Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.837
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Idea Nursing Journal Gender Equality: Internasional Journal of Child and Gender Studies Journal of English Literacy Education Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Batoboh : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Jurnal Sains Riset Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris (JUPENSI) Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi Literasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Inovasi Studies in English Language and Education
Fitriani, Naria
Politeknik Aceh
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Studies in English Language and Education

 1 
Vocational college students’ common errors in EFL speaking performance Naria Fitriani; Said Iskandar Zulkarnain
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 6, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (749.495 KB) | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v6i1.12131

Abstract

This research aims to find out the common errors made by students studying at one of the vocational colleges in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The students’ opinions on their experiences of learning English, particularly in speaking, were also explored. This qualitative-quantitative research design was conducted by collecting some recordings of the students’ speaking performance, and distributing questionnaires on the process of teaching and learning EFL to be filled in by the participants. In the analysis, the data from the recordings were coded, transcribed, described and displayed in accordance with the students’ error items. Meanwhile, the analysis of the questionnaire employed a simple percentage calculation. From the speaking performance, the students in the speaking class produced two types of common errors, i.e. pronunciation and grammar errors. The common errors in their English pronunciation vary between the vowel and the consonant. The errors in vowel production were produced the most. Meanwhile, 70% of the students made errors in grammar on language tense and some on plural morphemes. From the questionnaire, it was revealed that even though the students tried to speak English well, all of them were aware and agreed that they made grammatical errors when speaking English.
Vocational college students’ common errors in EFL speaking performance Naria Fitriani; Said Iskandar Zulkarnain
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 6, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v6i1.12131

Abstract

This research aims to find out the common errors made by students studying at one of the vocational colleges in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The students’ opinions on their experiences of learning English, particularly in speaking, were also explored. This qualitative-quantitative research design was conducted by collecting some recordings of the students’ speaking performance, and distributing questionnaires on the process of teaching and learning EFL to be filled in by the participants. In the analysis, the data from the recordings were coded, transcribed, described and displayed in accordance with the students’ error items. Meanwhile, the analysis of the questionnaire employed a simple percentage calculation. From the speaking performance, the students in the speaking class produced two types of common errors, i.e. pronunciation and grammar errors. The common errors in their English pronunciation vary between the vowel and the consonant. The errors in vowel production were produced the most. Meanwhile, 70% of the students made errors in grammar on language tense and some on plural morphemes. From the questionnaire, it was revealed that even though the students tried to speak English well, all of them were aware and agreed that they made grammatical errors when speaking English.
Co-Authors Ardian Ardian Cut Yunina Eriva Dewi Maya Sari Dewi Maya Sari Hilmi Hilmi Husna Hidayati Mislinawati Mislinawati Mislinawati Muhammad Abthahi Mutia Arfiani Nani Safuni Nani Safuni Rahmatun Ulia Sabarniati, Sabarniati Said Iskandar Zulkarnain Zaiturrahmi Zaiturrahmi Zaiturrahmi Zaiturrahmi Zulkarnain, Said Iskandar