Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) West Science Interdisciplinary Studies
Sarib, Suprijati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis

 1 
Avoiding Mistakes in Understanding the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad SAW with Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī's Hermeneutics Kamarudin, Kamarudin; Sarib, Suprijati; M. Arib, Juhrah; Putra, Sudarmadi; Rahman, Rahman
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5874

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the methodology for understanding hadīth according to Yūsuf Qaraḍāwī. This study uses library research methods to analyze data. The primary data are Qaraḍāwī's work, while the secondary data are books and journal articles relevant to the topic of this study. The results of this study indicate that Qaraḍāwī offers eight steps to understanding hadīth, namely defining hadīth based on the Qur'ān, collecting hadīth thematically, compromising contradictory hadīths, identifying asbāb al-wurūd of the hadīth, distinguishing changing and unchanging means, differentiating between the literal and figurative language (majāz), recognizing the unseen and the real, and confirming the meaning of the words in the hadīth. Some points that must be avoided in interacting with ṣunnāh are the interpretation of the ignorant, the deviation of the extremes, and the manipulation of the heretics. Furthermore, the basic principles in interacting with ṣunnāh are examining the validity of hadīth based on the scientific principles established by hadīth experts, understanding the editorial hadīth properly according to the language instructions and the context of the hadīth, and ensuring that the matān of the hadīth does not conflict with the nāsh of the Qur'an or other hadīth with a more powerful position
Religious Conversion in Hadith and the Discourse of Muslim Scholars Muttaqin, Zaenal; Sarib, Suprijati; Husain, Husain; Rahman, Rahman; Rohmah, Siti; Mokodenseho, Sabil
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 8, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v8i2.7576

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the status of hadiths that serve as the basis for the imposition of sanctions on individuals who convert from Islam to other beliefs (apostasy) and the views of Muslim scholars in understanding the legal messages behind hadiths on apostasy. This study addresses questions regarding the wording, transmission, and status of hadiths on apostasy, as well as how Muslim scholars define apostasy and interpret the legal messages of apostasy sanctions in the hadiths of the Prophet. The study utilizes the method of takhrij hadith with an analytical-descriptive approach. Both primary and secondary research data are gathered from various literary sources. The study finds that hadiths on the legal sanctions for apostasy have two forms of wording: "man baddala dinahu faqtuluhu - whoever changes his religion, kill him" and "la yahilllu damumriin muslimin illa tsalasin - no Muslim's blood is lawful except for three cases." Hadiths on apostasy sanctions fall into the category of ahad hadiths with a degree of authenticity (sahih). Furthermore, the study reveals the evolution of Muslim scholars' understanding of apostasy, wherein apostasy was initially understood solely as a departure from the Islamic faith (i'tiqad) but later came to be seen as a departure accompanied by enmity towards Islam. The scholars themselves are divided into two major groups in their interpretation of the position of hadiths on apostasy, namely the classical Muslim scholars who interpret it as a legal ruling that can be implemented against apostates. In contrast, contemporary Muslim scholars have started to criticize and reinterpret the status of these hadiths, emphasizing the need to reconsider the contextualized understanding of the legal message of apostasy sanctions. The significant contribution of this study lies in clarifying the status of hadiths on apostasy sanctions and illustrating the dynamic understanding of Muslim scholars regarding the implementation of these hadiths' messages
Co-Authors Gibtiah Gibtiah Hasibuan, Kalijunjung Husain Husain Kamarudin Kamarudin Lubis, Arief Fahmi M. Arib, Juhrah Mokodenseho, Sabil Putra, Sudarmadi Putri, Ananda Regina Rahman Rahman Regina Putri, Ananda Siti Rohmah utama, cholidah Yusida Fitriyati, Yusida Yusnita, Eti Zaenal Muttaqin Zain, Muhammad Irfanul Hakim