cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PADA SISWA SMP KELAS VII DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Ambarwati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of research is to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from students independence learning. The type of the research is a quasi-experimental. The population are the seventh grade students of junior high school at Surakarta. The sample are 268 students. Sampling is done by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments which are used to collect data are achievement tests and questionnaire of students independence learning. Hypothesis test is two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of this research are as follows: 1) the TPS-GNT learning model gives better learning achievement than TPS and direct learning model, and TPS learning model gives better learning achievement than direct learning model. 2)  the students with high independence learning have better learning achievement than students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have better learning achievement than students with low independence learning. 3) in each  learning model, the students with high, medium and low independence learning have the same learning achievement. 4) in the high independence learning, students with TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning model have the same learning achievement, but in the medium and low independence learning, students with TPS-GNT learning model have better learning achievement than students with direct model, students with TPS-GNT and TPS learning model have the same learning achievement and students with TPS and direct learning model have the same learning achievement.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Guided Note Taking  (GNT), Independence Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E (LC 5E) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA Rina Mahmudati; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the personality type of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TPS, LC 5E, and the classical learning model with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test on the topic of function and questionnaire of personality type. The data was analyzed by using two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) The mathematic learning achievement of students treated with TPS learning model was as good as that of those treated with LC 5E model, and that of those treated with TPS learning model was as good as that of those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach, and that of those treated with LC 5E model was better than that of those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach; (2) The mathematic learning achievement of students with sanguine personality was better than that of those with melancholic one but was as good as that of those with choleric and phlegmatic personalities, that of those with choleric personality was better than that of those with melancholic one, and that of those with melancholic personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic, and that of those with choleric personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic one; (3) In each type of student personality, it could be found that the students treated with Think-Pair-Share had equally good learning achievement to those treated with LC 5E model, the students treated with TPS had equally good learning achievement to those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach, those treated with LC 5E model had better learning achievement than those treated with classical learning model with scientific approach; and (4) In each type of learning models, it could be found that the learning achievement of students with sanguine personality was better than that of those with melancholic one but was as good as that of those with choleric and phlegmatic personalities, that of those with choleric personality was better than that of those with melancholic one, and that of those with melancholic personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic, and that of those with choleric personality was as good as that of those with phlegmatic one.Keywords: Learning Cycle 5E, Think-Pair-Share, Classical with scientific approach, personality type 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA KEDIRI Nanndo Yannuansa; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models of TAI Type with contextual approach, learning models of TAI and direct learning model on mathematics achievement viewed from learning style. The type of the research was quasi experimental research using design factorial 3x3. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in a city of Kediri. The samples of the research consisted of 321 students; 107 students belonged to experiment class one, 103 students belonged to experiment class two, and 111 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. Before giving the treatment, the population  had to be in balanced condition. The balance test used one way analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The hypothesis test used two ways analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies at the significance level of 0.05. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning, the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (2) Each of the learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic does not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students who taught by the TAI with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (4) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: TAI learning models, contextual approaches, and learning style.
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN TUTOR SEBAYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KEBUMEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Miftachudin Miftachudin; Budiyono Budiyono; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of quadrangle viewed from the multiple inellegences of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type with peer tutor, the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type, and the direct learning models. The kind of research is quasi-experimental research with factorial design 3x3. Population of this research is all students of State Junior High Schools in Kebumen. The sample of this research is 288 students which is 95 students in Experiment I class, 96 students in Experiment II class, and 97 students in controlled class. The hypothesis test uses two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The result of the research shows that: (1) TSTS learning model by peer tutor shows the higher achievement of students than cooperative learning model of TSTS. The cooperative learning model of TSTS results as good as the direct learning model, and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning one, (2) students with logic-mathematic linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same achievement among them, (3) at TSTS learning model by peer tutor, TSTS learning model, and direct learning model, students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same result, (4) at students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence, TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than TSTS cooperative learning model; TSTS cooperative learning model results as good as the result of direct learning model; and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning model.Keywords: TSTS learning model by peer tutor, Two Stay Two Stray, achievement, intelligence
KATEGORI BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 SURAKARTA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI POKOK HIMPUNAN Rahmawati Masruroh; Imam Sujadi; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to describe the fluency, flexibility, and novelty of seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta who have the high, moderate, and low mathematics ability to solve the mathematics problem on the topic of union. This research was qualitative research. The subjects were taken from seventh grade student of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta. The subjects were 9 students; 3 students with high ability, 3 students with moderate ability, and 3 students with low ability. Data were collected through think aloud method in which students were asked to express what he thought orally. The main data sources were the words and actions of students while being interviewed. Data was validated using data triangulation where data collection was conducted at two different time. The research results showed that  the students with the high, moderate, and low mathematics ability had different characteristics in fluency, flexibility and novelty.Keywords: fluency, flexibility, novelty, problems solving.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI PERBANDINGAN DAN SKALA DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PESERTA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Puji Rahayu; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrack: The aims of this research were to determine: (1) the better students’ achievement in learning by using Problem Based Learning (PBL), Discovery Learning (DL) or direct learning models (2) the better students’ achievement among the students who have positive, neutral or negative attitude (3) the better students’ achievement in each category attitude, in learning by using PBL, DL or direct learning models (4) the better students’ achievement in each learning model, among the students who have positive, neutral or negative attitude. This research used a quasi-experimental research with the population of seventh grade students of Junior High Schools in Klaten Regency which have implemented curriculum 2013 in the Academic Year 2013/2014. The sampling technique used stratified cluster random sampling and three schools selected namely SMPN 1 Delanggu, SMPN 1 Prambanan and SMPN 2 Wedi.  Two-way variance analysis was used to test the hypothesis, followed by scheffe’ technique. Considering the result of analysis, the following conclusion could be drawn. (1) The students’ achievement who learnt by using DL was better than PBL and direct learning models. The students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL were similar to direct learning models. (2) The students’ achievement with positive attitude was better than neutral and negative attitude. The students’ achievement with neutral attitude was better than negative attitude. (3) In the positive and neutral attitude, the students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL, DL and direct learning models were similar. In the negative attitude, the students’ achievement who learnt by using DL model were better than PBL and direct learning models and the students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL and direct models were similar. (4) In learning by using PBL, the students’ achievement with positive attitude were better than negative one, the positive and neutral attitude ware similar and the neutral and negative attitude were similar too. In learning by using DL, the student’s achievement with positive, neutral and negative attitude were similar. In learning by using direct learning, the students’ achievement with positive attitude were better than the negative one, the positive and neutral attitude were similar and the neutral and negative attitude were similar too.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Discovery Learning, students’ Attitude, achievement of mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI Se-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Dyah Susilawati; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstrac: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from learning activities of the students. The learning models compared were the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) with Guided Note Taking (GNT) learning model, the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, and conventional learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of state Junior Secondery  School of the Klaten regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the learning activities questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the  cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model, whereas cooperative learning model of TAI result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the learning model conventional. 2) The students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as  the moderate learning activities. The students with the high and moderate learning activitiy have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with low learning activities. 3) In the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI, the students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate activities and the students with high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. In the conventional learning model, the students with high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate learning activities, whereas the high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. 4) For the students with the high and moderate learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model. The student with the low learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI, whereas the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI result a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Guided Note Taking (GNT), conventional learning, Learning Activities, Learning Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD WITH GUIDED DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Suriyah, Puput; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:  The aims of this  research were to know: (1) which one is providing better mathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematics learning achievement, students with Adversity Quotient (AQ) climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (3) at each learning model, whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students with AQ climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (4) at each type of Adversity Quotient (AQ), whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning. This research was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell. This research concludes that: (1) students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with Guided Discovery Learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students taught using STAD and direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using STAD have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students taught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the climbers type of AQ were better than the students with the campers and quitters type of AQ while the students with the campers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with the quitters type of AQ, (3) in the cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the STAD, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the direct instruction, students with climbers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than students with quitters type of AQ, (4) for the students who have climbers type of AQ, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning models, for the students who have campers type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction, for the students who have quitters type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: STAD With Guided Discovery Learning, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievement
PROFIL PEMAHAMAN SISWA TERHADAP LUAS DAN KELILING BANGUN DATAR YANG DIGUNAKAN DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL ( Penelitian Pada Kelas VII MTsN Ketanggung Ngawi Semester Genap Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 ) Indayani, Sri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract :  Area and perimeter in plane gometry are one of the subjects in the study of mathematics in class VII of SMP / MTs. The mathematics learning system in Indonesia  generally is not emphasized in solving the problem, but on procedural matters. Students are trained to memorize formulas, but less understood and mastered its application in solving a problem. This study aimed to describe the profile of students' understanding of area and perimeter which are used in solving mathematical problems in terms of the level of emotional intelligence. The big difference in emotional intelligence on each student, it is possible to affect the level of student understanding. This research was conducted in class VII MTsN Ketanggung Ngawi. Research subjects consisted of 3 students were selected from the results of the questionnaire of emotional intelligence, which is one students with a high level of emotional intelligence, one students with the level of emotional intelligence is and one student with a low level of emotional intelligence. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. Data collection in this study was done by using a questionnaire, the results of the written test and interview-based tasks. The validity of the data is done by time triangulation. The main instrument in this study is the researchers themselves who aim to seek and collect data directly from the data source, and Insrument help in this research is the emotional intelligence questionnaire instruments, sheet student comprehension task, and interview guides. The results showed that students with high emotional intelligence and are entered on a relational level of understanding, and students with low entry level of emotional intelligence on the level of instrumental understanding. Keywords: student understanding, problem solving,  emotional intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN GUIDED DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI LOCUS OF CONTROL Widodo, Widodo; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from the students locus of control (LOC). The learning models compared were Jigsaw by using Guided Discovery Learning (GDL), jigsaw and direct learning. The type of this research were aquasi-experimental research with the factorial design 3x3. The population were the students of the VIII class of SMP Negeri Ponorogo Regency in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of the research consisted of 263 students and were taken through stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) Jigsaw-GDL provided better learning achievement than jigsaw and direct instruction, while jigsaw provided better learning achievement than direct instruction, (2) the students with high LOC had better learning achievement than medium and low LOC, students with medium LOC had better learning achievement than low LOC, (3) in students with high LOC, the use of jigsaw-GDL provided learning achievement as good as jigsaw, the use of Jigsaw provided learning achievement as good as direct instruction, the use of Jigsaw-GDL provided the better learning achievement than direct instruction, in students with medium and low LOC, there were no difference in learning achievement in each learning model, (4) in Jigsaw-GDL learning model, there were no difference in learning achievement between students with high LOC and medium LOC, and both of them had better learning achievement than students with low LOC, in Jigsaw and direct learning model, there were no difference in learning achievement in each level of LOC.Keywords:  Jigsaw-GDL, Jigsaw,  Locus of Control, and Learning Achievement

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue