Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PEMBERDAYAAN KETERAMPILAN SENI KAMPUNG LUDRUK UNTUK MENDONGKRAK PENDAPATAN PEREKONOMIAN MASYARAKAT SEKITAR Anggi Diah Pitaloka; Meilia Anggorowati; Davi Ramadhani; Supriyati -
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Volume 2 No 1 Tahun 2019 (On Proses)
Publisher : KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Ludruk merupakan sebuah pertunjukan drama tradisional yang berasal dari Jawa Timur. Pada pementasannya, Ludruk menceritakan kisah-kisah kehidupan sehari-hari rakyat biasa, yang seringkali di bumbui dengan humor atau komedi dan kritik sosial. Pementasan Ludruk biasanya dibuka dengan Tari Remo dan parikan (Cak Edi Karya, Pimpinan Ludruk Karya Budaya). Namun sayangnya popularitas kesenian tradisional Ludruk, kini sudah berangsur pudar (Factualnews.co, 2017). Kami menyoroti salah satu komunitas budaya yang berfokus pada keterampilan seni ludruk yaitu Paguyuban Ludruk Karya Budaya. Dimana komunitas ini adalah komunitas yang terkenal pada masanya, dan realita saat ini sudah lama tidak ada latihan yang terjadwal, beberapa mengatakan kurangnya regenerasi pemain, dan eksistensi yang menurun. Padahal ludruk adalah salah satu asset kekayaan bangsa yang unik, dimana memiliki nilainya tersendiri dan harus kembali dilestarikan. Selain itu, komunitas ini merupakan rumah dan sumber pendapatan bagi sebagian besar anggotanya. Oleh karena itu, melalui program ini telah dirancang beberapa metode yang memiliki tiga fokus utama, yaitu terciptanya komunitas paguyuban yang terstruktur memiliki sistem yang mengacu pada keberlajutan usaha, regenerasi anggota paguyuban, serta peningkatan eksistensi ludruk di masyarakat umum dimana akan berdampak pada peningkatan pendapatan perekonomian masyarakat sekitar (anggota paguyuban). Kata kunci: Ludruk, Generasi Muda, Perekonomian .

EKONOMI KELEMBAGAAN SISTEM USAHATANI PADI DI INDONESIA BENNY RACHMAN; SUPRIYATI -; SUPENA -
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (115.784 KB)

This study was conducted in five regencies/rural which covered both java and outside java.This objective of this study are to get knowledge about the effect of policy government’sincentive and analyze Profitability Of rice farming. This results have important implicationsfor Indonesia’s food policy, namely : (1) fertilizer market seem to be working well, ascharacterized by higher market competitiveness which increased efficiency, (2) in general, atfive case districts gabah – rice market is quite well, as reflected by smaller marketing marginwith a range 4 -6 % and restively competitive, (3) the performance at rice production costshowed that in both region have cooperative and competitive advantage to produce rice, forimport substitutions. In order to improve the welfare at rice farmers the following factorshould be taken into account, i.e. Input use balanced, reducing waste during harvest and postharvest,the improvement of gabah rendement, international improvement of input – outputmarket, to enchance farmers accesibility to land, capital and technology, and diversified thesource of household income, especially from off and non – agricultural activities.

HUBUNGAN PENGUASAAN LAHAN DAN PENDAPATAN RUMAHTANGGA DI PEDESAAN (Kasus di Propinsi Jawa Tengah, Sumatera Barat dan Kalimantan Barat) SUPRIYATI -; SAPTANA -; YANA SUPRIYATNA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (122.211 KB)

Historically correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdincome structure in the rural area is linearity. Land owner or land holding structure inequalitymain factors to cause income structure inequality. In condition, there are the opportunityemploy and economic activity to open up, why is the correlation between landowner and landholding structure with the income structure? This paper objective to study: (1) Land owneror land holding structure in the rural area; (2) Household income structure in the rural area;and (3) The correlation between landowner and land holding structure with the householdincome structure in the rural area. Location on this study to focused in the three district inthree provincial exes. Klaten, central Java; Pasaman, West Sumatera; and Landak, WestKalimantan. The study to analyze by descriptive, gini index, and correlation analyze. Ingeneral, land owner and land holding size in Klaten, central Java less than West Sumatera andWest Kalimantan. Gini index analysis relatively to indicate high equality, except in Pasaman,West Sumatera. Inequality on land holding lower than landowner in all location. Totalincome in Klaten, Central Java to range Rp. 6,77 - 6,97 million/years; Pasaman, WestSumatera to range Rp. 7,30 – Rp. 8,10 million/years; and in Landak, West Kalimantan torange Rp. 5,90 – 6,65 million/years. Analyze gini index for household income to indicatehigh inequality income structure rural area in Klaten. On the other hand, rural area inPasaman, West Sumatera and Landak, West Kalimantan gini index result reflecting lowinequality. There are deferent factors by location to cause inequality of landowner or landholding and household income structure, in Klaten rural area caused by high proportionincome source from non-agriculture. On the other hand, in Pasaman and Landak rural areacaused by level of technology adoption and kind of commodity planting by farmers.Statistically, correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdagriculture income is not significant. Correlation between total income with the landowner orland holding in Pasaman, West Java is significant, but in Klaten, Central Java and Landak,West Java is not significant.

STRUKTUR DAN DISTRIBUSI PENDAPATAN RUMAHTANGGA PETANI LAHAN SAWAH DI JAWA DAN LUAR JAWA HANDEWI P.S. RACHMAN; SUPRIYATI -
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (75.242 KB)

This article following aim to study (1) structure earnings of farmer household of rice fieldfarm in five kabupaten in Java and two kabupaten Off Java, (2) the earnings distributionand bearing of with ownership distribution of farm, and (3) formulating policy suggestionto improve earnings of household. Research use primary data result of survey of farmerhousehold in MH 2000 / 01, MK I and of MK II 2001. Research result indicate that (1)agricultural sector still contribute more than 60% of earnings of household farmer of ricefield farm in research area, and paddy farming system have compartment around 21 -38% in Java and 23 - 41% Off Java to totalizing earnings of household, and there istendency more and more wide of rice field farm of land holding high more and morelevel earnings of household, (2) distribution earnings of household in Java and Off Javahave heavy Lameness level (Index of Gini >0,5) where mean Lameness level ofhousehold compared to heavier Java Off Java, and ( 3) entry of sector non-agriculture instructure earnings of household farmer of rice field farm have negative diffraction toearnings distribution which for example because of the lowering of accessing householdto sector is non-agriculture. Implication of finding is important allocation priority ofresource of development for relevant agricultural sector still placed forward. Inagricultural sector strives the make-up of earnings related to scale efficiency dominationof farm of land holding, usage of seed with quality and efficiency marketing and inputoutput. Besides for the reduce of negative diffraction entry of farmer sector to distributionearnings of household in rice field farm area require to be considered to access householdinto the sector through extension of opportunity of job in sector non-agriculture.

DINAMIKA KETENAGAKERJAAN DAN PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA DI PEDESAAN JAWA (Kasus di Propinsi Jawa Barat, Jawa Tengah dan Jawa Timur) SUPRIYATI -; SAPTANA -; SUMEDI -
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (125.286 KB)

The last periode, agricultural sector have to burdensome rural labor absorbtion,consequenly decleaning productivity of labor in agricultural sector and wage rate relativelystagnant. This paper obyective to study : (1) labor dinamic in the macro and micro level; (2)variety kind of labor activity and labor supply in wet land rural area; (3) structure of timelabor allocation in household level; (4) trend of wage rate in wet land rural area. Both inmacro and micro level labor absorbtion in agricultural sector each achieved 68 % and 66 %.Total labor absortion by members household about 75 – 127 days (21-35 %) from timeavaibility. Trend of riel wage rate in two provincial (East Java and Central Java) relativelystagnant (1.03 – 2.03 % per years), so in West Java Provincial to decleaning (0.09 %/years).This fact to indicate shown sign labor over supplay in the rural area. Several recomendationto solve this problem are land use optimalization by higher plant intencity; to developefarming diversification, especially high value commodity; land and farming consolidation;and to develope agroindustry based on local raw material.

HUBUNGAN PENGUASAAN LAHAN DAN PENDAPATAN RUMAHTANGGA DI PEDESAAN (Kasus di Propinsi Jawa Tengah, Sumatera Barat dan Kalimantan Barat) SUPRIYATI -; SAPTANA -; YANA SUPRIYATNA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (140.349 KB)

Historically correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdincome structure in the rural area is linearity. Land owner or land holding structure inequalitymain factors to cause income structure inequality. In condition, there are the opportunityemploy and economic activity to open up, why is the correlation between landowner and landholding structure with the income structure? This paper objective to study: (1) Land owneror land holding structure in the rural area; (2) Household income structure in the rural area;and (3) The correlation between landowner and land holding structure with the householdincome structure in the rural area. Location on this study to focused in the three district inthree provincial exes. Klaten, central Java; Pasaman, West Sumatera; and Landak, WestKalimantan. The study to analyze by descriptive, gini index, and correlation analyze. Ingeneral, land owner and land holding size in Klaten, central Java less than West Sumatera andWest Kalimantan. Gini index analysis relatively to indicate high equality, except in Pasaman,West Sumatera. Inequality on land holding lower than landowner does in all location. Totalincome in Klaten, Central Java to range Rp. 6,77 - 6,97 million/years; Pasaman, WestSumatera to range Rp. 7,30 – Rp. 8,10 million/years; and in Landak, West Kalimantan torange Rp. 5,90 – 6,65 million/years. Analyze gini index for household income to indicatehigh inequality income structure rural area in Klaten. On the other hand, rural area inPasaman, West Sumatera and Landak, West Kalimantan gini index result reflecting lowinequality. There are deferent factors by location to cause inequality of landowner or landholding and household income structure, in Klaten rural area caused by high proportionincome source from non-agriculture. On the other hand, in Pasaman and Landak rural areacaused by level of technology adoption and kind of commodity planting by farmers.Statistically, correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdagriculture income is not significant. Correlation between total income with the landowner orland holding in Pasaman, West Java is significant, but in Klaten, Central Java and Landak,West Java is not significant.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search