Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.109
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ilmu dan Budaya Nuansa Informatika Cloud Information Sriwijaya Law Review The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" JURNAL AGRONIDA Warta Penelitian Perhubungan Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Jurnal Pengabdian Sumber Daya Manusia JSEP (Journal of Science Education and Practice)
Yati Nurhayati
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Sriwijaya Law Review

 1 
Dispute Settlement between Telkomsel and Indosat: An Analysis on Competition of Cellular Operator Mukti Fajar ND; Diana Setiawati; Yati Nurhayati
Sriwijaya Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss1.155.pp86-98

Abstract

Telecommunication advancement has become a central part of human life brought tight competition among cellular operators. On June 2016, there was a case of business competition between Telkomsel and Indosat (the big Three Cellular operators in Indonesia) that conduct monopoly practice and predatory pricing. In Indonesia, there are two Institutions that maintain business telecommunication and business competition namely Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) has mandated by Law number 36 of 1999 and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) by Law Number 5 of 1999. The research aims to know how the government regulates on competition of cellular operator in Indonesia and to know the role of Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to settle the cases on competition of cellular operator (Telkomsel and Indosat cases). The study is normative legal research with statute and case approach, by using juridical qualitative approach. The results of this research are, firstly the analysis of regulation regarding on competition of cellular operator. Secondly the analysis of the role of Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) and Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to settle the cases on competition of cellular operator (Telkomsel and Indosat cases) that conduct monopoly practice and predatory pricing, regarding with Law Number 36 of 1999 on Telecommunication and Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practice and Unfair Business Competition.
Co-Authors Agus Wahyuddin Ari Susetyadi Arifah Rahayu Bibin Rubini Diana Setiawati Hanafi Ramsi Hasrina Rahma Hisworo Ramdani Indarini Dwi Pursitasari Indra Kurniawan Inggrid Dirgahayu Iwan Lesmana Iwan Riswandie M.Yasir Said Miftah Ulumuddin Tsani Muhammad Akbar Ridho Muhammad Hatta Mukti Fajar ND Munajah Munajah Muthia Septarina Nadia Nadia Nahdhah Nur Intan Hayati Husnul Khotimah Ramalinggam Rajamanickam Rina Auliana Riyan Febriyana Tengku Noor Azira Tengku Zainudin Yoga Saputra Yuke Sri Rizki