Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Ideas:%20Jurnal%20Pendidikan,%20Sosial%20dan%20Budaya

Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama di Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah 001 Sebatik Barat Akbar Nur Aziz; Danang Eko Prastya; Hasse Jubba; Herpita Wahyuni
Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya Vol 7 No 3 (2021): Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya (Agustus)
Publisher : Ideas Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32884/ideas.v7i3.409

Abstract

Pendidikan merupakan hak bagi warga negara dan akses pendidikan diharapkan dapat merata di seluruh Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan model CIPP. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan cara observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Tujuan Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui evaluasi kurikulum Pendidikan Agama di SD Muhammadiyah 001 Sebatik Barat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) evaluasi context meliputi penyusunan kurikulum sudah baik meski menerapkan kurikulum KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013, Kurikulum ISMUBA belum diterapkan; (2) evaluasi input meliputi kualitas guru masih kurang. Bahan ajar masih kurang mencukupi; (3) evaluasi process meliputi pelaksanaan kurikulum berjalan kurang baik, kurangnya fasilitas sekolah menjadi faktor penghambat jalannya kurikulum; (4) evaluasi product meliputi evaluasi belajar ada ulangan tengah semester dan ujian akhir semester, tetapi evaluasi kurikulumnya belum, dan lulusan siswa melanjutkan ke SMP dan pesantren. Education is a right for citizens, and access to education is evenly distributed throughout Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with the CIPP model. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. This study aimed to determine the evaluation of the Religious Education curriculum at SD Muhammadiyah 001 Sebatik Barat. The study results show that: (1) context evaluation includes the preparation of a good curriculum, although implementing the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum, the ISMUBA curriculum has not been implemented; (2) input evaluation includes the lack of teacher quality. Teaching materials are still insufficient; (3) the evaluation process includes implementing the curriculum that is not running well. The lack of school facilities is a factor that hinders the course of the curriculum; (4) product evaluation includes learning evaluation with Mid-semester examinations and final semester exams. Still, the curriculum evaluation has not yet been carried out, and graduate students continue to junior high schools and pesantren.