Articles
<![CDATA[Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights ]]>
<![CDATA[Palguna, I Dewa Gede]]>
<![CDATA[ Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (473.403 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/consrev311
<![CDATA[Constitutional complaint is one of important issues to be dealt with by severral countries issues adopting constitutional court in their national legal system and the Federal Constitutional Court Germany (Bundesverfassungsgericht) is considered by expert as one of the most advance mechanism among countries in dealing with the issue. Generally speaking, constitutional complaint can be described as a complaint or lawsuit filed by an individual citizen who deems his or her constitutional right (s) has been violates by act or omission of public institution or public official. Mostly, such a complaint can only be filed it theere is no other legal remedy available or all legal remedies available have been exhausted. The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia however is not entrusted with authority to hear constitutional complaint case not withstanding the fact that statistical data on judicial review cases filed by many petitioners before the Court were substantially constitutional complaint issues. It means that, empirically giving the Court to hear constitutional complaint case is necessarily pivotal and theoritically, the Court has the very foundation to be entrusted withq such authority. Considering the complex mechanism to amend the Constitution of 1945, which exhaustively deserible the courtâs authorities, this article offers the lawmaker a theoretical insight tio give the Court a limited authority to hear constitutional complaint case by the way of amending the law on Constitutional Court.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA PERS MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO 40 TAHUN 1999 DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK ]]>
<![CDATA[I Kadek Oka Wijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 04, No. 01, Februari 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Paper titled press criminal liability under the Act No. 40 of 1999 in the crime of defamation. Workers press considers the imprisonment of journalists in the reform period is very restrict creativity press workers and a threat to freedom of expression as guaranteed in the Constitution and Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press. Issues raised in this paper regarding the criminal responsibility by the negative press associated with the news as reported by him. The research method of this paper is normative research. The purpose of this paper to determine the criminal responsibility of the press. Based on Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press in the event of prosecution, which is responsible for the editorial content of news is that the media in general, in this case represented by the Chief Editor (Editor in Chief). Accountability system press Act also may be charged to the company news. This criminal liability is known as "Vicarious Liability" (substitute criminal liabiability) sehubung thereto, affirmed in Article 12 of Law No. 14 of 1999 on the Press.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN “ASAS TIDAK ADA EKSTRADISI UNTUK KEJAHATAN POLITIK” TERHADAP PENOLAKAN PERMINTAAN EKSTRADISI ]]>
<![CDATA[Ketut Gede Sonny Wibawa]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sri Utari]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 01 (2012) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Political offense is the reason for rejecting the request for extradition of a country.However, in some cases turned out to still be done despite the extradition act as the basis ofan extradition request considered political crimes, or at least related to political crimes.Therefore, this paper will describe a nation justified in using “non extradition of politicalcriminal" against the rejection of the request for extradition if the crime is included inAttentate Clause, hotis humani generis and military crimes. This paper also describes theremedies that should be taken in the event of rejection of the request for extradition forpolitical crimes. So there is legal certainty and to avoid arbitrary action.Keywords: Extradition, Criminal Poli]]>
<![CDATA[PROSES LAHIRNYA HAK CIPTA TERHADAP PEMBUATAN VIDEO KLIP BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2002 ]]>
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Adi Sanjaya]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 01, No. 11, November 2013 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (296.122 KB)
<![CDATA[This paper entitled "The Birth Process of Copyright to the Making of Video Clip Based on Regulation Number 19 of 2002". The method used in making this journal is to analyze the normative juridical cases and regulations that are interrelated. In the making of this video clip is not simple because it requires a cost and Human Resources. That Human Resources are the Artist, Director, and Producer. That three part have a crucial position in the manufacture of a Video Clips, so The Writer made this paper to find out who is the holder and process of copyright to the Video Clip if examined from the Regulation Number 19 of 2002 about Copyright. Explication of the legal status and the process of the copyright to the video clip is very important to know in order to avoid conflict between parties who’s involved in the process of making the Video Clip.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB PERBUATAN DIREKSI YANG DILAKUKAN ATAS NAMA PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG BELUM MEMPEROLEH STATUS BADAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Tommy Guntara]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 02, No. 01, Februari 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (297.588 KB)
<![CDATA[This paper entitled “Legal Responsbility fo Acts of Direktor Carried Out on Behalf of A Limited Company Which Has No Legal Person Status” is a normative legal research. This research is aimed at describing and analizing the legal responsibility for acts carsied out by director on behalf of such a company.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI HAK MENGUASAI NEGARA TERHADAP HAK MILIK PERORANGAN SEBAGAI POLITIK AGRARIA DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN ATAS TANAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Amelia Febrina Merry Bogia]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 01, No. 05, Juli 2013 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (201.917 KB)
<![CDATA[Land acquisition due to public necessity shall be grounded upon the basis of State Authoritative Rights, had implied towards derogation of personal ownership rights since the compensation granted due to the acquisition of land. It had triggered social disparity within society and increasing the level of poverty in Indonesia. Hence, this writing shall apply normative legal research and secondary data with statutory and conceptual approach. This writing shall also illustrate the basic provisions of State Authoritative Rights and personal ownership rights pursuant to the 1945 Constitution and Law No 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations of Land Management and its acquisition procedure pursuant to the Law No 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition Due to Public Necessity and President’s Decree No 71 of 2012 concerning On the Use of Land Acquisition Due to Public Necessity]]>
<![CDATA[STATUS TENTARA ANAK DALAM KONFLIK BERSENJATA ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Adhi Supradnyana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 03, No. 03, September 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (109.025 KB)
<![CDATA[Proses perekrutan tentara anak dalam konflik bersenjata masih terus berlangsung diberbagai Negara hingga saat ini. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis status tentaraanak dan akibat hukum yang timbul terkait dengan keterlibatan tentara anak dalam konflikbersenjata. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, yang menggunakan beberapapendekatan, yaitu pendekatan Undang-undang, sejarah, fakta dan kasus. Dapat disimpulkanbahwa terdapat beberapa status yang dapat diberikan kepada anak berdasarkan prinsippembedaan yaitu sebagai kombatan, sebagai unlawful combatant, dan sebagai penduduksipil. Terhadap tentara anak yang tertangkap musuh atau menyerah maka diberikan statustawanan perang. Selanjutnya terdapat pula sejumlah akibat hukum yang dapat dikenakankepada tentara anak itu sendiri, Negara dan komandan militer pengguna tentara anak.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK-ANAK YANG MENJADI KORBAN PENGGUNAAN SENJATA AGENT ORANGE DALAM PERANG VIETNAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Risa Sandhi Surya]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Budi Arsika]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 03, No. 01, Februari 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (166.13 KB)
<![CDATA[This writing aims to discuss the legality of the use of ‘Agent Orange’ weapon during the Vietnam War and the legal protection of children who are victims of the use of such weapon in Vietnam. This paper is a normative legal research that uses statute, case, and historical approaches. It describes and analyzes the chronology of events and legal protection that can be provided to victims of Agent Orange, especially children. This article concluded that the legal protection that can be given to children affected by Agent Orange weapon is not sufficiently provided.]]>
<![CDATA[JUSTIFIKASI PERLINDUNGAN PENDUDUK SIPIL DALAM SERANGAN MILITER PAKTA PERTAHANAN ATLANTIK UTARA (THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION/NATO) TERHADAP LIBYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Veronika Puteri Kangagung]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>;
<![CDATA[A. A. Sri Utari]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 04, No. 02, Februari 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (138.325 KB)
<![CDATA[Jatuhnya korban sipil akibat serangan NATO terhadap Libya selama berkecamuknya perang di Libya pada tahun 2011 menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai legalitas serangan tersebut beserta batasan pemakaian alasan perlindungan penduduk sipil dapat dibenarkan. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, yang dalam hal ini menganalisis instrumen internasional yang relevan dan pendekatan kasus. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa serangan militer yang dilakukan NATO terhadap Libya dapat dibenarkan dalam perspektif penggunaan kekuatan dalam Hukum Internasional. Adapun penggunaan ‘Perlindungan Penduduk Sipil’ dapat dijadikan alasan dalam serangan militer NATO terhadap Libya dengan sejumlah pembatasan.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP KEJAHATAN TERORISME YANG MELEWATI BATAS-BATAS NASIONAL NEGARA-NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Windusadu Anantaya]]>;
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Palguna]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Putra Ariana]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 03, No. 03, September 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (161.528 KB)
<![CDATA[Sejak dahulu hingga kini, tindak pidana terorisme lintas negara selalu menjadi masalah bagi masyarakat internasional. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui status hukum dari tindak kejahatan terorisme berdasarkan hukum internasional yang berlaku serta untuk menganalisa pertanggungjawaban dari Negara kewarganegaraan pelaku kejahatan terorisme yang melintasi batas-batas Negara-negara. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang mengunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk menganalisis instrumen hukum internasional yang relevan dan pendekatan konsep. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terorisme merupakan kejahatan luar biasa dan kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan, sehingga dalam kaitannya dengan kejahatan internasional yang merupakan kompetensi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dapat diberlakukan yurisdiksi teritorial dan yurisdiksi nasional aktif. Dapat pula disimpulkan bahwa suatu Negara tidak serta-merta bertanggung jawab atas aksi terorisme yang dilakukan oleh warga negaranya.]]>
