Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

Moral Values That Thwart Intergroup Interactions: An Investigation on the Interaction Between Indonesian Moslems and Chinese-Indonesian Christians Hudiyana, Joevarian; Muluk, Hamdi; Milla, Mirra Noor
Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia Vol. 21, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

As one of the most established theories, the contact hypothesis has been well-researched throughout decades of investigations. However, there have been few attempts to investigate individual factors that may influence interaction processes that may lower prejudice. The present study attempts to find the individual factors that can moderate the contact – prejudice effect, that is, individual moral values. Previous researches have noted that individuals with high moral loyalty, authority, and sanctity may resist interacting with outgroups. Consequently, these individuals may possess higher prejudice. Thus, we hypothesize that individuals with higher levels of those three moral values may experience the contact effect more profoundly, in which there is stronger contact – prejudice effect. 594 Moslem participants participated in the online survey we administered. We found that moral authority and purity can moderate the contact – prejudice effect, consistent with our hypotheses. These patterns were found only for the contact – subtle prejudice effect. However, moral loyalty cannot moderate this effect. We discuss the implications by examining the Indonesian current sociopolitical conditions and how the three moral values influence the dynamics of intergroup contact.
Learning Approach as Predictor of Students' Epistemological Development in the Framework of Self-Authorship Theory Arifin, Haykal Hafizul; Muluk, Hamdi
Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia Vol. 21, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Past studies have found that an individual's epistemological development is predicted from learning that is meaningful to the learner. The current research aims to address whether deep learning style is able to predict students' epistemological ability (self-authorship, which is defined as the internal capacity to construct and evaluate knowledge claims, to comprehend the nature of contextual knowledge, and to have independence in the acquisition of knowledge). The researchers hypothesized that the deeper the learning approaches adopted by students, the higher their selfauthorship. Conversely, the more students utilize a surface approach to learning, the lower their self-authorship. A total of 346 students enrolled in a university in Indonesia participated in the study. The results showed support for both hypotheses, and we discussed the role of cognitive dispositions in the development of epistemological ability.
Support for Palestine Among Indonesian Muslims: Religious Identityand Solidarity as Reasons for E-PetitionSigning Shadiqi, Muhammad Abdan; Muluk, Hamdi; Milla, Mirra Noor
Psychological Research on Urban Society Vol. 3, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A petition is a form of collective action urging the government or a public entity to resolve a specific situation. There is inconsistency between previous research on whether religious or political identity is more likely to lead to radical or peaceful actions, especially in terms of how feelings of solidarity relate to religious-political issues. This study examines the reasons Indonesians signed e-petitions supporting Palestine. Data were collected from the comment sections of e-petitions supporting Palestine on change.org. In total, we analyzed 380 comments from 25 e-petitions using a qualitative approach. Using NVivo for thematic analysis, we found that the most recurring themes were moral violation, followed by independence for Palestine, solidarity, hatred as a negative emotion, and religious identity. Additionally, matrix nodes analysis showed identification with Islam was related to solidarity. These findings suggest that the similarity of religious identity in the two nations can be associated with solidarity as a reason for signing the e-petitions. We also discussed the association between moral violation and independence for Palestine as reasons for signing the e-petitions.
The premises and promises of Psychological Research on Urban Society Muluk, Hamdi
Psychological Research on Urban Society Vol. 5, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Extended Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Attitude of Students in Public and Religious Homogeneous Schools: Understanding the Mediating Role of Ingroup Norms, Outgroup Norms, and Intergroup Anxiety Whinda Yustisia; Joevarian Hudiyana; Hamdi Muluk
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 48, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (779.649 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.42419

Abstract

Previous studies had shown the benefits of extended intergroup contact for outgroup attitude, mainly when direct intergroup contact is blocked. However, there have not studies that attempt to directly compare the role of extended contact in outgroup attitude across different contexts. The present study aimed to fill the gap by examining the relationship of extended intergroup contact and outgroup attitude in three different contexts: public schools, moderate Islamic Boarding School, and fundamentalist Islamic Boarding School. These schools differ in the level of group heterogeneity. Possible mechanisms that could explain the relationship were also examined: ingroup norms, outgroup norms, and intergroup anxiety. Two correlational studies were conducted to test the hypotheses—study 1 employed 126 Muslim public high school students employed as participants, study 2 employed 112 participants from a more fundamentalist Islamic Boarding School and 230 participants from a more moderate Islamic Boarding Schools. Across studies, we found evidence that extended intergroup contact indirectly predicted outgroup attitude. However, different social contexts involve different mechanisms. This difference is attributed to direct intergroup contact.
How is the State Perceived as Fair? A Literature Review of Social Identity-Based Procedural Justice in the National Context Andina Mega Larasati; Joevarian Hudiyana; Hamdi Muluk
Buletin Psikologi Vol 29, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (218.718 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.64101

Abstract

Justice is relevant in various domains of life, including the state. The social identity-based procedural justice theories (Group Value Model and Group Engagement Model) emphasize the importance of procedural justice from the authority in signaling the group’s inclusion and respect, thus increasing individuals’ cooperation and compliance. This article aims to critically review published literature using the two models in a national context, of which there were inconsistent findings regarding the role of group identification. Three issues are underlying this inconsistency. First, both models could be applied when national identity was salient, such as legal compliance (to taxation and traffic law). Second, perceived police legitimacy is a better mediator when the national identity was not salient (e. g. cooperation in counter-terrorism and crowd policing). Third, the effect of procedural justice depends on the motivation to secure identity (which is generally higher among minority/marginalized groups). As both models are strongly bound by context, the author suggests controlling police-national identity prototypicality on studies about police procedural justice, attitude toward outgroup and relational identification with the police on studies involving intergroup conflict, and uncertainty about membership status on studies toward minority groups. Hopefully, this article could contribute references and encourage related studies in Indonesia.
Development of Muslim Identity Expression Scale Ilmi Amalia; Hamdi Muluk; Mirra Noor Milla
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 2 (2023): JP3I
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i2.30478

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of Muslim identity expression scale, a measurement instrument used to evaluate various manifestations. Muslim identity obtained expressionin a multitude of domains, including the private sphere, politics, economics, socio-culture, legal matters, and education. The expression was categorized into two distinct functions, namely consolidation and mobilization. In the context of Indonesia, consolidation was defined as an expression that enhanced identity of individuals as Muslim. Meanwhile, mobilization changed the condition of Muslim, often related to power and politics, such as participating in political actions to defend Islam or supporting the establishment of political parties. This study comprised two distinct phases, namely the development of the scale and the examination of the structural validity. Based on a review of relevant literature and results from an open-ended questionnaire, 55 items were compiled and administered to 546 subjects. The results showed that 34 items met the criteria consisting of four dimensions, namely personal, interpersonal, collective action, and political participation expression. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 34 items and four dimensions matched the structure offered (ꭓ2 = 1793.805 df = 521, p < .01; RMSEA = 0.066, 90% CI = 0.062-0.069; CFI = 0.945; TLI = 0.94). The results provided preliminary evidence to support Muslim identity expression scale as a valid measuring tool with sound conceptual and empirical psychometric bases.
Melihat Pengaruh dari Social Endorsement Cues (SECs) dalam 10 Tahun Terakhir: Systematic Literature Review Muhammad Reza Satya; Hamdi Muluk
G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Desember 2024. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/gcouns.v9i1.6386

Abstract

Pengguna media sosial mengalami peningkatan dalam 10 tahun terakhir yang disertai dengan manfaat dan bahaya yang ditimbulkan. Salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi cara orang menilai kebenaran informasi di media sosial adalah pandangan tentang dukungan sosial atau dikenal dengan istilah social endorsement cues (SECs). Peneliti melakukan systematic literature review (SLR) mengenai pengaruh SECs pada penelitian eksperimen. Peneliti menemukan bahwa bentuk SECs semakin beragam seperti rating, label peringatan atau cek fakta, jenis komentar, dan persentase kecocokan dengan suatu produk. SLR ini juga menemukan beberapa variabel potensial yang dapat menjadi moderator seperti rasa percaya, persepsi terhadap media sosial, keberpihakan politik, dan tingkat partisipasi politik. Penelitian ini berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan pemahaman individu mengenai bagaimana pengaruh SECs terhadap perilaku konsumen dan interaksi sosial di platform digital serta membantu memahami tren dan perubahan individu dalam merespon dukungan sosial. Penelitian selanjutnya sebaiknya mempertimbangkan peran dari variabel yang berpotensi memberikan dampak yang lebih kuat terhadap pengaruh SECs. Kata kunci: media sosial, social endorsement cues, label peringatan