cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Apri Winar Cahyani; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the learning style. The learning models compared were Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, and classical with saintific approach (NHT, PBL, Classical). This research was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3×3. The population of this research was all of students in second  grade of Junior High Schools of Karanganyar regency in academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research consisted of 245 students and were gathered through stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments consisted of  pre test, test of learning achievement and learning style questionnaire. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it were concluded as follows. 1) NHT and PBL learning models gave the same mathematics achievement. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. 2) Students with visual and auditory learning style have better mathematics achievement than students with kinesthetic ones. On the other hand, students with visual and auditory learning style have equal mathematics learning achievement. 3) On all learning models, cooperative learning NHT type, problem based learning, and classical models, students with visual learning style have an equal mathematics learning achievement with auditory. Both learning style have a better mathematics learning achievement than kinesthetic ones, (4) On all visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, cooperative learning with NHT type gives an equal  mathematics learning achievement with PBL. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, learning style, Scientific Mathematics learning achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAMS ASSITED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAUDARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Kurnia Awalia; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students learning creativity. The learning models compared were TAI with contextual approach, NHT with contextual approach, and direct instruction  with contextual approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Gemolong subdistrict. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Gemolong, SMPN 2 Gemolong, and SMP Muh 9 Gemolong. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and creativity questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with contextual approach, TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than direct instruction with contextual approach, NHT and direct instruction with contextual approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) For students with high and medium learning creativity have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high and medium learning creativity was better than students who have low learning creativity. (3) For students who have high learning creativity, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have medium learning creativity, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. (5) For students who have low learning creativity, TAI and NHT with contextual approach gives the same mathematics achievement. NHT and direct instruction with contextual approach gives the same mathematics achievement. TAI with contextual approach gives better mathematics achievement than direct instruction with contextual approach.Keywords: TAI, NHT, contextual approach, learning achievement, learning creativity.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SEMARANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Noviana Sukma Dewi; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the sosial skill of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Think Talk Write (TTW) type with scientific approach, Think Pair Share (TPS) type with scientific approach, and classical model with scientific approach.The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population were all of grade VII students of Junior High School in Kabupaten Semarang. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and sosial skill questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the hypothesis testing it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students’ learning achievement treated by TTW learning model with scientific approach are better than students treated by TPS model with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach. In addition to, students’ learning achievement treated by TPS model with scientific approach are better than students treated by classical learning model with scientific approach. (2) Students’ learning achievement who have high social skill are better than students who have moderate and low social skill. Furthermore, students who have moderate social skill are better than students who have low social skill. (3) In high, moderate, and low social skill category, students learning achievement treated by TTW model with scientific approach are better than student who treated by TPS learning model with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approaching. Asides from that, students learning achievement are treated by TPS learning model with scientific approach are better than students who treated by classical learning model with scientific approach. (4) In TTW learning model with scientific approaching, TPS with scientific approach and classical learning with scientific approach, students learning achievement who have high social skill are better than students who have moderate and low social skill. Moreover, students who have moderate social skill are better than students who have low social skill.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Think Pair Share (TPS), Scientific Approach, Student Social Skill.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN MAKE A MATCH (MM) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2016 Rini Dewi Safitri; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed form reasoning ability of the students. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Teams Games Tournament (TGT), scientific Make a Match (MM), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Public Junior High Schools in Sragen Regency. Sample was collected by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and reasoning ability questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA  with unequal cell. The conclusions of the study were as follows. (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students treated with TGT-PS learning model was better than that of those treated with MM-PS learning model and K-PS learning model.   the mathematics learning achievement of students treated with learning model was as good as that of those treated with K-PS learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with medium reasoning ability and low reasoning ability. The mathematics learning achievement of students with medium reasoning ability was better than that of those with low reasoning ability. (3) In TGT-PS learning model, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was as good as that of those with medium reasoning ability, and that of those with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with low reasoning ability, and that of those with medium reasoning ability was as good as that of those with low reasoning ability. In MM-PS and K-PS learning models, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with medium reasoning ability and low reasoning ability. And that of those with medium reasoning ability was as good as that of those with low reasoning ability. (4) In students with high reasoning ability and low reasoning ability, the students treated with TGT-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with MM-PS model, the students treated with TGT-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model, the students treated with MM-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model. In students with medium reasoning ability, the students treated with TGT-PS model had better learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model. The students treated MM-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS learning model.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, Teams Games Tournament, Make a Match, Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, Reasoning ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN PROBING-PROMPTING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Kurniasari, Dewi; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the mathematics anxiety. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the GI with Scientific Approach, the cooperative learning model of the Probing-Prompting with Scientific Approach, and classical learning model with Scientific Approach. This was a quasi-experimental study with 3×3 factorical design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Karanganyar District. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling method. The sample consisted of 280 students with 95 students in the first experimental class, 93 students in the second experimental class, and 92 students in the control class. Instruments used to colled data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematics anxiety questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach gave better achievement than probing-prompting with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach while probing-prompting and classical learning model with scientific approach gave same achievement, 2) the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety, 3) in all categories of student’s mathematics anxiety, GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach, Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, and classical learning model with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in the GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach and Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety. In the classical learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, while the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety had the same achievement.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Probing-Prompting, Classical Instruction, Scientific Approach, Mathematics Anxiety, Learning Achievement in Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI SURAKARTA Hidayat, Edisut Taufik; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: 1) which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical, 2) which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 3) in each learning models, which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 4) in each AQ level, which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical. This research was the quasi experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Surakarta. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that used were achievement test and Adversity Quotient (AQ) questionare. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way ANOVA. The results of this research were as follows. 1) Scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. 2) The students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 3) In scientific NHT, the students with high, medium, and low AQ had the same learning achievement. In scientific TAPPS, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium AQ, while the students with high and medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. In scientific classical, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 4) At the students with high AQ, scientific NHT and scientific classical had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the students with medium AQ, scientific NHT had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT and scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the student with low AQ, scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had the same learning achievement with scientific classical.Keywords: scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, scientific classical, Adversity Quotient (AQ), Achievement
PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 3 POLANHARJO KLATEN DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PECAHAN Wahyuni, Fina Tri; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to describe the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary School 3 of  Polanharjo Klaten who have the high, moderate, and low abilities in solving fractional problems. This research used qualitative case study approach. The data of research were gathered through task-based in-depth interview. The results of research were the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students as follows: 1) The students with the high initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were able to realize the mistakes and to fix them, to examine the truth of an argument, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to communicate ideas with symbols instead of pictures or direct objects; and (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 2) The students with the moderate initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were unable to do reflective thinking; (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 3) The students with the low initial ability in Mathematics were able to do reflective thinking merely on the problem understanding phase, with the following characteristics: they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done.Keywords: Characteristics of reflective thinking process, problem solving, and initial ability in Mathematics.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI PECAHAN DALAM BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI 2 ADIMULYO KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Savitri, Maria Endah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to: (1) identify the occurrence of misconceptions in the eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence, and (2) describe the occurrence of misconceptions eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence. This research used a descriptive qualitative  method with a case study. Subjects of this research are eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Adimulyo academic year 2013/2014. The sample of the research was taken by using the snowball sampling technique. The identification of the existence of misconceptions was done by using misconception diagnostic test. While the identification of the students' cognitive styles was conducted by using student cognitive style questionnaire instrument. Data validity used the source of triangulation method. Analysis of data use the model of Miles and Huberman. The results of this research indicate that: (1) misconceptions that occur in the FD students more likely to misconceptions on the concept of understanding the elements of the algebra and the terms of a fraction is called fractional form algebra, the concept of canceling, the concept of operating powers, and understand the properties the concept of distributive, (2) the highest misconceptions experienced by the FI students in understanding the concept of distributive properties, as well as understanding the elements of the algebra the condition is referred to as a fraction in the form of algebraic fractions, (3) causes of the misconceptions students FD is dominated by reasoning is not complete and students who lack of ability to process and memorize course, (4) factors causing of misconceptions students FI dominated by reasoning is not complete.Keywords: Misconceptions, algebraic fractions, cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN OPEN-ENDED LEARNING (OEL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGI EMPAT DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VII MTs NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Purwaningsih, Tri; Usodo, Budi; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of this research are to know: 1) which learning models between OEL learning model using scientific approach, PBL scientific approach, or direct learning, give better achievement in learning quadrangle, 2) what kind of creativity between high creativity, medium creativity, or low creativity give better achievement, 3) in each students’ creativity, which learning model gives better achievement in mathematics learning between OEL using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, or direct learning, and 4) in each learning model, which one gives better achievement in mathematics learning or mathematics learning achievement between the students who have high creativity, medium, or low. This research was a quasi-experimental study by using a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was the seventh grades of MTsN in Ngawi regency in the Academic Year of 2014/2015. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Consist consisting of 318 students: 108 students in first experiment, 102 students in second experiment, and 108 students in control class. This experimental used independent variables that were learning model and the students’ creativity, and dependent variable was achievement in mathematics learning or mathematics learning achievement. Moreover, the validity test of instruments (the mathematics test and questionnaire) was done by validator. Then, the reliability of test instrument used KR-20 formula, whereas, the reliability of questionnaire used Cronbach Alpha. The internal consistency test of questionnaire was done by using Product Moment Correlation of Karl Pearson. The prerequisite test consists of Normality Test done by Lilliefors and Homogeneity Test using Bartlett. Then, data was analyzed by using two-way ANOVA.The results of the research are: 1) the mathematics learning using OEL with scientific approach gives better achievement than using PBL with scientific approach or direct learning, and PBL with scientific approach gives better achievement than direct learning, 2) the students who have high, medium and low creativity have same/equally mathematics learning achievement, 3) each  creativity, the students who learn mathematics using OEL have better achievement than those who learnt mathematics using PBL and direct learning, while the students who learnt mathematics using PBL have better achievement than those who use direct learning, and 4) in each learning model, the students who have high, medium and low creativity have same/equally mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Open-Ended Learning, Students’ Creativity. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, SNOW BALLING, DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP SWASTA DI KABUPATEN PONOROGO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Ahmad Husni Mubarok; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of the learning model toward student’s mathematics achievement seen from student’s learning style. The learning models compared were Discovery Learning, Snow Balling and Problem Based Learning using scientific approach (DL-S, SB-S, and PBL-S). This research was the quasi experimental with factorial design 3x3. The populations of this research was students at eight grade of private Junior High school in Ponorogo in the academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 336 students, consisted of 115 students in the first experimental group, 107 students in second experimental group and 114 students in third experimental group. The instruments consisted of learning achievement test and questionnaire of learning style. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The  results of  the  research were. (1) Learning achievement using DL-S learning model is better than that of SB-S, learning achievement using DL-S learning model is better than that of PBL-S, SB-S and PBL-S learning model have the same achievement. (2) Visual students have better mathematics achievement than auditory and kinesthetic students, auditory and kinesthetic students have the same achievement (3) In visual, auditory, and kinesthetics students, DL-S have better achievement than SB-S and PBL-S, SB-S and PBL-S have the same achievement. (4) In DL-S, SB-S, and PBLS, visual and auditory students have better achievement than kinesthetics students, auditory and kinesthetics students have the same achievement.Keywords: scientific approach, DL-S, SB-S, PBL-S learning, learning style, learning achievement

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue