Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER

Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Agama Melalui Sidang Keliling Dikaitkan dengan Prinsip dan Asas Hukum Acara Perdata Kusmayanti, Hazar; Putri, Sherly Ayuna; Rahmainy, Linda
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli – Desember 2018
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (572.234 KB) | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v4i2.83

Abstract

The religious court through the mobile court made a breakthrough in applying the principle of cheap, simple and fast in the proceedings. The circuit assembly is carried out to fulfi ll the justice of the community especially those who are lawless and live on the edge of the city. This research is intended to find out the practice of conducting a circuit court in religious courts whether it is in accordance with the principles and legal principles of civil procedure. The method used is normative juridical which focuses on research into applicable legal provisions, namely Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement or HIR and Perma No.1 of 2015. The specifi cation of this study is descriptive analytical then analyzed using qualitative normative methods. Based on the research conducted that the practice of mobile courts conducted in the Religious Courts is in accordance with the principles and principles of civil procedural law as stated in, Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement or HIR and the implementation process is in accordance with Perma No.1 of 2015 concerning Integrated Session Services Around the District Court and Religious Court/Syar’iyah Court in Order to Issue Marriage Deed, Marriage Book, and Marriage Certificate
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial melalui Putusan Perdamaian di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas I (A) Kusmayanti, Hazar; Karsona, Agus Mulya; Fakhriah, Efa Laela
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (257.276 KB) | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.100

Abstract

Industrial relations disputes can be resolved through court (litigation) and out of court (non litigation) as stipulated in Law Number 2 of 2016 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement (PPHI). From the formal legal aspect governing the settlement of industrial relations disputes is the Law Civil Procedure that applies in the General Court, which is usually complicated and long. Usually for litigation at the District Court level, at least the workers/litigants must meet for 8 to 10 days. Padang District Court in the IA Class in order to achieve the principle of Civil Procedure Law Fast, Simple and Low Cost made a breakthrough with the success in bringing a decision on peace in industrial relations disputes in the past 4 years. The author is interested whether this Peace ruling does not contradict Article 4 of PERMA Number 1 of 2016 and does not confl ict with statutory regulations and has permanent legal force. The method used in this research is normative juridical analysis of facts that exist systematically. The results of the research and discussion showed that Article 4 of PERMA Number 1 of 2016 is doubly meaningful, so that the Peace Decision in the Padang District Court of Class IA is not in confl ict with the laws and regulations and has permanent legal force. The factors causing peace in the Padang Industrial Relations Court, namely Article 4 PERMA Number 1 of 2016 has a double meaning, so that the Padang Industrial Relations Court refers to Article 130 HIR, there is pressure on the bipartite process, mediation in the employment service is less than optimal, the parties those who disputed want peace to be carried out in the industrial relations court, the panel of judges considered that disputes were very possible to be carried out peacefully, and to reduce the accumulation of cases in the court.
PERANAN DISNAKERTRANS DALAM MELAKUKAN MEDIASI PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DI MASA PANDEM Karsona, Agus Mulya; Kusmayanti, Hazar; Afriana, Anita
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari - Juni 2022
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v8i1.167

Abstract

Salah satu bentuk penyelesaian sengketa alternatif yang biasa digunakan adalah melalui mediasi. Mediasi ini secara langsung merupakan suatu kewajiban yang harus dilakukan dalam proses persidangan di pengadilan. Instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/ Kota yang berwenang untuk menerima pencatatan perselisihan hubungan industrial dan melakukan mediasi adalah instansi yang bertanggung jawab di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten/Kota tempat pekerja/buruh bekerja. sejauh mana kesiapan Disnakertrans dalam menghadapi konfl ik antara buruh dan perusahaan di masa pandemi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifi kasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan uraian di atas maka sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial maka Disnakertrans memiliki peranan yang penting dalam menyelesaikan perselisihan hubungan industrial melalui proses mediasi, hal ini membuktikan pemerintah juga (dalam hal ini Disnakertrans) mendukung proses penyelesaian arbitrase, konsiliasi dan bipatride. Proses tersebut sangat berpengaruh besar terhadap penyelesaian suatu permasalahan hubungan industrial dan proses yang kerap dipakai untuk menyelesaikan tersebut adalah mediasi. Kelancaran mediasi sangat berpengaruh terhadap peranan mediator yang terampil dan pakar untuk menyelesaikan suatu masalah, namun hambatan mediasi di Disnakertrans ini adalah minimnya jumlah mediator tidak sebanding dengan jumlah perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial yang masuk dan perlu diselesaikan.