cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Published by Kementerian Pertanian
ISSN : 02164361     EISSN : 25802674     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi (FAE) adalah media ilmiah komunikasi penelitian yang berisi review, gagasan, dan konsepsi orisinal bidang sosial ekonomi pertanian, mencakup sumber daya, agribisnis, ketahanan pangan, sosiologi, kelembagaan, perdagangan, dan ekonomi makro.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi" : 5 Documents clear
PENGEMBANGAN USAHA INTEGRASI SAWIT SAPI: DUKUNGAN LEGISLASI DAN STAKEHOLDER Nyak Ilham; nFN Ashari; IGAP Mahendri; S. Wulandari
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v39n1.2021.1-9

Abstract

The area of oil palm plantations is now reaching 14.7 million hectares, and it is an opportunity for Indonesia to develop an integrated beef cattle industry with the oil-palm integrated system. However, the development of this system is not yet massive. The problem among others is the plantation area owned by the smallholder farmers which is not sufficient for grazing area. To formulate concentrate feeds for the cattle, farmers need supports from palm oil processing companies for its raw materials. This paper is prepared as a literature review aimed at analyzing the prospects and constraints, legal aspects, and stakeholders' role in developing cattle-oil palm integration. This paper concludes that there is ample opportunity to develop an oil palm-cattle integration system. Furthermore, oil palm industry development requires legal aspects, the number of farmers and companies, and the organizations. A policy is needed to develop an oil palm-cattle integration system, coordinated by the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs. The needed policies among others organizing smallholders involved in the integration system for easier access to technologies, extension, livestock health services, and access to feed raw materials such as palm kernel cake and sludge. Sustainability of oil palm-cattle integration efforts in the regions is needed to extend the status of current regulations regarding the integration system from Governor and Regency Regulations into Regional Regulations.
TINJAUAN KRITIS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HARGA GABAH DAN BERAS DI INDONESIA Rizka Amalia Nugrahapsari; Manuntun Parulian Hutagaol
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v39n1.2021.11-26

Abstract

The government intervened unhulled rice and rice price policies which requires a large budget and is faced by a trade off between protecting producers and consumers. There is also a rice trading system that has an interest in creating profits. This condition creates obstacles in achieving policy objectives. Objectives of this paper are (1) to analyze the effectiveness of unhulled rice and rice price policies and factors that affect policy effectiveness, (2) to formulate policy recommendations in minimizing side effects. Analysis using secondary data and literature review methods. Results showed that with support of other rice policies, price policy has achieved its goal of stabilizing prices and supporting economic stability. However, it is not yet effective enough to protect farmers' income, affordability of rice prices, and safeguard government rice reserves. Pricing policies need to be carried out selectively with a clear target date and be accompanied by policy instruments for farmer income and food consumption flexibility, as well as encouraging farmer independence. Farmers can be facilitated to choose profitable commodities supported by an information system, market access, credit policies, input subsidies and agricultural infrastructure such as irrigation.
THE PERFORMANCE OF THE UPSUS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ON RICE PRODUCTION AND FARMERS’ INCOME Adi Setiyanto
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v39n1.2021.27-47

Abstract

Padi merupakan komoditas pangan utama penduduk dan memiliki peran penting dalam perekonomian Indonesia. Pada tahun 2015 dilaksanakan Program Upsus oleh Kementerian Pertanian di 16 provinsi dan diperluas di 33 dari 34 provinsi di Indonesia pada 2016. Program Upsus telah dilaksanakan selama 5 tahun, namun demikian penelitian-penelitian mengenai kinerja pelaksanaan Program Upsus dari aspek peningkatan produksi dan pendapatan petani padi penerima program tidak banyak dilakukan.  Naskah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kinerja Program Upsus terhadap pencapaian target peningkatan produksi dan pendapatan usaha tani padi menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif dan difokuskan pada Provinsi Jawa Barat untuk mendapatkan gambaran implementasi secara nyata di lapangan. Program Upsus telah berhasil mempertahankan luas tanam padi dan mendorong peningkatan luas areal panen padi, tetapi tidak berhasil dalam mendorong pertumbuhan produktivitas dan peningkatan pendapatan petani padi. Dalam implementasi Program Upsus yang akan datang perlu diupayakan (1) mengembangkan perencanaan yang sistematis dan rinci berdasarkan evaluasi yang spesifik, komprehensif, dan terinci guna meningkatkan efektivitas pelaksanaan Program Upsus, (2) penguatan sistem penyuluhan pertanian dan peningkatan bantuan teknis untuk meningkatkan produktivitas dan kualitas padi dan beras yang dihasilkan, (3) melakukan perbaikan dan penguatan penyelenggaraan organisasi pelaksanaan Program Upsus mulai dari pusat hingga lokasi kegiatan, (4) menempatkan implementasi strategi pada fokus yang lebih besar untuk peningkatan produktivitas, baik melalui peningkatan penerapan paket teknologi budi daya pada usaha tani padi, maupun penurunan tingkat kehilangan hasil pada saat panen dan penanganan pascapanen, serta saat distribusi dan pemasaran, dan (5) mendorong peningkatan pendapatan petani dari usaha tani padi dan aktivitas penanganan panen dan pascapanen mereka.
KINERJA AGRIBISNIS MANGGA GEDONG GINCU DAN POTENSINYA SEBAGAI PRODUK EKSPOR PERTANIAN UNGGULAN Ening Ariningsih; nFn Ashari; Handewi P. Saliem; Mohamad Maulana; Kartika Sari Septanti
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v39n1.2021.49-71

Abstract

Gedong gincu mango is a specific mango variety in West Java Province, which has a high economic value and the prospect of being a superior export commodity of Indonesia. Despite its increasing production and high market prospect, gedong gincu mango agribusiness still faces various problems, both in on-farm and off-farm aspects. This paper aims to study the agribusiness of gedong gincu mango, covering both on-farm and off-farm aspects and export prospects. In general, gedong gincu mango farmers are small-scale farmers who practice traditional cultivation, harvest, and post-harvest management; are not yet market-oriented; practicing conventional marketing that relies on collecting traders, and have weak institutional. These conditions cause low productivity and diverse quality of gedong mango and are not continuously available throughout the year, which hinder the potential for wide-open exports from being appropriately utilized. It needs improvement in both on-farm and off-farm to improve the production and marketing of gedong gincu mango. At the on-farm level, efforts to increase competitiveness can be made by improving fruit production, productivity, quality, and continuity, by applying good agricultural practices. At the off-farm level, this can be done through improving facilities and infrastructures, institutions, and regulations. These efforts should involve all parties, including farmers (producers), marketing agents (collectors, traders, exporters), and policymakers.
KINERJA, KENDALA, DAN STRATEGI PROGRAM KREDIT USAHA RAKYAT SEKTOR PERTANIAN MASA DEPAN Rusli Burhansyah
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v39n1.2021.73-87

Abstract

Agricultural funding institutions need capital business. The challenge of the Agriculture Sector Public Credit Program is to increase reach program, institutional regulations, empowerment, and synergy. Some of the problems of the Agriculture Sector Public Program include low absorption rates, schemes, program coverage, assistance, and institutions. Policy recommendations among others; increase people business credit proposals agricultural, provide the people business credit scheme with a base and groups like the farmer's group, involving Agribusiness Micro Finance Institution and cooperatives, extending branch of the bank and the of a companion. Recommendations empowerment and synergies between other; addition and strengthening the role of Independent Smallholder Financing Facilitator, special programs the agricultural sector (people plantation and holder livestock) with the ceiling adjusted to the proposal, joint responsibility, business partner, Independent Smallholder Financing Facilitator in Sector Public Credit Program special enough important. Cooperation with the Field Agriculture Extension necessary for the socialization is at the farmer's group and gapoktan. The technical team's provincial and district role is to performance monitoring Independent Smallholder Financing Facilitator.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 39, No 2 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi : In Press Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 38, No 2 (2020): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 38, No 1 (2020): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 37, No 2 (2019): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 37, No 1 (2019): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 36, No 2 (2018): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 36, No 1 (2018): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 35, No 2 (2017): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 35, No 1 (2017): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 34, No 2 (2016): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 34, No 1 (2016): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 33, No 2 (2015): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 33, No 1 (2015): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2014): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 1 (2014): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 31, No 2 (2013): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 31, No 1 (2013): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 30, No 2 (2012): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 30, No 1 (2012): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 29, No 2 (2011): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 29, No 1 (2011): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 28, No 2 (2010): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 28, No 1 (2010): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 27, No 2 (2009): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 27, No 1 (2009): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 26, No 2 (2008): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 26, No 1 (2008): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 25, No 2 (2007): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 25, No 1 (2007): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 24, No 2 (2006): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 24, No 1 (2006): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 23, No 2 (2005): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 23, No 1 (2005): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 22, No 2 (2004): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 22, No 1 (2004): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 21, No 2 (2003): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 21, No 1 (2003): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 20, No 2 (2002): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 20, No 1 (2002): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 19, No 2 (2001): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 19, No 1 (2001): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 18, No 1-2 (2000): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 17, No 2 (1999): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 17, No 1 (1999): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 16, No 2 (1998): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 16, No 1 (1998): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 2 (1996): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (1996): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 13, No 2 (1995): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 13, No 1 (1995): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (1994): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 1 (1994): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 10, No 2-1 (1993): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (1993): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 9, No 2-1 (1992): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 9, No 1 (1991): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 8, No 1-2 (1990): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 7, No 2 (1989): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 7, No 1 (1989): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 6, No 2 (1988): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 6, No 1 (1988): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 5, No 1-2 (1987): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 4, No 2 (1986): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 4, No 1 (1985): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 3, No 2 (1984): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 3, No 1 (1984): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 2, No 2 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 2, No 1 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 1, No 2 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 1, No 1 (1982): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi More Issue