cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Lukman Santoso
Contact Email
info@lpkd.or.id
Phone
+6283108502368
Journal Mail Official
info@lpkd.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum. Bumi Pucanggading, Jln. Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Kelurahan Batursari, Mranggen , Kab. Demak, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Published by Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen
ISSN : 30466172     EISSN : 30465656     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen. Jurnal ini adalah Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Hukum, Ilmu Politik, dan Ilmu Humaniora. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 4 kali setahun: Maret, Juni, September dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora" : 5 Documents clear
Tindakan Hukum Yang Di Lakukan Oleh Pelaku Usaha Terkait Kerugian Yang Di Akibatkan Oleh Orderan Fiktif Moh Aditya Adjara; Mutia Cherawaty Thalib; Dolot Alhasni Bakung
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.131

Abstract

The purpose of this study leads to legal action that can be done by business actors related to losses caused by fictitious orders and legal protection against business actors in online buying and selling transactions Cash on Delivery (COD) payment methods. This type of research is a juridical normative research that leads to legal norms, legal principles and using the statute approach (legislation) and supported by the fact approach (the Fact Approach) and conceptual approach (concept approach). The results of the study that the form of legal protection against business actors who are harmed by consumers is in the form of compensation and/or sanctions against consumers when consumers still do not replace the losses as intended. Although Chapter 13 of the UUPK does not specify criminal sanctions against consumers in particular, this does not mean that consumers can avoid criminal sanctions. Criminal sanctions can be imposed against consumers if the consumer's actions have met the criminal elements. The legal action of business actors against consumers who make fictitious orders can then implement the principle of strict liability, business actors who feel aggrieved over the actions of consumers who are not responsible for the goods that have been ordered can demand compensation or compensation without having to dispute the presence or absence of elements of error on the part of consumers. The threat of punishment obtained against consumers who are proven to have committed fraud will be subject to imprisonment for a maximum of four years in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code.. Therefore, it should pay more attention to legal certainty regarding legal protection not only to consumers but also to business actors. Because basically losses can not only be experienced by consumers but can also be experienced by business actors.
Status Hukum Atas Tanah Yang Belum Bersertifikat Yang Sementara Disengketakan Oleh Ahli Waris dan Masyarakat Desa Tolitehuyu Kecamatan Monano Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara Ferawati Potonuo; Nur Mohammad Kasim; Moh. Taufik Z. Sarson
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.134

Abstract

This research aims to find out the legal status of uncertified land that is disputed by the heirs and the community of Tolitehuyu village, Monano District, North Gorontalo Regency and to find out the form of legal settlement by the Tolitehuyu Village Government regarding disputed uncertified land. This research uses empirical methods. The results of this research show that the legal status of land ownership by the people of Tolitehuyu Village, Monano District, North Gorontalo Regency, some have a certificate and some do not have a certificate for the land they own. Where those who already have a legal status certificate are already the property of that community. Furthermore, for those who do not yet have a certificate, the legal status of their land is unclear or still weak. So the legal status must be registered with the National Land Agency of North Gorontalo Regency in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws. The role of the Tolitehuyu Village Government in resolving uncertified land disputes in the community can be achieved by mediating through an intermediary called a modiator. The process of resolving land disputes by the Tolitehuyu Village Government is carried out in stages, namely submitting a complaint to the hamlet head, head The village presents the parties to the dispute, collects data, mediates and reads the decision.
Konsistensi Tuntutan Jaksa Dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dilihat Dari Asas Dominis Litis. Anatasya Awalia S. Hasan; Fence M. Wantu; Julisa Aprilia Kaluku
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.136

Abstract

Criminal disparity refers to dissenting judgments regarding the same criminal act or one that possesses dangerous characteristics, both of which can be compared without clear justification. This research aims to understand and analyze whether the existence of disparities in prosecution can fulfill the legal perspectives’s objectives and to identify and analyze the factors causing disparities in prosecution in Cases Number: 176/Pid.B/2019/PN Gto and Cases Number: 163/Pid.B/2019/PN Gto by using a normative research method with a case approach. The technique employed involves a literature review supported by descriptive analysis a supplementary method. The research findings are as follows: firstly, in both verdicts, Number 176/Pid.B/2019.PN Gto and Number 163/Pid.B/2019/PN Gto, it is observed that they still do not fully meet the legal perspective’s objectives because there are legal objectives that remain unfulfilled. Secondly, both verdicts contain factors influencing the occurrence of disparities in prosecution, including the consequences caused, considerations from the prepator’s prespective, personal factors, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and the extent of the losses incurred.
Tuntutan Jaksa Terhadap Pencemaran Nama Baik Pasca Putusan MK Ria Beu; Fence M wantu; Jufryanto Puluhulawa
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.139

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the demands of prosecutors at the Bone Bolango district attorney's office regarding defamation on social media and to determine the factors that influence the disparity in prosecutors' demands at the Bone Bolango district attorney's office regarding criminal acts of defamation on social media. The research method used is a type of empirical research, namely a legal research method that functions to see the law in real terms and examine how the law works in society. The results of the research obtained regarding the prosecutor's demands at the Bone Bolango District Prosecutor's Office regarding defamation on social media, there is a disparity in the demands therein, where in the same case the level of material is the same, but the prosecution in both cases is too far apart, this is caused by several factors. These include social reasons, trial facts and statutory regulations. The conclusion that there is a disparity in sentences demanded by public prosecutors was never intended to eliminate the difference in the amount of punishment for criminals, but rather to reduce the range of differences in sentences imposed because this disparity which is too far is contrary to justice and law enforcement and has an impact on the wider community.
Analisis Proses Hukum Yang Dapat Dijalani Oleh Content Creator Untuk Menegakkan Hak Orisinalitas Pandito Malim Hasayangan Tanjung; Zalzabila Agnia Husna
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.145

Abstract

In the turbulent digital era, originality rights have become a crucial issue for content creators. This article analyzes the legal process that content creators can undergo to enforce their originality rights. The first step in this process is proving copyright ownership, which involves gathering strong evidence of the original ownership of the work. After that, content creators can apply for a cease and desist order against the infringing party, as a preventive measure before entering the judicial stage. If the injunction is ineffective, the content creator can take further legal steps by filing a civil suit in court. In addition, content creators can also utilize alternative dispute resolution such as mediation or arbitration. Cross-border cooperation and international agreements are also important in the protection of originality rights at a global level. Understanding these legal processes is important for content creators to ensure that their works are respected and protected in the ever-evolving digital environment.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora