Holish, Amarru Muftie
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang

Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dan Dampaknya Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia: Corruption in the Covid-19 Pandemic Period and Its Impact on the Fulfillment of Human Rights Arifin, Ridwan; Syariefudin, Iqbal; Holish, Amarru Muftie
Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Seminar Nasional Jaminan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional dan Implementasinya di
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snhunnes.v7i1.717

Abstract

Corruption is a complex problem for the Indonesian nation and state, not only a matter of law enforcement, but the impacts of this crime are widespread and affect almost all sectors from the lowest to the highest levels. Many studies related to criminal acts of corruption only focus on the punishment of perpetrators and the patterns of formation and development of these crimes in society. Research related to the impact of corruption is only limited to research on the amount of state losses and economic financial calculations, only a few have examined the socio-economic impact of corruption. When the criminal act of corruption is confronted with human rights, research studies that arise relate to the rights of the perpetrators of corruption in the framework of protecting human rights. In fact, corruption has a broad dimension and has a significant impact on the fulfillment of human rights in all sectors.
Covid-19 dan Studi Hukum: Bagaimana Mahasiswa Mencermati Peluang Publikasi di Tengah Pandemi? Covid-19 and Legal Studies: How Do Students Find Publication Opportunities in the Midst of a Pandemic? Alkadri, Riska; Arifin, Ridwan; Holish, Amarru Muftie; Sari, Dewi Puspa; Resthiningsih, Lilies
Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Seminar Nasional Jaminan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional dan Implementasinya di
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snhunnes.v7i1.718

Abstract

Student activists are one of the important pillars in nation building, not only in the student movement but also various breakthroughs for the progress of the nation, many are initiated by students. The development of the student activist movement requires that every student who is a member of various student institutions must not only have a critical and noble attitude, but also the ability to convey ideas and solve existing problems. A lot of bad stigma is attached to student activists, ranging from unsatisfactory levels of academic quality, not graduating on time, responsive and very reactive, harsh and with opposing views, to demonstrations colored by various violence. The stigma is only in a few cases, not all activists face such conditions, but this stigma seems to have been far attached. The development of student activists today demands that activists must also have three literacy skills: data literacy, human literacy, and technological literacy. However, based on the results of preliminary research on this activity, 90 percent of student activists from the Faculty of Law, UNNES agreed that activists must have a critical attitude and critical writing skills, but only about 10 percent of activists have taken it seriously (publishing ideas in various forms). . This activity is aimed at developing the critical skills of student activists through increasing publications in various media. This activity also aims to form a critical writing community for student activists and to present a concrete platform for channeling student activist ideas and solutions in written form that can be read by many people. This activity is carried out through a critical thinking approach in legal studies using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method which is commonly used in analyzing various cases in legal study thinking. This activity lasts for 8 (eight) months with several stages of activities involving partners (student activists) directly, as well as guides and managers.