Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KORESPONDENSI KETIDAKTERSEDIAAN RUANG MAKAN TERHADAP JENIS HUNIAN MELALUI PENDEKATAN GROUNDED THEORY Sarah Heriyanti Putri; Hanson Endra Kusuma; Annisa Safira Riska
NALARs Vol 21, No 1 (2022): NALARs Volume 21 Nomor 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/nalars.21.1.67-74

Abstract

ABSTRAK. Ruang makan pada hunian umumnya menjadi tempat untuk mewadahi kegiatan makan, pengolahan makanan, penyimpanan bahan pokok dan makanan siap saji. Namun, penghuni diberbagai hunian masih menggunakan ruang lain sebagai wadah kegiatan tersebut disebabkan keterbatasan ruang untuk memuatnya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui faktor ketidaktersediaan Ruang Makan pada berbagai jenis hunian seperti Apartemen, Rumah, Indekos, dan Rusun. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengungkap alternatif ruang kegiatan makan penghuni berdasarkan jenis hunian. Penelitian dengan metode kualitatif ini menggunakan pendekatan grounded theory serta pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner daring. Hasil penelitian menemukan sebanyak 24,86% responden dari jenis Apartemen, Rumah, Indekos, dan Rusun yang tidak memiliki Ruang Makan untuk mewadahi kegiatan makan, mengolah makanan dan menyimpan makanan. Pada penelitian ini disimpulkan kegiatan makan pada hunian yang tidak memiliki ruang makan dapat dilakukan di Ruang Tamu, Ruang Keluarga, Ruang Kerja dan Ruang Tidur. Kata kunci: jenis hunian, kegiatan makan, ketidaktersediaan ruang, ruang makan. ABSTRACT. The dining room in residential generally provides a place to accommodate eating activities, food processing, storage of staples, and faster food storage. However, residents in various dwellings still use other spaces to carry out these activities due to the limited space to accommodate them. This study aims to determine the unavailability of the dining room for various types of housing such as vertical houses, landed houses, boarding houses, and flats. Furthermore, this study also reveals alternative dining rooms based on the type of occupancy. This qualitative study with a grounded theory approach also collects data through an online questionnaire. This study found that 24.86% of respondents in various types of housing such as vertical houses, landed houses, boarding houses, and flats did not have space for a dining room to accommodate eating, processing food, and storing food. This study reveals that eating activities can be carried out in the Drawing Room, Living Room, Study Room, and Bedroom for residents who do not have a dining room. Keywords: dining room existence, dwelling types, eating activities, unavailable space
Perbedaan Kegiatan Penghuni di Ruang Makan dengan Ruangan lain berdasarkan ketersediaan Ruang Makan pada Hunian Sarah Heriyanti Putri; Sofia Pamela; Hanson Endra Kusuma; Annisa Safira Riska
RUAS Vol 19, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : RUAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.ruas.2021.019.02.10

Abstract

The existence of a dining room is now rarely found in some residences. Some people who do not have a dining room will be forced to use a room to carry out eating activities. In comparison, other people use the dining room to do other activities. It shows that the existence of space reflects the behaviour of the occupants in living. This study will compare community activities with residential conditions with a dining room and those without a dining room. This study aims to reveal the differences and activities most often carried out in the two conditions. Then all these activities will be classified based on the theory of affordance. This research method uses a sequential mixed-method approach by distributing online questionnaires. The data collected were analyzed using principal component analysis and analysis of the mean latent variables to find the most dominant variable. Based on the study results, the most dominant activity carried out in residential areas that have a dining room is only eating activities. Meanwhile, residential areas that do not have a dining room include learning, working, relaxing and household activities.