangunan kesadaran akan arsitektur tradisional melalui skenario pengembangan wisata warisan. Hasil pendampingan menunjukkan bahwa pelestarian bangunan tradisional memerlukan dua pendekatan, yaitu aturan dan keuntungan. Aturan dapat berupa adat istiadat yang mengikat masyarakat dalam melakukan perubahan atas rumah adat dan keuntungan berupa sumber penghasilan tambahan bagi pemilik.]]>
<![CDATA[Kajian Etis Normatif dalam Pendidikan Arsitektur di Era Industri 4.0 ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ ARSITEKTURA Vol 17, No 2 (2019): ARSITEKTURA : Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Binaan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (416.898 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/arst.v17i2.30522
<![CDATA[Industry 4.0 is a necessity in the current global era. Indonesia since 2018 has prepared itself with the "Making Indonesia 4.0" roadmap, which covers the food and beverage, textile, automotive, electronics and chemical industries. This program is also supported by a link and match program between the Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education. On the other hand, the development of the use of BIM and 3D printers in building construction has begun to develop rapidly. The construction approach 4.0 will soon be entering Indonesia so, that the link and match with the world of education need to be a concern. Is it the education of architecture in Indonesia already prepare for that technology? That is the main question in this paper. This research approach is a normative ethical philosophy approach. The method used is a normative qualitative method and makes a comparison between the phenomena of industrial development 4.0, especially those related to construction 4.0 with the latest developments in the world of education, especially architectural education in Indonesia. This comparison is then compared with legislation related to undergraduate higher education in the department / architecture study program. These appeals become the basis for the stages of discussion that see developments into the future of the IT world related to architecture. This research shows that there is something fundamental in the present development, namely the aspect of cooperation. The aspect of cooperation is the key to the use of BIM, and this is also the main variable in legislation which is termed the humanities value. Thus the difficulty of using BIM software in various universities due to various technical and non-technical reasons is not an obstacle to pursuing standards that are consistent with the development of the phenomenon of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. This can be said because the development of BIM in the future is not only talking about technical matters, but also on social problems, especially human capabilities collaboratively. The ability of collaboration between designers and the ability of collaboration across sciences is an important capability in the future.]]>
<![CDATA[ARSITEKTUR DAN AIR (Kasus: Kota Palembang) ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (6061.137 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21460/atrium.v3i2.14
<![CDATA[Title: Architecture and Water (Palembang Case) The total area of Indonesia consists of a total land area of 1,904,569 km2 and a sea area of 7.900.000 km2. Indonesia's geographical location has two rainy and dry seasons, tropical climate and high humidity and sunshine throughout the year. This condition is also reinforced by the location of Indonesia located on two continents, Asia and Australia. Thus Indonesia is not only about land but also waters. This general description becomes the basic of understanding the case study of Palembang city. The case of Palembang was appointed to see the consequences of 'water' in the course of city development and the traces of its architectural artifacts. Then how the latest development of Palembang city, is still oriented to the water or have forgotten the water as the face of the city? The purpose of this discussion is to show the development of the city, especially Palembang, related to its natural geographical conditions. Explore this descriptive paper using a historical study approach with chronic descriptive methods. Chronic descriptive method is a method of translation as it is with a note on events that are considered important in a particular location. Descriptive descriptive results show that the city of Palembang has left the water, the icon of the Musi River is placed as a 'separator / distinguishing / distance maker' rather than 'union' between Ilir and Ulu. Geographical natural conditions are not placed as a basis in the implementation and development of Palembang City.]]>
<![CDATA[PERSPEKTIF KONSERVASI ARSITEKTURAL PADA MASYARAKAT JAWA ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (443.983 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21460/atrium.v1i1.35
<![CDATA[Title: Architectural Conservation Perspective In Javanese Community Traditionally, Indonesian, with tropical climate, use wooden material for their building. The consequences of that material and the tropical climate is building cannot durable compare stone material. The building needs renewal more frequently and sometimes reconstruction.This study focus in Java building (houses) and their culture. In Javanese manuscripts (primbon), repairing the house is the same level with build the new one. To repair or to build the house for Javanese is not only the technical aspect (like structure or the form), but also about the connection with nature and their expectation in the future. Based on that understanding what the meaning of the conservation in Javanese culture? The subject for this study is architectural Javanese manuscripts (Primbon, Kawruh Kalang, and Kawruh Griya). This study uses hermeneutics method by Paul Ricouer. There are three steps: step one is to build the conservation understanding in Javanese culture, using content analysis. Step two is validation. This step using Ngibikan Village for case study. Step three is discussion. This step exploring the philosophical aspect in Javanese culture and compare with Ricouer thinking about „history,memory and forgetting?. The result of this exploration studies that for Javanese culture, conservation not only discuss about building. Based on Javanese philosophy that live only „stop? for drink (urip mung mampir ngombe), the conservation is a process, not result; the conservation is dynamic or change, not permanent or unchanged.]]>
<![CDATA[Perwujudan Bentuk Arsitektur Berbasis Aktivitas Sehari-hari: Studi Kasus: Pendekatan Maya Lin dan Eko Prawoto ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21460/atrium.v7i2.157
<![CDATA[Title: Architectural Forming in Daily Activities (Case Study: Maya Lin and Eko Prawoto Approach) Form is the based architecture. The idea of architecture can come true in the form. Architecture can become a container of human activities because form and space. This paper focusses on architectural form. The main question in this paper is how the architect creating their form’s based on their daily activities? This paper used qualitative phenomenology method to phenomenology hermeneutics approach. This method place the daily activities of responding. The cases are Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veteran Memorial and House of Eko Prawoto’s. Their cases were interpreted with Mangunwijaya thinking with written at Ragawidya. This paper shows that architectural form is a manifestation of the contemplation proses and from daily activities. The forming of architectural form is also a process of expression of the deposition of experiencing in the past time which carried out continuously. The result of forming is not an astonishing form, but familiar with everyday life.]]>
<![CDATA[ARSITEKTUR SEBAGAI MANIFESTASI IDENTITAS INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[johannes adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ NALARs Vol 21, No 2 (2022): NALARs Volume 21 Nomor 2 Juli 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24853/nalars.21.2.139-150
<![CDATA[Arsitektur secara umum dipahami sebagai ilmu bangunan. Namun bagaimana latar belakang munculnya pemikiran arsitektur terutama dalam perspektif politik dan kebangsaan tidak banyak di bahas.Paper ini melihat bagaimana suatu bangsa – dalam hal ini Indonesia – menempatkan arsitektur sebagai sebuah identitas kebangsaannya. Kasus waktu yang dipakai dalam paper ini adalah masa pemerintahan Sukarno, Suharto dan Joko Widodo. Pembacaan kasus arsitektur menggunakan cara baca semiotika, yang menempatkan karya arsitektur sebagai simbol yang dipersepsi oleh penerima simbol tersebut. Metode penulisan menggunakan metode sejarah yang sinkronik dan diakronik.Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa dari ketiga Presiden Indonesia tersebut menempatkan ‘arsitektur’ sebagai simbol identitas. Arsitektur diposisikan sebagai sarana komunikasi terhadap kebijakan-kebijakan politik identitasnya. Perbedaan dari ketiganya adalah lebih pada pendekatan arsitektur yang digunakan. Masa Presiden Sukarno menggunakan arsitektur modern sebagai sarana mempersatukan keberagaman arsitektural dan menunjukkan jati diri kesetaraan dengan bangsa lain. Hal yang penting sebagai salah satu negara yang baru merdeka saat itu. Masa Suharto justru sebaliknya menempatkan keberagaman arsitektural sebagai identitasnya atau menggunakan pendekatan arsitektur regionalisme, walau dengan pendekatan sentralistik dalam kebijakan politiknya dengan perundang-undangan yang mengikat. Pemerintahan Joko Widodo menggunakan keberagaman arsitektur namun dalam kemasan yang lebih mengkini dengan istilah arsitektur nusantara mengkini. Disini terlihat bahwa arsitektur dimaknai sesuai dengan pemimpin yang berkuasa saat itu. Arsitektur menjadi mempunyai kaitan erat dengan pemilihan pendekatan politik saat pemerintah itu berkuasa.]]>
<![CDATA[Archi-text-ture: Architecting Through Writing ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Adiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Architectural Research Journal (ARJ) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): ARJ: Architectural Research Journal ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (792.687 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/arj.1.1.3296.1-7
<![CDATA[Architecture is often understood as a real and tangible science, in the form of space and form. This understanding is associated with the origin of the word ‘techne’ which refers to the engineering in the construction process of a building, an architectural work. Writing on new architecture developed around 1968, at a time when architectural criticism by Louis Huxtable became known although the form of writing, identification both in pictures and description, had been done since the time of the Roman Empire by Vitruvius and later interpreted by Leon Battista in the Renaissance. This paper describes descriptively several examples and categories of writing about architecture, especially in Indonesia. The study uses an exploratory study approach with reference to the theory of architectural criticism from Attoe’s understanding. The descriptive exploration of this paper shows there are at least four categories of architectural writing in Indonesia, from those aimed at creating architectural narratives to making architectural texts which are then called archi-text-ture in the paper. The paper is not a final paper, because it is the start of a long textual journey, so it is made as an archi-text-ture construction process and to open up opportunities for further interpretation and development]]>
