Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM)

PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN ARGUMENTASI HUKUM DALAM OPTIMALISASI LEGAL ADVICE PADA BAWASLU Andi Intan Purnamasari; Supriyadi Supriyadi; Nursiah Moh Yunus; Awaliyah Awaliyah
Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): JPPM : Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jppm.v2i2.481

Abstract

This study focuses on efforts to improve the ability of human resources through the form of training in producing legal argumentation as one of the strengthening skills of Bawaslu members in Donggala district. Legal Argumentation is essentially made to answer certain issues. This issue generally arises from the client. Therefore, a legal argumentation must be made in a focused, systematic, and proportional manner. Legal argumentation usually only consists of 3-5 pages. For this reason, legal argumentation must focus only on the issue in question, not discussing matters outside of it. Legal argumentation must also be systematic so that the description is easy to understand. There is no standard format for a Legal Argumentation, but at least an LO consists of: (1) the case, (2) identifiable and relevant legal basis, (3) legal opinion, and closed with (5) conclusion, which includes suggestions or recommendations.