cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sujarwo
Contact Email
sujarwo@ub.ac.id
Phone
+62341-551665
Journal Mail Official
agrise@ub.ac.id
Editorial Address
Socio-Economics/Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran Malang, 65145
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AGRISE
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 14121425     EISSN : 22526757     DOI : 10.21776/ub.agrise
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
AGRISE adalah Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian yang berada di lingkungan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya yang berupa hasil penelitian, studi kepustakaan maupun tulisan ilmiah terkait. Jurnal ini diterbitkan pertama kali pada tahun 2001 oleh Jurusan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian FPUB. Pada tahun 2011, Jurnal Agrise bekerjasama dengan Perhimpunan Ekonomi Pertanian Indonesia (Perhepi) untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan kuantitas penerbitan. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Agrise diterbitkan tiga kali setahun (bulan Januari, Mei, dan Agustus). Frekuensi penerbitan akan ditambah bila diperlukan. ISSN cetak : 1412-1425 ISSN Elektronik : 2252-6757
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY" : 6 Documents clear
THE IMPACT OF SUBSIDY POLICY FOR COMPETITIVENESS OF PADDY FARMING IN GORONTALO PROVINCE, INDONESIA Zulkifli Mantau; Nuhfil Hanani; M Muslich Mustajab; S Syafrial
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.4

Abstract

 Abstract: The aims of this research are 1) to analyze the policy impact of input and output subsidies to paddy-rice competitiveness, and 2) to analyze the comparative and competitive advantages of paddy farming in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. The research conducted at Gorontalo Province. The method use Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) to measure the competitiveness parameters such a Domestic Resources Cost Ratio (DRCR) as a ratio for comparative advantages and Private Cost Ratio (PCR) as a ratio for competitive advantages. Meanwhile, PAM also measure the protection coefficients, such a Nominal Protection Coefficient on Output and Input (NPCO and NPCI), Effective Protection Coefficient (EPC). In additional, Producer Subsidy Equivalent (PSE) was used to measure a relative incentive for producers (farmers). Consumer Subsidy Equivalent (CSE) was used to measure a relative incentive for consumer. The results showed that NPCO and NPCI are 1.35 (there’s government protection for output/ rice) and 0.42 (there’s protection for inputs or subsidies for tradable inputs), respectively. The result of the EPC is 1.51. EPC> 1 indicates that government protection works effectively to rice commodity. Based on PAM analysis, PCR and DRCR values in this study were 1.14 and 1.52, respectively. PSE obtained value of 0.33 which indicate that producers (farmers) are not receiving direct or indirect incentives from government subsidy policies. CSE obtained results -0.27 at the level of actual prices and -0.37 at the border price. It indicates that consumers lost a surplus of 27% of the domestic rice price on average, or 37% of the border price.
VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS AT TUNA PROCESSED AGROINDUSTRY IN PACITAN, EAST JAVA Irfan Miftahul Fauzi; Budi Setiawan; Anthon Efani
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.5

Abstract

Abstract: Indonesia's economy was convener of the sea; however, the poverty of the fishermen is still high enough. The factors of management and utilization of marine fishery resources in order to improve the people's welfare are should be a significant concern. The leading commodities, tuna fish, need to be supported to increase production, processing, distribution system, diversified products. A good marketing and marketing margin distribution should be allocating a fairer on the processed tuna products. The purpose of this research is to analyze the mapping, critical factors that influence, and business value chain improvement strategies processing tuna in Pacitan. Research conducted on agro-industries processing tuna in district of Pacitan, Pacitan Regency, East Java. Sampels used are 4 fishermens, 2 traders, 2 agro-industries, 4 managers, 4 resellers, 4 retailers, and 50 consumers. Data retrieval is performed in February-March 2018. Data are analyzed using the mapping analysis, analysis of the Critical Success Factor (CSF), the analysis of governane, analysis of upgrading. Based on the analysis of the principals involved in agro-industries processing tuna are fishermens, traders, agro-industries, retailers, resellers and consumers. The party receives the smallest profit amounting to Rp 4,000 fishermen/kg. Critical factors according to agro-industries are the taste, price and quality, while the critical factor according to consumers is the taste, quality, expiration date. Factors that have a high gap are 0.49 stock and 0.55 of innovation and 0.73 of expiration. Upgrading of value chain processed tuna is process improvement by increasing production capacity, increasing the role of Marketing Manager for network marketing with branding in the tourism industry so processed tuna products widely known both national and international.
TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF SUGAR CANE FARMING IN MALANG REGENCY, INDONESIA Pujiastuti Lestari; Nuhfil Hanani; S Syafrial
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.1

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the factors that affect the production of sugar cane, to analyze the level of technical efficiency of farming sugar cane, and to analyze the factors that affect the technical inefficiency of sugar cane farming in Malang Regency. Methods of data analysis that is used to find out the factors that affect the production of sugar cane and the level of technical efficiency of sugar cane farming is a stochastic frontier analysis used  the Frontier 4.1 software. As for knowing the factors  that affect technical inefficiency of sugar cane farming used tobit regression analysis. The results show that production factors of sugar cane farming in Malang Regency i.e. amount of seeds, amount of labor, amount of fertilizer, amount of land area, and ratooncane. The average technical efficiency of sugar cane farming achieved i.e 0,81. Factors that influence the technical inefficiency of sugar cane farming i.e. age factors of farmers and formal education have a positive influence on the inefficiency effect of sugar cane farming and factors of farm experience and farmer group participation have a negative effect on the inefficiency effect of sugar cane farming.
MEASURING THE TECHNICAL AND COST EFFICIENCIES OF MAIZE FARMING IN THE NORTHERN REGION OF GHANA: DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACHES Abdul-Basit Tampuli Abukari; Tuna Alemdar
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.6

Abstract

Abstract: The study sets out to measure the technical, allocative and cost efficiencies of maize farming in the Northern Region of Ghana for the 2014-2015 farming season. The region has 73% of its population as farmers, with maize being the most cultivated and consumed cereal. Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are employed in the estimation. Interviews were conducted on 121 farmers selected through a mixed sampling technique. The study also segregated the quantities and prices of nitrogen and phosphorus from compound fertilizers. Under DEA, the study found an average efficiency of 79%, 67% and 53% for technical, allocative and cost efficiencies respectively. For SFA the results respectively are 77%, 27% and 21%. Cost and allocative efficiency estimates were very low especially for SFA. Using fractional regression analysis, it was found that household structure of farmers determined their technical efficiencies. Maize land size, marital status, education, and maize farming experience were found to affect allocative efficiency whiles marital status, household structure and maize farming experience affected cost efficiency. The study also found that labor was excessively used in the production process. Fertilizer application increased maize productivity more than other inputs. Policy recommendations were made following these findings.
COMPARATIVE AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ANALYSIS OF CASSAVA, CASE IN SIMALUNGUN DISTRICT, NORTH SUMATERA PROVINCE, INDONESIA Junnia Pramesthia Putri; S Suhartini; Nuhfil Hanani
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.2

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the competitive advantage and comparative advantage of cassava in Simalungun Regency, North Sumatera Province, which will be focused on increasing the production more better and more diversified through the approach of cassava farming activities. This context, based on the demand side of cassava commodity that is feasible to be developed by increasing its production in order to influence the level of income that will be received by farmers. This paper is proposed to: (a) analysis of farming both financially and economically, (b) comparative and competitive analysis, (c) to formulate the interim policy assumption of both advantages. Result of Matrix Policy Analysis Method (PAM), indicating that both of these commodities has a comparative and competitive advantage, shown by the ratio of DRC and PCR less than 1. Calculation shows DRC for cassava equal to 0.259. PCR of cassava farming is 0.66. This value means that cassava farming in Simalungun district can be said to have superiority comparative and competitive advantage. In other words, cassava farming at more research sites more better to be produced domestically rather than imported.
THE INFLUENCE OF SATISFACTION ON CONSUMER LOYALTY OF SUMAWE COFFEE MALANG Yulita Anggraeni; Dwi Retnoningsih; Abdul Wahib Muhaimin
Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY
Publisher : Socio-Economics/Agribusiness Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.agrise.2019.019.1.3

Abstract

Abstract: The most famous coffee in Malang Regency is Amstirdam coffee and one of them is Sumawe coffee. Sumawe coffee is a robusta coffee from Sumbermanjing Wetan Sub District but not widely known yet. However this coffee has the potential of coffee to be improved to satisfy consumers. Producers who are able to satisfy consumers and have loyal consumers tend to survive in the competition. The purpose of this research is analyzing the influence of satisfaction on consumer loyalty Sumawe coffee. The sampling data was gathered from consumers Sumawe coffee with the number of sample is 40 respondents. The data are analyzed by using a Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) technique. The results of analysis showed that product quality and price perception have a positive and significant influence on consumer satisfaction. Consumer satisfaction has a positive and significant influence on consumer loyalty. Product quality and price perception also have a positive and significant influence on consumer loyalty.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 23 No. 3 (2023): JULY Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023): APRIL Vol. 23 No. 1 (2023): JANUARY Vol. 22 No. 4 (2022): OCTOBER Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022): JULY Vol 22, No 3 (2022): JULY Vol 22, No 2 (2022): APRIL Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): APRIL Vol 22, No 1 (2022): JANUARY Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): JANUARY Vol. 21 No. 4 (2021): OCTOBER Vol 21, No 4 (2021): OCTOBER Vol 21, No 3 (2021): JULY Vol 21, No 2 (2021): APRIL Vol. 21 No. 2 (2021): APRIL Vol 21, No 1 (2021): JANUARY Vol 20, No 4 (2020): OCTOBER Vol 20, No 3 (2020): JULY Vol 20, No 2 (2020): APRIL Vol. 20 No. 1 (2020): JANUARY Vol 20, No 1 (2020): JANUARY Vol 19, No 3 (2019): AUGUST Vol 19, No 2 (2019): MAY Vol 19, No 1 (2019): JANUARY Vol 18, No 3 (2018): August Vol 18, No 2 (2018): MAY Vol 18, No 1 (2018): JANUARY Vol 17, No 3 (2017) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 16, No 3 (2016) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 15, No 3 (2015) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 14, No 3 (2014) Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Vol 14, No 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 3 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) Vol 12, No 3 (2012) Vol 12, No 2 (2012) Vol 12, No 1 (2012) Vol 12, No 1 (2012) Vol 11, No 3 (2011) Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 10, No 3 (2010) Vol 10, No 2 (2010) Vol 10, No 1 (2010) Vol 9, No 1 (2009) Vol 8, No 2 (2008) Vol 8, No 1 (2008) More Issue