cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 540 Documents
 49   50   51   52   53 
Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Mencegah Gejala Autocratic Legalism di Indonesia Miftah Faried Hadinatha
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1941

Abstract

The phenomenon of autocratic legalism has become a serious problem that threatens democracy. As the guardian of constitution, the Constitutional Court should be present to stop the spread of this phenomenon. This research has two objectives, first, to understand the autocratic legalism phenomenon and the spread of it. Second, to formulate what kind of role the Constitutional Court can play to stop the escalation of it. The research methods used are doctrinal. The results showed, firstly, autocratic legalism refers to the actions of a person who uses the law to legitimize his desire for power. This can be seen in several policies issued in Indonesia. Second, the way the Constitutional Court can stop the escalation of it by adopting the doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment and judicial activism in the exercise of judicial review.
Eksistensi Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri terhadap Peraturan Daerah dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Juwita Putri Pratama; Lita Tyesta ALW; Sekar Anggun Gading Pinilih
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1947

Abstract

Ministrial Regulations as Legislative Regulations aren’t regulated in their position. This causes hierarchy confusion in the Ministerial Regulation faced with the Regional Regulation. This study aims to determine the hierarchy of regulation of Ministerial Regulations and the legal consequences that arise between it if they are mentioned in the hierarchy. This paper’s method is normative-juridical with descriptive analysis. This paper uses library research and interviews. The data analysis method used is qualitative analysis. The result of this research is that Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation doesn’t regulate Ministerial Regulations either being part of the hierarchy or from outside the hierarchy. Even so, viewed from the concept of a unitary state, ministerial regulations are part of the central level legislation. When the Ministerial Regulation is put up against the Regional Regulation, this has a number of legal effects.
Observing The Differences in Constitutional Court Decision About the Legal Age of Marriage Mia Hadiati; Febriansyah Ramadhan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1937

Abstract

In 2014–2017, there were two tests of the same norms in the Marriage Law, namely the Constitutional Court Decision Number 74 / PUU-XII / 2014 and 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. However, there is a difference in the verdict between one judgment and the next. In Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017, the Constitutional Court changed the previous stance that stated that the age limit norm was constitutional, changing it to unconstitutional, which led to the follow-up of the lawmakers to revise the Marriage Law. This study will compare judges' considerations in the decisions of Constitutional Court Number 74 / PUU-XII / 2014 and Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. It will be sought against the Constitutional Court's background changing its stance from one ruling to the next. This research uses normative research methods with a conceptual and philosophical approach to legislation. The results showed that the difference underlying the two rulings was in the excavation of legal sources by judges in their legal considerations.
Menakar Konstitusionalitas Penundaan dan/atau Pemotongan Anggaran Transfer ke Daerah dalam UU APBN M Beni Kurniawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1945

Abstract

 Provisions regarding delays and/or withholding of transfers to regions by the Government in the APBN Law create problems when they are considered to create legal uncertainty regarding finances, which should be the domain of regional governments. This study aims to analyze: the constitutional urgency of the existence of a transfer budget to the regions from the center and the suitability of the sanctions for delaying and/or cutting budget transfers to the areas in the APBN Law. The study results show that transfers to the regions are a form of constitutional embodiment in the form of handing over financial resources to the areas as an actualization of effective fiscal decentralization. However, in practice, some regions do not comply with budget allocations, so the implications for regional financial management are not on target. On the other hand, the provision of sanctions for delaying and/or withholding funds transfers to the regions is in line with the financial construction of the unitary state with a decentralized system. This has also been strengthened through Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-XVI/2018.
Problematika Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya Adam Ilyas; Dicky Eko Prasetio
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1943

Abstract

The position of the Constitutional Court Regulation (PMK) in the hierarchy of laws and regulations is not strictly regulated, so it is not known where it is located, or which institution has the right to conduct a judicial review of it. Therefore, this study will examine three things, namely: (i) the position of PMK; (ii) the implications of PMK that have not been promulgated; and (iii) the institution entitled to conduct a judicial review of PMK. The research method used is the normative legal research method. The result is that PMK has a "conditional" position equivalent to a presidential regulation because it has the same function. Despite having the same "conditional" position, the PMK has so far not been able to be tested by any institution because it has not been promulgated in the State Gazette, which should also imply that it cannot bind the public. Therefore, PMK should be promulgated in the State Gazette to bind the public, and the institution entitled to examine it is the Supreme Court. That way, the parties to the proceedings at the Constitutional Court will obtain legal certainty and protection.
Relevansi Monisme dan Dualisme Bagi Pemberlakuan Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia Intan Permata Putri; Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum; Ananthia Ayu Devitasari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1934

Abstract

The application of treaty is still influenced by different views on the approach chosen by Indonesia, whether monism or dualism. By using normative method, this study questions the relevance of monism-incorporation and dualism-transformation approaches in determining the application of treaty. Two key aspects will be reviewed, namely parliamentary approval and the drafting of national regulations to implement treaty. It concludes that the dichotomy of monism and dualism has various limitations, and is irrelevant for determining the application of treaty. Parliamentary approval is required for treaty application, both in monist and dualist countries. Several dualist countries have even sought parliamentary approval before ratification can take place. The formulation of national regulations is common in monist and dualist countries. Not to fulfill theoretical demands in line with the monism and dualism approaches, but to ensure harmonization and the ability of state to carry out its obligations.
Evaluasi Proses Amendemen Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945: Perspektif Habermasian Costantinus Fatlolon
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1944

Abstract

This article evaluates the amendment process of the 1945 Constitution conducted by the MPR from 1999 to 2002. The theoretical framework used is Jürgen Habermas’s theory of law and democracy. By employing an expositive-critical-reconstructive approach, this article argues the amendment of the 1945 Constitution was inclusive but not participatory because the process was more dominated by the MPR and it did not include the active participation of ordinary citizens, including civil society groups, the mass media, and radical groups in the society. The remedy to this problem is for the MPR to institutionalize ideal conditions of deliberative democracy that grant publicity, transparency, civic participation, and rational communication between the executive body and citizens in every phase of the constitutional amendment process.
Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi Fitra Arsil; Qurrata Ayuni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk19410

Abstract

In general, the Constitutional Court has the view that political parties that have seats in the DPR and/or members of the DPR already have legislative space and do not have the legal standing to review laws. However, there are a number of exceptions in many cases where political parties and members of the DPR are considered to have a special position even though they are also discussing the passed laws. This paper discusses the jurisprudential pattern of the Constitutional Court in granting special legal status to political parties and members of the DPR. Using the case approach method in collaboration with the comparison method this paper seeks to map the potential for testing with specific constitutional rights. The findings in this paper reinforce the concept that although the results of law formation in the legislature and legal review in the judiciary are equally binding for citizens, the process of law formation and legal review has a different character and these differences are beneficial within the framework of checks and balances.
Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rumawi Rumawi; Udiyo Basuki; Mellisa Towadi; Supianto Supianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1933

Abstract

This article aims to analyze legal subjects whose rights have been violated by the Fiduciaire Act. The Act law can be revoked by the Constitutional Court. The act that violates the rights of subjects is the rule in the provisions of parate executie on Fiduciaire Act. The first analysis is the ontology of parate executives that inflict certain subjects, and the second analysis is the ratio decidendi decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This paper uses dogmatize analysis. The decisions of the Constitutional Court are analyzed with the doctrine of experts and regulations. Parate execution is a right attached to the recipient fiduciary which can exercise if the fiduciary giver breaks the commitment. Collateral is auctioned through a public offering submitted by the recipient of guarantee. Default by a fiduciary giver occurs if there is an agreement between the giver and the fiduciary recipient. Default occurs based on legal remedies in determining the default. The agreement of the collector with the fiduciary acquirer, the emergence of a broken pledge experienced by the fiduciary giver can give birth to a parate executie.
Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia Catur Alfath Satriya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1932

Abstract

One of the features of the presidential system is the process of presidential impeachment. Before the amendment, Indonesia did not have a clear mechanism to impeach the president in the middle of his term. The impeachment of the president is determined by a majority vote in the People’s Consultative Assembly. This is a problem because the impeachment of the president only uses a political process, and there is no legal process in it. After the amendment, the presidential impeachment concept was born that in a presidential system, the president cannot be dismissed only through a political process; there must be a legal process before the political process. Based on the analysis, the process of presidential impeachment in Indonesia does not follow the principle of checks and balances. This is because the impeachment process for the president in Indonesia does not involve the second chamber in the process

Page 51 of 54 | Total Record : 540

 49   50   51   52   53 

Filter by Year

2015 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue