Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020"
:
10 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Hukum Digital Signature Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Acara Perdata ]]>
<![CDATA[Eman Sulaiman]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Arifudin]]>;
<![CDATA[Lily Triyana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.207
<![CDATA[Indonesia memasuki era globalisasi yang mendorong perkembangan teknologi dan kegiatan usaha para pelaku bisnis ke arah yang lebih efektif dan efesien yaitu e-commerce. Dalam perkembanganya, penggunaan Digital Signature mulai menggeser keberadaan tanda tangan konvesional yang biasa digunakan dalam perjanjian diatas media kertas. Penggunaan Digital signature dalam perdagangan elektronik untuk menjaga keutuhan dan keaslian data dalam suatu dokumen elektronik. Kegiatan perdagangan yang menggunakan media elektronik sebagai alat bukti di dalam sistem pembuktian di Indonesia masih terdapat kekurangan dalam proses pengadilan di Indonesia. Menurut sistem HIR/RGB (hukum acara yang berlaku) dalam acara perdata, hakim terikat pada alat-alat bukti yang sah, yang berarti hakim hanya boleh mengambil keputusan berdasarkan alat-alat bukti yang di tentukan oleh undang-undang saja (HIR/RGB).Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan doktrinal, yaitu penelitian hukum menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dengan menggunakan sumber data dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier dengan metode pengumpulan data dari berbagai sumber bacaan, seperti perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal atau karya ilmiah, serta internet yang dinilai relevan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas.Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Digital Signature bukan lah tanda tangan konvensional yang kemudian discan menggunakan scaner, melaikan menggunakan teknik Kripography. Adanya asas lex specialis derogate lex generalis maka penggunaan alat bukti Digital Signature dalam Hukum Acara Perdata memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan akta otentik. Kata Kunci: Tanda Tangan, Digital, Alat Bukti.]]>
<![CDATA[Pencabutan Hak Politik Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Dina Fajar Indah]]>;
<![CDATA[Haris Retno Susmiyati]]>;
<![CDATA[Rini Apriyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.285
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The judge took the progressive step. This step strongly supports the prevention and eradication of Corruption Crimes. However, in implementing the revocation of rights, the time limit for revocation must be explicitly given for the right to vote. This study aims to find out additional crimes in the form of revocation of rights to choose and be elected to public office if reviewed from the perspective of criminal law and to find out the compatibility between the decisions of the Supreme Court judge Number 537K / Pid.Sus / 2014 with human rights principles. This study uses doctrinal types. Namely, the authors collect material from the literature. These are hardcopy and softcopy that relate to the title of this study and by using an analysis of the object of research. The results obtained from this study are as follows: 1). Revocation of the right to choose and be chosen should be based on the crime rate, the impact caused to society, and the position of the position while doing the crime of corruption. Revocation of certain rights must be determined by a judge’s decision, and there is a time limit for revocation according to what has been stipulated in article 38 Criminal Code. However, Article 38 of the Criminal Code does not regulate specifically related time constraints for the removal of the right to vote and elected in public office. 2). Revocation of the right to be elected in public office complies with the principles of human rights. It can be said to be included in the category of degradable rights, or rights can be restricted. While the revocation of the right to vote who are not given the time constraints and repeal incompatible with the principles of human rights. Because the right to vote is a fundamental right of every citizen, who has been guaranteed by the constitution of 1945, besides, the time limit for the removal of the right to vote still needed due to respect of human rights offender criminal acts of corruption but to provide justice for victims of crime over the extraordinary crime then the period of revocation may be given more long, judging from the level of crimes committed.Keywords: rights; Human Rights; Revocation; Criminal; Corruption]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Perdagangan Telur Penyu ]]>
<![CDATA[Apridyanita Pratiwi Tarigan]]>;
<![CDATA[La Syarifuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Agustina Wati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.376
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This study discusses a law enforcement against the trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda. Sea turtles emerge as part of endemic animals in Indonesia in which their existence is almost extinct based on the Government Regulation, Number 7 Year 1999. This study employed a socio-legal (socio-legal research/law in contex) approach, namely a case study on empirical legal research in the form of community legal behavior. The existence of the trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda can still be encountered in the area located on Jl. Pangeran Antasari. The results of this study indicated that the legal protection on the sea turtle population, due to the rampant trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda, was not completely carried out. It is shown by the fact that the turtle egg trade in Samarinda still exists. Additionally, the law enforcement against the perpetrators of the turtle egg trade is not optimally implemented in which it is proven by the fact that the court merely imposes a light sanction and does not perceive ecological aspects. Keywords: Enforcement, Protection, Trade, Sea Turtle Eggs]]>
<![CDATA[Tindakan Amerika Serikat Dalam Menarik Diri Dari Paris Agreement Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf]]>;
<![CDATA[Mahendra Putra Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Hidayatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.158
<![CDATA[This research is motivated by the United States, which withdrew from the Paris Agreement because for the United States, the Paris Agreement is an agreement that weakens the economy. Following Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, this action raises problems that the United States cannot withdraw before 2020. In this case, there needs to be legal clarity in binding the country to global climate protection. The act of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement would undoubtedly be a problem for the countries incorporated in it. In this case, the Paris Agreement continues to run as it should because the United States withdrew using the mechanisms contained in the Paris Agreement. Still, the United States continues to handle climate change because it does not come out of the Convention (UNFCCC). Then in the campaign and carbon trading, the United States should compensate for having left obligations as a developed country party following the Paris Agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan ]]>
<![CDATA[Adella Aldionita Chairi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivan Zairani Lisi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rini Apriyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.203
<![CDATA[In Indonesia, cases of sexual violence against children are serious crimes. Law Number 17 the Year 2016 concerning Establishment of Government Regulation in place of Law (PERPPU) Number 1 the Year 2016 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 23 the Year 2002 concerning Child Protection, which can be picked up following chemical castration. The author has two objectives, first about the additional legal requirements for chemical castration in terms of the perspective of justice against victims, the second to provide clarity on the additional innocence of chemical castration in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 in children The granting of additional castration chemical crime law from the perspective of justice against victims is a form of retaliation for the crime. Nothing in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 has the objective to be achieved is to protect the nation's children and become material for judges in opposing penalties against violence against children.]]>
<![CDATA[Tindakan Amerika Serikat Dalam Menarik Diri Dari Paris Agreement Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf]]>;
<![CDATA[Mahendra Putra Kurnia]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Hidayatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.158
<![CDATA[This research is motivated by the United States, which withdrew from the Paris Agreement because for the United States, the Paris Agreement is an agreement that weakens the economy. Following Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, this action raises problems that the United States cannot withdraw before 2020. In this case, there needs to be legal clarity in binding the country to global climate protection. The act of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement would undoubtedly be a problem for the countries incorporated in it. In this case, the Paris Agreement continues to run as it should because the United States withdrew using the mechanisms contained in the Paris Agreement. Still, the United States continues to handle climate change because it does not come out of the Convention (UNFCCC). Then in the campaign and carbon trading, the United States should compensate for having left obligations as a developed country party following the Paris Agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan ]]>
<![CDATA[Adella Aldionita Chairi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivan Zairani Lisi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rini Apriyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.203
<![CDATA[In Indonesia, cases of sexual violence against children are serious crimes. Law Number 17 the Year 2016 concerning Establishment of Government Regulation in place of Law (PERPPU) Number 1 the Year 2016 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 23 the Year 2002 concerning Child Protection, which can be picked up following chemical castration. The author has two objectives, first about the additional legal requirements for chemical castration in terms of the perspective of justice against victims, the second to provide clarity on the additional innocence of chemical castration in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 in children The granting of additional castration chemical crime law from the perspective of justice against victims is a form of retaliation for the crime. Nothing in Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of PERPPU Number 1 of 2016 has the objective to be achieved is to protect the nation's children and become material for judges in opposing penalties against violence against children.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Hukum Digital Signature Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Acara Perdata ]]>
<![CDATA[Eman Sulaiman]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Arifudin]]>;
<![CDATA[Lily Triyana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.207
<![CDATA[Indonesia memasuki era globalisasi yang mendorong perkembangan teknologi dan kegiatan usaha para pelaku bisnis ke arah yang lebih efektif dan efesien yaitu e-commerce. Dalam perkembanganya, penggunaan Digital Signature mulai menggeser keberadaan tanda tangan konvesional yang biasa digunakan dalam perjanjian diatas media kertas. Penggunaan Digital signature dalam perdagangan elektronik untuk menjaga keutuhan dan keaslian data dalam suatu dokumen elektronik. Kegiatan perdagangan yang menggunakan media elektronik sebagai alat bukti di dalam sistem pembuktian di Indonesia masih terdapat kekurangan dalam proses pengadilan di Indonesia. Menurut sistem HIR/RGB (hukum acara yang berlaku) dalam acara perdata, hakim terikat pada alat-alat bukti yang sah, yang berarti hakim hanya boleh mengambil keputusan berdasarkan alat-alat bukti yang di tentukan oleh undang-undang saja (HIR/RGB).Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan doktrinal, yaitu penelitian hukum menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dengan menggunakan sumber data dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier dengan metode pengumpulan data dari berbagai sumber bacaan, seperti perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal atau karya ilmiah, serta internet yang dinilai relevan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas.Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Digital Signature bukan lah tanda tangan konvensional yang kemudian discan menggunakan scaner, melaikan menggunakan teknik Kripography. Adanya asas lex specialis derogate lex generalis maka penggunaan alat bukti Digital Signature dalam Hukum Acara Perdata memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan akta otentik. Kata Kunci: Tanda Tangan, Digital, Alat Bukti.]]>
<![CDATA[Pencabutan Hak Politik Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Dina Fajar Indah]]>;
<![CDATA[Haris Retno Susmiyati]]>;
<![CDATA[Rini Apriyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.285
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The judge took the progressive step. This step strongly supports the prevention and eradication of Corruption Crimes. However, in implementing the revocation of rights, the time limit for revocation must be explicitly given for the right to vote. This study aims to find out additional crimes in the form of revocation of rights to choose and be elected to public office if reviewed from the perspective of criminal law and to find out the compatibility between the decisions of the Supreme Court judge Number 537K / Pid.Sus / 2014 with human rights principles. This study uses doctrinal types. Namely, the authors collect material from the literature. These are hardcopy and softcopy that relate to the title of this study and by using an analysis of the object of research. The results obtained from this study are as follows: 1). Revocation of the right to choose and be chosen should be based on the crime rate, the impact caused to society, and the position of the position while doing the crime of corruption. Revocation of certain rights must be determined by a judge’s decision, and there is a time limit for revocation according to what has been stipulated in article 38 Criminal Code. However, Article 38 of the Criminal Code does not regulate specifically related time constraints for the removal of the right to vote and elected in public office. 2). Revocation of the right to be elected in public office complies with the principles of human rights. It can be said to be included in the category of degradable rights, or rights can be restricted. While the revocation of the right to vote who are not given the time constraints and repeal incompatible with the principles of human rights. Because the right to vote is a fundamental right of every citizen, who has been guaranteed by the constitution of 1945, besides, the time limit for the removal of the right to vote still needed due to respect of human rights offender criminal acts of corruption but to provide justice for victims of crime over the extraordinary crime then the period of revocation may be given more long, judging from the level of crimes committed.Keywords: rights; Human Rights; Revocation; Criminal; Corruption]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Perdagangan Telur Penyu ]]>
<![CDATA[Apridyanita Pratiwi Tarigan]]>;
<![CDATA[La Syarifuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Agustina Wati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.376
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This study discusses a law enforcement against the trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda. Sea turtles emerge as part of endemic animals in Indonesia in which their existence is almost extinct based on the Government Regulation, Number 7 Year 1999. This study employed a socio-legal (socio-legal research/law in contex) approach, namely a case study on empirical legal research in the form of community legal behavior. The existence of the trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda can still be encountered in the area located on Jl. Pangeran Antasari. The results of this study indicated that the legal protection on the sea turtle population, due to the rampant trade of sea turtle eggs in Samarinda, was not completely carried out. It is shown by the fact that the turtle egg trade in Samarinda still exists. Additionally, the law enforcement against the perpetrators of the turtle egg trade is not optimally implemented in which it is proven by the fact that the court merely imposes a light sanction and does not perceive ecological aspects. Keywords: Enforcement, Protection, Trade, Sea Turtle Eggs]]>
