Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

Kewajiban Notaris Mengenali Pengguna Jasa dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Korporasi Ismail Ismail; Ermanto Fahamsyah; I Gede Widhiana Suarda
Syntax Idea Vol 3 No 10 (2021): Syntax Idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v3i10.1511

Abstract

Prinsip mengenali Pengguna Jasa diterapkan dalam jabatan notaris dalam rangka melaksanakan ketentuan PP No 43 Tahun 2015 dan Permenkumham No 9 Tahun 2017, yang mana Notaris wajib menerapkan prinsip mengenali pengguna jasa. Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa bagi Notaris merupakan bagian dari upaya mendeteksi adanya penggunaan jasa notaris oleh para pelaku TPPU dengan melakukan identifikasi, verifikasi dan pemantauan identitas serta dokumen pada pengguna jasa Notaris. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menemukan Menemukan kewajiban notaris mengenali pengguna jasa dalam upaya pencegahan tindak pidana pencucian uang oleh korporasi tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Pada penelitian ini digunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu Kewajiban notaris mengenali pengguna jasa dalam upaya pencegahan tindak pidana pencucian uang oleh korporasi tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Republik Indonesian Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
A LITERATURE REVIEW ON INDONESIA’S DERADICALIZATION PROGRAM FOR TERRORIST PRISONERS I Gede Widhiana Suarda
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.816 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16682

Abstract

AbstractAfter many terrorists are captured and receive prison sentences, Indonesia instituted a de-radicalization program for terrorist prisoners. As yet, however, Indonesia lacks a national policy for planning, implementing and evaluating the program. The program is currently being developed and managed locally by prison directors consistent with a prison’s circumstances and capability. This article presents a review of the literature on Indonesia’s de-radicalization program for terrorist prisoners. The objectives of this review are to understand the nature of the program, consider the results, and to indicate a new approach for future research. Intisari Setelah banyak teroris ditangkap dan menjalani pidana penjara, Indonesia mulai menjalankan program deradikalisasi terhadap narapidana teroris. Namun demikian, Indonesia belum memiliki kebijakan nasional dalam hal perencanaan, pelaksanaan dan evaluasi dari program deradikalisai. Saat ini, program dikembangkan dan dikelola secara lokal oleh kepala lembaga pemasyarakatan (Kalapas) sejalan dengan keadaan dan kemampuan lembaga pemasyarakatan (Lapas). Artikel ini menyajikan sebuah kajian pustaka tentang program deradikalisasi Indonesia terhadap narapidana teroris. Tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk memahami karakter programnya, menelaah hasil-hasilnya, dan untuk menunjukkan sebuah pendekatan baru dalam penelitian mendatang. 
Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara melalui Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Habi Burrohim; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Ainul Azizah
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v11i1.1137

Abstract

Abstrak Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan atau Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) dalam upaya pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara tindak pidana korupsi oleh korporasi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dan merumuskan konsep yang tepat di masa yang akan datang dalam pelaksanaan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan atau Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) guna mendorong pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara yang diakibatkan oleh tindak pidana korupsi korporasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil dalam penelitian ini adalah perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan yang berasal dari rumpun hukum Common Law dapat diterapkan pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dengan didasarkan pada 4 (empat) dasar kajian yakni tujuan sistem peradilan pidana dan asas sistem peradilan pidana dan bahwa konsepsi Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan yang akan diterapkan pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia didasarkan pada Pengertian dan Tujuan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan, Pihak yang Terlibat dan Kewenangannya, Kualifikasi Tindak Pidana, Syarat Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan. Kata kunci: Kerugian Negara, Korupsi, Korporasi, Penuntutan Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) in an effort to recover state financial losses for corruption by corporations in the Indonesian criminal justice system and formulate the right concept in the future in the implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement or Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) to encourage the return of state financial losses caused by corporate corruption. The method of this research is normative juridical. The results in this study are the Delay of Prosecution agreement originating from the Common Law legal family can be applied to the Indonesian Criminal Justice System based on 4 (four) basic studies, namely the objectives of the criminal justice system and the principles of the criminal justice system and that the conception of the Delay of Prosecution Agreement will be applied. The Criminal Justice System in Indonesia is based on the Definition and Purpose of the Suspension of Prosecution Agreement, the Parties Involved and Their Authorities, Criminal Acts Qualifications, Terms of the Suspension of Prosecution Agreement,.  Keywords: State Loses, Corruption,Corporation, Prosecution
Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa; Priambudi, Zaki
Indonesia Law Review
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to examine what the pre-trial judges consider in determining whether a suspect's determination is legal. The basis of the reason "not based on the provisions and legal procedures in force" is a pre-trial petition. Including examining whether the Notification Letter for the Commencement of Investigation has not been submitted to the Reported Party and the Reporting Party, it can be used as a basis for the judge's consideration to judge the legality of the determination of the suspect. This article uses a legal research method through a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. This article finds that after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 and the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016, the fulfillment of preliminary evidence, namely that two valid tools of evidence constitute the absolute standard of determining the suspect. Besides, in terms of proof, pre-trial only assesses the validity of formal aspects, which incidentally do not touch the case's subject matter. An application for the cancellation of a suspect's status, for whatever reason, cannot be granted if the initial evidence is not fulfilled, namely the two tools of evidence listed in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Law of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). Ultimately, this study recommends the need for affirmation in terms of determining suspects through changing the parameters for deciding suspects in Article 1 point 11 of the Draft of the Law of Criminal Procedure from what was originally only based on "...sufficient preliminary evidence" to "...the fulfillment of two tools of evidence contained in Article 175 paragraph (1) of the Law of Criminal Procedure" to achieve legal certainty and fulfill the suspect's human rights.
Legal Certainty on PPAT Authority in Making Deed Outside of His Location Bhim Prakoso; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Dendik Surya Wardana
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 4 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i4.7339

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal certainty of the PPAT's authority in making deeds outside the area of his domicile. PPAT in carrying out its functions and authorities is limited by the working area, as regulated in PP PPAT in Article 12 paragraph (1) that the PPAT working area is "one working area of the Regency/Municipal Land Office". But then it was changed to one province area.” Based on the article, it is clear that the PPAT's work area has expanded, which was originally in the district/municipality area, now it is in the province. Legal issues studied 1). What is the basis for the amendment to Article 12 paragraph 1 of PP Number 24 of 2016 regarding the PPAT work area? 2). How is the legal certainty of the authority of the PPAT who makes the deed outside the domicile? The results of the study indicate that the expansion of the PPAT working area arrangement into one province as stipulated in Article 12 (1) PP No. 24 of 2016 caused problems due to the absence of implementing regulations. And when there is legal certainty about the authority of PPAT after the issuance of PP 24/2016, there is no implementing regulation in this case a Ministerial Regulation which is expected to be a guideline for PPAT in carrying out its authority. Suggestions in this study are for the government to review PP No. 24 of 2016 with the aim of maximizing the implementation of the rules by PPAT officials.
Legis Ratio of Tax Imposition to the Transfer of Land Rights through Instruction I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Bhim Prakoso; Khafid Setiawan
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 4 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i4.7338

Abstract

Inheritance is a legal event that occurs when a person dies. Inheritance is the process of transferring inheritance from the deceased heir to heirs who are related by blood and marriage to the heir. When a person dies, this creates a legal consequence, namely how the management and continuation of rights and obligations as a result of a legal event due to the death of a person is regulated by inheritance law. Assets obtained from inheritance receipts are one form of additional economic capacity that can be received by a person as regulated in Law Number 36 Year 2008. Problem formulation 1) What is the basis for imposing Tax on heirs to the object of inheritance? 2). Does the imposition of taxes on heirs meet the principles of justice? The methodology used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and. historical approach. Conclusion That the taxation legis ratio using this approach is a fundamental basis on a philosophical basis which justifies the state to collect taxes as enforceable in the sense of having authority with coercive power. Taxes have become the backbone of a very dominant development wheel. Whereas the imposition of tax on the heirs on the object of inheritance does not meet the principles of justice and benefit to the heirs, because the heirs are subject to BPHTB twice. Suggestion The government should review the products of legislation related to the imposition of taxes with legal considerations that meet the legal objectives of the purpose of imposing taxes on the community. Especially the regulation regarding the determination of NPOPTKP for objects obtained from inheritance in order to take into account the economy of the community because the income level of the community is different.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim) Armanda Herlangga; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Fiska Maulidian Nugroho
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol 2 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3100.625 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v2i1.30320

Abstract

This study examines the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim in a case of criminal action of terrorism. This type of research is a normative legal research. The approaches used are the legal, case, and conseptual ones. The results showed that based on Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim found that the public prosecutor was not careful in formulating the charges, the indictment of the Public Prosecutor is not in accordance with the actions that have been carried out by the defendant as stated in the Terrorism Law. The public prosecutor does not meet the requirements in making an indictment as regulated in the provisions of Article 143 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the formal and material requirements in making an indictment in a criminal act that is charged to the defendant. And based on the decision in Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim, the judge's consideration is not in accordance with what was done by the defendant who considered that the defendant had attempted to commit a criminal act of terrorism as stated in the facts revealed by the trial in the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Lelang Eksekusi PUPN dalam Hal Objek Lelang Tanah Kabur Afifah Nur Azizah; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Firman Floranta Adonara
Syntax Idea Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Syntax Idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v5i1.2101

Abstract

Banks are one of the most important financial institutions and have a large role in the economic life of society, considering that banks are one of the people's choices that can provide credit facilities. Problems in the field are increasingly complex with various sources of data used as a reference to find answers from the processes carried out by researchers so that this problem approach method is a sub-method to be able to solve a problem. The auction principles based on the auction regulations include the principle of publicity, the principle of competition, the principle of certainty, the principle of accountability, the principle of efficiency, the principle of balance and the principle of justice in the land auction object, even though there is a certificate of title. on valid Land and SKPT, one of the principles that has not been implemented except for the principle of certainty because it does not involve BPN in taking care of the existence of the object prior to auctioning to find out the location of the land. As a result, one of the principles has an impact on the implementation of the auction principle, namely the principle of accountability and the principle of justice, which is not realized
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Lelang Eksekusi PUPN dalam Hal Objek Lelang Tanah Kabur Afifah Nur Azizah; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Firman Floranta Adonara
Syntax Idea Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Syntax Idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v5i1.2101

Abstract

Banks are one of the most important financial institutions and have a large role in the economic life of society, considering that banks are one of the people's choices that can provide credit facilities. Problems in the field are increasingly complex with various sources of data used as a reference to find answers from the processes carried out by researchers so that this problem approach method is a sub-method to be able to solve a problem. The auction principles based on the auction regulations include the principle of publicity, the principle of competition, the principle of certainty, the principle of accountability, the principle of efficiency, the principle of balance and the principle of justice in the land auction object, even though there is a certificate of title. on valid Land and SKPT, one of the principles that has not been implemented except for the principle of certainty because it does not involve BPN in taking care of the existence of the object prior to auctioning to find out the location of the land. As a result, one of the principles has an impact on the implementation of the auction principle, namely the principle of accountability and the principle of justice, which is not realized
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PASIEN COVID-19 PADA PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT: SEBUAH LITERATURE REVIEW I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Fendi Setyawan; Ulfa Elfiah
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 32 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.32.1.40-59

Abstract

Artikel ini merupakan tinjauan literatur awal yang bertujuan untuk menemukan arah penelitian yang tepat terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi pasien COVID-19 di Indonesia. Dalam upaya mencapai tujuan tersebut, kajian dalam artikel ini menggunakan metode literatur review dengan mengumpulkan data dari berbagai sumber literatur seperti buku dan jurnal untuk membandingkan hasil penelitian yang satu dengan yang lainnya. Langkah selanjutnya adalah melakukan identifikasi literatur yang relevan dengan topik yang dibahas. Dari proses tersebut, terdapat 6 penelitian yang relevan untuk di-review. Hasil kajian menunjukkan dua kesimpulan. Pertama, topik penelitian tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien COVID-19 pada pelayanan kesehatan di Rumah Sakit merupakan sebuah topik yang perlu diteliti lebih lanjut mengingat topik tersebut belum dibahas dalam penelitian exisiting. Kedua, metode penelitian empiris maupun non doctrinal perlu dilakukan secara holistik dengan subyek utama adalah pasien COVID-19 termasuk para pihak yang berkaitan langsung dengan pelayanan terhadap pasien COVID-19 di rumah sakit, seperti tenaga kesehatan dan juga pihak pimpinan rumah sakit. Dengan demikian, hasil penelitian empiris tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien COVID-19 pada playanan kesehatan di Rumah Sakit akan dapat memperkaya ilmu pengetahuan, baik untuk bidang ilmu-ilmu rumpun kesehatan, hukum, maupun ilmu-ilmu sosial.