cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Political Science Journal
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 143 Documents
Politicization of Water: Is Water Marketization a Solution for Ground Water Issue in Semarang? Annisa Kirana Andaneswari; Amalinda Savirani
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v7i2.72893

Abstract

This study intends to provide light on the subject of groundwater governance in Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. This article has sought to address two questions ; Questioning he provision of water among local government and also questioning whether water marketization is one of the fittest solution for ground water issues or an instrument to serve certain interest ?. The politicization of water refers to the ways in which issues related to water resources, access, management, and distribution become intertwined with political agendas, power struggles, and decision-making processes. Water marketization and politicization are two important and interconnected concepts related to the management and governance of water resources. The main finding of this research is that water marketization is being projected as the main remedy for ground water or land subsidence issue. The provision of water as a commodity is one of the political agenda that is framed through ground water issues at Semarang. While, local government keep pursuing this agenda, this research found out that water marketization is just oversimplified solution for ground water issue at Semarang.
Factors Influencing Social Vulnerability in Central Java Province Ridho Harta; Widiyanto Widiyanto
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v7i2.74861

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a concerning rise in the frequency of conflicts within various regions. These conflicts stem from a complex interplay of economic, social, and cultural factors. This study sets out to discern the key determinants that shape the overall level of peace and stability within Central Java province. A qualitative descriptive approach is used to comprehensively investigate the factors influencing social vulnerability. The analysis of available data unveils an encouraging decrease in reported crime rates, reflecting positive strides in law enforcement and security measures. However, it is crucial to note that certain indicators suggestive of heightened vulnerability have exhibited worrisome trends. Factors like unemployment and poverty have shown an alarming upward trajectory, warranting closer examination and targeted interventions. Conversely, the declining trend in school dropout rates could be interpreted as a positive sign, potentially contributing to a more conducive environment within the region. This study underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the evolving dynamics of vulnerability and peace-building, providing valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in Central Java and beyond.
The Interplay of Public Health, Politics, and Economics in COVID-19 Border Control Strategies: A Comparative Study of Brunei Darussalam, UK, China, Germany, and Australia Brice Tseen Fu Lee; Ayidana Asihaer; Juan Pablo Sims; Salman Ali
Unnes Political Science Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/upsj.v7i2.75374

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of border control in containing the spread of COVID-19. Through a literature review and discourse analysis, the study examines the pandemic response of China, the UK, Brunei Darussalam, Australia, and Germany, with a focus on their border control policies. The data collected suggests that countries with closed borders were more successful in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of health statistics, such as the prevention of infection, hospitalization cases, and death rates. Effective domestic public health measures, including mask mandates and social distancing, were also found to be critical components of successful pandemic containment protocols. However, the study also highlights the impact of domestic and international relations and political perceptions on shaping each government’s pandemic response. The role of the economy was identified as the biggest factor contributing to the government decision to close their borders, with regime type considered to a certain extent as it allows for less pushback towards policy changes. Overall, the study suggests that a combination of effective domestic public health measures and border controls is critical to containing the spread of COVID-19.