cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Prodi Penelitian & Evaluasi Pendidikan, Pascasarjana UNNES
Contact Email
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang Kelud Utara III, Semarang 50237 Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 22526420     EISSN : 25031732     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/jere
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation is a fully refereed international journal publishing original academic articles that promote educational processes and outcomes that are both well-informed and evidence-based. The journal is deliberately multi-disciplinary and broad in its scope, and addresses rigorous research and evaluation at all levels, and in all sectors and ages of education. The journal publishes papers which report results of: original research and evaluation studies; secondary analyses of existing (international) data sets; meta-analyses and reviews synthesizing evidence and guidelines for practice. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation also invites articles about the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, theoretical, conceptual, methodological and substantive issues in research and evaluation, as well as position papers related to issues about evidence-based education.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 20 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 6 No 1 (2017)" : 20 Documents clear
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif untuk Mengukur Literasi Membaca Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Model Pirls pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Pratiwiningtyas, Bekti Nanda; Susilaningsih, Endang; Sudana, I Made
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (263.698 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16199

Abstract

Literasi membaca merupakan proses memaknai hal-hal yang disampaikanoleh penulis, dan membawa pengalaman mereka sendiri pada teks yang dibacanya serta menciptakan sesuatu yang bermakna bagi kehidupan pembaca. Kemampuan literasi membaca setiap siswa seharusnya dapat terukur melalui penilaian dengan menggunakan instrumen penilaian yang baku. Kenyataannya, belum tersedia instrumen penilaian yang baku untuk mampu mengukur kemampuan literasi membaca siswa sehingga perlu dikembangkan instrumen penilaian literasi membaca bahasa Indonesia dengan mengacu pada model PIRLS. Model PIRLS dipilih sebagai acuan karena mempunyai tes literasi membaca yang telah digunakan di seluruh dunia. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah tersedianya instrumen penilaian literasi membaca yang praktis dan terstandar. Desain penelitian yang digunakan merupakan penelitian pengembangan yang mengacu pada dua model yaitu Borg&Gall dan Branch sehingga terdiri atas sembilan tahap penelitian. Adapun hasil penelitian berupa buku panduan penilaian literasi membaca bahasa Indonesia untuk guru Sekolah Dasar. Berdasarkan hasil uji kelayakan, instrumen penilaian yang dikembangkan berada pada kategori layak dengan prosentase 83,33% serta kualitas butir juga dinyatakan memenuhi persyaratan karena indeks tingkat kesukaran butir (p) yang dihasilkan setelah uji coba luas berada pada kisaran 0,300-0,700 dan indeks daya beda (d) menunjukkan ≥0,400. Reading literacy is a process to make sense of things disampaikanoleh writer, and bring their own experience to the text he read and create something meaningful for the life of the reader. Reading literacy skills every student should be measured through assessment using standardized assessment instruments. In fact, are not yet available for the standard assessment instrument able to measure students' reading literacy skills need to be developed so that the literacy assessment instrument Indonesian read with reference to the PIRLS models. Model PIRLS chosen as a reference because it has a reading literacy tests that have been used around the world. The purpose of this study is the availability of reading literacy assessment instrument that is practical and standardized. The study design used is a research development refers to two models of Borg & Gall and Branch that consists of nine stages of the research. The research results in the form of guide books Indonesian reading literacy assessment for elementary school teachers. Based on the results of due diligence, assessment instruments developed in the category feasible with a percentage of 83.33% and grain quality is also otherwise meet the requirements for the level of difficulty index point (p) generated after extensive testing in the range of 0.300 to 0.700 and different power index (d) shows ≥0,400.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja pada Reading Aloud Text Recount Siswa SMP pada Kurikulum 2013 Ambarsari, Pipit; Linggar Bharati, Dwi Anggani; Rusilowati, Ani
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.067 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16203

Abstract

Penelitian pengembangan instrumen unjuk kerja 10 langkah dari Sugiyono. Data kualitatif diperoleh melalui kegiatan observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumen, sedangkan data kuantitatif diperoleh dari hasil unjuk kerja siswa dalam reading aloud yang dikembangkan. Analisis data kualitatif menggunakan teknik triangulasi, sedangkan analisis data kuantitatif melakukan uji validitas konstruk, analisis daya beda butir dan uji reliabilitas instrumen. Uji validitas konstruk menggunakan KMO and Bartlett’s Test, analisis daya beda butir menggunakan korelasi produk momen Pearson dan reliabilitas memakai formula α (konsistensi internal) dan formula Mosier. Hasil uji coba skala kecil pada instrumen unjuk kerja memiliki koofisien reliabilitas yang berkategori sedang yaitu sebesar 0,57. Pada uji coba skala luas, koofisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,698 dan berkategori tinggi. Selanjutnya, jumlah komponen (faktor) yang terbentuk pada instrumen unjuk kerja adalah sejumlah 4 faktor. Total porsentase varian unjuk kerja siswa pada pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris yang mampu dijelaskan oleh keempat faktor sebesar 63,908%. Kepraktisan instrumen terletak pada angka 156 (praktis) untuk instrumen penilaian unjuk kerja. Instrumen ini diharapkan guru tidak kesulitan menilai reading aloud siswa pada pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Performance from Sugiyono. The qualitative data were obtained through the observation, interviews and documentation, while the quantitative data were obtained from the students' performance in developed reading aloud. Qualitative data analysis used triangulation techniques, whereas quantitative data analysis conducted test the construct validity, item analysis of different power and reliability testing instruments. The construct validity test KMO and Bartlett’s Test and the analysis of different point used correlation Pearson product moment and reliability by using α formula (internal consistency) and Mosier formula.The result of small-scale trial on the instrument has a coefficient of performance reliability that has average category, it is 0.57. On the wide scale trials, the reliability coefficient is 0.698 and it belongs to high category. Furthermore, the number of components (factors) that were formed on the instrument of performance had 4 factors. The total of variant percentage of the performance of students in learning English are able to be explained by four factors amounted to 63.908%. The result of practicality number of instruments is located at number 156 (practical) for performance assessment instruments. This instrument is expected by the teachers that there will be no difficulty in assessing students’ reading aloud in English learning.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotor Senam Lantai dalam Pembelajaran Penjasorkes pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Heri, Lalu; Rusilowati, Ani; Raharjo, Tri Joko
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (220.638 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16204

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menghasilkan instrumen penilaian psikomotor senam lantai menggunakan alat pada materi guling depan, guling belakang, lompat kangkang dan lompat jongkok yang valid, reliabel dan praktis. Data diperoleh di SDN Baturintang dengan subjek uji coba skala kecil 10 siswa, sedangkan uji coba skala luas 50 siswa. Analisis data menggunakan triangulasi sumber, validitas butir, analisis faktor comfimatory (CFA), relibilitas intra-kelas koefisien (ICC) dan uji kepraktisan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian dan pengembangan (R&D). Hasil validitas butir skala kecil untuk guling depan 14 butir dan 1 butir tidak valid, guling belakang 15 butir dan 1 butir tidak valid, sedangkan untuk lompat kangkang dan lompat jongkok valid dari 16 butir. Nilai reliabilitas skala kecil untuk materi guling depan 0.88, guling belakang 0.92, lompat kangkang 0.97 dan lompat jongkok 0.96. Instrumen yang dikembangkan valid secara konstruk karena mampu menjelaskan variasi keseluruhan pada materi guling depan sebesar 72%, guling belakang 74%, lompat kangkang 70% dan lompat jongkok 74%. Nilai reliabilitas ICC materi guling depan 0.983, guling belakang 9.87, lompat kangkang 0.984 dan lompat jongkok 0.984. Hasil uji kepraktisan menunjukkan instrumen guling depan pada angka 33 dalam kategori “praktis”, guling belakang 34, lompat kangkang 35 dan lompat jongkok 35 dalam kategori “sangat praktis”. The propuse this research to produce an assessment instrument psychomotor gymnastics floor using a material roll forward, roll back, straddle jump and jump squats are valid, reliable and practical. Data obtained in SDN Baturintang with Subject for limited scale try out was 10 students, meanwhile subject for a larger scale try out was 50 students. The method used research and development (R&D). Analysis of data using triangulation sources, validity,factor analysis comfimatory (CFA), reliability intra-class (ICC) and practicality test. The result of validity on item for little scale forward roll 14 valid and 1 invalid, back roll 15 items and 1 ietm is not valid, straddle jump and squat jump for each 16 items. The reliability score for little scale of front rolling is 0.88, back rolling 0.92, straddle jump is 0.97 and squat jump is 0.96. The developed instruments were valid in term of construct vaidity (CFA) because they are able to explain the variation entirely on material of front rolling with 72%, back rolling 74%, straddle jump 70% and squat jump 74%. Scor of reliability ICC on average for material of forward roll 0.983, back roll 9.87, straddle jump 0.984 and squat jump 0.984. The result of practicality showed that instrument of front rolling is in number 33 or categorized ‘practical’ for back rolling 34, straddle jump 35 and squat jump 35 and they are three categorized into ‘very practical’.
Instrumen Asesmen Sikap Siswa Berbasis Konservasi pada Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Hidayad, Arif; Masrukan, Masrukan; Kartono, Kartono
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (240.312 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16205

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menghasilkan buku panduan guru tentang instrumen asesmen sikap siswa pada pembelajaran matematika SMP berbentuk skala sikap (penilaian diri) dan lembar pengamatan guru (orang lain). Data diperoleh di SMPN 1 Bolo Kabupaten Bima NTB dengan subjek penelitian 100 siswa dan 4 guru matematika. Instrumen pengumpul data berupa lembar observasi, kamera/alat perekam, pedoman wawancara, angket dan skala sikap. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode campuran dengan desain pengembangan instrumen afektif mengacu Mardapi. Analisis data menggunakan analisis data kualitatif menggunakan triangulasi sumber dan teknik, validitas, daya beda butir, reliabilitas dan analisis faktor ekploratori. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dari validasi ahli, 50 butir instrumen awal layak diujicobakan ke skala kecil dengan 27 butir berkategori cukup memadai dan 23 butir berkategori memadai. Hasil uji coba skala kecil, terdapat 32 butir yang berkategori valid dan instrumen reliabel dengan α = 0,85. Setelah instrumen diperbaiki, instrumen digunakan untuk uji coba skala luas dengan subjek 100 siswa dan hasilnya instrumen reliabel dengan rxx=0,73 serta instrumen mampu mengungkap variabel sikap siswa yang diukur sebesar 67,53% dengan jumlah komponen yang terbentuk sebanyak tiga faktor yaitu Jujur, Interaksi lingkungan dan Serius. The purpose of this research is to produce assessment instrument the attitude of the students in the mathematics teaching JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL in the form of attitude scale (self-assessment) and teacher observation sheet (others). The Data obtained at SMPN 1 Bolo Bima Regency NTB with research subject 100 students and 4 mathematics teacher. The instrument data collector in the form of observation sheet, camera/recorders, guidelines, interview questionnaires and attitude scale. The research method used is mixed method with the design of the development of affective instrument by Mardapi. Analysis of the data using the analysis triangulation source and techniques, the validity of the different power point, reliability and factor analysis ekploratori. The results of the study showed from examine the expert team, 50 items early instrument worthy trialled to small scale with 27 items category is adequate and 23 items very adequate category. The results of the small scale test there are 32 items valid category and reliability instrument with α = 0.85. After the instrument repair, instruments used to test large-scale with the subject of 100 students and as a result the instrument reliability with rxx=0.73 obligation and able to reveal the variables measured students attitude of 67,53% with a number of components that are formed as many as three factors namely honest, environmental interaction and serious.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Afektif Peminatan Peserta Didik SMA Negeri 1 Semarang Indrayani, Luthfi; Djuniadi, Djuniadi; Ridlo, Syaiful
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (236.218 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16206

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen penilaian afektif peminatan peserta didik SMA yang valid, reliabel dan praktis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan (Research and Development) model Borg & Gall yang dimodifikasi tanpa tahapan terakhir yaitu diseminasi dan implementasi. Instrumen penilaian afektif peminatan peserta didik SMA dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis Mixmethod. Validitas isi instrumen diukur dengan divalidasi oleh 4: bidang materi dan pengukuran, psikologi, pengguna, dan kebahasaan melalui teknik walktrough. Validitas diukur menggunakan rumus product moment, dan reliabilitas menggunakan rumus alfa cronbach. Validitas konstruk dianalisis faktor konfirmatori second order menghasilkan model konstruk Goodness of Fit model diukur menggunakan r2 variabel laten dependen dengan interpretasi yang sama dengan regresi Hasil penelitian didapatkan 25 butir valid pada angket minat yang mewakili 3 aspek minat pada peminatan. Instrumen observasi dengan 7 butir valid mewakili 3 aspek minat, dan instrumen wawancara dengan 10 butir yang mewakili 3 aspek minat. Nilai reliabilitas instrumen menunjukkan hasil 0.918 yang bernilai reliabilitas tinggi. Nilai R-square indicator minat pada peminatan menujukkan nilai yang tinggi, yaitu keterlibatan 0.906, perasaan senang 0.900, dan nilai guna 0.880. Kepraktisan instrumen sebesar 92% dengan kategori sangat baik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dihasilkan instrumen penilaian afektif peminatan peserta didik SMA yang valid, reliabel, dan praktis yang dikemas menjadi buku panduan penggunaan penilaian afektif peminatan peserta didik SMA. This research has an aim to develop a valid, reliable and practical affective assessment instrument of students’ specialization in senior high school. This research is a Borg & Gall research and development model which is modified by excluding the end phase that is dissemination and implementation. Affective assessment instrument of senior high school students’ specializationis analyzed by using Mixmethod analysis method. The instrument content validity is measured by 4-field validations: material and measurement, psychology, user, and language through walkthrough technique. Validity is measured by using product moment formula Instrument reliability is measured using alfaconbach formula and results in reliability value of 0.918. Construct validity analyzed by second order. confirmed factor results in a construct model of Goodness of Fit model measured by r2 latent dependent variable with the same interpretation with regression value.Interest questionnaires is results in with 25 valid items which represent 3 interest aspects in specialization. Observation instrument constitutes 7 valid items representing 3 interest aspects, and interview instrument comprises 10 items expressing 3 interest aspects. R-square interest of indicator in specialization that shows high points, i.e. 0.906 for involvement, 0.900 for enjoyment, and 0.880 for task value. Instrument practicality valuesat 92% with very good category. The research results in a valid, reliable, and practical affective assessment instrument of senior high school students’ specialization which is packed in a guide book of how to use affective assessment of senior high school students’ specialization.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Zuliani, Dewi; Florentinus, Totok Sumaryanto; Ridlo, Saiful
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.822 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16207

Abstract

Guru belum melakukan penilaian karakter pada pembelajaran Matematika di SD karena tidak ada instrumen penilaian karakter yang tersedia, serta ketidakmampuan guru untuk mengembangkan secara mandiri. Oleh karena itu dilakukan pengembangan instrumen penilaian karakter khususnya pada pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SD. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan. Model pengembangan memodifikasi model 4-D (Four D model) yang meliputi: (1) pendefinisian, (2) perancangan, (3) pengembangan dan (4) penyebaran. Produk instrumen penilaian karakter dilakukan uji validitas isi secara kualitatif dengan pertimbangan ahli di bidang materi dan penilaian. Uji validitas konstruk juga dilakukan secara kuantitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) dengan ujicoba instrumen kepada 150 siswa, serta diujicoba reliabilitas didasrkan pada construct reliability dan uji kepraktisan terhadap 20 orang guru sebagai praktisi. Hasil validasi ahli menunjukan instrumen penilaian karakter bernilai 4,72 dengan kriteria baik. Uji validitas konstruk instrumen observasi menghasilan 22 butir dan instrumen angket menghasilkan 20 butir. Instrumen observasi dan angket penilaian karakter memiliki validitas konstruk dan reliabilitas yang baik dimana nilai korelasi butir amatan terhadap factor melampaui cut off point yakni 0,45. Nilai koefisien reliabilitas melalui construct reliability juga telah melampaui batas yang ditetapkan yaitu 0,70 dengan tingkat kepraktisan instrumen 44,1 pada kategori praktis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dihasilkan instrumen penilaian karakter yang valid, reliabel, dan praktis yang dikemas menjadi buku panduan penggunaan instrumen penilaian karakter bagi guru. The purposes of this study are: to describe and to analyze the factual conditions assessment of students' attitude in learning English, grade VIII students of SMPN 13 Semarang, to estimate the coefficient of validity, reliability and the differences of developing instruments, to calculate the percentage that is capable revealed by developed instruments on the variables of performance which be measured, and to determine the practicality of the developed instrument. The method used is mixed method research with 10 steps research of design instrument development performance from Sugiyono. The qualitative data were obtained through the observation, interviews and documentation, while the quantitative data were obtained from the students' performance in developed reading aloud. Qualitative data analysis used triangulation techniques, whereas quantitative data analysis conducted test the construct validity, item analysis of different power and reliability testing instruments. The construct validity test KMO and Bartlett’s Test and the analysis of different point used correlation Pearson product moment and reliability by using α formula (internal consistency) and Mosier formula.The result of small-scale trial on the instrument has a coefficient of performance reliability that has average category, it is 0.57. On the wide scale trials, the reliability coefficient is 0.698 and it belongs to high category. Furthermore, the number of components (factors) that were formed on the instrument of performance had 4 factors. The total of variant percentage of the performance of students in learning English are able to be explained by four factors amounted to 63.908%. The result of practicality number of instruments is located at number 156 (practical) for performance assessment instruments. This instrument is expected by the teachers that there will be no difficulty in assessing students’ reading aloud in English learning
Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Otentik Unjuk Kerja pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di SDN Jlamprang dan SDN Wonosari 03 Kabupaten Batang Majid, Nur Kholis; Raharjo, Tri Joko; Supriyadi, Supriyadi
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (304.412 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16208

Abstract

Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrumen penilaian psikomotor IPA yang valid, reliable dan praktis. Instrumen penilian diujicobakan pada siswa kelas V SD tahun pelajaran 2015/2016 dengan melibatkan tiga guru sebagai rater (penilai). Model Pengembangan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah model R&D atas Borg and Gaal yang dimodifikasi menjadi tiga tahap meliputi : (1) Pendahuluan; (2) Pengembangan Produk; (3) Penyajian produk pengembangan. Dihitung validitasnya menggunakan validasi ahli dari ketiga penilai terhadap instrumen asesmen unjuk kerja dapat digunakan dari nilai expert judgement menggunakan teknik aiken’s V. Dinilai dari reliabilitas instrumen unjuk kerja pada skala kecil di SDN Jlamprang soal nomor satu sebesar 0,875, soal nomor dua sebesar 0,898, soal nomor tiga sebesar, 0,631, soal nomor empat sebesar, 0,962 dan soal nomor lima sebesar, 0,75, untuk nilai reliabilitas pada skala besar menggunakan ICC dan IRR. Hasil analisis menunjukkan kesepakatan antar rater SDN Wonosari 03 sebesar 0,61 untuk harga seorang rater sedangkan rata-rata rater sebesar 0,82, untuk SDN Wonosari 01 menunjukkan 0,67 untuk seorang rater serta 0,85 untuk rata-rata rater yang artinya instrumen mempunyai kualaitas stabilitas yang cukup tinggi. Secara umum guru menilai instrumen unjuk kerja memiliki subyektivitas, kesistematisan, konstruksi, masing-masing sebesar 14,33 (Obyektivitas), 13.00 (Kesistematisan), 13,50 (Konstruksi), 15,00 (Kebahasaan) dan 14,00 (Kepraktisan) dengan demikian instrumen unjuk kerja ini dapat dikatakan secara umum dinilai praktis. The development of research aimed at producing psychomotor assessment instrument IPA are valid, reliable and practical. Judging instrument tested in the fifth grade elementary school students in the academic year 2015/2016, involving three teachers as raters (assessors). Development models used in this study is a model of R & D on a modified Borg and Gaal into three stages: (1) Introduction; (2) Product Development; (3) Presentation of product development. Calculated validity using expert validation of the three assessors to the assessment instrument performance can be used from the value of expert judgment using techniques aiken's V. Judged reliability of the instrument performance on a small scale in SDN Jlamprang about the first 0.875, question number two at 0.898, Question three of, 0.631, about number four for, and about 0,962 for the number five, 0.75, for the value of reliability on a massive scale using ICC and IRR. The analysis showed inter-rater agreement SDN Wonosari 03 of 0.61 to the price of a rater rater while the average was 0.82, for SDN Wonosari 01 shows a rater and 0.67 to 0.85 for the average rater which means instruments kualaitas has a fairly high stability. In general, teachers assess the performance of the instrument has a subjectivity, Systematics construction, each at 14.33 (Objectivity), 13:00 (Systematic), 13.50 (Construction), 15.00 (Linguistic) and 14.00 (Practicality) thus the instrument's performance can be said to be generally considered practical.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Percaya Diri pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Gaol, Paltiman Lumban; Khumaedi, Muhammad; Masrukan, Masrukan
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.988 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16209

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian karakter percaya diri pada mata pelajaran matematika SMP. Penelitian menggunakan metode pengembangan instrumen. Pengumpulan data melalui angket penilaian diri siswa. Alat pengumpulan data divalidasi 3 Expert Judgment dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken’V dan uji lapangan penilaian diri dianalisis menggunakan validitas konstruk Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), reliabilitas dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach. Hasil validasi Expert Judgment menunjukkan validitas ≥ 0,3 bahwa seluruh item valid, reliabilitas antar-rater menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil KMO = 0,710 dan rata-rata MSA = 0,752 pada uji coba pertama dan pada uji coba kedua KMO = 0,838 dan rata-rata MSA = 0,858. Berdasarkan muatan faktor terdapat 31 item yang memiliki nilai ≥ 0,3, maka keseluruhan item valid. Reliabilitas uji coba pertama 0,906 dan uji coba ke dua 0,923. Berdasarkan hasil analisis EFA instrumen yang dikembangkan memiliki reliabilitas yang tinggi dan lebih besar dibanding kriteria minimum = 0,6. Faktor-faktor karakter percaya diri terdiri dari 8 faktor yaitu; tidak putus asa, kemampuan diri, usaha sendiri, menyampaian pendapat, bertanggung jawab, komunikasi, membantu sesama, dan cita-cita. Produk akhir hasil penelitian berupa instrumen penilaian karakter percaya diri yang valid, reliabel, dikemas dalam bentuk buku panduan instrumen penilaian karakter. This study aims to develop a confident character assessment instrument on junior mathematics subjects. The research uses the development of the instrument. Data collection through self-assessment students questionnaires. The data collection tool validated of 3 Expert Judgment was analyzed using Aiken formula, self-assessment analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) construct validity, reliability was analyzed using Cronbach Alpha. Expert Judgment validation results show the validity of ≥ 0.3 that all items are valid, inter-rater reliability shows no significant difference. The KMO result = 0.710 and the mean MSA = 0.752 in the first trial and in the second trial KMO = 0.838 and the mean MSA = 0.858. Based on the factor load there are 31 items that have value ≥ 0.3, then the whole item is valid. The reliability of the second test is 0.923 and the first test is 0.906. Based on the result of EFA analysis the developed instrument has high reliability and greater than minimum criterion = 0,6. The factors of confident character consists of 8 factors namely; Not despair, self-efficacy, self-effort, expressing opinions, being responsible, communicating, helping others, and ideals. The final product of the research result is a valid, reliable, self-confident, valid character assessment instrument in the form of a character assessment instrument manual.
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Mata Pelajaran PKn Standar Kompetensi Memahami Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia Soleh, Ahmad; Khumaedi, Muhammad; Pramono, Suwito Eko
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.797 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16210

Abstract

Pengembangan instrumen penilaian harus memenuhi unsur validitas dan reliabilitas agar menjadi instrumen penilaian yang baik (standar). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendiskripsikan dan menganalisis instrumen penilaian mata pelajaran PKn Standar Kompetensi Memahami Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia untuk peserta didik kelas 8 Sekolah Menengah Pertama yang valid dan reliabel. Pengembangan instrumen penilaian mata pelajaran PKn dikembangkan dengan langkah-langkah pengembangan instrumen penilaian Djemari Mardapi dengan sedikit modifikasi. Teknik analisis data pada tahap pengembangan instrumen untuk mencari validitas isi dengan menggunakan metode analisis indek validitas dengan V indeks dari Aiken, untuk mencari indek reliabilitas isi dengan metode analisis anova dua jalur dengan rumus C. Hoyt (1941). Pada tahap uji coba lapangan, untuk mencari indek validitas konstrak dianalisis dengan metode analisis faktor, untuk mencari indek reliabilitas dianalisis dengan metode alfa Cronbah. Kreteria penerimaan validitas sebesar 0,3 kreteria reliabilitas sebesar 0,5. Pada tahap pengembangan instrumen, hasil analisis validitas isi menunjukkan bahwa semua instrumen sudah sesuai dengan indikator, untuk indeks reliabilitas isi juga telah memenuhi kreteria yang ditetapkan. Hasil analisis indeks validitas konstrak uji coba 1 sebesar 0,619 dan uji coba 2 sebesar 0,646. Hasil analisis indeks reliabilitas instrumen uji coba 1 sebesar 0,627 dan uji coba 2 sebesar 0,643. Hasil tersebut sudah lebih besar dari kreteria yang ditetapkan. Kesimpulannya Instrumen penilaian PKn yang dikembangkan sudah memenuhi kreteria sebagai instrumen yang valid dan reliabel. The development of assessment instruments must fulfill elements of validity and reliability. Elements of validity and reliability are a prerequisite for being a good assessment instrument (standard). The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze assessment instruments of PKn subject, Competency Standards Understanding Sovereignty of the People in the Government System in Indonesia for 8th grade students Junior High School valid and reliable. The development of assessment instruments PKn subjects based on the content on the standard of competence "to understand the sovereignty of the people in the system of government in Indonesia for ". The development of assessment instruments of PKn subject was developed by using steps Djemari Mardapi assessment instruments with minor modifications. Data analysis techniques in developing instruments was to search for content validity, by using a validity index analysis method with V index of Aiken, to search the contents of the reliability index using analysis method ANOVA two lanes of formula C. Hoyt (1941). During field trials, to search index construct validity was analyzed by factor analysis, to look for the reliability index was analyzed by alfa cronbah method. The results of the data analysis at this stage of development of instruments were obtained content validity suitable with indicators, to index the contents of the reliability suitable with date of creteriants. The results of the analysis of first trial construct validity index is 0.619 and second trial is 0.646. The results of the analysis instrument reliability index of first trial is 0.627 and second trial is 0,643. The results are greater than the stated criteria. In conclusion development of PKn Assessment instruments has been fulfilled the criteria as a valid and reliable.
Instrumen Penilaian Diri Kompetensi Klinis Mahasiswa Kedokteran Novitasari, Andra; Ridlo, Saiful; Kristina, Tri Nur
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.16 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16212

Abstract

Penilaian diri dibutuhkan untuk refleksi diri kompetensi klinis bagi mahasiswa sebagai dasar pengembangan diri. Penilaian diri yang selama ini dilakukan belum mampu secara akurat memberikan gambaran kompetensi klinis mahasiswa. Penelitian bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen yang valid, reliabel, dan efektif untuk melakukan penilaian diri kompetensi klinis. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran dengan rancangan sekuensial eksploratoris. Penelitian dilakukan dalam 4 tahap. Tahap identifikasi dimensi kompetensi klinis dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka. Tahap penyusunan instrumen dilakukan dengan menyusun definisi konseptual, dimensi, dan indikator, penyusunan kisi-kisi instrumen, menulis butir-butir instrumen, dan penentuan skala pengukuran. Tahap validasi instrumen dilakukan dengan meminta pertimbangan ahli dalam bidang pendidikan kedokteran dan dianalisis menggunakan Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Tahap implementasi, instrumen diuji reliabilitasnya. Reliabilitas instrumen dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach’s. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dimensi kompetensi klinis terdiri dari hubungan dokter-pasien, anamnesis, pemeriksaan fisik, kemampuan diagnostik, tata laksana, ketrampilan komunikasi, dan profesionalitas. CVR diperoleh nilai positif pada semua butir sehingga instrumen dinyatakan valid. Uji reliabilitas instrumen menunjukkan nilai Alpha 0.949 sehingga instrumen dinyatakan reliabel. Butir-butir di dalam instrumen telah mencerminkan keseluruhan komponen kompetensi dan memiliki konsistensi dalam mengukur konstruk yang sama, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan mahasiswa untuk mengukur kompetensi klinisnya masing-masing sebagai bahan pengembangan diri. Self-assessment is needed for self-reflection of clinical competence for students as a basis for self-development. Unfortunately, self-assessment has not been able to accurately provide an overview of student clinical competence. The aims of the study is to develop a valid, reliable, and effective self-assessment instrument of clinical competence.The study used a mixed method. The study was conducted in 4 stages. The identification of clinical competence’s dimensions in medical students was done through in-depth interview and literature study. The instrument compilation was performed by defining conceptual definitions, dimensions, and indicators, arranging the instrument blueprint, writing instrument items, and determining the measurement scale. The validation was performed by expert in medical education, and analyzed using Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Instrument implemented and tested quantitatively its reliability. Reliability was analyzed with Alpha Cronbach's. The dimensions of clinical competence consisted of: physician-patient relationships, anamnesis, physical examination, diagnostic ability, management, communication skills, and professionalism. CVR obtained positive values ​​on each item so the instrument is valid. Test reliability of the instrument shows Alpha 0.949 so the instrument is reliable. Self-Assessment Instrument of Clinical Competence for Medical The items within the instrument have reflected the overall component of competence and have consistency in measuring the same constructs, so that students can use it to measure their own clinical competence as a self-development material.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 20

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) 2021: Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue