cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Irfan Anshor
Contact Email
mhdirfananshori@gmail.com
Phone
+6285156722546
Journal Mail Official
mhdirfananshori@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Head Office : Jl. Sisingamangaraja Nomor 171 Kota Pematang Siantar, Sumatera Utara Editorial Office : Jl. Bilal Ujung, Kota Medan, Sumatera Utara
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Published by Yayasan Amanah Nur Aman
ISSN : 28303784     EISSN : 28300262     DOI : https://doi.org/10.58432/mahir
Core Subject : Education,
Education
MAHIR : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran memuat manuskrip atau naskah artikel dalam bidang penelitian pendidikan, praktik pembelajaran, dan hilirisasi hasil penelitian kuantitatif maupun kualitatif maupun pengembangan mencakup bidang keilmuan yang relevan mencakup: Teknologi pendidikan Lingkungan Pembelajaran Inovasi pembelajaran Pengembangan kurikulum Pendidikan Karakter Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Multikultural Manajemen Pendidikan Pengembangan Peserta Didik
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 48 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Analysis Of Factors That Influence Motivation In Learning Mathematics Hiftinia Finuya
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

  There are several reasons why education in Indonesia does not go according to plan. One of the reasons is the number of underdeveloped talents of students. This raises the question why it can happen. So one of the reasons is because there is no proper motivation for students. For this reason, we investigated what factors influence students' motivation in learning mathematics at the location of SMP Negeri 2 Binjai, precisely in class IX-1 which consists of 15 students to see what factors influence their learning motivation in learning mathematics. By using quantitative research methods by giving questionnaires to respondents so that research data are in the form of numbers and analysis using pie charts. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there were several factors that influenced the motivation in learning mathematics for class IX-1 students of SMP Negeri 2 Binjai. These factors include: the ideals or aspirations of students, interests, the role and position of the teacher in teaching students, the desire and willingness to learn, learning expectations, praise from the teacher, and interest in the material/lesson. So, based on these factors, it is known that the types of motivation possessed by class IX-1 students of SMP Negeri 2 Binjai are Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Motivation
Differences In The Ability To Understand Mathematical Concepts And Problem Solving Of Students Who Are Taught With The Cooperative Learning Model Dini Pratiwi Desy
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1) the difference in the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students who were given the STAD type cooperative learning model with students who were given the CTL learning model; 2) Differences in mathematical problem solving abilities of students who were given the STAD type cooperative learning model with students who were given CTL learning model; 3) the difference in the ability to understand concepts and solve mathematical problems of students who were given the STAD type cooperative learning model with students who were given the CTL learning model; 4)Interaction between STAD and CTL cooperative learning models on students' mathematical problem-solving and conceptual understanding skills This research is a quantitative research with quasi-experimental type. The population is all students of class X MAN 2 Model 2018/2019 school year. The sample in this study was class X IPA-2 as a class taught with the CTL learning model. The data were obtained from the post test with 5 questions for the concept understanding ability test and 5 questions for the students' mathematical problem solving ability test. The data were analyzed descriptively and using the two way ANAVA test technique and continued with the Tuckey test.Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it was obtained: 1) there were differences in the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students who were given the STAD cooperative learning model and students who were given the CTL learning model; 2) THERE are differences in the ability of solving mathematical problems of students who were given the STAD type cooperative learning model with students who were given the CTL learning model; 3) there are differences ability in solving mathematical concepts and problems of students who were given the STAD type cooperative learning model with students who were given the CTL learning model; 4) there is not significant interaction between the STAD and CTL cooperative learning models on students' mathematical problem-solving and conceptual understanding abilities.
Differences Of Reciprocal Teaching And Problem Solving Learning On Mathematics Reasoning Ability And Mathematic Representation Maysarah Piliang
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in learning Reciprocal Teaching and Problem Solving on the ability to reason and mathematical representation in Mathematics Statistics Class XI MAS Al-Washliyah Tembung 2018/2019 Academic Year. This research is a quantitative research, which is a quasi-experimental research type. The population of all students in class XI totaling 60 students, experiment 1 sampled 30 students and experiment 2 also 30 students. The test instrument used is a mathematical reasoning ability test and a representation ability test, each of which consists of 5 questions in the form of descriptions. The results of the F test analysis contained in the summary of ANOVA results, obtained the value of F count = 0.439 and F table at the level (α = 0.05) = 3.923. The findings of the population Fcount < Ftable, then there are differences in reasoning abilities and mathematical representation abilities between students who are taught by learning Reciprocal Teaching and learning Problem Solving in Statistics. The mathematical representation ability of students who are taught by learning Reciprocal Teaching is better than students who are taught by learning problem solving on circle material in class XI MAS Al Washliyah Tembung.
Development Of Mathematics Learning Module Using Inquiry Method Based On Etnomatematics Ikke Maldina Tanjung
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to develop a product in the form of a Mathematics Learning Module with the step of completion of the Inquiry Method and associated with Ethno in North Sumatra, especially Medan, researchers raised buildings in North Sumatra, namely the Grand Mosque and Maimun Palace. The teaching material presented by the researcher is Trigonometry for class XI MA/SMA students. The subjects in this study were students of class XI• MIA 2 MAN 1 Medan. The procedure for developing the mathematics learning module in this study refers to the 4D development model which is modified to become 3D, namely: the definition stage (define), the planning stage (design), and the development stage (develop). The instruments used in this research are validation sheets to measure the validity of the developed learning modules, learning implementation assessment sheets and student response questionnaires as well as learning outcomes tests to measure the effectiveness of the learning modules. The learning module developed in this study was declared valid, based on the average module validation score of 4.65 which met the very good category, the teacher's assessment of the module was 4.6 in the very good category, and student responses in the very good category. This learning module has met the effective criteria based on the percentage of classical learning completeness of 83.3%
The Differences Of Reasoning Ability And Understanding Of Mathematics Concepts Teached With The CORE And CRH Learning Luly Febriani
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in mathematical reasoning abilities and understanding of mathematical concepts of students who are taught with the CORE learning model and the CRH learning model in class XI MAS Darul Akhirah. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research. The population in this study were all students of class XI MAS Darul Akhirah. The academic year 2020/2021 consisted of three classes and totaled 70 students. the sample in this study was class XI IPS 1 totaling 28 students and class XI IPS 2 totaling 27 students. the test instrument used to determine the reasoning ability and understanding of students' mathematical concepts by using a descriptive form test. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). the findings show : 1). Mathematical reasoning ability and understanding of mathematical concepts of students taught with the CORE learning model were not better than students taught with the CRH model in arithmetic sequences and series. obtained f count (3,307) < f table (3,93);2). the mathematical reasoning ability of students who are taught by the CORE learning model is not better than students who are taught by the CRH model, it is obtained that f count (2.481) < f table (4.023), 3). the ability to understand concepts taught by the CORE model is not better than students who are taught by the CRH model, it is obtained that f count (3.035) < f table (4.023). The conclusion in this study explains that there is no difference in mathematical reasoning ability and understanding of mathematical concepts of students who are taught with the CORE and CRH models.
Development Of Mathematics Learning Media Based On Macromedia Flash Muhammad Iqbal Nasution
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to develop mathematics learning media through macromedia flash on the material of a three-variable linear equation system in class X MA Pondok Pesantren Darul Qur'an. This study also aims to determine the practicality and effectiveness of the developed media. The teaching material presented by the researcher is a system of three-variable linear equations for class X students of MA Pondok Pesantren Darul Qur'an. The subjects in this study were students of class X MIA 3 MA Darul Qur'an Islamic Boarding School. This type of research is development research that refers to a 4D development model that is modified into 3D, namely: the definition stage, the design stage, and the develop stage. The instruments used in this study were validation sheets to measure the validity of the developed learning media, student response questionnaire sheets, teacher response questionnaire sheets, and learning outcomes tests. student. The learning media developed in this study was declared valid, based on the percentage score of eligibility by media experts, namely 75% and by material experts, namely 89% in the very feasible category. From the teacher response questionnaire data, it can also be seen that the teacher assesses the learning media as being very practical with reaching a percentage of 82.5%. And according to student responses, the learning media developed is included in the practical criteria with a percentage of 70%. The developed learning media has met the effective criteria based on the value of the hypothesis test carried out where, t count 14.12 and t table = 1.70. This shows that t count > t table (14.12 > 1.70). Based on the t-test criteria, then H0, rejected as well as accepted Ha. So the alternative hypothesis Ha which states "Development of learning media for mathematics on the subject of a linear equation system based on Macromedia Flash is effective for improving student learning outcomes in class X MA Darul Qur'an Islamic Boarding School T.P 2021- 2022" is accepted.
Differences In Communication Skills And Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities Of Students Who Are Taught Using A Jigsaw And Make Match Type Cooperative Learning Model Lamia Harahap
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in communication skills and mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught with jigsaw and make a match cooperative learning on cube and block material for class VIII MTs Nurul Islam Indonesia for the 2019-2020 school year. This research is a type of quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research. The population is all grade VIII students of MTs Nurul Islam Indonesia for the 2019-2020 academic year. The data analysis technique was carried out by analysis of variance (ANAVA). The results of these findings indicate: 1)The communication skills and mathematical problem solving skills of students who are taught using the jigsaw type cooperative learning model are better than students who are taught the make a match cooperative learning model. 2)The mathematical communication ability of students who are taught with the jigsaw type of cooperative learning model is better than the students who are taught by the make a match type of cooperative learning model. 3) The mathematical problem solving ability of students who are taught using the jigsaw cooperative learning model is not better than students who are taught the make a match cooperative learning model. 4) There is no significant interaction between the learning model used on students' mathematical problem solving and communication skills. The conclusions of this study explain that the communication skills and mathematical problem solving skills of students who are taught with the jigsaw type cooperative learning model are better than the make a match type cooperative learning model on the cube and block material of class VIII MTs Nurul Islam Indonesia for the 2019-2020 school year.
Differences In Students Problem Solving and Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills Using Problem Based Learning and Inquiry Models Siti Khodijah Nasution
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the difference between Problem Solving Ability and Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Students by Using Problem Based Learning and Inquiry Models. The assessment was carried out on the tenth grade students of SMA Private Nurul Islam Indonesia, Medan. The sample was determined by cluster random sampling. This research is a quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research, and the test instrument used in this research is in the form of a description. From the results of data research using Analysis of Variance (ANAVA), the findings show: 1). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of students who are taught using the Problem Based Learning model is better than students who are taught using the Inquiry model on SPLTV material seen in the value of Fcount = 10,480, and the value in Ftable at the level of (0,05) = 4,001. This means that Fcount > Ftable; 2). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of students who are taught using the Problem Based Learning model is better than students who are taught using the Inquiry model on SPLTV material seen in the Fcount = 8,574, and the value in Ftable at the level (0,05) = 4,001. This means that Fcount > Ftable; 3). Problem Solving Ability and Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of students who are taught with the Problem Based Learning model are not better than students who are taught with the Inquiry model on SPLTV material Fcount = 0.415, Ftable at level (0.05) = 3.920. This means that Fcount< Ftable. The conclusion of the study explains that there is no difference in Problem Solving Ability and Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of students who are taught with Problem Based Learning and Inquiry Learning Models.
Differences In Mathematic Problem Solving Ability and Creative Thinking Of Students Teached With Realistic Mathematic Education Learning Models and Problem Solving Maisyaroh
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1)Differences in problem solving abilities and mathematical creative thinking of students who are taught using realistic mathematical education learning models and students who are taught using problem solving learning models; 2)Differences in mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught using realistic mathematical education learning models with students who are taught using problem solving learning models; 3)Differences in students' mathematical creative thinking abilities who are taught using realistic mathematical education learning models with students who are taught using problem solving learning models.This type of research is a quasi-experimental. The population in this study were all students of MAS Pondok Pesantren Darul Qur'an. The sample in this study was class XI IIK 1 as a class that was taught using a problem solving learning model and class X IIK 2 as a class that was taught using a realistic mathematical education learning model. The data were obtained from the post-test with 5 questions for the problem-solving ability test and 5 questions for the students' mathematical creative thinking ability. The data were analyzed descriptively and using the Two Way ANOVA technique and continued with the Tuckey test.Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it is obtained: 1)There are differences in problem solving abilities and mathematical creative thinking of students who are taught using realistic mathematical education learning models with students who are taught using problem solving learning models; 2)There are differences in the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught using a realistic mathematical education model with students who are taught using a problem solving learning model; 3)There are differences in the mathematical creative thinking ability of students who are taught using a realistic mathematical education model with students who are taught using a problem solving learning model.
Differences Of Reasoning Ability And Mathematical Representation Using Jigsaw Learning And Student Facilitator Merisa Ammelia Sari
Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yana Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the reasoning abilities and mathematical representation abilities of students who are taught using Jigsaw learning and Student Facilitator and Explaining learning in class X SMA PAB 6 Helvetia TP. 2019-2020.This research is a type of quantitative research with a quasi-experimental type of research. The population is all students of class X SMA PAB 6 Helvetia TP. 2019-2020. The samples in this study were class X MIA-1 and class X MIA-2. The data analysis technique used normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test using analysis of variance (ANAVA). These findings show: 1)The reasoning ability and mathematical representation ability of students taught by Jigsaw learning are better than students taught by Student Facilitator and Explaining learning, 2)Mathematical reasoning abilities of students taught by Jigsaw learning are not better than students taught by by learning Student Facilitator and Explaining, 3)The ability of mathematical representation of students who are taught by learning Jigsaw is better than students taught by learning of Student Facilitator and Explaining, 4)There is no significant interaction between the learning model used on reasoning ability and mathematical representation ability student.The conclusion of this study explains that the reasoning ability and mathematical representation ability of students taught by Jigsaw learning are better than students taught by Student Facilitator and Explaining learning in class X SMA PAB 6 Helvetia TP. 2019-2020.

Page 1 of 5 | Total Record : 48

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2022 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 2 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran