cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) YANG DILENGKAPI ASSESMENT FOR LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP N SE-SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Arief Kristyawan; Budiyono Budiyono; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) among the cooperative learning model TAI type equipped AfL, TAI or direct learning equipped AfL that provide better learning achievement. (2) among students who have cognitive style type of field dependent or fields independent that provided better learning achievement. (3) on each of students group with cognitive style type (field dependent or field independent), which learning models that provide better learning achievement. (4) on each of learning model (cooperative learning model of TAI type equipped AfL, TAI or direct learning equipped AfL), which cognitive styles that provide better learning achievement. This research was quasi-experimental research. The population was all of seventh grade students of State Junior High School in Surakarta in academic year of 2013/2014. The research samples ware 302 students, taken used a stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data collection instruments used ware learning achievement test and cognitive style test. Hypothesis testing used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The research conclusions are as follows.  (1) The TAI learning model equipped AfL provides better learning achievement than TAI learning model and direct learning equipped AfL, while TAI learning model provides better learning achievement than direct learning model equipped AfL. (2) Students with cognitive style of field independent have better learning achievement than students with field dependent. (3) In the cognitive style of field dependent and field independent, TAI learning models equipped AfL provides better learning achievement than TAI learning model and direct learning model equipped AfL, while TAI learning model provides a better learning achievement than direct learning model equipped AfL. (4) In the TAI learning model equipped AfL, TAI and direct learning model equipped AfL, the students group with cognitive styles of field independent have better learning achievement than students with field dependent.  Keywords: TAI, AfL, Cognitive Style, and Learning Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII SEKOTA MADIUN Lingga Nico Pradana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models viewed from the student multiply intellegence. The learning models compared were NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. This research  was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation, tests and questionnaires method. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing were concluded that: (1) NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (2) students with type linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement, (3) on each type of multiple intelligences, NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (4) on each models of learning, learning achievement of students with linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement.Keywords: cooperative learning NHT, CTL approaches, multiple intelligences, learning achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA POKOK BAHASAN TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMA SE-KOTA SALATIGA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Kristin Yulianti; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to know: (1) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct  learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result; (2) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give te best mathematics learning result; (3) which learning models - discovery learning, problem based learning and direct learning model - that will give the best learning mathematics result in each creativity categories; (4) which level of students creativity- high, medium, or low- that will give the best mathematics learning result  in each learning models. The research used a quasi-experimental designed by using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell sizes. The population of this research are all X grade students of Senior High School in Salatiga 2013/2014. The sampling technique being used in this research was stratified cluster random sampling. The results show as follows. (1) Mathematics learning achievement using guided discovery model and problem based model show similar result which is better than using direct learning model. (2) Students with high level of creativity show better learning achievement than those of low level creativity. Students with high and medium  level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. (3) On students with high level of creativity, guided discovery and problem based learning models show the same result, and guided discovery learning model results in better achievement compares to direct learning model. Problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with medium level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. On students with low level of creativity, guided discovery, problem based and direct learning model show the same learning achievement. (4) In guided discovery model, students with high and medium level of creativity show the same learning achievement, however students with high level of creativity have better achievement than students with low level of creativity. Students with medium and low level of creativity show the same learning achievement. Using problem based learning model, students with high, medium and low level of creativity show the same achievement. In direct learning model, the result of the three creativity categories also show the same learning achievement.Keywords: guided discovery model, problem based learning model, creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TTW DAN NHT PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student mathematics communications ability. The learning model compared were TTW (Think Talk Write), NHT (Numbered Head Together) and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3 12×"> 3 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Magelang regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sampling tecnique was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 298 students consisted of 100 students in the first experimental group, 99 students in second experimental group and 99 students in control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and mathematics communication ability test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TTW learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT and conventional learning model, and NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model. (2) The students with high mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with middle or low mathematics communication ability, the students with middle mathematics communication ability have better mathematics achievement than the students with low mathematics communication ability, (3) a. In the students with high and middle mathematics communication ability, TTW,  NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement,  b. In the students with low mathematics communication ability, TTW and NHT learning model give the same mathematics achievement, but give better mathematics achievement than conventional learning model, also NHT and conventional learning model give the same mathematics achievement, (4) a. In the TTW and NHT learning model, students with high, middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, b. In the conventional learning model, students with high and middle mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement, but have better mathematics achievement than students with low mathematics communication ability, and students with middle and low mathematics communication ability have the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TTW, NHT, mathematics communication ability, mathematics achievement
KREATIVITAS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 1 ARJOSARI KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF DAN GENDER Ariska Yuliana Putri; Riyadi Riyadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe male and female students creativity of class VIII SMPN 1 Arjosari District of Pacitan that has a Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style in solving space geometric problem. This was a qualitative research. These subjects were taken using purposive sampling and snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were the students in the eight grade of SMPN 1 Arjosari. Data collection techniques in this research were GEFT, creativity test and interview. Techniques to validate the data were time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The aspect of creativity in this research were consists of  four aspects, there were fluency,  flexibility, originality and elaboration. Students less creative if they do not meet the four aspects of creativity, quite creative if they meet one, two and three aspects of creativity and creative if they meet the four aspects of creativity. The results showed that male students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet one of the creativity aspects which is fluency. The male students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet three creativity aspects which are fluency, flexibility and elaboration. So the male and female students that have Field Dependent and Field Independent have a quite creative but it are different in each aspect of creativity.Keywords: creativity, problem solving, cognitive style, gender.
KARAKTERISTIK BERPIKIR MATEMATIS SISWA SMP MAJELIS TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN (MTA) GEMOLONG DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL (SPLDV) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA DAN GENDER Agus Supriyanto; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know and to describe mathematical thinking characteristic of grade VII students of SMP MTA Gemolong in solving mathematic  problems at linear equation of two variables (LETV) observed from the reasoning capability and gender. This research belonged to descriptive research with qualitative explorative approach. The sample was taken by using purposive sampling technique. There were six samples used in this research. The category of the sample based on this reasoning ability was taken by reasoning test and space field test. There were two types of instruments that were used in this research to collect the data. The first was solving problem test instrument, and the second was interview guidance. Validation test of the data that was used in this research was time triangulation test. The results of this research indicated as follows. (1) The characteristic of mathematical thinking of male and female students with high reasoning ability in solving problems did not complete the phases of mathematical thinking, but it completed in the reproduction and connection phase. Whereas in analysis phaseit was not completed. (2) The characteristic of mathematical thinking of male and female students with intermediate reasoning ability in solving problems did not complete the phases of mathematical thinking, but it completed in the reproduction and the connection phase.  Whereas in analysis phase, it was not completed. (3) The characteristic of mathematical thinking of male and female students with low reasoning ability in solving problems did not complete the phases of mathematical thinking, but it completed in the reproduction phase. Whereas in the connection and analysis phase, it was not completed.Keywords: mathematic thinking, solving problem, reasoning ability, gender
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SMPN KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maghfiroh Yanuarti; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the self confidence of the students. The learning models compared were Think Pair Share (TPS)  model, Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem (TAPPS) model, and conventional model. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Sukoharjo. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 302 students; consisted of 100 students in the first experimental class, 101 in the second experimental class, and 101 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self confidence. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) TPS model had better learning achievement than TAPPS model and conventional model, TAPPS model had better learning achievement than conventional model. (2) the students having high self confidence had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self confidence, the students having medium and low self confidence had equally mathematics learning achievement. (3) there was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the self confidence on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the student.Keywords:Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (TAPPS), mathematics learning achievement, and self confidence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI DISPOSISI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PURWOREJO Wijayaanto, Zainnur; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The study aimed to know: 1) which one of the learning models gave a better achievement between Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model with Open-Ended Approach, TPS, or direct learning model, 2) which one of the students with mathematical disposition category had a better achievement between students with high, moderate or low mathematical disposition, 3) in each student’s mathematical disposition category, which learning model gave a better student’s achievement in mathematics, 4) in each learning models, which one of the students with mathematical disposition category had a better student’s achievement in mathematics. This was quasi-experimental study with 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Purworejo District. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematical disposition questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded that: 1) TPS with Open-Ended Approach gave better achievement than TPS and direct learning model while TPS and direct learning model gave same achievement, 2) the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, and the students with moderate mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with low mathematical disposition, 3) at all categories of students’ mathematical disposition, TPS with Open-Ended Approach, TPS, and direct learning model gave the same achievement, 4) in the TPS with Open-Ended Approach and TPS, the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, and the students with moderate mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with low mathematical disposition. In the direct learning model, the students with high mathematical disposition had better achievement than the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition, while the students with moderate and low mathematical disposition had the same achievement.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Open-Ended Approach, Direct Instruction, Mathematical Disposition, Learning Achievement in Mathematics.
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN DIMENSI MYER-BRIGGS SISWA KELAS VIII MTs NW SURALAGA LOMBOK TIMUR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Aziz, Abdul; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at describing the process of creative thinking of the eight grade students of MTs NW Suralaga East Lombok  in the academic year of 2013/2014, who had personality type based on the Myer-Briggs personality dimensions, namely rational personality type (STR) and guardian personality type (STG) in the mathematics problems solving on Wallas steps, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. The approach used descriptive qualitative approach in a case study. The data collection technique was conducted by using task based interview. The result showed that the procces of creative thingking on: (1) the STR students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read APS (assignment problem solving) silently, observed the instructions and information carefully, and mentioned the known and the asked things in  reading once APS; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent for a moment, the students do a contemplation activities, planned the problem solving, and took a long time to bring up the idea; (c) illumination, the students started by identifying the contained information in the APS, wrote how to solve the problem and continued by explaining the procedure of problem solving, the students established the steps to resolve the problem and got the idea by developing the idea of the previous answers; (d) verification, the students expressed orally the re-examination procedure of the answer, wrote the re-examination procedure, explained the re-examination procedure and explained the procedure again orally. (2) The STG students, namely: (a) the preparation, the students read the APS silently, and in a loud voice, mentioned the current issues in the APS, wrote the problems on the answer sheet, mentioned the known and the asked things of APS after a given follow-up questions; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent, the students do a contemplation activities and arranged the plan of problem-solving when they were calm; (c) illumination, the students identified the information on APS and determined the attributes that were used to solve the problem, established the steps to resolve the problem, described the problem solving procedures, solved the problems by developing the idea from the previous idea; (d) verification, the students revealed and explained the re-examine procedure of the answer orally, wrote the re-examination procedure of the answer, observed and re-checked the problem solving that had been done.Keywords: Creative Thinking, Problem Solving, and Personality Type
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN MISSOURI MATHEMATICS PROJECT (MMP) DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN AJARAN 2012/2013 Sutarman, Sutarman; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Triyanto, Triyanto
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research were to find out: (1) which one was improving better the students mathematics learning achievement, Think-Talk-Write (TTW) or Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) and Conventional Learning model, (2) which one was providing better to mathematics learning achievement, the students who used visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style (3) who the students were provided to be better in mathematics learning achievement by applied the TTW, MMP, and Conventional model on each learning style. The research method used was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of the research were the students of junior high schools in Pacitan regency in the school in year of 2012/2013. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The were 275 students who were divided into three groups. The groups devided into the experiment I, experiment II, and control class. Experiment I was consisted of 92 students, experiment II was consisted of 92 students, and control class was consisted of 91 students. The instruments used to collect the data were the students learning styles questionnaire, the students achievement in mathematics and documentation. The technique of data used was an unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The results of the reseach were as follows: (1) the mathematics learning achievement to the students who were given the TTW learning model were as same as to the students were given the MMP learning model, but they were better than the students, learning achievement who were taught by the conventional learning model, The students learning achievement in the MMP learning model were as same as to the students learning achievement in the conventional learning model. (2) the mathematics learning achievement of the students by visual learning style were better than the students learning achievment by auditory or kinesthetic learning style, while the students by auditory learning style had their learning achievement as same as with the students by kinesthetic learning style. (3) the mathematics learning achievement to the students on each learning style, students were given the TTW learning model had shown the same learning achievement to students were given the MMP learning model, but they were better achievements when compared with student who were taught the conventional learning model, while the students who were given the MMP learning model has achievement as well as student who were given the conventional learning model.Keywords:     TTW learning model, MMP learning model, conventional learning model, learning style, mathematics learning achievement.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue