Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)

KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN GENDER Johanis Stefanus Lakusa; La Moma; Anderson L Palinussa
JUMADIKA Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)
Publisher : Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Pattimura Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/jumadikavol4iss1year2022page17-28

Abstract

Berpikir kritis hendaknya menjadi salah satu aktivitas yang harus dikembangkan dan diajarkan di setiap mata pelajaran, karena kemampuan berpikir kritis bukan bawaan sejak lahir. Kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam penyelesaian masalah matematika hendaknya didukung oleh penggunaan model pembelajaran yang digunakan guru dalam proses pembelajaran. Setiap siswa memiliki perbedaan pengetahuan, pengalaman, kemampuan dalam pemecahan masalah. Perbedaan ini dapat juga dikategorikan berdasarkan gender. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa antara siswa yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Discovery Learning (DL) ditinjau dari segi gender. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode campuran, dengan strategi metode campuran bertahap, yaitu tahap pertama adalah mengumpulkan dan menganalsis data kuantitatif kemudian diikuti oleh pengumpulan dan menganalisis data kualitatif. Penelitian ini bertempat di SMA Negeri 6 Ambon. Instrumen tes yang digunakan berupa soal uraian yang disusun berdasarkan indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis menurut Facione. Analisis data yang dilakukan dalam peneitian ini terbagi atas analisis data kuantitatif dan analisis data kualitatif. Analisis data kuantitatif berupa uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji hipotesis. Analisa data kualitatif yang dilakukan berdasarkan langkah-langkah yang dikemukakan oleh Miles dan Huberman yaitu: reduksi Data, penyajian Data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis antara siswa yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran PBL dengan siswa yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran DL dan juga tidak terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa berdasarkan gender, dan tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran PBL dan DL dengan gender terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA SD NEGERI 40 AMBON PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR Rachmawati T; Theresia Laurens; La Moma
JUMADIKA Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)
Publisher : Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Pattimura Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (568.439 KB) | DOI: 10.30598/jumadikavol1iss2year2019page91-101

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical creative thinking ability of Grade VI students of SD Negeri 40 Ambon on flat material. This type of research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were fifth grade students of SD Negeri 40 Ambon in semester 2 of 2018/2019 academic year as many as five people. The subject taking technique is done by purposive sampling. Methods of data collection through tests of mathematical creative thinking and interviews. Data analysis techniques refer to the opinion of Miles and L-Luberman, namely the data reduction stage, the data presentation stage, and the conclusion drawing stage. The results showed that the five subjects representing each level of creative thinking ability had different characters in showing indicators of creative thinking ability
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF DAN ANALITIK PESERTA DIDIK SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MODEL PROGRAMME FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENT ASSESSMENT (PISA) Hasan Bashri Hadimu; Theresia Laurens; La Moma
JUMADIKA Vol 2 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)
Publisher : Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Pattimura Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/jumadikavol2iss2year2020page46-59

Abstract

During this time, reflective thinking and analytical skills have not been one of the objectives of mathematics and learners have not demonstrated reflective activity and analytic learning. The ability of the students ' reflective thinking and analytics is an important aspect to be examined and developed so that the learner's math learning is more optimal. The study aims to describe the ability of the students ' reflective thinking and analytic of junior high school in solving the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) model. This research is a qualitative descriptive study describing the reflective thinking skills and analytical students of junior high school in solving the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) model. The subject in this study is a class IX student consisting of three learners with the details of each of the 1 learners with reflective thinking skills, 1 student with analytic thinking skills and 1 student with reflective and analytical thinking skills. The data collection techniques used are tests of reflective thinking and analytical skills as well as interviews. Test Data and interviews are analyzed based on indicators that meet the ability of reflective thinking and analytical thinking skills. Data analysis techniques refer to the Miles and Hiberman concepts which include data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion withdrawal. Data validity techniques use observer persistence, triangulation time and peer checking. The results of the study provide conclusions: 1) Subject 1 meets the indicator of the reflective thinking ability, subject 1 able to the reacting phase, comparing, less in the contemplating phase: 2) Subject 2 meets the analytical thinking ability indicator, subject 2 is capable at would phase, organizing and attributing: 3) Subject 3 meets the indicator of reflective thinking capabilities capable of the reacting, comparing, contemplating and subject 3, organizing and attributing