Articles
<![CDATA[Reversal Of The Burden Of Proof And Recovery Of State Assets Due To Corruption ]]>
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 37 No 1 (2022): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v37i1.375
<![CDATA[Kasus korupsi terus mengalami peningkatan dari waktu ke waktu di Indonesia. Korupsi yang terjadi tidak hanya berdampak terhadap kerugian bagi keuangan negara, akan tetapi juga menghambat pembangunan serta kesejahteraan masyarakat. Melihat dampak korupsi yang begitu besar, tidaklah berlebihan jika korupsi disebut sebagai kejahatan luar biasa. Penanganan terhadap kejahatan luar biasa ini memerlukan upaya yang luar biasa pula. Upaya luar biasa yang dimaksud adalah tidak lagi memfokuskan pemberantasan korupsi pada pemidanaan terhadap koruptor, akan tetapi dengan mengejar dan menyita aset-aset ilegal hasil korupsi.]]>
<![CDATA[PROSPEK PEMBERLAKUAN HUKUM ADAT DALAM HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2069
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the existence of customary law specifically related to customary offenses in national criminal law and its implementation that has been applied so far, and to find out the prospects for its application after the HP bills have been implemented. The results of this research are to provide an overview of present and future.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[vincentius patria setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i1.2070
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan mengenai pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi bagi partai politik dalam hal terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi, dan formulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana tersebut serta bentuk sanksi yang akan dijatuhkan kepada partai politik selaku korporasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah rekomendasi untuk penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana koporasi bagi partai politik dan jenis-jenis sanksi yang dapat diterapkan kepada partai politik selaku korporasiKata Kunci: partai politik, pertanggungjawaban pidana. korporasi ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the arrangements regarding corporate criminal liability for political parties in the event of criminal acts of corruption, and the formulation of these criminal liabilities and the form of sanctions to be imposed on political parties as corporations. The results of this study are recommendations for the application of corporate criminal liability for political parties and types of sanctions that can be applied to political parties as corporationsKeywords: political parties, criminal liability. corporation]]>
<![CDATA[ASAS LEGALITAS DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i1.3276
<![CDATA[This article discusses legal issues related to the history and process of the formation of the principle of legality which is a fundamental principle in criminal law in various countries, including Indonesia. Tracing the history and development of the principle of legality shows that the principle of legality is much influenced by the thoughts of philosophers from various countries. The purpose of the principle of legality is to provide guarantees and protection of human rights for citizens from the arbitrariness of the authorities in applying the provisions of criminal law. This research is a normative legal research using a conceptual approach that is grounded in theories / doctrines of legal experts used to answer legal issues / issues in this article. The analysis technique used in the writing of this article is a deductive analysis technique, and uses legal material collection techniques in the form of library research (library research) and internet search (cyber-research). The results of this study are a common thread among philosophers' thoughts which form the basis of the formation of the principle of legality, including in Indonesia which is still valid today in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[KRIMINALISASI FENOMENA PENYIMPANGAN SOSIAL KUMPUL KEBO (SAMENLAVEN) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[A Danardana]]>;
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713
<![CDATA[The public's reaction to the act of social deviation, gathering together often reaps various negative responses and tends to be vigilante (eigenrichting). Based on this, it is necessary that the act of gathering together is categorized as a crime through a criminalization policy. The Draft Criminal Code has listed this act as a crime of decency, but in its formulation it needs to be re-examined regarding its impact on society. This study aims to provide an analysis of the extent to which the criminalization of gathering kebo brings social impacts to the community. This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual approach. The data collection technique was carried out by literature study, namely studying primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The analysis used in this research is prescriptive, to find out what should be done to answer the legal issues raised in this paper. The result of this research is that the criminalization of the act of gathering together needs to consider the social aspects of society.]]>
<![CDATA[The Transition Of Legal Modernism Paradigm To Legal Postmodernism In The Digital Era ]]>
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JUSTISI: Journal of Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Abstract: Legal construction in Indonesia, which is largely influenced by the influence of the Continental European legal system, the Dutch heritage is identical with the nuances of legal positivism. The flow of legal positivism is in legal modernism, which is included in the form of written rules. The development of human civilization in modern times is so fast and gives birth to a modern digital civilization. The power of legal positivism is strong enough to solve legal problems that develop following the civilization of its people. The new paradigm that can be a solution to problems in this digital era is the post-modernism paradigm. Post-modernism opens up opportunities for diversity in the meaning of law. Rigid written law can be interpreted more flexibly with the context, so that within the framework of that meaning it becomes more flexible in solving problems that occur in society.Keywords: Modernism, Post-Modernism, Digital Era. ]]>
<![CDATA[Pemenuhan Asas Persidangan Terbuka Untuk Umum dalam Persidangan Secara Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ SOL JUSTICIA Vol 5 No 1 (2022): SOL JUSTICIA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Kader Bangsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (305.478 KB)
|
DOI: 10.54816/sj.v5i1.468
<![CDATA[Writing this article will discuss the problems related to the implementation of electronic trials in the answer-and-responsibility agenda (oral-debate) and the agenda for reading decisions that do not realize the principle of an open trial. These problems make it difficult for the public to know the course of criminal case investigations in court. The research and writing of this article aims to understand the holding of electronic trials that are open to the public, and to find out the problems in the form of barriers to public access to obtaining information about court decisions. The writing of this article uses a normative research method, with a conceptual and statutory approach. The legal materials used in writing this article are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Keywords: Electronic Trial, Trial Open to the Public, Court Verdict.]]>
<![CDATA[Digitization of Legal Philosophy from a Postmodernism Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Hyronimus Rhiti]]>;
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Desember 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4467
<![CDATA[Abstract Digitalization in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 also had an impact on the development of legal philosophy, especially towards postmodernism. The process of digitizing the modern world seems to have become a culture of all aspects of life which includes laws that are constantly developing towards post-modernity (after modernity). This article aims to explore the influence of the digitalization phenomenon on the development of legal philosophy, especially the postmodern school. This article is written using a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. Data collection was carried out by means of a literature study. The results of the research in this article show that the development of the postmodernism school of legal philosophy produces a new school of "digimodernism" which is constantly developing and always in the process of dialecticization so that tracing the direction of its development requires a journey of thinking in the style of digitalization, breathing virtual but actually happening in legal reality. developed in human civilization. Keywords: Postmodernism, Digitalization, Digimodernism.]]>
<![CDATA[Prospects of Artificial Intelligence Criminal Liability Regulations in Indonesian Criminal Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Gregorius Widiartana]]>;
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i1.4780
<![CDATA[Abstrak Kecerdasan buatan adalah hasil dari perkembangan teknologi yang demikian pesat di era revolusi industri 4.0. Kehadiran kecerdasan buatan memberikan banyak manfaat dan memudahkan pekerjaan manusia sehingga lebih efektif dan efisien. Selain dampak positif dari kecerdasan buatan, ternyata terdapat potensi permasalahan dari kehadiran kecerdasan buatan yakni jika kecerdasan buatan melakukan tindak pidana dan menimbulkan korban. Hukum positif Indonesia belum mengatur mengenai pengaturan pertanggungjawaban perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh kecerdasan buatan ketika melakukan tindak pidana. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prospek pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh kecerdasan buatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah kecerdasan buatan bukanlah subjek hukum dalam hukum pidana, dan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh kecerdasan buatan dibebankan kepada pembuat kecerdasan buatan, dan pengguna kecerdasan buatan. Kata Kunci: kecerdasan buatan; pertanggungjawaban pidana; subjek hukum. Abstract Artificial intelligence is the result of such rapid technological developments in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. The presence of artificial intelligence provides many benefits and facilitates human work so that it is more effective and efficient. Apart from the positive impact of artificial intelligence, it turns out that there are potential problems with the presence of artificial intelligence, namely if artificial intelligence commits crimes and causes victims. Indonesia's positive law does not yet regulate the regulation of accountability for actions committed by artificial intelligence when committing a crime. This article aims to find out the prospects for setting criminal liability for acts committed by artificial intelligence. The method used in writing this article is a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The results of this study are that artificial intelligence is not a legal subject in criminal law, and criminal responsibility for crimes committed by artificial intelligence is borne by artificial intelligence makers and artificial intelligence users. Keywords: artificial intelligence; criminal liability; legal subject.]]>
<![CDATA[The Role of Legal Philosophy in Forming the Rule of Law in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Hyronimus Rhiti]]>;
<![CDATA[Vincentius Patria Setyawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i1.5153
<![CDATA[Abstract Legal philosophy in Indonesia has the biggest role in the formation of law in Indonesia. Pancasila as a source of law contains the meaning of all regulations and laws, starting from our constitution and all regulations apart from our constitution, of course, Pancasila is the basis and foundation of the law. Pancasila is the Indonesian legal system. Therefore, Pancasila is not only known as a philosophy but also known as written law in Indonesia which contains living laws. The problem is how big is the role of Legal Philosophy in influencing the formation of the legal system in Indonesia. This question must be very important to answer. The author tries to examine this problem with normative law in the legal method. The approach taken by the author is taken from several books that contain related problems. Keywords: Legal Philosophy, Law Making, Legal System.]]>
