Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Towards Quality and Sustainable Tourism in Bali: Should the Regional Master Plan be Adjusted? I Dewa Gede Palguna; Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa; Made Maharta Yasa; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Vol 7 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of law Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/UJLC.2023.v07.i01.p03

Abstract

Bali is the area in Indonesia that is most affected economically due to the paralysis of the tourism industry during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Consequently, tourism development programs designed by the government faced many obstacles in their implementation. This article discusses how the concept of quality and sustainable tourism are incorporated into the Tourism Master Plan of the Bali Province 2015-2029. Further, it evaluates the implementation of the master plan during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This writing is designed based on legal research that applies a policy-oriented approach. The research collected and analyzed primary sources in the form of law, regulation, and policy at the national and regional levels, as well as secondary sources that are available in textbooks, journal articles, and website content. A series of qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion were conducted to deepen understanding of legal and non-legal matters. This article suggested that even though the concept of quality and sustainable tourism has been incorporated into the aforementioned master plan, the document implies a contradiction between the vision that desires to apply the concept and the goals and objectives which tend to support quantity tourism. The qualitative evaluation indicated that the master plan could not be appropriately implemented and requires an adjustment to bring in again the vision into the implementing policy adopted by the provincial government.
The Power of Constitutional Court to Settle Disputes on Local Election Results : Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Bisariyadi Bisariyadi; I Dewa Gede Palguna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2011

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 abolished the proposal to establish a special court that have the power to resolve disputes on local election. As a result, that power shifted to Constitutional Court. This, de facto, is not the power designed to be exercised by the Court. Back tracked on historical trajectory of holding direct local elections, there has been a tug-of-war between judicial bodies on who have the legitimate power to settle the disputes on local elections results. This study aims to examine the power of Constitutional Court to adjudicate disputes on local election results. To achieve the research objective, this research framework will look at the historical context to have an overview of the dynamics of transposition of judicial bodies to settle the disputes. In addition, this also assess Constitutional Court decisions which provide interpretations as the basis for the legitimacy of the Court's power to adjudicate local election disputes.
PENAFSIRAN ORIGINAL INTENT DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG RENCANA PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILU DAN PILKADA SECARA SERENTAK Claudia Samantha Rico; I Dewa Gede Palguna
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 7 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i07.p11

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menganalisis terkait metode original intent dalam pengujian undang-undang terhadap konstitusi serta penerapan original intent dengan penafsiran Pasal 18 dan Pasal 22E UUD NRI 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Rencana Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada secara Serentak. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Rencana Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada secara Serentak metode penafsiran original intent kurang tepat digunakan mengingat , namun jika putusan terkait dengan masalah kedaulatan atau dalam konteks negara kesatuan maka metode penafsiran original intent memang tepat digunakan. Hal ini karena secara hukum memang pelaksanaan Pemilu dan Pilkada serentak tidak dilarang, namun pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-Xi/2013 menjadi kabur, bahwa memang harus dilaksanakan secara serentak. Namun yang paling penting adalah melihat secara empiris mengenai keuntungan dan kerugian apabila Pemilu dan Pilkada dilakukan secara serentak dan tidak serentak. Jika melihat bahwa adanya fakta mengenai banyaknya Kepala Daerah yang selesai masa jabatan pada tahun 2022 dan 2023, sehingga Pilkada tetap dilaksanakan pada 2024 maka disini hakim mengabaikan konsekuensi politik terhadap putusan. ABSTRACT This study aims to find out and analyze the original intent method in reviewing laws against the constitution and the application of the original intent with the interpretation of Article 18 and Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Plans for Elections and Pilkada simultaneously. This study uses normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study explain that in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Plans to Hold Simultaneous Elections and Pilkada, the method of interpreting the original intent is not appropriate considering that, however, if the decision is related to issues of sovereignty or in the context of a unitary state, the method interpretation of the original intent is appropriate to use. This is because legally it is true that simultaneous elections and local elections are not prohibited, but after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-Xi/2013 it became unclear, that indeed they must be carried out simultaneously. However, the most important thing is to look empirically at the advantages and disadvantages if the General Election and Pilkada are held simultaneously and not simultaneously. If you see that there are facts regarding the number of Regional Heads who have finished their terms of office in 2022 and 2023, so that the Pilkada will still be held in 2024, then here the judge ignores the political consequences of the decision.
Urgensi Sui Generis Regime Permintaan Slot Geostationary Orbit melalui Perspektif Negara Khatulistiwa Khususnya Indonesia Rackel Andriwinata; I Dewa Gede Palguna
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24, No 1 (2024): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.089-106

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries whose position is crossed by the equator, which is parallel to the Geostationary Orbit (GSO). The passing of Law No. 16 of 2002 marks Indonesia’s binding to the Outer Space Treaty, which encourages Indonesia to have regulations regarding the resolution of issues relating to the use of GSO slots in the national interest. Indonesia proposes a special legal regime that recognizes GSO as an independent territorywithout disturbing existing rules. This research emphasizes the urgency of creating a fair and equitable legal framework in utilizing GSO, especially for developing countries. This research aims to explore legal certainty in the context of space utilization and exploration, especially Geostationary Orbit (GSO). This research uses a normative juridical method with the main approaches, namely legislation and conceptual. The results show the needfor a special regime that regulates the utilization of GSO so that there is no gap between countries with the principles of maintaining peace, justice and mutual benefit, with the hope of providing clarity of rules and guidelines in exploring and utilizing space safely and fairly.
The Legal Power of the Constitutional Court Decisions Remains I Nyoman Suandika; Yohanes Usfunan; I Dewa Gede Palguna; Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i12.1606

Abstract

Issues relating to granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court immediately after they are pronounced in a plenary session open to the public are important to research for several reasons Firstly, it is very important for us to know the rationale for granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court given immediately after completion. pronounced in a public meeting open to the public. Second, understanding the permanent legal force of constitutional court decisions is also related to the question of why it is not possible to have legal efforts to correct constitutional court decisions if errors occur in terms of achieving legal certainty. Based on this, the question also arises as to whether the constitutional court's decision regarding this error will continue or not. Third, it is related to whether the legislator (positive legislator) can override the decision of the constitutional court. What is the rationale underlying the granting of permanent legal force to a Constitutional Court decision from the moment it is pronounced in a session open to the public? This research is normative legal research because there is a legal vacuum if the constitutional court's decision is contrary to the spirit of the 1945 Constitution. The importance of immediacy in granting permanent character to the constitutional court's decision, if viewed from the law in book aspect, is indeed the best choice. This is based on the following reasons. First, the Constitutional Court was formed to protect the purity of the Constitution with a more detailed interpretation. This interpretation will be used as a basis for resolving problems by certain authorities who are given direct authority by the Constitution. Therefore, it is appropriate that the interpretation is only carried out once, which is binding so that the decision must be placed at the first and final level where no effort can be made to cancel it. Second, apart from that, it must also be understood that the constitutional court as a constitutional court can resolve problems and provide legal certainty quickly by the principles of fast and simple justice.