Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.776
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Wacana Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Bedah Hukum UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Yussy A. Mannas
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas
Religion Humanities Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
UPAYA HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ANTARA KONSUMEN DENGAN PENGEMBANG PT. NAJAH BINTANG SEJAHTERA DI KOTA PEKANBARU Dwi Weka Wirawan; Yulfasni Yulfasni; Yussy Adelina Mannas
Alhurriyah Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (705.254 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1351

Abstract

House buying and selling is very vulnerable and problems often occur to cause disputes, This research was conducted in an empirical juridical way, the nature of descriptive analysis was by qualitative data analysis, The absence of consumer understanding of the buying and selling process in a contract carried out with the developer and there are still those who do not understand the contents of a contract and there are still developers with consumers making agreements under the hand that are not in accordance with the Laws and Regulations, Housing developers must be responsible for losses suffered by consumers, The legal effort that can be made by consumers is by taking a solution in a way outside the court of non-litigation and litigation through the general court, Consumer dispute resolution is first resolved by means of consensus agreement or peacefully if there is no further settlement, it can be done through a way of settlement outside the court (non litigation) or through a public court (litigation) either civil or criminal. 
Legal Certainty of Implementing Telemedicine Services in Indonesia as Effort Towards Renewal of National Health Law Yussy Adelina Mannas; Siska Elvandari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p07

Abstract

Digital health services are carried out without direct interaction between doctors and patients, where patients only need to consult with doctors in virtual rooms, such as through electronic media and social media, known as Telemedicine. Apart from the hope that telemedicine promises various conveniences and opportunities so that it can be used as a solution in overcoming health problems, it is also realized that telemedicine brings potential legal problems in medical practice. Many of the legal implications of medicolegal telemedicine Other important aspects are the doctor-patient relationship, standard of care and informed consent. The formulation of the problem that will be raised in this study, namely: First, how is the legal certainty of the regulation of telemedicine services in terms of the laws and regulations in the field of health law in Indonesia? and Second, what is the concept of the right telemedicine regulation in the provision of health services based on the principle of legal certainty in Indonesia? The purpose of this research is to find out the legal certainty regarding the regulation of telemedicine services in Indonesia, and to find out the concept of the right telemedicine regulation based on the principle of legal certainty in Indonesia. The research method in writing this proposal uses a normative juridical approach. The result of this research is that legal certainty is needed to regulate telemedicine. There is no specific law that regulates telemedicine, and without legal certainty this will certainly have an impact on legal protection.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Kuasa Menjual Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Anishya Yulia Anggraini; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 5, No 4 (2023): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), May
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v5i4.1746

Abstract

This study aims to determine the responsibility of a notary for a power of attorney to sell in the transfer of land rights and differences in consideration of the decisions of judges of first instance, judges of appellate level and judges of final instance in judicial review based on Supreme Court decision Number 20 PK/Pid/2020. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with a conceptual and statutory approach. The technique of collecting data is by studying literature relevant to legal issues and then analyzing it qualitatively. This study concludes that the notary Ketut Neli Asih can only be subject to administrative sanctions that adhere to the principle of responsibility based on fault (based on fault of liability), so that the notary concerned cannot be held criminally responsible, because the notary performs his duties as a public official. The verdict of the Panel of Judges of the First Level and the Panel of Judges of the Appellate Level are of the opinion and believe that the actions committed by Ketut Neli Asih as a notary have fulfilled the elements of a crime Article 378 jo. Article 56 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, namely "Deliberately Providing Opportunities or Means in the Crime of Fraud". Meanwhile, the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court who tried the review was of the opinion and believed that the charges charged by the Public Prosecutor were true and proven, but it was not a crime, but rather an administrative matter. 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR ATAS AKTA CESSIE YANG DILAKSANAKAN SEPIHAK OLEH KREDITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN No. 53/ Pdt.G/2018/PN Gpr. DAN PUTUSAN No. 21/ Pdt.G/2019/PN Kdr) Rhonny Yusvaldi; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.481

Abstract

According to Article 613 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, it is stated that the surrender of receivables on behalf of and other incorporeal objects are carried out by making an authentic deed and/or private deed, by which the rights to the object are delegated to another person. In a cessie, the takeover of bank receivables by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but is accompanied by the takeover of the bank's rights and obligations, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The research method used in this study is a Normative Juridical approach, the research results obtained are 1. As a result of the Cessie Deed being carried out unilaterally by the creditor, the Jessie is carried out by making an authentic deed or private deed, the Jessie is transferred by the creditor, and there will be a replacement of the creditor only if the cassie is carried out by Article 613 of the Civil Code, but if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor then the cassie deed has no legal consequences because the cassie in the deed does not fulfill one of the elements of Article 613 of the Civil Code 2. In case, the taking over of a receivables bank by a third party does not mean that only the receivables are taken over, but it is accompanied by the takeover of the rights and obligations of the bank, including the transfer of collateral for the debtor's debt. The transfer of receivables by Jessie does not result in the termination of the existing agreement made between the creditor and the debtor. 3. The debtor's legal protection for a session which is carried out unilaterally by the creditor according to the Civil Code Article 613 such submission to the debtor has no consequences unless the delivery is notified to him or in writing it is approved and acknowledged if the cassie is carried out unilaterally by the creditor the Jessie has not resulted in the debtor, in other words, the Jessie has not occurred or has not been transferred and the debtor can file a lawsuit in court.
URGENSI PEMBUKTIAN REKAM MEDIS ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM DI INDONESIA Engga Lift Irwanto; Syofirman Syofyan; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.496

Abstract

The development of science also has a significant impact on the development of good health service provision. One of the developments in the field of health services is the renewal of electronic medical records. Where the benefits of electronic medical records are of course as a basis or guide to knowing and analyzing diseases and knowing the treatment, care and medical action that must be given to patients, as well as improving the quality of service to protect medical personnel in the promotion of optimal public health. Then this electronic medical record can also be used as a type of evidence to be able to make light of a certain legal event. The medical legal basis for electronic records is evidence based on Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Then this research is a normative research or library research that will examine the urgency of proving electronic medical records based on a legal perspective in Indonesia.
ANALYSIS OF MERGER OF PERUM PPD INTO PERUM DAMRI BASED ON REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA Nadya Muthia Wulandari; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.501

Abstract

In Indonesia, SOE has a strategic role as a pioneer for business activities that cannot yet be carried out by the private sector, providing public benefits in the form of providing adequate goods and/or services to meet the needs of many people and actively providing assistance and guidance to the community. However, the challenges faced by SOEs are that there are too many SOEs, some SOEs have poor financial, operational and governance performance, and the roles and functions of SOEs themselves are still not efficient in supporting the national economy. Therefore, restructuring SOE has been carried out in an effort to streamline the number of SOEs in Indonesia, one of which is through a Merger. There are two road transport SOEs that currently play a role in the development and operation of national road transportation and have equivalent core businesses, namely Perum DAMRI and Perum PPD. Perum DAMRI and Perum PPD were both affected by the Covid-19 Pandemic so that both their financial and operational performance deteriorated. The Ministry of SOEs together with the Ministry of Finance initiated the merger of the two companies as a strategic effort to nourish the two companies. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the Merger of Perum PPD into Perum DAMRI. This research seeks to answer the following questions: what is the legal process for the merger of Perum DAMRI and Perum PPD based on regulations in force in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical. This study concludes that the merger of Perum with Perum has not been regulated directly in the existing laws and regulations in Indonesia. The merger of Perum PPD into Perum DAMRI currently still refers to regulations regarding the merger of SOE Companies. Several regulations related to the Merger of Public Corporations in Indonesia, especially regarding the Merger of Perum PPD into Perum DAMRI, including Law No. 19 of 2003 on SOE, GR No. 43 of 2005 concerning Mergers, Consolidations, Acquisitions, Changes in Legal Entity Forms of State-Owned Enterprises, Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower as amended by Perppu No. 2/2022, Law no. 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation as amended by Perppu No. 2/2022, and Government Regulation No. 30 of 2021 concerning Implementation of the Road Traffic and Transportation Sector.
Kepastian Hukum Pengaturan Pengaduan Tindakan Malapraktik Dokter Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia Engga Lift Irwanto; Syofirman Syofyan; Yussy Adelina Mannas
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v7i1.1002

Abstract

Malapraktik adalah semua tindakan dokter yang bersifat substandart, kurang kompeten atau tidak sesuai dengan yang diupayakan dalam perjanjian dokter pasien. Untuk menentukan apakah seorang dokter telah melakukan pelanggaran disiplin atau malapraktik harus dilihat perbuatan tersebut bersifat sengaja atau tidak sengaja yang menjadi dasar dari means rea-nya, Kepastian hukum dalam penegakan hukum untuk pengaduan terhadap pelanggaran disiplin dokter menjadi tidak adil, sebab dalam hal ini penegak hukum hanya memperhatikan kepentingan seorang pasien saja merujuk pada Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran, tanpa memperhatikan kepentingan untuk tanpa memperhatikan kepentingan dokter padahal sebelum putusan diputuskan, sehingga asas praduga tidak bersalah harus tetap diberikan kepada dokter yang memberikan pengobatan kepada pasiennya. Dokter yang sudah bekerja sesuai SOP dan SPK seringkali harus menerima kenyataan adanya tuntutan pidana. Persoalan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana kepastian hukum dalam pengaduan tindakan malapraktik yang dilakukan dokter berdasarkan hukum positif di Indonesia dan Bagaimana konsep pengaturan hukum yang tepat dalam penyelesaian malapraktik yang dilakukan dokter ditinjau berdasarkan asas kepastian hukum. Adapun penelitian yang digunakan dengan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis, yaitu menganalisis kaitan antara peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dengan teori-teori hukum dan praktik pelaksanaan terkait objek penelitian yang kemudian menghasilkan beberapa kesimpulan. Dalam pelaksanaannya banyak pemahaman yang berbeda dalam memaknai maksud Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran sehingga tidak jelas kemana sebuah sengketa malapraktik akan diperiksa yang dimana hal tersebut jalan terbaik bagi dokter dan pasien.
PELAKSANAAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM PERUSAHAAN TERBUKA SECARA ELEKTRONIK (E- RUPS) DENGAN SISTEM E-PROXY DI PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (Persero), Tbk Harsa Khairu; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.627

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the electronic General Meeting of Shareholders (e-RUPS) using the e-proxy method at PT Telkom and to find out how the Notary's authority is in holding the General Meeting of Shareholders electronically. The research method that researchers use is Empirical Juridical law (sociolegal research). The data that has been collected will then be analyzed using a qualitative approach, namely research procedures that produce descriptive data. The research results of PT Telkom as one of the users of the easy.KSEI applications have carried out e-RUPS since the Covid-19 pandemic hit Indonesia in 2020 until the last e-RUPS in 2022.
IMPLEMENTASI ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PEMBERIAN KESEMPATAN PENYELESAIAN PEKERJAAN PENGADAAN BARANG JASA PEMERINTAH Harry Ismaryadi; Khairani Khairani; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.363

Abstract

Salah satu perbuatan hukum Pemerintah di bidang hukum privat adalah melaksanakan Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah khususnya Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan infrastruktur pelayanan publik. Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi antara Pemerintah sebagai Pengguna Jasa dengan pihak swasta sebagai Penyedia Jasa konstruksi, berlaku aturan hukum kontrak pada umumnya dan berlaku juga ketentuan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan Jasa Konstruksi. Asas utama yang melandasi hukum perjanjian adalah asas Itikad Baik. Suatu perjanjian tidak akan terlaksana dengan baik apabila dilaksanakan tidak dengan itikad baik. pada tahap pelaksanaan kontrak, pengguna jasa dan penyedia jasa wajib untuk menaati keseluruhan isi kontrak kerja konstruksi dalam kondisi apapun sekaligus menaati kepatutan, kebiasaan, dan undang-undang terkait dengan kontrak kerja konstruksi. Namun hal ini tidak dilaksanakan oleh Penyedia jasa, sehingga PPK dengan kewenangannya melakukan pemutusan kontrak sepihak sebagai konsekuensi hukum lebih lanjut dari hal-hal yang terjadi dalam pemenuhan kegiatan kontraktual yaitu tidak melaksanakan kewajiban kontrak walaupun telah diberikan kesempatan kepada penyedia jasa, sehingga kontrak dihentikan.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PRINSIP PEMILIK MANFAAT (BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP) SERTA PERANAN NOTARIS BERDASARKAN PERMENKUMHAM NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2019 Fatrul Razi; Rembrandt Rembrandt; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.807

Abstract

Notaries as public officials have an obligation to apply the principle of recognizing beneficial owners in a corporation where this obligation is not regulated in UUJN. On the one hand, a notary does play an important role in disclosing beneficial ownership of a corporation, but on the other hand, the transparency of beneficial ownership disclosure must be based on honest and clear information from parties representing the corporation. This is due to the existence of beneficial ownership which cannot be fully detected by a notary. The problems are what are the legal consequences if the principle of recognizing beneficial owners (BO) is not implemented and what is the urgency of applying the principle of recognizing beneficial owners (BO) in carrying out notary duties. This legal research uses normative legal research, namely library research, which is a data collection method by studying books, laws and regulations, and writings related to this research. While the nature of the research is analytical descriptive, that is, it gives a clear and detailed description of an event that occurred. The results of research on legal consequences if the principle of recognizing beneficial owners (BO) is not implemented are given administrative sanctions, namely revoking the notary's license if violations are found, supervision in the implementation of the application of the BO principle is carried out by the Minister of Law and Human Rights through the Director General of General Legal Administration. Meanwhile, the notary's responsibility for the deed he made is that in civil terms the notary is only responsible for the head of the deed, meaning that it contains the authority of the appearers in signing the deed, then for the closing deed which contains the authority of the witnesses then the appearers are confronted with signing the deed, whereas against contents of the deed the notary is only responsible that the deed he made does not violate the clauses prohibited by law and the provisions stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Criminally, a notary can be prosecuted in court if at a later date, the competent authorities can prove that the notary has consciously entered information that benefits one party and harms the other party. And the urgency of applying the principle of recognizing beneficial owners (BO) in carrying out notary duties is that basically the obligation to disclose beneficial ownership is carried out by parties who wish to use the services of a notary. The role and position of a notary is as a supporting system in disclosing beneficial ownership of a corporation, namely in this case during the process of inputting data related to the establishment or changes to the corporate statutes/bylaws. Thus the obligation related to disclosure of beneficial ownership cannot be borne by the notary but the service user.
Co-Authors Ade Putra Prima Anishya Yulia Anggraini Azheri, Busyra Azmi Fendri Calvin Danovand Devianty Fitri Dian Wahyuni Dwi Weka Wirawan Engga Lift Irwanto Engga Lift Irwanto Fatrul Razi Harry Ismaryadi Harsa Khairu Ismansyah Ismansyah Khairani Khairani Nadia Tiara Syahredi Adnani Nadya Muthia Wulandari Rembrandt Rembrandt Rhonny Yusvaldi Siska Elvandari Siti Lauriyanti Imran Syofirman Syofyan Titia Tauhiddah Yulfasni Yulfasni