cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewanta Arya Nugraha
Contact Email
dewanta.an@gmail.com
Phone
+6289673449687
Journal Mail Official
jmme@fkip.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36A Kentingan Surakarta 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 20898878     EISSN : 27158276     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jmme
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Journal Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics and mathematics education. This journal was founded by the Magister of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret. It is published twice in a year (June and December). The JMME welcomes high-quality manuscripts resulted by researchers, scholars, teachers, and professionals from a research project in the scope of Pure Mathematics, Computing Mathematics, Statistics, Mathematics Learning, Evaluation and Assessment in Mathematics Learning, STEAM, Ethnomathematics, ICT in Mathematics Education, Design / Development Research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)" : 8 Documents clear
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENTS (TGT) PADA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI Yustinus Murdoko; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20246

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were TAI (Team Assisted Individualization), TGT (Teams Games tournament) and direct teaching learning. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of junior high school  in Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of sample was 234 students consisted of 77 students in the first experimental group, 76 students on the second experimenta groupl, and 81 students on the tirth experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test, questioner, and the likert scale instrument. The data was analyzed using analisis of variance two way.  Conclusions of the research were as follow. (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (2) the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning style, the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TAI, TGT, direct learning, learning style, achievement
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI LIMIT FUNGSI ALJABAR KELAS X DI SMA INSAN CENDEKIA SUKOHARJO TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Setyati Puji Wulandari; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20236

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to: 1) determine the validity of the results of the development of learning modules with discovery learning approach on the material of limit algebra functions; 2) determine the practicality of the development of learning modules; 3) determine the effectiveness of the development of learning modules; 4) determine whether students achievement in the material of limit algebra functions using learning modules is better than the students who don’t use it. The development of the modules was done through the modified Four D, namely define, design, development, and disseminate. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Validity analysis was based on an expert assessment. Practicality analysis was based on implementation of learning module. Effectiveness analysis was based on student response after using the module. Analysis of student achievement was based on t-test hypothesis. The result concluded that: 1) learning modules with discovery learning approach to the material limit algebra functions declared fit for use by experts with the validity score of 3.44 and be in very good criteria; 2) learning modules expressed practical use in learning with the practicality score gained from the sheet of implementation of learning is 0.919 and be in very good criteria; 3) learning modules is effective for use in learning with the scores of effectiveness obtained from the sheet of student's response to the module is 3.03 and be in good criteria; 4) learning achievement of students who use the learning module is better than students who don’t use it, but isn’t significant.Keywords: learning module, discovery learning, limit algebra functions.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMK SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Lia Septy Nirawati; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20248

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students adversity quotient. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of TAI, TGT, and direct learning model. The type of research was a  quasi-experimental research with a  3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade 10 students of Secondary Schools in Ngawi Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and learning style questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded that: 1) The mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TAI learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TGT and direct learning model on equality and inequality, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TGT learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by direct learning model on equality an inequality; 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with visual type was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students with auditory or kinesthetic type and the learning achievement of auditory type students was better than  the  learning  achievement of kinesthetic type students on equality and inequality; 3) The visual type students who were treated by TAI learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with TGT or direct learning model and the students mathematics learning learning  achievement with TGT learning model was same the students with direct learning model; the mathematics achievement of auditory type students who were treated by TAI learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with TGT or direct learning model and students who were treated by TGT learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with direct learning model; the mathematics achievement of kinesthetic type students who were treated by TAI, TGT, and direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement; 4) In TAI, TGT and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of visual type, auditory, and kinesthetic had the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: TAI, TGT, Direct Learning Model, Learning Style, Mathematics Learning Achievement
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL KESEBANGUNAN BERDASARKAN PROSEDUR NEWMAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL (Penelitian dilaksanakan di Kelas IX SMPN 1 Paguyangan Kabupaten Brebes) An Nur Ami Widodo; Imam Sujadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20238

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this research was to identify the types of students error at 9th grade of SMPN 1 Paguyangan in solving similarity by using Newman’s error analysis procedure from spatial ability. The type of this research is a qualitative research. Subject’s selection procedure was by using purposive sampling. There are 6 subjects in this research. Data collection technique was task-based interviews. The validity was determined by time triangulation. The data analysis was Miles and Huberman model including reduction, data displays, and conclusion. The results of this research showed as follows. The types students with low spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding errors. The types students with medium spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were: transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The types students with high spatial ability error in solving based on Newman’s error analysis procedure were : transformation error.Keywords: types of error, Newman procedure, spatial ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) YANG DIMODIFIKASI DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK TEKNIK DI KABUPATEN MADIUN Suryanto Suryanto; Budi Usodo; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20250

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from creativity of the student. The learning models compared were Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) The Modified By Assessment For Learning (AfL), Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) an direct model. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research is all class 11th student of Vocational High School in Madiun. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling of the sample totaled 266 students, with details of 87 students in the experimental class of 90 students in two experimental classes and 89 students in the control class. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and test creativity in learning. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unequal cells. The results of research showed that: (1) The model of cooperative learning TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides mathematics learning achievement as well as direct learning model; (2) Students who have a high learning creativity gives better mathematics learning achievement than students who have studied creativity medium and low. Students who have studied creativity is giving mathematics learning achievement as well as students with low learning creativity; (3) For each learning model show that, the prestige mathematics students with high creativity learning are better than the student who have medium or low, and students who have the creativity learning is giving better mathematics learning achievement than students with low learning creativity. (4) For each students' level of creativity show that, cooperative learning model TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: cooperative learning, TGT modified AfL, TGT, creativity in learning, academic achievement.
PROFIL KETERAMPILAN GEOMETRI SISWA TUNANETRA DI SEKOLAH INKLUSI PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT ( Studi Kasus di SMP MIS Surakarta) Gigih Ardiantoro; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20240

Abstract

Abstract: This research is aimed to describe the skills in geometry of visually impaired inclusion students on rectangular learning. This research was qualitative research. The research subjects were grade IX student of SMP MIS Surakarta. There were 3 students consisting of 1 low vision student, 1 totally blind when he was 15 years old, and 1 totally blind since she was born. The procedure of selecting the subject used in this research was purposive sampling technique. The data of research was collected through interviews based on rectangular task. The data was analyzed based the theory skill in Geometry’s of Hoffer. The steps are : analyze all data are available from several sources, perform data reduction, compiling data in units, categorization the obtained data unit which shows each information on skill in Geometry of blind students in SMP MIS Surakarta as well as implementation of inclusion programs at SMP MIS Surakarta’s data. Skill in Geometry’s data was validated using time triangulation and  implementation of inclusion programs at SMP MIS Surakarta’s data was validated using sources triangulation. The result of this research show that: 1) skills in geometry of low vision student cannot reach level 2 at all; 2) skills in geometry of student with totally blind when he was 15 year old can reach level 2 just on drawings skill. However, he cannot mastering level 0 on drawings skill well; 3) skills in geometry of student with totally blind since she was born cannot reach level 2 at all; 4) factors that affect skills in geometry of the students are availability of textbooks for students with visual impairment, the role of special guidances teachers, availability and uses of learning medium, teacher who has skills to handle student with visual impairment.Keywords: Geometry, Skills in Geometry, Visually impaired Student, Inclusions Student, Rectangular 
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI TEOREMA PYTHAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA Yafita Arfina Mu’ti; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20242

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to: (1) produce teaching and learning materials with CTL approach on Pythagorean theorem at VIII Grade of Junior High School that was valid, practical, and effective, (2) investigate the better achievement in mathematics, whether using teaching and learning materials of CTL approach than using conventional teaching and learning materials. This study was development research. The development model used in this research was a developmental  research by  Plomp that contained five phases, (1) preliminary investigation, (2) design, (3) realization/ construction, (4) test, evaluation, and revision, and (5) implementation.  Teaching and learning materials said have quality if fulfilled validity, practical, and effective criteria. Teaching and learning materials was categorized validity based on expert judgement. Taeching and Learning materials was categorized practical if based on theory, teaching and learning materials was able to use it without revision or little revision and had fulfilled criteria of a practical teaching and learning materials. Teaching and learning materials was categorized effective if it fulfilled the indicators for a effective learning, including students activity during studying, learning activities based on syntax, student response about the learning, and students learning result. The data in this research was collected using test, questionnaire, observation, documentation, and interview.  To investigate the better student achievement used t-test. The results of this study were as follows: teaching and learning materials of CTL approach that include lesson plans, worksheets, and test of learning outcome was said to be valid, practical, and effective. Besides  that, student achievement with teaching and learning materials of CTL approach was better than student achievement with teaching and learning materials of conventional approach.Keywords: Teaching and learning materials, CTL, Pythagorean theorem
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW BERBANTU MEDIA FLASH PADAMATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Rina Kurniawati; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20244

Abstract

Abstract: This research was purposed to determine: (1) which one produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash, or direct instruction; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each learning style, which one learning model that produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash or direct instruction (4) on each learning model, which one student had better mathematics learning achievement , student who had visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style. This study was a quasi-experimental study with factorial 3x3 design. Population in this research were eleventh grade students of Vocational High School in Sragen. Sample collection were done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data collection were done by the method of documentation in order to test the balance of the population, the questionnaire were used to determine the students learning style and test were used to know the students achievement on material dimension three. Data analysis techniques used ANAVA two ways with unbalanced cells. The results of this study concluded as follows (1) cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) Students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style; students with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style; (3) on each learning style, cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (4) on each learning model (Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, and direct instruction), students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style.Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, Learning Style, learning achievement

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education More Issue