cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 540 Documents
 48   49   50   51   52 
Relevansi Teori Oplossing dalam Penanganan Sengketa Terkait Keputusan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Paulus Rudy Calvin Sinaga; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1928

Abstract

The Indonesian State Administrative Court has applied the oplossing theory, where claims related to disputes over the procurement of government goods or services are considered to be merged in the civil realm so that they are assumed to be not authorized to handle the dispute. This research is normative juridical research by comparing the practice of handling cases of government procurement of goods and services in the Indonesian State Administrative Court, the Constitutional Court, and the French Administrative Court. Research shows that there are inconsistencies in the Indonesian state administrative court regarding the interpretation of the oplossing theory after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, while in France, the plaintiff can file a lawsuit in the form of annulment of administrative decisions related to the procurement of government goods and services or a compensation claim. The implication of eliminating the oplossing theory is that a third party can file a claim for compensation against a dispute over the procurement of government goods and services in the state administrative court in accordance with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XVI/2018 regarding the grace period for filing a lawsuit by a third party.
Konsistensi Pembuatan Norma Hukum dengan Doktrin Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Judicial Review Bagus Surya Prabowo; Wiryanto Wiryanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1925

Abstract

This study intends to explain the consistency of the Constitutional Court (MK) in making new legal norms by using the doctrine of judicial activism and to explain the factors that underlie the consistency of the Constitutional Court in making new legal norms through normative juridical research by explaining the principles, principles, and analysis of interrelated decisions. This study concludes that the Constitutional Court is inconsistent because it only grants and makes new legal norms in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 5/PUU-V/2007. Meanwhile, in the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 53/PUU-XV/2017, the Constitutional Court refused to make a new norm even though the two cases created discrimination and limited public participation in politics. The inconsistency factors include: 1) jurisprudence factors, 2) the application cannot convince the majority of the judges of the Constitutional Court, and 3) the paradigm factor of judges.
Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perlindungan Hak Pilih dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis Agusniwan Etra
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk19210

Abstract

The involvement of ex-convicts in political contests sparked a discourse on human rights and their protection by the Constitutional Court. This paper will answer constitutional dynamics of these rules through the decisions of the Constitutional Court. This research uses normative-legal method. The result shows that since the beginning, the regulation has been declared conditionally unconstitutional, but the requirements and implementation of it have developed in subsequent decisions. The Court has determined four constitutional requirements cumulatively in the form of not being revoked by a court decision; limited to a period of 5 (five) years; admits being a former convict openly and honestly; and not as a recidivist. The Court changed its stance that the requirement applies alternatively if there is an honest and open acknowledgment as an ex-convict, then other conditions are no longer needed. However, in its final decision, the Court restored the validity of the previous four cumulative conditions. 
Perluasan Makna Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dian Ayu Widya Ningrum; Al Khanif Al Khanif; Antikowati Antikowati
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1942

Abstract

Public participation is intended the idea of forming laws and regulations does not always have to come from the power holders only, but can emerge from the society. This paper aims to determine the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision Number 91 PUU XVIII 2020 on the formation of laws in Indonesia, especially in accommodating public participation which is limited to two main issues. First, how is the form of expanding the meaning of public participation in the Constitutional Court’s decision Number 91 PUU XVIII 2020. Second, what is the impact of expanding the meaning of public participation in the formation of laws. This doctrinal legal research uses secondary data. The results of the study show that the form of expanding the meaning of public participation in the Constitutional Court’s decision Number 91 PUU XVIII 2020 is carried out in a meaningful way, by providing guarantees of participation for affected communities and the impact of expanding the meaning of public participation in the formation of laws, namely changing the paradigm of law formation, improvement of regulations and strengthening of public participation as a basis for formal testing.
Positive Legislature dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Upaya Hukum Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Catur Alfath Satriya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1949

Abstract

Constitutional Court as negative legislature as time goes by has become positive legislature, recently Constitutional Court verdict Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 regarding Articel 235 examination from Bankruptcy Law and Debt Payment Postponement (PKPU) toward Indonesia’s Constitution (UUD NRI 1945), considered to cause constitutional losses because it does not regulate the existence of legal remedies against the PKPU verdict. This research aims to analyze the Judges consideration (ratio decidendi) of the Constitutional Court’s verdict regarding the legal remedies of PKPU verdict in accordance with the principles of justice and legal certainty and to analyze the enforcement of the Constitutional Court verdict regarding the legal remedies for the PKPU verdict which are positive legislation. This article used normative legal research method. The results of the study show that the progressivity in constructing the legal remedies in PKPU verdict with certain conditions (Conditionally Unconstitutional). The Constitutional Court’s decision which is final and binding in its implementation is not in accordance with the theory. It should be realized that in a decision that is self-executing, it still requires bureaucratic procedures to address the decision so that it can be implemented consistently in accordance with the principle of erga omnes.
The Relationship between DKPP and PTUN Decisions regarding Ethical Violation by General Election Administrators Ahmad Siboy; Dewi Cahyandari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1936

Abstract

The commissioner of the general election administration was discharged through the decision of the General Election Administrator Honorary Council (DKPP). The decision is not final and binding at the executive branch, considering that the decision can be cancelled by the Administrative Court. This study aims to define the authority of DKPP and PTUN in resolving ethical violations committed by election administrators and parse the implications and relationships of the decisions of the two institutions. This paper also proposes an ideal concept for the design of solving ethical violations of election administrators in the future. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results showed that the DKPP and PTUN have overlapping authority but with different decisions. DKPP purely adjudicates ethical issues, and the Administrative Court adjudicates the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the DKPP decision. To avoid conflicting decisions on cases that intersect, violations of the code of ethics in the future must be resolved with a settlement mechanism by the judiciary.
The Absence of Constitutional Court’s Decision Follow Up: Is it A Loss? Vera Wheni S. Soemarwi; Yeremia Wijaya; Arthuro Richie Gunawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk19310

Abstract

The establishment of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of constitution that protects the citizens’ human rights gives hope for the implementation of “rule of law” principle. The Constitutional Court is expected to play a big role in upholding and protecting the citizens’ constitutional rights through each of its decisions. This expectation has become meaningless since Article 59 (2) of Law Number 8/2011 is declared to have no binding legal force by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-IX/2011. What are the impacts of the elimination of Article 59 (2) which has been formulated in Law Number 7/2020? This research is socio legal studies that uses secondary data that are collected through literature study. The elimination of Article 59 (2) in Law Number 7/2020 shows violation of the rule of law principles. In addition, the legislation products which are legitimized based on Law Number 7/2020 are unable to guarantee the citizens’ constitutional rights.
The Legitimacy Death Penalty Application of Certain Conditions in the Anti-Corruption Law Rodes Ober Adi Guna Pardosi; Yuliana Primawardani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1938

Abstract

This article discusses the imposition of the death penalty as stipulated in article 2 paragraph (2) of the Corruption Eradication Law for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption that are deemed to be detrimental to the State and can have a wide impact on the lives of many people. In this case, there are many pros and cons related to the imposition of the death penalty as stipulated in article 2 paragraph (2) of the Corruption Eradication Law, especially in the sentence “Certain conditions” in that article which are related to the corruption of social assistance funds for handling Covid-19. Apart from that, this article is also considered to be against the Government’s obligations in the effort to respect, protect and fulfill human rights. This article concludes that this article cannot fulfill the juridical aspect of prosecuting corruption actors because it is not included in the requirements of “certain conditions” and is also considered unconstitutional because it is not in accordance with the constitution, which provides protection for a person’s right to life. The imposition of the death penalty has also been proven to be inappropriately used in eradicating corruption, as seen in the 2019 Corruption Perception Index.
The Proposal of Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1939

Abstract

The research focuses on the proposal of a Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court. The background causes of the constitutional weakness to protection and fulfilment of constitutional rights, especially the absence of a Constitutional Complaint mechanism. Research methods used normative legal research methods with statutory, analytical, and case approaches. The study results show that legal thinking, including an embodiment of the values of constitutionalism in the rule of law of Pancasila, complements a checks and balances system, the basis for protecting fundamental rights, and aims to realize good governance. There are several steps/ methods to giving this authority, amendments to the 1945 Constitution, non-original interpretations, and revision of the Constitutional Court Act. Several objects of dispute are the Court’s verdict, the problems of interpreting the 1945 Constitution and law by a state official, People Consultative Assembly decisions, and others.
Problematika Pengawasan Tindak Lanjut Putusan Bawaslu dan DKPP dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Rofi Aulia Rahman; Iwan Satriawan; Marchethy Riwani Diaz
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1948

Abstract

Bawaslu is tasked with supervising the implementation of Bawaslu and DKPP decisions which must be followed up by KPU. The contrary of that during general elections in 2019 has created complications in the electoral law enforcement system. The research is focused to determine the legal certainty of follow-up to Bawaslu and DKPP decisions and form and scope of Bawaslu’s supervision of the follow-up. This is a qualitative descriptive analytical research with a normative and empirical juridical approach. The results indicate that in the implementation of Bawaslu and DKPP decisions is no legal certainty. The Constitutional Court have statement that the final and binding of DKPP decision applies to KPU, Bawaslu and President and its implementation is monitored by Bawaslu. The Bawaslu Regulation also does not accommodate in detail the mechanism for monitoring the follow-up, so it is necessary to have the regulation specifically.

Page 50 of 54 | Total Record : 540

 48   49   50   51   52 

Filter by Year

2015 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue