Anna Triningsih, Anna
MK Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta Pusat 10110

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court Triningsih, Anna; Mardiya, Nuzul Qur’aini
Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (401.466 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev325

Abstract

The relationship of mutual control and balance between state institutions gives an opportunity for the emergence of the dispute about the authority of state institutions, especially the dispute about the constitutional authority. In relation to a dispute about authority of state institutions given by the 1945 constitution, a judicial institution is used to resolve the dispute. That judicial institution is the Constitutional Court. The court can evaluate the subjectum litis and objectum litis from the dispute about the authority of state institutions. Therefore that matter will be resolved definitively by the verdict of the Constitutional Court where the verdict is permanent and binding, then later it will become a jurisprudence, and it will be used as a reference. There are eight verdicts of the Constitutional Court related to disputes about the authority of state institutions which are related to the subjectum litis and objectum litis, such as: The verdict of The Consitutional Court No.004/SKLN-IV/2006; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No.030/SKLN-IV/2006; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 26/SKLN-V/2007; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 27/SKLN-VI/2008; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 1/SKLN-VIII/2010; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 2/SKLN-IX/2011; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 5/SKLN-IX/2011; and the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 2/SKLN-X/2012.
Dasar Pertimbangan Yuridis Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Proses Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi Nur Rahman, Irfan; Triningsih, Anna; Harumdani W, Alia; Kurniawan, Nallom
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 5 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (548.784 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

In the context of history and politics, in fact, indigenous people have been there ahead of the country of Indonesia. Protection of customary law community unit to defend their constitutional  rights  if there are laws  that harm their constitutional rights. But there are certain requirements that must be met in order for customary law community unit having  legal domicile (legal standing) to file a petition for legislation in the Constitutional Court because not all indigenous people have legal standing in testing the law. This of course has the legal implications on  the recognition, respect and protection of customary law community unit, namely the unity of indigenous people that still exist are not automatically recognized as customary law community unit unless it has to meet certain constitutional requirements set out in the 1945   post-change.The purpose of the conduct of this research is to discover, deepen and develop ideas related to concepts, theories, principles of legal and normative provisions concerning the legal status of customary law community unit in the proceedings in the Constitutional   Court.Requirement for customary law community unit in order to have legal status (legal standing) as the applicant in the testing of the Act is quite heavy, but must prove himself as a customary law community unit as referred to in Article 51 paragraph (1) letter b Law the Constitutional Court, must also meet 5 (five) loss of constitutional requirements as specified in jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. The legal position because of the weight requirement (legal standing) for customary law community unit, until now there is no applicant who claims to customary law community unit, has a legal domicile (legal standing) in testing the law. Typology and benchmarks about who is categorized as a customary law community unit is still not clear, so that through decision No. 31/PUU-V/2007, the Court gave typology and size of the unity of indigenous people by interpreting Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution
Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional Bisariyadi, Bisariyadi; Triningsih, Anna; Rahmawaty H, Meyrinda; Harumdani W, Alia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (694.982 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Every country in the world, moreover in every country which has implemented the way of life of democcratic and nation, presume that election is one of the important element as a marker of democracy of the country and also has a practical function of government political as a succession’s tool between the government parties and the oposition parties. In every democratic constitutional state, the election process has  a purpose to embody will of the people into pattern of power without violence.The election process will not only be assessed by sticking to the existing legal framework but the laws, codes of conduct of the election and its implementation needs to be tested and adjusted if it is in accordance with its primary purpose  or not without ignoring  the  rights  of  individuals  or  people.  In  the  process  of  the general election, the election process does not always run smoothly. Various obstacles in the implementation of good elections that occurred both during and previous election, is a  problem  that  certainly  would  have  widely  spread  impact if not immediately resolved. The existence of problems in the election related to dissatisfaction of decision of the election or criminal violations and administrative which can influence the result of election is commonly known by electoral disputes. In order the election dispute does not disturb the constitutional system or system of government of a country or region, it requires an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that effective and can give a fair decision to the parties.The main problem is how the benchmark of an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that are effective? Because, if traced further and reflect on democracies country in the world, not all democracies country, especially the democracies country which basing on the supremacy of the constitution, has the same electoral dispute resolution mechanisms between one country to another country. This is very important, because by knowing the measure or the benchmark of the effectiveness of an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms, we can consider to choose which electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that appropriate and give the fairness to the parties and society in general.
Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/Puu-X/2012 tentang SbI atau RSbI Laksono, Fajar; Wijayanti, Winda; Triningsih, Anna; Mardiya, Nuzul Qur’aini
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (680.008 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012 is very important and interesting to be studied because due to its implications and implementation. Ministry of Education and Culture as the addressat of the decision make transitional policy regarding on how to eliminate the policy concenring International Standard School/ International-Standard School Pilot Project (SBI/RSBI). In fact, transitional policy  is not addressed and does not have a legal basis in the implementation of the decision. There is a conflict between the normative provisions that Constitutional Court Decision are binding since   pronounced in an open session for the public   with the certainty of  cross-state agency collaborative cooperation to implement  the Court Decision. Therefore, there’s a need to investigate this Decision at the practical leve on how the decision is implemented. This research is doctrinal in which the object of the research is laws and regulations and other legal materials, in this case, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012. In addition, field studies are also conducted by way of searching mass media news which is important to be done in order to know the response of the public on how to implement the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012.  The  results  showed  that  (1)  the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012 is that it eliminates the legal basis of RSBI policy. Consequently , the implementation of SBI/ RSBI should be stopped because it has lost its legal basis since the judgment is pronounced. In addition, the Government through the Ministry of Education and Culture, shall implement the decision, including to repeal or revise the technical regulations that become legal framework of RSBI, (2) The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012 can be seen in two categories, namely: (a) spontaneous implementation, which is implementation by some education authorities and the schools themselves by removing the attributes of SBI/RSBI shortly after the Constitutional Court’s decision was pronounced, without waiting for further instruction by Ministry of Education and Culture, and (b) a structured implementation through the Ministry of Education and Culture by issuing Circular of Minister of Education and Culture No. 017/MPK/SE/2013 about RSBI Transition Policy. Although this policy is contrary to normative-imperative provisions, the measure taken by the Ministry of Education and Culture to establish a transition policy is the most probable step taken in order that the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-X/2012 can be implemented as it should be.
Pengadilan Sebagai Lembaga Penegakan Hukum (Perspektif Civil Law dan Common Law) Triningsih, Anna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1374.68 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1218

Abstract

Law, as an justice institution run its functions through a specific process towards a certain direction in order to achieve justice. Justice now a days is needed as something concrete as the fulfillment of the most basic needs of the community. Law enforcement, in parliamentary life is run by the Government (the executive organs) and through the courts (judicial organ).There are different approaches in law enforcement. The rule of law in the Civil Law System which is shared by the countries in the European continent or land use law, also known as legal approach. In the Common Law System which is shared by the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom speaking countries, using the administration approach of the Administration, called the administration of justice. Implementation of the fundamental principles of the law, or because of its emphasis on the steps of a procedure in the event properly can make the law as an unrealistic myth, inefficient and far from the purpose of    the law and implies the occurrence of loss of trust from the community, while the basic principles of administration, because of its emphasis on the achievement of business objectives efficiently will have implications for the lack of certainty in law enforcement that is essential for the achievement of Justice for everyone. Besides that addition, it also can be an opportunity for the Court arbitrariness because discretion has its wide open room. Every Legal Approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Making option to choose which legal approach as an appropriate and good policy in law enforcement is related to the characteristics and level of knowledge of the community also the environment where these law applied.
Politik Hukum Pendidikan Nasional: Analisis Politik Hukum dalam Masa Reformasi Triningsih, Anna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.304 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1425

Abstract

Sistem pendidikan nasional yang diatur dalam UU Sisdiknas harus mampu meningkatkan keimanan dan ketakwaan, mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa, dan memajukan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang berorientasi 4 (empat) hal, yaitu menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai agama, memelihara persatuan bangsa, memajukan peradaban, dan memajukan kesejahteraan umat manusia. Salah satu tujuan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia ialah mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa. Hal ini berdampak bahwa kewajiban negara terhadap warga negara dalam bidang pendidikan mempunyai dasar yang fundamental. Hal ini sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945. Adanya tujuan nasional tersebut mengakibatkan bahwa kewajiban mencerdaskan bangsa melekat pada eksistensi negara, sehingga negara memprioritaskan anggaran pendidikan minimal 20% dari APBN dan APBD. Bahkan seharusnya untuk pendidikan dasar, baik negeri maupun swasta, harus cuma-cuma, karena menjadi tanggung jawab negara yang telah mewajibkan setiap warga negara mengikuti pendidikan dasar. Era reformasi telah memberikan ruang yang cukup besar bagi perumusan kebijakan-kebijakan pendidikan baru yang bersifat reformatif dan revolusioner. Bentuk kurikulum menjadi berbasis kompetensi. Begitu pula bentuk pelaksanaan pendidikan berubah dari sentralistik (orde lama) menjadi desentralistik. Anggaran pendidikan ditetapkan sesuai dengan UUD 1945 yaitu 20% (dua puluh Persen) dari APBN dan APBD, sehingga banyak terjadi reformasi di dunia pendidikan.
Interpretasi Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Lembaga Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Triningsih, Anna; Mardiya, Nuzul Qur’aini
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 4 (2017)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.917 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1444

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan antarlembaga negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan konstitusional antar lembaga negara itu terdapat 2 (dua) hal penting yang harus dieksplorasi yaitu soal konsepsi lembaga negara dan kewenangan konstitusional. Guna memahami lembaga negara terlebih dahulu harus melakukan pengelompokan berdasarkan landasan yuridis pembentukannya. Berdasarkan pembentukannya lembaga negara dapat dikelompokkan menjadi 3 (tiga), yaitu lembaga negara yang dibentuk berdasarkan Keppres, UU, dan UUD. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 004/SKLN-IV/2006 tanggal 12 Juli 2006 telah merumuskan kata “lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Dasar” dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD 1945 dengan menggunakan penafsiran gramatika (grammatische interpretatie). Menurut Mahkamah Konstitusi, dalam menentukan subjectum litis atau objectum litis perkara sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan UUD 1945 maka ditentukan terlebih dahulu kewenangan-kewenangan yang diberikan dalam Undang-Undang Dasar dan baru kemudian kepada lembaga apa kewenangan-kewenangan tersebut diberikan.This article is about settlement disputes between authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. In the resolution of disputes between the state institutions there are 2 (two) important things that must be explored, the conception of constitutional state institutions and authority. To understand state institutions once must be done is grouping by the juridical of its formation. Based on its juridical formation state institutions can be grouped into 3 (three), that is institutions formed based on the presidential decree, law, and the constitution. The verdict of The Constitutional Court No 004/SKLN-IV/2006 dated 12 July 2006, Constitutional Court has formulated “state institutions under the authority granted by the constitution” regarding Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution by using grammatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie). According to The Constitutional Court, in order to determine subjectum litis or objectum litis in settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions cases that authority granted by 1945 Constitution, ones must be considered is the existence of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given.
Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara Triningsih, Anna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (408.643 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1316

Abstract

Legislation or commonly called the law is a  political  product.  Politics  is  a field in the society which relate to public goals, and the law as one of the fields in society is always linked to the goals of society. Because of being associated with these objectives, the law has its own dynamics side. In its socio-political dynamics there is always a message that wants to be heard, known, understood, and then executed by the addressee, which is the organizer of state power, political power holders. In the perspective of constitutional law that  message  then  becomes  a  goal in organizing the state and then organized into a political structure as the procedures in the administration of the state in order to reach the goal of the state. The meaning of a more democratic state administration and based on law as a goal in the amendment of the 1945 Constitution was to provide a constitutional basis, (i) equal relationship between state and society based on rights and obligations in reciprocal nature; (ii) the equal relationship between state institutions based on checks and balances system; (iii) strengthening the independence and impartiality of judicial authority to guard the running of the legal and constitutional system. Review of egal products in state administration through judicial mechanism aims to provide a guarantee for the implementation of these relationships and the running of the legal and constitutional system in accordance with the 1945 Constitution.
Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 Terkait Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam Pembentukan UndangUndang Laksono, Fajar; Triningsih, Anna; Ramdan, Ajie; Karmadaniah, Indah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (422.436 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1236

Abstract

Why Constitutional Court verdict Number. 92/PUU-X/2012 attractive to serve as an object of research? The main reason is, there is a problem that is visible on   the implementation of the Decision. The problem shown in fact that can be observed after the verdict was pronounced in the plenary session of the Constitutional Court. Up to almost 1 (one) year later, since pronounced in the plenary session, the Constitutional Court also considered yet implemented. This research seeks to express the fact that covers the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. Therefore, although more as a normative-doctrinal research and/or prescriptive with the focus of study that leads to the question of “how it should act”, this research is very likely propose another style that touches the issue of  “what happened” and “why it happened”. The purpose of the implementation of this study was to determine and explain about the implementation of the Constitutional Court Number 92/PUU-X/2012, including to identify and explain the obstacles  and difficulties in the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012, and find out and explain the legal politics legislation following the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 92/PUU-X/2012. In this theoretical framework introduced some basic concepts that are key aspects to strengthen the argument in this study. In this regard, this study uses a few basic concepts, namely: (1) the law not only as a rule (rule) but also behavior (behavior), (2) awareness  and compliance with the law; (3) The strength of binding court decisions, and (4) Due to legal and implementation models court decision.
PENYULUHAN ASPEK HUKUM PEMBIAYAAN TERHADAP UMKM DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN UMKM BINAAN DI KECAMATAN CIATER SUBANG DI ERA INDUSTRI 4.0 Hartadi, I Gede; Olivia, Fitria; Redjeki, Sri; Widarto, Joko; Siswanto, Ade Hari; Subiyanto, Achmad Edi; Triningsih, Anna
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas Vol 8, No 03 (2022): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Abdimas
Publisher : Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/abd.v8i03.5206

Abstract

Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah adalah usaha ekonomi produktif yang berdiri sendiri, yang dilakukan oleh orang perseorangan atau badan usaha yang bukan merupakan anak perusahaan atau cabang perusahaan yang dimiliki, dikuasai atau menjadi bagian baik langsung maupun tidak langsung dengan usaha kecil atau usaha besar dengan jumlah kekayaan bersih atau hasil penjualan tahunan. Aspek hukum UMKM meliputi UU No. 20 Tahun 2008 dan KUHPerdata Pasal 1313 tentang perjanjian. Problematika UMKM yang sering terjadi adalah menyangkut sejumlah persoalan, seperti ketimpangan struktural dalam alokasi dan penguasaan sumber daya, dan pengembangan strategi industrialisasi, kinerja yang relatif terbatas pada hal yang klasikal (sumber daya manusia atau SDM, permodalan dan akses terhadap kelembagaan keuangan, teknologi, manajemen, pemasaran dan informasi). Mitra dalam kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ini adalah UMKM binaan Kecamatan Ciater, Subang, Jawa Barat. Kegiatan ini dimulai dengan adanya permintaan dari mitra (Kecamatan Ciater Subang Jawa Barat) untuk dapat dilaksanakannya kegiatan penyuluhan hukum terkait aspek hukum pembiayaan terhadap UMKM. Kemudian dilanjutkan dengan audiensi, rapat pembahasan tema, penandatangan kerjasama dan pelaksanaan edukasi/penyuluhan. Setelah itu, kami menyepakati bahwa pelaksanaan akan diselenggarapak pada tanggal 04-05 Desember 2021 di Aula lembah Sarimas Subang, Jawa Barat. Kata Kunci: Perjanjian Pembiayaan, UMKM