Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.323
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Jurnal IKA Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Bhineka Tunggal Ika: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan PKN Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Widya Accarya Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan JNANASIDDHÂNTA : JURNAL TEOLOGI HINDU Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Media Ganesha FHIS (P2MMGFHIS) Journal of Sustainable Development Science
I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum

 1 
Konsekuensi Yuridis Berlakunya Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Ardhya, Si Ngurah; Mertha Sujana, I Putu Windu
Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Februari, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31493

Abstract

Philosophically PMK (Constitutional Court Decision) Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 based on way of life, awareness, and legal ideals such as the mystical atmosphere and Indonesian Nation according Pancasila and The Constitutional of The Republic of Indonesia Article 28E Paragraph (2). Sociologically, based on legal needs society regarding the leniency when the marriage agreement was made that is the phenomenon of a husband and wife for some reason feels they needed to make a marriage agreement after the wedding day was held. Juridically, the issuance of PMK Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 is not solely on the basis of unconstitutionality, but also on a conflict of norms between Article 29 Paragraph (1) of Act Nr.  Year 1974 with general provisions of the ageement in Book III Code of Civil Law. Referring to PMK No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 which was strengthened by Act Nr. 2 Year 2014, Notary has the right to ratified the marriage agreement into an authentic deed so that there is no justifiable reason for the Department of Population and Civil Registration and Office of Religious Affairs rejects the authentic nature of the deed which is validated bay notary. 
Konsekuensi Yuridis Berlakunya Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Si Ngurah Ardhya; I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana
Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Februari, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31493

Abstract

Philosophically PMK (Constitutional Court Decision) Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 based on way of life, awareness, and legal ideals such as the mystical atmosphere and Indonesian Nation according Pancasila and The Constitutional of The Republic of Indonesia Article 28E Paragraph (2). Sociologically, based on legal needs society regarding the leniency when the marriage agreement was made that is the phenomenon of a husband and wife for some reason feels they needed to make a marriage agreement after the wedding day was held. Juridically, the issuance of PMK Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 is not solely on the basis of unconstitutionality, but also on a conflict of norms between Article 29 Paragraph (1) of Act Nr.  Year 1974 with general provisions of the ageement in Book III Code of Civil Law. Referring to PMK No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 which was strengthened by Act Nr. 2 Year 2014, Notary has the right to ratified the marriage agreement into an authentic deed so that there is no justifiable reason for the Department of Population and Civil Registration and Office of Religious Affairs rejects the authentic nature of the deed which is validated bay notary. 
Co-Authors Ardhya, Si Ngurah Camellia Camellia Camellia Cecep Darmawan Dasim Budimansyah, Prayoga Bestari, Redi Yamanto, Dasim Budimansyah, Edwin Nurdiansyah Enik puji lestari Gunawijaya, I Wayan Titra I Made Riyan Cahyadi I Made Yudana I Wayan Landrawan I Wayan Titra Gunawijaya I Wayan Titra Gunawijaya Ika Pramita Rusadi Dawolo Made Riyan Cahyadi Ni Made Widya Sari Puspa Dianti, Puspa Riyan Cahyadi, I Made Sukadi Sukadi Sukadi Sukadi Widya Sari, Ni Made Yeni Yeni