cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 12, No 1 (2023)" : 4 Documents clear
Freedom Of Religion And Belief Under Supreme Court Verdict Study Case On Supreme Court Decision Number 17/P/HUM/2021 Zainal Amin Ayub; Ari Wirya Dinata; Nur Sulistyo Budi Ambarini; Pipi Susanti; Arie Elcaputera
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.1-28

Abstract

Freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) is one of the human rights stated in the 1945 Constitution. Article 29 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The recognition of religion guarantees the independence of each of its inhabitants to embrace their respective religions and to worship according to their religion or beliefs. The state guarantee on FoRB consists of assurance for the internal and external forums. Freedom to embrace religion or belief is an internal forum for everyone, an absolute right as regulated in ICCPR that Indonesia has also ratified. In fact, this provision is also regulated in Article 28 I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. The fulfillment of the right to FoRB is frequently discriminated against in Indonesia. The  issue of forcing to wear school uniforms with hijab for non-Muslim female students is still common in many public schools in Indonesia. The State has issued a joint decree (SKB) of 3 ministers to normalize the discriminatory status quo. However, the attempt to return it to its normal position was thwarted by the LKMM, which carried out the SKB test. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court (SC) canceled the SKB because schools have the right to carry out religious education and instilled values. The judges ratio decidendi made by the SC Justices were very dry from the perspective of freedom of religion or belief in canceling the 3 Ministerial Decrees. The judge saw the issue of forcing to wear hijab on non-Muslim students from the perspective of the majority religious thought without noticing that Indonesian society is very diverse. Therefore, the protection of the right to FoRB should also safeguard the religious minorities rights. This paper will examine decision made by judiciary power in term protecting the FoRB right. This verdict will be reviewing toward to justice consideration (ratio decedendi) and legal archicteture in filling the norm FoRB. Moreover, it will also appraise to judicial behavior based on breakfasting theory.
Indonesian Omnichannel Banking: How Far Do Governing Laws Protect Customer's Data Privacy Fontian Munzil; Nadisah Zakaria
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.29-56

Abstract

In the digital transformation era, banks have been working to implement a digital strategy that will lead to lower costs, better service, higher profitability, and the desired level of customer satisfaction. Utilising marketing technology for consumer engagement is essential to bringing in more customers without increasing costs. Omnichannel is the marketing strategy that offers more services to customers by having them interact with it across all available physical and digital channels at any time, resulting in higher customer satisfaction and loyalty. Customer data is significant information that may be used at any stage of the digital marketing process. The Protection of Personal Data Act of 2022 and the Act of Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector of 2023 govern consumer data protection at all stages of marketing activities, including data processing, profiling, and collaboration with other organisations. This study reviews how far the governing laws can protect consumer private data in utilisation in the company's digital marketing program to boost utilisation of the company's omnichannel approach. The study discovered that governing laws can protect the customer's private data in the banking omnichannel approach. Customer data are governed clearly and strongly by the regulations at all marketing program phases that could potentially be exploited, so both laws will be able to prevent illegal activities of customer data optimally in the future. Lastly, customer approval is critical for the Bank's use of all customer data.
Distribution Of Joint Properties According To Balanced Justice Principle M Ridwan; Gugun Gumilar; Amran Suadi; KN Sofyan Hasan; M Syaifuddin
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.57-76

Abstract

The structure of joint property divided governed by Law No. 1 of 1974, and the Compilation of Islamic Law must fully reflect the importance of justice and legal clarity. Based on that, the issue addressed in this journal is how to design a more reasonable and legally specific partition of the joint property after divorce for the community in the relevant marital law in the future. This study is categorized as legal-normative research. According to the study's findings, the future concept of joint property law reconstruction is to incorporate the principle of balanced justice based on Pancasila into Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law through amendments to Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The notion of balanced justice has been found in various Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court decisions. As a result, some of the legal rules in the joint property decision must be reviewed while developing joint property law regulations.
The Religious Court Trial Of Wali Adhal Cases In The Indonesian Legal System: A Legal Analysis Mardi Candra; Ramlani Sinaulan; Fahadil Al Hasan; Jelang Ramadhan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.77-96

Abstract

Marriage combines the husband-wife relationship and unifies two families of different ethnicities, cultures, and backgrounds. The consent of the wali is a significant function of the family, particularly the prospective bride's family. Marriage requires the permission of the wali because it is null and void without it. In actuality, the wali of the prospective bride may be hesitant to marry off the woman under his supervision for various reasons, both Shar'i and non-Shar'i. As a result, the prospective bride must apply to the Religious Court for wali adhal for the marriage to occur. This qualitative research employs a normative legal approach, which examines legal norms found in laws and regulations, judge judgments, and other legal sources. According to the findings of this study, wali adhal cases are currently evaluated by voluntary trials or unilaterally. However, because it is unilaterally assessed and there is no opponent, fulfilling the legal purpose of building integrative justice in this examination requires considerable effort. Therefore, wali adhal cases must be examined using a contentious trial.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue