Articles
<![CDATA[Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen dalam Penggunaan Aplikasi Pembayaran Elektronik (Electronic Payment) ]]>
<![CDATA[Asmadi, Erwin]]>
<![CDATA[ DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Medan Area ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (840.886 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v1i2.1923
<![CDATA[Perkembangan teknologi komunikasi, multimedia dan informasi mempengaruhi sisi kehidupan manusia dalam bermasyarakat. Selain memunculkan kemanfaatan atau dampak positif, kemajuan teknologi tersebut juga berdampak negatif yakni berpotensi terjadinya pelanggaran atas transaksi atau pembayaran secara elektronik (e-payment). Konsep e-payment telah diatur melalui Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, mulai dari sertifikat keandalan, penyelenggara sistem elektronik atau agen sistem elektronik dan lain sebagainya. Namun, secara khusus aturan penyelenggaraan aplikasi e-payment tunduk pada Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 11/12/PBI/2009 tentang Uang Elektronik, yang memuat pengaturan antara lain mengenai tata cara perizinan dan peralihan perizinan, tata cara penyelenggaraan, pengawasan, peningkatan keamanan teknologi e-money. Bagaimana dengan konsumen yang melakukan transaksi dengan e-payment? Maka berlaku pula UU Perlindungan Konsumen yang menegaskan kenyamanan harus diberikan kepada konsumen.]]>
<![CDATA[Procedure for Destruction of Evidence of the Crime of Narcotics Abuse Based on Formal Law in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Asmadi, Erwin]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) Vol 1, No 2 (2020): September - December ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Extermination of narcotics evidence is further regulated in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2013 concerning Implementation of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, namely as a form of procedure for destroying narcotic evidence which is destroyed according to its type. Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2010 concerning Technical Guidelines for Handling Confiscated Narcotics, Narcotics and Other Chemical Substances Safely, explains that the destruction of narcotics evidence, including marijuana is destroyed through the steps that have been set out therein. This regulation becomes a standard rule that must be implemented by the parties carrying out the destruction of confiscated evidence. This research is a type of normative legal research by means of literature study where the data is sourced from secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it is known that based on the hierarchy of regulations the procedures for destroying narcotics evidence are based on Article 91 and Article 92 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Destruction of narcotic evidence is carried out before a court decision is made based on the determination of the local District Attorney's office and destruction after a court decision is based on an order of a judge's decision. Regarding the technical guidelines for destruction, the hierarchical stages of the destruction procedure are regulated in the Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2010 concerning Technical Guidelines for Handling and Destruction of Confiscated Narcotics, Narcotics Precursors and Other Chemicals Safely]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Saksi dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Asmadi, Erwin]]>
<![CDATA[ Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2020): Okotber 2020 - Januari 2021 (ON PROGRES) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System explains that children have a strategic role which is explicitly stated that the state guarantees the rights of every child to survival, growth and development as well as protection from violence and discrimination. Therefore, the best interests of children should be lived out as the best interests for the survival of mankind. Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, explicitly explains in Article 1 Paragraph (2), "Child protection is all activities to guarantee and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop and participate optimally in accordance with human dignity. , and face violence and discrimination â€. This writing uses normative juridical legal research methods (normative research). The nature of this research is descriptive, which aims to provide an overview of social symptoms regarding the role of psychiatrists in proving psychological violence in criminal acts of domestic violence. Sources of research data are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method was carried out using document study techniques, which were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the research that children as witnesses are entitled to all protections as regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System. Seen in Articles 89, 90 and 91 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System]]>
<![CDATA[Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen dalam Penggunaan Aplikasi Pembayaran Elektronik (Electronic Payment) ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>
<![CDATA[ DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Medan Area ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v1i2.1923
<![CDATA[Perkembangan teknologi komunikasi, multimedia dan informasi mempengaruhi sisi kehidupan manusia dalam bermasyarakat. Selain memunculkan kemanfaatan atau dampak positif, kemajuan teknologi tersebut juga berdampak negatif yakni berpotensi terjadinya pelanggaran atas transaksi atau pembayaran secara elektronik (e-payment). Konsep e-payment telah diatur melalui Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, mulai dari sertifikat keandalan, penyelenggara sistem elektronik atau agen sistem elektronik dan lain sebagainya. Namun, secara khusus aturan penyelenggaraan aplikasi e-payment tunduk pada Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 11/12/PBI/2009 tentang Uang Elektronik, yang memuat pengaturan antara lain mengenai tata cara perizinan dan peralihan perizinan, tata cara penyelenggaraan, pengawasan, peningkatan keamanan teknologi e-money. Bagaimana dengan konsumen yang melakukan transaksi dengan e-payment? Maka berlaku pula UU Perlindungan Konsumen yang menegaskan kenyamanan harus diberikan kepada konsumen.]]>
<![CDATA[Procedure for Destruction of Evidence of the Crime of Narcotics Abuse Based on Formal Law in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) Vol 1, No 2 (2020): September - December ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55357/ijrs.v1i2.27
<![CDATA[Extermination of narcotics evidence is further regulated in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2013 concerning Implementation of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, namely as a form of procedure for destroying narcotic evidence which is destroyed according to its type. Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2010 concerning Technical Guidelines for Handling Confiscated Narcotics, Narcotics and Other Chemical Substances Safely, explains that the destruction of narcotics evidence, including marijuana is destroyed through the steps that have been set out therein. This regulation becomes a standard rule that must be implemented by the parties carrying out the destruction of confiscated evidence. This research is a type of normative legal research by means of literature study where the data is sourced from secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it is known that based on the hierarchy of regulations the procedures for destroying narcotics evidence are based on Article 91 and Article 92 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Destruction of narcotic evidence is carried out before a court decision is made based on the determination of the local District Attorney's office and destruction after a court decision is based on an order of a judge's decision. Regarding the technical guidelines for destruction, the hierarchical stages of the destruction procedure are regulated in the Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2010 concerning Technical Guidelines for Handling and Destruction of Confiscated Narcotics, Narcotics Precursors and Other Chemicals Safely]]>
<![CDATA[The Role of Legal Aid at the Muhammadiyah University of North Sumatra in Divorce Prevention ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rachmad Abduh]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) Vol 2, No 1 (2021): January-April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55357/ijrs.v2i1.72
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a rule of law, which is contained in the 1945 Constitution (Yahman & Nurtin Tarigan, 2019: 16). In a rule of law, the state guarantees equality before the law and recognizes and protects human rights, so that all people have the right to be treated equally before the law (equality before the law). Equality before the law must also be accompanied by equal treatment, one form of equality of treatment is the provision of legal aid to the poor and illiterate to achieve equitable access to justice. The form of legal assistance is the existence of a defense or assistance from an advocate (access to legal counsel). Legal aid standards in litigation are implemented in case handling: (a) Criminal; (b) Civil Code; and (c) State Administration. Types of non-litigation Legal Aid activities carried out by Legal Aid Providers include: (a) Legal Counseling; (b) Legal Consultation; (c) Investigation of cases, both electronically and non-electronically; (d) Legal Research; (e) Mediation; (f) Negotiation; (g) Community Empowerment; (h) Outside court assistance; and (i) Drafting legal documents.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Saksi dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020 - Januari 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55357/is.v1i2.30
<![CDATA[Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System explains that children have a strategic role which is explicitly stated that the state guarantees the rights of every child to survival, growth and development as well as protection from violence and discrimination. Therefore, the best interests of children should be lived out as the best interests for the survival of mankind. Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, explicitly explains in Article 1 Paragraph (2), "Child protection is all activities to guarantee and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop and participate optimally in accordance with human dignity. , and face violence and discrimination ”. This writing uses normative juridical legal research methods (normative research). The nature of this research is descriptive, which aims to provide an overview of social symptoms regarding the role of psychiatrists in proving psychological violence in criminal acts of domestic violence. Sources of research data are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method was carried out using document study techniques, which were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the research that children as witnesses are entitled to all protections as regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System. Seen in Articles 89, 90 and 91 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Action Against Of Notary Supervisory Board Decision ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>
<![CDATA[ NOMOI Law Review Vol 1, No 1 (2020): May Edition ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[NOMOI Law Review ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v1i1.4285
<![CDATA[The Notary Supervisory Board has the authority to supervise the Notary Public and in order to carry out this authority the Notary Supervisory Board issues decisions related to violations committed by Notaries. The method used is secondary data sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The decision of the Notary Supervisory Board for the central level is final and binding. If then there are parties who are not satisfied with the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board, what legal remedies can be taken by the dissatisfied party. Based on the research conducted, the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board can be categorized as a state administration decision which is a competency of the Administrative Court to examine, hear, and decide upon it. Therefore, if there are parties who are dissatisfied with the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board, then they can submit legal remedies to the Administrative Court.Keywords: Decision, Notary Supervisory Board, Administrative Court]]>
<![CDATA[Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Selama Pandemi Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Padian Adi Selamat]]>;
<![CDATA[Benito Asdhie Kodyat]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismail Koto]]>
<![CDATA[ DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Juli-Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30596/dll.v6i2.9431
<![CDATA[Wabah Covid-19 yang menyebar di penjuru Tanah Air telah memberikan pembelajaran tersendiri bagi sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Untuk itu persidangan online merupakan terobosan positif sebagai solusi di tengah perkembangan teknologi informasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pada Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Yuridis Empiris (Field Research). Penelitian ini akan dilakukan dengan pendekatan Empiris didukung dengan data normative dan diperkaya dengan pendekatan sosiologis dengan harapan mendapatkan gambaran yang comprehensive. Undang-Undnag No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) belum mengatur terkait dengan persidangan melalui elektronik. Terkait dengan penyelenggaraan Peradilan Pidana, Mahkamah Agung (MA) membentuk Perma tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Secara Elektronik di Pengadilan, yaitu Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Perma Sidang Pidana Online) selanjutnya di dalam SEMA No. 1 Tahun 2020, seluruh pimpinan, hakim, dan aparatur peradilan pada MA dan badan peradilan di bawahnya diminta untuk melakukan penyesuaian sistem kerja dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi No. 19 Tahun 2020 tentang Penyesuaian Sistem Kerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Penyebaran Covid-19 di lingkungan instansi pemerintah. Dalam pelaksanaannya ,persidangan pidana daring menemui beberapa kendala dan permasalahan Adapun beberapa permasalahan yang ditemui saat pelaksanaan persidangan online seperti sarana prasarana, akses internet pemenuhan hak terdakwa dan penerapan asas Sistem Peradilan Pidana]]>
<![CDATA[Rumusan Delik dan Pemidanaan Bagi Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwin Asmadi]]>
<![CDATA[ DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Januari-Juni ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (251.421 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30596/dll.v6i1.4910
<![CDATA[Social media currently plays a very important role in disseminating electronic information. Users as legal subjects are sometimes unaware of the words, memes or images that constitute electronic information which can adversely affect one's good name. Although disseminating information is a human right owned by every human being, but it is obliged to respect the rights of other citizens so that this form of punishment can be avoided. The presence of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 Year 2008 regarding Information and Electronic Transactions applies severe penalties for perpetrators who defame, namely a maximum imprisonment of 6 years. Therefore raises concerns about the disparity in its application so that the legal certainty is neglected, namely whether a person can be arrested or not even though his mistake is uncertain. This can occur due to the fulfillment of the requirements for detention in accordance with Article 21 paragraph (4) point a of the Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code. On the other hand, as part of human rights in the context of freedom of expression, it turns out that the conviction has changed and there is an authentic explanation or definition of the offense formulation in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016.]]>
