Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

COMMUNITY UNDERSTANDING OF CORUPPTION OF CRIMINAL MEASURES (Study Case in Malang) Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (331.071 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v4i1.2666

Abstract

Currently we are concerned when witnessing the news about Operation CatchingHands (OTT) or the action of the regional head. As for the case in East Java alone,there were 13 regional heads affected by the KPT OTT. In 2018 yesterday the KPKconducted OTT, as many as 30 times OTT and 20 of them involved regional heads(Kompas, 2/28/2019). Regarding the Eradication of Corruption, Indonesia actually has had regulations since 1971, through Law Number 3 of 1971 concerning Eradication of Corruption. Subsequently in 1999, Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Acts became the main rule regarding law enforcement in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, which was later revised through Law Number 20 of 2001 in several articles. Based on the background above, the formulation of the problem in this study is: What is the community's understanding of corruption especially in the city of Malang? The type of data used are primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. Primary data were obtained from interviews with people in Malang who were not legal experts. Whereas Secondary Data is obtained from various sources or legal materials such as Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning Corruption and other Regulations relating to corruption. While tertiary material is obtained from various corruption cases that occur in the city of Malang. Data is processed based on qualitative analysis. Where the researcher uses secondary legal material sources, namely by examining the elements of criminal acts of corruption, especially in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption, is it in accordance with the applicable regulations. The process of analyzing the data first is to examine the results of interviews with the community in Malang, then analyzed using Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning Eradication of Corruption, is it in accordance with the applicable regulations. the results of the study the authors get field data that illustrates that in fact there are already a lot of general public especially in the poor city of Lowokwaru  sub-district who understand about criminal acts of corruption, but about 16% of the people there are less understanding of corruption, they just know the meaning corruption without knowing how and what they have to do if that happens or they know even they fear their security is threatened when showing their active role against corruption.
LEGAL EFFORTS OF EXECUTION APPLICATION AGAINST JOINT TREATMENT DECISIONS (Study of the Implementation of Decisions on the Decisions of Religious Courts Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg) Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (692.917 KB) | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v3i1.1802

Abstract

Case Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg is the product of the Malang Religious Court which has permanent legal force. In fact, after the ruling gets permanent legal force, it is known that the parties have a joint debt which causes problems for the parties who are responsible for paying off the joint debt if the decision only regulates the share of each of these assets. The problems in this study are: 1) The judge's decision regarding the division of joint assets in terms of legal certainty and justice in the decision Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg. 2) The implementation of sharing the shared assets 3) The implementation of shared debt division if there is no decision by the judge, in fact there is a joint debt. The author uses an empirical juridical research method located in the Malang Religious Court. Primary data is obtained by interviewing the Head and the Registrar of the Malang Religious Court and the Judge who handled the case Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg and the secondary data is obtained from research and literature review which consisted of laws and other legal materials which are relevant. Regarding the opinion of the Panel of Judges on the decision of 0701 / Pdt.G /2014 / PA.Mlg it can be learned from legal considerations in the a quo decision. In general, the principles of justice and legal certainty must be upheld. Justice must be upheld in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 to 37 of Act Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 85 up to Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law.