This study aims This study aims to determine the comparison of the course review horay and Teams Games Tournament learning models on students' cognitive learning outcomes. The method used in this study is a comparison with the design of the Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Sampling was used by random sampling technique. Posttest results in experimental class 1 get the lowest score 60 and the highest score 80. While in the experimental class 2 get the lowest score is 65 and the highest score is 90, the average value in experimental class 1 is 74.25 and the average value of the experimental class 2 is 79.25 The results showed that there was a comparison of the Course Review Horay and Teams Games Tournament learning models on student learning outcomes. This can be seen from the results of the hypothesis using the t test obtained a significance value of 0.043, because the significance value is less than 0.05 then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted. Thus it can be said that there is a comparison of the Course Review Horay and Teams Games Tournament learning models on student learning outcomes in Theme 1 Sub-th eme 2 Class V SDN Mekar Baru, with a difference value of 5.