cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yeremias Jena
Contact Email
yeremias.jena@atmajaya.ac.id
Phone
+6221-5708808
Journal Mail Official
ppe@atmajaya.ac.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Pengembangan Etika Gedung Karol Wojtyla Lt. 12 Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Jl. Jenderal Sudirman No. 51 Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Published by Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta
ISSN : 08538689     EISSN : 27154769     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25170/respons.v25i02
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Respons (p-ISSN 0853-8689/e-ISSN 2715-4769) is a bilingual (Indonesian and English language) and peer-reviewed journal published by Centre for Philosophy and Ethics of Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia. Respons specializes in researched papers related to social ethics, philosophy, applied philosophy from interdisciplinary-methodological point of view. Respons welcomes ethical and philosophical contributions from scholars with various background of disciplines. This journal uses English and Indonesian Language. "Respons" is an open access journal whose papers published is freely downloaded.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 143 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Etika Belaian Sebagai Sebuah Model Etika Pasca-Modern Hendar Putranto
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 13 No 02 (2008): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v13i02.398

Abstract

Post-modernism offers new and unprecedented challenges in the light of morality issues. Some of the big issues faced by post-modern way is how to respond to ambivalence and how to treat “the Other” in a more fair and dignified way. Here, these issues are “answered” by post-modern ethics as articulated by Polish-British thinker, Zygmunt Bauman. Arguably, the role-model of post-modern ethics is an ethic of care since it highlights and prioritizes the act of care and responsibility toward others in a (more) flexible way while at the same time recognizing the differences. Nevertheless, an ethics of care is a sufficient but not necessary response to the moral issues of our times because of some inherent flaws.
Ingatan Sosial, Trauma, dan “Maaf”: Sebuah Refleksi untuk Indonesia Reza A.A. Wattimena
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 13 No 02 (2008): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v13i02.399

Abstract

The paper exposes the concept of social memory through three perspectives, namely philosophy, history, and social psychology. Social memory is the accumulation of individual memory, and beyond. It means that, social memory has its ontological status which is different to individual memory. Social memory contains both kind of memories of positive events in the past, and the memories of traumatic negative events. In Indonesia, the memory of traumatic events buried deeply. This act will change the social memory concerning traumatic events to social trauma. This kind of trauma will create further crises in Indonesia, e.g. the crises of identity.
Lingkungan Hidup Manusiawi Ahimsa dan Transformasi Budaya Jacobus Tarigan
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 13 No 02 (2008): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v13i02.400

Abstract

Men and earth are inseparable unity. The is a dialectical relationship between them. There is no man without earth. Man is not a lord to his environment. The domination of man upon earth is denied. Man is required to give a friendly and respectful attitude to environment. Man is using the environment and maintaining it at the same time. The principle of justice penetrates the relationship old man with his environment. The destruction of the environment is a concern for everybody, institutions and states. The concern is not enough to be shown by conducting a lot of discussion and reflections, but it must be expressed in very real actions: looking at the problem, considering the problem and making solution as well as takin it into action. The philosophical-ethical reflection and critical-ethical evaluation must be based on experience.
Menggali Warisan Hannah Arendt dalam “Asal-Usul Totalitarisme” Alois A. Nugroho
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.402

Abstract

Abstract: Arendt’s analysis of totalitarism in The Origins of Totalitarism has combined several dimensions of power: imperialism, racism, and anti-Semitism. Under these exercises of power, polis as a model of politics is reduced into the holocaust and colonization. This article finds out that those processes bring forth the society into the dichotomy between the pariah and the parvenu, the people and the mass, human qua human and human qua citizen, and the authentic and the unauthentic. This phenomenological analysis of the dichotomy shows that emotion may be the only sources of disturbancesKata Kunci: Totalitarisme, rasisme, pariah, pervenu, massa, warga negara, yang otentik
Demokrasi: Pergumulan Melawan Sang Demagog Refleksi Atas Pemikiran Plato, Aristoteles dan Hannah Arendt Mikhael Dua
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.403

Abstract

Abstract: As far as it develops, democracy has been practiced in many forms of civil states as the only way to reduce many forms of domination. The course of political history, however, shows that democracys is not the ideal form of the states, especially because it cannot be purified from the phenomena of the demagogues. The turn from democracy to tyranny can be explained from this point of view: democracy is the source of the demagogues. This paper will deal with the question of the relationship between democracy and the demagogues. By following Plato, Aristotle and Hannah Arendt who concern with the question of the essence of the politics, the paper brings forth the idea that the constitution of democracy should be developed into the constitution of the freedom of the people. In such a way, politics can be identified with the human togetherness.Kata Kunci: Demokrasi, demagog, kebebasan, konstitusionalisme, filsafat Yunani
Hannah Arendt: Kekerasan bukan Tindakan Politik, Namun bukan tanpa Resiko Benyamin Molan
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.404

Abstract

Abstract: This paper considers the implication of Hannah Arendt’s criticism of the relationship between violence and politics. For some political theorists and philosophers, it is taken for granted, that violence and politics are inextricably intertwined. For Arendt, it is crucial to  keep the two clearly and distinctly apart. After arguing for a tripartite division between the human activities of labor, work and action, Arendt identifies the politics as the part of action, and the violence as the part of labor and work. This is the way Arendt argues to keep the politics and the violence clearly apart.Kata Kunci: Kekerasan, politik,  kerja (labor), karya (work), tindakan (action), kebebasan
Politik, Kekuasaan, dan Kekerasan Perspektif Hannah Arendt Stanislaus Nugroho
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.405

Abstract

Abstract: Politics is not a simple word. Aristotle identifies it with human togetherness. In line with this identification, Hannah Arendt suggests that politics is not a kind of dominating actions, but the way in which the human beings promote freedom of actions in the public sector. The essence of politics, then, is communication. In this line of thought, power can be understood as one’s ability to act/behave with and within others/in togetherness with others on base of a given mandate. Violence is nothing else but an anti-political stance of togetherness.Kata Kunci: Politik, kekuasaan, kekerasan, kebebasan, komunikasi
Antara Dasein dan Caritas Pemikiran Hannah Arendt mengenai Kekuasaan Alex Seran
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.406

Abstract

Abstract: The rediscovery of Arendt’s 1929 dissertation, Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin, forces a modification of the standard of interpretation of Arendt’s relationship both to the Christian philosophic tradition and to Martin Heidegger. The dissertation is an extended encounter with Heidegger’s Dasein  through an inquiry of St Augustine’s thought of caritas. Arendt’s thought on Existenz was methodologically focused on a turn from death and committed to test Heidegger’s phenomenology of Being-towards-death. Although contingency is central to Arendt’s Existenz, she insisted on invalidating determinism at every opportunity which allowed her to transform the fact of birth into a miraculous exemplar of natality to begin her own “turn” away from Heidegger’s gridlock of givennes. For Arendt, birth regenerates the power of contingency of individual person inserted into a community, i.e., the existing web of conflicting wills and intentions. The study of Arendt’s dissertation is significant because all her later works can be read as footnotes to it, as Jean Elshtain termed it.Kata Kunci: Dasein, existenz, waktu, natalitas
Penderitaan Ayub dan Kekerasan Massa: Refleksi René Girard dan Hannah Arendt Iman Sukmana
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i01.407

Abstract

Abstract: Assuming that violence can be found in many fields in our life, this article proposes the logic of violence in the story of Job. It shows us how Job suffers in his life. His suffering was absurd in his eyes. He didn’t understand why he should suffer. The problem was not only why he got suffering in his life, but also why his friends and people around him changed their attitudes towards him. Many people thought that Job suffered because of his sin. Their thought was mimetic among them. So, many people had the same perception about Job. There was an unanimity of opinion which judged that Job was a sinner. They asked Job to confesse his sin if he wanted to be saved. The unanimity of their voice became verbal abuse to Job, but people didn’t know that they made Job as a “scapegoat”.Kata Kunci: Ayub, kekerasan, kambing hitam, mimesis, banal, massa.
Kejahatan yang Banal dan Kekerasan oleh NegaraRefleksi Hannah Arendt atas Pengadilan Adolf Eichmann di Yerusalem Yeremias Jena
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 02 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v14i02.410

Abstract

Following the whole process of the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, Hannah Arend trealised that crimes and violence (evil) done by Eichmann and the Nazi were the clues of theabsence of the thoughtfulness. The question arises as to why a thoughtless man like Eichmann didsuch a big crime and violence against the Jews? The absence of reflective and philosophical thoughtsthat expels a moral agent to justify his moral deeds has become the root cause why Eichmannfailed to act according to some fundamental moral principles. The trial of Eichmann was really anexposure of the banality of evil against humanity. Could reason or reflective thoughts hinder amoral agent from evil deeds? How should we understand the banality of evil in political exercise?By reflecting the thoughts of Hannah Arendt on the banality of evil, this article discusses and triesto answer these questions.

Page 2 of 15 | Total Record : 143

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2008 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 25 No 02 (2020): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 24 No 02 (2019): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 23 No 02 (2018): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 23 No 01 (2018): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 22 No 02 (2017): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 22 No 01 (2017): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 21 No 02 (2016): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 21 No 01 (2016): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 20 No 02 (2015): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 20 No 01 (2015): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 19 No 02 (2014): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 19 No 01 (2014): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 18 No 02 (2013): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 18 No 01 (2013): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 17 No 02 (2012): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 17 No 01 (2012): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 16 No 02 (2011): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 16 No 01 (2011): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 15 No 02 (2010): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 15 No 01 (2010): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 02 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 14 No 01 (2009): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 13 No 02 (2008): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 13 No 01 (2008): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial More Issue