cover
Contact Name
Alvyn C. Hendriks
Contact Email
ahendriks@unai.edu
Phone
+6281312468128
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.koinonia@unai.edu
Editorial Address
Jalan Kol. Masturi No 288, Parongpong 40559 Kab. Bandung Barat
Location
Kab. bandung barat,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Koinonia : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia
ISSN : 20860935     EISSN : 23385960     DOI : prefix 10.35974/koinonia
Jurnal Koinonia is the research journal prepared for those who want to broaden their knowledge in the area of Biblical and Theological studies. In line with this intent, Koinonia welcomes articles coming both from national and international writers. Below is the scope of this journal: Systematic and Historical Theology, Applied Theology (Missiology, Ministry, Leadership and Management), Biblical Studies: Old Testament, New Testament, Pastoral Counseling and Christian Education.
Articles 119 Documents
STUDENT PERCEPTION ON THE SPIRIT OF PROPHECY AT ADVENTIST ACADEMY IN EAST NUSA TENGGARA Reymand M. Hutabarat
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 1 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (119.206 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i1.188

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine the perception of students on thespirit of prophecy at Adventist Academy at East Nusa Tenggara. The study isdescriptive and used descriptive statistics to present based on tables of meansdistribution for the responses of personal characteristic, spirit of prophecy perceptionand students motivation with respect to demographic profile of the respondents. Ftestused to see if there is a significant difference in the answers of the respondentbased on the school they attended. Based on the result of the study, it can beconcluded that the respondent have good personal characteristics, they also havegood perception on the Spirit of Prophecy and finally the students are motivated tohear the word of God from the bible, spirit of prophecy writing, sermon at churchand would like to share to others, and believe on Jesus second coming as Lord andSavior.
ANALISA FRASE ”TO AKATHARTON PNEUMA” DALAM LUKAS 11:24-26 Gerry C.J. Takaria
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (137.046 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.189

Abstract

Dalam dunia ini selalu ada dua kuasa yang berjuang untuk mempengaruhimanusia, kuasa kegelapan melawan kuasa terang Ilahi. Kuasa kegelapan yaitu setandan para pengikutnya bekerja untuk memastikan manusia memperoleh kebinasaanyang pasti. Kuasa terang Ilahi yaitu Roh Kudus bekerja untuk melindungi danmemimpin manusia untuk memperoleh hubungan yang sejati dengan Allah. Manusiatidak dapat mengelak apakah akan berada di bawah kuasa kegelapan atau terang Ilahi.Jika manusia tidak mau bekerja sama dengan Roh Kudus, maka secaraotomatis setan akan menguasai manusia dan menjadikannya sebagai rumahnya yangtetap. Manusia tidak perlu dengan sengaja menyerahkan diri kepada kekuasaan setansupaya dapat dikuasai oleh setan. Hanyalah cukup dengan melalaikan hubungandengan Roh Kudus maka setan akan bertahta di dalam hati manusia danmengendalikanya. Oleh karena itu manusia hanya memiliki satu pilihan,menyerahkan diri sepenuhnya kepada Kristus dan Roh-Nya, atau akan dikuasai olehpenguasa kegelapan itu. Tuhan Yesus menjelaskan hal ini melalui analogi“Kembalinya Roh Jahat” dalam Lukas 11:24-26.
DOSA ASAL: BERDASARKAN EKSEGESIS SURAT ROMA 5:12 - 21 Bartholomeus Diaz Nainggolan
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (211.827 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.190

Abstract

Because of Jesus, people can enjoy life to the fullest. Because of him,humans have a new chance in life. In contrast to a lot of people who do not knowJesus, man can experience the joy that remains, as it has a guarantee of eternalsalvation. Amid all the pressures and hardships of life, people can be relieved in thelove of God
HAWA: SI WANITA PERTAMA (EVE: THE FIRST WOMAN) Milton T. Pardosi
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (123.653 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.191

Abstract

Eve was the first woman who lived on this earth. She is the wife of Adamand created by God from Adam’s rib. In the life of Eve, especially before sin, shehad advantages that may never be owned by every woman who has ever lived on thisearth. But those advantages disappeared for she believed the words of Satan (Snake)rather than the word of God. The issue discussed in this paper is what the advantagesthat Eve had not shared by other women? Another thing is to discuss what thecauses of the fall of Eve into sin?The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the life of Eve before sin with theadvantages that she has and the reasons why she fell into sin. There are severallessons to be drawn from the life of Eve. At least she has ten special advantages.There are lessons, too, that can be drawn from either the cause of the fall of Eve andalso solutions for her. Those lessons are, first, do not let this life be alone without afriend. Second, do not walk to the place where there is temptation in it.Furthermore, do not argue with the temptation. Fourth, do not add or take away theWord of God. Next, do not give even a slightest attention to the devil or temptation.Sixth, do not make other people falls into sin. Seventh, all actions have a definiterisk. Finally, remain always to have hope although has fallen into sin.
SIGNIFIKANSI TANPA ALAS KAKI: SUATU PERSPEKTIF LAIN SEHUBUNGAN DENGAN MENANGGALKAN KASUT MUSA DARI KAKINYA DI TEMPAT KUDUS Alfonso Tarigan
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.858 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.192

Abstract

The significance of removing Moses’ sandals from his feet has beenunderstood differently. First, it is to signify an act of respect and politeness. Secondis to denote an act of keeping cleanliness or purity. This paper does not discuss thedifferent opinions nor give a comprehensive answer to the significance of the action.Instead, it tries to look the performance based on some other possible lights.The lights from studying the text, context, and its relations to Passover, Sinai,and sanctuary services show that Moses’ act at the mount of Horeb contains moralpurpose. God wants Moses to depend on Him fully in order he can be successful indoing the appointed task from God, that is, to deliver the Israelites from theEgyptian’s bondage. This is to implies that the same principle prevail upon us todayin order to be successful doing God’s work.
THE INCOMMUNICABLE NATURES OF GOD: A BIBLICAL UNDERSTANDING Reymand M. Hutabarat
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (42.235 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.193

Abstract

God has some basic attributes that make Him different from angels,human beings and all others created beings. There are six divine attributeswhich belong to God Himself and cannot be communicable to other being. Theyare: Omnipresence, Omniscience, Omnipotence, Immutability, Self existence,and Eternal. The result of this study shows that God is present everywhere inHis creation. The unchangeable nature of God guarantees that what He hasproposed will be fulfilled by Him, for it is impossible for Him to lie; The everpresent nature of God assures His people of His continued accompaniment to betheir “help and shield;” His eternal and all-powerful nature assure His people ofHis power to raise the dead from the graves and to give them eternal life, thatthey will never die; The all-knowing, all-powerful, ever-present , unchangeable,and eternal natures of God assure His people of their present needs and of theirwelfare in the world to come; Only “he who believes in the Son has eternal life;but he who does not obey the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideson him.
TIGA DIMENSI DASAR RELASI MANUSIA DALAM KEHIDUPAN SOSIAL Stimson Hutagalung
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (49.503 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v7i2.194

Abstract

Early relationships in the life of humans as social beings generally begin inthree dimensions: family, marriage and friendship. The family is the corerelationships in the social institutions of mankind because families formedcommunity and nation. Marriage is a relationship that is the closest, most intimate inhuman relations area and the most ideal relationship among other relationship. Bibleuses the marital relationship to symbolized God's relationship with His people, Christas the bridegroom and his church as the bride. As social beings, friendship relation isa necessity. Friendship is a reciprocal relationship between individuals who each ofone will build relation one another.
ANALISIS KONSEP PENGEMBALIAN PERSEPULUHAN OLEH KARYAWAN RUMAH SAKIT ADVENT BANDUNG YANG BERGEREJA DI JEMAAT CIHAMPELAS BANDUNG BERDASARKAN MALEAKHI 3:10 Yultrismen Simanungkalit; Milton T. Pardosi
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 8 No 1 (2016): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (80.635 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v8i1.2262

Abstract

In this survey, the author examined the understanding of the concept of returning based on Malachi 3:10. The author focuses the research on employees of Adventist Bandung Hospital who are members of Jemaat Cihampelas Bandung. The survey is based on four main indicators, namely; theology of tithing, the purpose of returning tithe; how to calculate the tithe, and the meaning of “storehouse.”Frequently there are still some people who do not understand these issues, as the consequences, the concept of returning tithe is not practiced well. This study is divided into two parts, namely the study of the theory and field research. The results of theoretical research on the concept of returning tithe based on Malachi 3:10 is divided into three parts: First, the theology of tithe, tithe God's possession and must be returned to Him for it belongs to Him. The purpose is to be used for God’s work. The second, the purpose of this a statement of appreciation for the unselfish and help the servants of God to preach the gospel to the whole world. The third is how to calculate tithe? This calculated from the gross income figure, for example, shops, shoe companies, store pharmacies. And net income, for example, is pastors, mission employees, and government officials(permanent workers or employees). The fourth “storehouse” namely, the tithe is given where a member is served by ministers or pastors a church where a member regularly attends its worship. The results of field research conducted through a questionnaire distributed to employees of Bandung Adventist Hospital church that are members of Jemaat Cihampelas Bandungwhich produces an average of data that respondents understand well the theology of tithe. Results of research on the purpose of tithe to the average price of respondents understand well but, in P5 with the statement that the tithe is given to others in responding to ministry hesitation. Third, regarding the storehouse that is the tithe is given where members are served by servants of God with the tithe P8 that we should give to the church in our homeland, the results of this research they replied with hesitation. Results of research on how to calculate the tithe to the average of respondents are still undecided understand this with P6 statement that tithing should we give to a church in our homeland
ANALISIS TEOLOGIS PEMAHAMAN GMAHK JEMAAT BARUS JULU TENTANG INTERPRETASI “MENGHUJAT ROH KUDUS” BERDASARKAN MARKUS 3:28,29 O Wilden Efransa Ginting
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 8 No 1 (2016): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (146.993 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v8i1.2265

Abstract

In this study, the author examines the understanding of blaspheming the Holy Spiritis based on Mark 3:28, 29. The author of this research focuses on the Seventh-dayAdventists Church of Barus Julu, Karo. The study has a base with three mainindicators, namely; the role of the Holy Spirit, the concept of blasphemy of the HolySpirit and not be forgiven forever.This study is divided into two parts, namely the study of the theory and fieldresearch. The results of the study of the theory is about the role and work of theHoly Spirit, the concept and definition of blasphemy of the Holy Spirit never hasforgiveness forever and is guilty of an eternal sin.This study includes three parts: (1) What is the role and work of the Holy Spirit.Some experts say that the role of the Holy Spirit at the end of this age are verynumerous and important. Some of the Holy Spirit's role is very important of which isto help the saints in prayer, giving a new heart, give the gift of the Spirit, which leadsto Truth, helper and comforter, sensitize and convince; (2) Definition of blasphemyof the Holy Spirit. Experts claim that blaspheming the Holy Spirit that is resistingthe Holy Spirit works continuously and when the Holy Spirit had retreated fromhumans, so there is no repentance on human; (3) Never has forgiveness forever andis guilty of an eternal sin. The only unpardonable sin is blaspheming the Holy Spirit.The results of field research conducted through a questionnaire distributed to 34members of the church Seventh-day Adventist Church congregation Barus Julu,Karo, where the questionnaire contains 27-points statement generates a data it can beconcluded that the respondents have a poor understanding well in answering the firstindicator in a statement 3, 4 about the work Fatherhood different and in indicatorsboth in the statement 12 of blaspheming the Holy Spirit differ with blaspheming Godthe Father and Jesus, in a statement 13 of blaspheming the Spirit Ghost is said thatthe work of the Holy Spirit is the work of Satan.
ANALISIS TUJUAN JAMUAN MAKAN BERSAMA SEBAGAI SUATU METODE PENGINJILAN BERDASARKAN KISAH PARA RASUL 2:46 DI JEMAAT PAKUSARAKAN CIMAHI BANDUNG Bistok Hasibuan; Stimson Hutagalung
Jurnal Koinonia Vol 8 No 1 (2016): Koinonia
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Advent Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2247.361 KB) | DOI: 10.35974/koinonia.v8i1.2266

Abstract

In this study, the author examines with a title is Analysis of the Purpose of EatingTogether as a Method of Evangelism Based on Acts 2:46 at Pakusarakan SDAChurch, Cimahi, Bandung. This research is conducted to know whether the purposeof eating together can be used as a method of evangelism or not? The Researcher haddistributed the list of questionnaires to 30 persons of the church member with 25statements are taken from the opinions of experts.Problem identification in this study is based on four indicators of questionsnamely: first, how about the purposes of eating in the Bible?; second, how thepurposes of eating together in the early church?; third, how the connection in theservice of the need for physical and the need for spiritual and what consequences ifavoid both of them in evangelism services?Based on observation through literature books, there are four indicators that the authoroffers namely: first, the purpose of eating in the Old Testament explained as eatingfor hospitality, eating is a sign of friendship, eating is an honor. The secondindicators are about the purpose of eating in the New Testament explained as eating isan honorary, eating is a sign of fellowship, eating is part of holistic services, eating isan instrument of reach in, eating is an instrument of reach out.The third indicators are the purpose of eating together in the early Church namelyeating together is to build up brotherly love, eating is as a sign of kindness of theheart, eating is to honor the quest, eating is to tighten or to maintain the fellowship,eating is to help the needy, eating is to remember the sacrifice and the death of Jesus.The fourth indicators are about the connection in the service of the need for physical andthe need for spiritual and what consequences if avoid both of them in evangelismservices.This study is divided into two parts namely theoretical research and field research.The theory research about the purpose of eating in the Old Testament, the author foundthat eating is for hospitality; eating is a sign of friendship; eating is a sign of virtue.Then the theory research about eating in the New Testament, the author found that eatingis an honor, eating is a sign of fellowship; eating is part of holistic services, eating is atool to reach in and eating is a tool to reach out. The last theory of this study is aboutconnection in the service of physical needs and spiritual needs. The author concluded thatthe physical and spiritual needs are two types of needs that are connected to one another.Thus the service of physical needs and spiritual needs can not be ignored inevangelism service.The Research through questionnaires distributed, authors obtained the following data: 1. For the questionnaires were distributed about the purpose of eating in the OldTestament, the authors noticed that 30 respondents have a good answer.2. For the questionnaires about statement of the purpose of eating in the NewTestament, the authors noticed that 30 respondents also have a good answer.3. For the questionnaires on the purpose of eating together in the early church, 30respondents have a good answer.4. For the questionnaires about the connection in the service of the need for physicaland the need for spiritual, 30 participators also have a good answer.Thus the results of 30 respondents answer Pakusarakan church of all thestatements from each indicator are offered, the authors concluded that all therespondents have a very positive answer that the answer category is strongly agreeand agree.

Page 4 of 12 | Total Record : 119