cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Istiqlal
Contact Email
m.istiqlal@iainsalatiga.ac.id
Phone
+6285729356143
Journal Mail Official
m.istiqlal@iainsalatiga.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Nakula Sadewa V No. 9, Kembangarum, Dukuh, Kota Salatiga, 50722, Jawa Tengah
Location
Kota salatiga,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Indonesian Law (JIL)
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga
ISSN : 27748081     EISSN : 27744906     DOI : 10.18326/jil.v1i1.1-34
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Journal of Indonesian Law is an academic journal published twice a year (June and December) by the Faculty of Sharia State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga.Journal of Indonesian Law emphasizes specifications in the discourse of Indonesian Law . The journal focuses on Indonesian Law studies, such as Indonesian family law, Indonesian criminal law, Indonesian political law,Indonesian economic law and other dicipline of law that exist in Indonesia, with various approaches of normative, philosophy, history, sociology, anthropology, theology, psychology, economics and is intended to communicate the original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes to any contributions from scholars of the related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 30 Documents
 1   2   3 
Implementasi Kurikulum Darurat di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Pendidikan Jaka Bangkit Sanjaya; Rastini Rastini
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i2.161-174

Abstract

The WHO-19 pandemic is a state emergency that has major consequences for all countries, including Indonesia. These consequences occur in various fields of life, including education. Many Indonesian citizens feel that their education rights are not fulfilled because they have to undergo distance education. This makes the government have an important role to play in overcoming this problem, namely by issuing an emergency education curriculum. The curriculum is a curriculum that is in common with the National Curriculum because it is a simplification. This curriculum also, when viewed from the perspective of Constitutional Law, is a great hope so that the education rights of Indonesian citizens can be fulfilled. This hope can be created because the learning prioritizes the achievement of student understanding. So that with the Emergency Curriculum, it can be a step to adapt and proceed towards normal state conditions, especially to fulfill the education rights of Indonesian citizens. In writing and describing the analysis, the author uses the juridical normative research method.
Strategi Normativitas Pembatasan Terpidana dalam Proses Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia Karnoto Karnoto
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i1.53-74

Abstract

The polemic of ex-convict candidates for legislative members has given special attention to academics and the general public. In this case, the polemic lies in the overlap between regulations number 7 of 2017 about General Elections and Regulation of Election Commission number 20 of 2018 about the nominations of DPR, provincial DPRD and Regency / city DPRD members. The core problem in the regulation is the limitation of political rights for ex-convicts (Croupier of Drugs, Sexual Crimes against Children and Corruption). Whereas the higher level regulation does not limit this. This research is a library research. Namely research that uses all sources of research from books, journals, articles, research, laws, and from the internet. After the sources are obtained and then analyzed using related theories. This research focuses on the normativity strategy that should have been carried out and applied by the general election commission in limiting former convicts in the 2019 general election. The normativity strategy that should be carried out by the general election commission on the limitation of convicted persons in general elections in Indonesia is the making of regulations relating to the submission of honesty to the public that those who nominate themselves as prospective legislative candidates are ex-convicts. One of the strategies that must be regulated in the regulation is, Submission to the public through social media, in this case the delivery must be regulated more stringently and in more detailed procedures, because it is feared that political actors whose status as ex-convicts only pay to one television station and get a certificate or proof. However, the provision of information is not broadcast on the television station, and so forth.
Rekonstruksi Hak Subpoena Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Satria Rangga Putra
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i2.175-199

Abstract

Hak subpoena merupakan instrumen DPR untuk mengawasi kebijakan pemerintah yang berpotensi merugikan kepentingan rakyat dan penggunaannya terbatas pada hak angket. Hak subpoena diatur dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Kedua UU MD3. Pengaturan hak subpoena dan sanksi penyanderaan pada Pasal 73 ayat (3), (4), (5), dan (6) menimbulkan kontroversi karena berpotensi digunakan dalam rapat-rapat DPR. Masyarakat kemudian menguji ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dan keluarlah Putusan 16/PUU-XVI/2018. MK dalam pertimbangannya menyatakan DPR dapat melakukan pemanggilan paksa dalam konteks hak angket, di sisi lain MK mengatakan Kepolisian hanya dapat melakukan pemanggilan paksa dalam tindakan yang berkaitan dengan proses penegakan hukum. Penulis mengajukan gagasan untuk melakukan “kriminalisasi” terhadap tindakan menolak memberi keterangan dan menolak hadir memenuhi panggilan DPR dalam konteks hak angket sebagai contempt of parliament dengan mengaturnya ke dalam UU MD3. Penulis mengajukan dua ide, pertama, menjadikan contempt of parliament sebagai dasar melakukan pemanggilan paksa, kedua, menghapus ketentuan pemanggilan paksa.
Implementation of Women Representatives in Regional Legislative Election in Salatiga 2019 (Study of the Gerindra Party and the Nasdem Party) Ambar Ayuningsih
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i1.75-90

Abstract

Political parties, as a democratic institution, have a strategic role in empowering women in politics. One of the crucial roles of the party is to guide women party cadres to be prepared to become qualified women cadres and, at the same time to boost women representation in politics, especially in the legislative body. Women representation in politics is needed because society needs to have balanced views between the needs of men and women. Besides, the formulated public policy must also represent the interests of both. This type of research is qualitative research as a socio-legal research by expressing symptoms thoroughly and by the context through collecting data from the field and interacting directly with the two parties in the City of Salatiga, namely the Gerindra Party and the Nasdem Party, as well as candidates women from both parties. The policy adopted by the Gerindra Party and the Nasdem Party by applying the open and closed recruitment method has resulted in the fulfillment of a 30% quota for women’s representation so that the implication of the Gerindra and Nasdem Party legislative candidates has been determined as a permanent candidate in the 2019 concurrent elections.
PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD IN CONSTITUTIONAL ELECTION IN 2019 (PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PEOPLE SOVEREIGNTY) Muhammad Aziz Maftuh
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i2.200-213

Abstract

The 2019 Election leaves a problem with the people sovereignty in Indonesia, especially in the concept of the parliamentary threshold which is enforced at 4%. There are millions of legitimate votes that were wasted and did not convert into parliament because the party did not pass the threshold. The focus of this study is about the concept of parliamentary threshold in 2019 election which is reviewed from the people's sovereignty. This research is a library research (literature study) and employs a qualitative approach based on theoretical views and is reviewed from philosophical studies.  The data is collected tin the form of documentation from various books and scientific works related to this research. Based on the results, the concept of PT in the 2019 election resulted in the occurrence of wasted votes from valid votes so that millions of valid votes originating from the people's sovereignty were wasted. All new parties and small parties have very little chance of getting into parliament to voice the aspirations of their people. The disproportionality between the votes and the number of seats acquired becomes the reason that the concept of the parliamentary threshold in the 2019 elections is against the people's sovereignty.
Kebijakan Hukum dalam Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (B3): Studi Implementasi Pengelolaan Limbah Medis di Rumah Sakit Salatiga Absori Absori; Muhamad Latif
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i1.91-117

Abstract

Keberadaan Rumah sakit selain memberikan dampak positif sebagai media kesehatan juga memberikan konsekuensi negatif yaitu menghasilkan limbah bahan berbahaya dan beracun (B3) sehingga perlu mendapatkan perhatian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan acuan bagi pihak berkepentingan dalam upaya memajukan pengelolaan limbah B3 dari rumah sakit. Jenis penelitian ini bersifat yuridis empiris, bahan penelitian tersusun atas data primer dan data sekunder. Data-data yang diperoleh dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian kondisi pengelolaan limbah B3 medis rumah sakit belum sesuai dengan persyaratan sebagaimanaterkandung dalam peraturan. Keadaan tersebut diantaranya meliputi pembuangan limbah medis ke lingkungan secara langsung, pengelolaan limbah tanpa izin, pengolahan limbah yang tidak memenuhi kriteria, dependensi jasa pengolah limbah, terbatasnya pengetahuan untuk pengelolaan limbah medis bagi pelaksana maupun aparat penyelidik.
Mekanisme Pemakzulan (Impeachment) Presiden: Studi Pebandingan Negara Indonesia dan Brasil Edi Prabowo
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i2.119-144

Abstract

Impeachment is the process of dismissing a president from his position. In this case, Indonesia and Brazil are countries that adhere to a presidential system of government, and have dismissed the president, so it is interesting to study more closely the similarities and differences in the reasons a president can be impeached and the mechanism for impeachment of presidents in both countries. the. This study uses a normative juridical approach and with descriptive analysis research specifications. The data used is data in the form of secondary and tertiary materials collected by document study techniques. In this study the authors used qualitative data analysis methods. The collected data is then processed and arranged systematically for further descriptive presentation.Departing from a different constitutional system, the reasons and mechanisms for impeachment for the president are also different. Thereasons for the impeachment of the president must be in accordancewith the constitution as the highest law, where in Indonesia it is regulated in Article 7A of the 1945 NRI Constitution, while in Brazil it is regulated in Art. 85 Brazil's 1988 Constitution. The impeachment mechanism for the president in Indonesia involves 3 (three) state institutions, namely the House of Representatives (DPR), the Constitutional Court (MK) and the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR). The mechanism starts with the right to express an opinion by the DPR, then the opinion of the DPR is assessed by the Constitutional Court. If the Constitutional Court confirms the DPR's opinion, the decision is forwarded to the MPR to be brought to the Plenary Session. And in the trial the MPR decision was a political decision (politieke beslessing).Likewise, impeachment in Brazil involves 3 (three) state institutions, namely the Council of Deputies, the Supreme Court and the Senate. The mechanism starts from the initiation of the Council of Deputies, then the Council of Deputies to form a Congressional Committee to investigate, if it is justified it will be brought to full trial. The Council of Deputies is then brought before the Senate which has full authority, led by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The results of the decisions of the Senate are semi-justicial decisions. The punishment of the impeachment decision in Indonesia is to stop serving as President while Brazil is to stop serving as president and the punishment for not serving as a public official for a period of 8 years. So that the difference between the two state  mechanisms lies in the nature of the impeachment decision and the punishment of the impeachment decision.
Judicial Preview sebagai Mekanisme Penakaran Konstitusionalitas Rancangan Undang-Undang Alfian Yulianto
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i1.1-34

Abstract

Judicial preview adalah suatu mekanisme pengujian konstitusionalitas suatu produk hukum yang belum di sahkan sebagai undang-undang sebagai upaya untuk menjaga kualitas dan konstitusionalitas suatu produk hukum. Fokus dari skripsi ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah judicial preview layak untuk diberlakukan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan (library reasearch) yang menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan  bersifat diskriptif anailitis. yaitu dengan studi kepustakaan berupa mengumpulkan data sekunder dengan bahan-bahan tulisan baik berupa peraturan perundang-undangan serta literatur-literatur terkait dengan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan. Temuan dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa judicial preview layak diberlakukan di Indonesia. guna membenahi dan meningkatkan kualitas produk hukum di Indonesia, Untuk meningkatkan kualitas dan konsistensi suatu undang-undang terhadap konstitusi sekaligus sebagai kontrol atas kinerja DPR serta co-legislator lainnya, maka perlu diadakan perubahan dalam mekanisme legislasi baru di Indonesia, dan mekanisme tersebut dapat dilakukan dengan penambahan konsep judicial preview dalam proses legislasi di Indonesia.  melihat banyaknya problematika yang terjadi di dalam pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia, mulai dari kepentingan yang tidak untuk kepentingan umum sampai kurang medalamnya pemahaman dan pengimplementasian konstitusi oleh pembuat undang-undang maka dangat tepat jika diberlakukan Judicial preview. Dalam memasukkan judicial preview kedalam mekanisme legislasi di Indonesia, yakni ketika telah terbentuknya kesepakatan antara DPR dengan Presiden maka pimpinan DPR mengajukan judicial preview ke Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menguji konstitusionalitas suatu rancangan undang-undang. Kemudian setelah Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan suatu rancangan undang-undang tersebut sesuai dengan konstitusi, maka baru DPR bersama dengan Presiden menandatangani pengesahan undang-undang tersebut.
The Guarantee od Adopted Children on Their Inheritance through Wasiah Wajibah Erkham Maskuri
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i2.145-160

Abstract

This research examines the rules of law as a system-building related to a legal event which aims to give legal arguments as the basis for determining the right or wrong of a case according to a law perspective by referring to books of Fiqh and the compilation of Islamic law which contains regulation prevailing in Indonesia. This study discusses about the implementation of wasiah wajibah in Indonesia and the role of judges in deciding a case related to wasiah wajibah. This study uses the concepts of normative law approach with three criteria of law such as primary, secondary, and comparative laws by combining Wasiah Wajibah law in an Islamic perspective with the Islamic Law Compilation. The method of collecting the data used in this study is through library research and looking for law materials that are related and relevant to qualitative analysis. All collected data from various sources are arranged properly and then analysed using qualitative method so that it easily solve the problems. Research finding shows that wasiah wajibah is a solution for adopted children to obtain their rights to inheritance with certain provision and limit so that the judges have a way in deciding the case.
The Authority of Legislative Institution (A Comparative Study between Regional Represntatives Council of RI and US Senate) Muhammad Nabil Mabdaunni'am
JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/jil.v1i1.35-52

Abstract

DPD RI is institutionally similar to US Senate. Senate is also a form of regional representation on a legislative institution which its members consist of state representatives and elected in the general election. So, the membership of Senate or DPD RI is based on representation similarity without considering the number of people in a country. This research uses a normative juridical approach, an approach which refers to the law and applicable law. Research findings show that DPD RI and US Senate have a special authority whis is regulated in the constitution of each institution. Similarities and differences between the two institutions can be seen from the legislative authority and election of public officials.

Page 1 of 3 | Total Record : 30

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2020 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3, No 2 (2022) Vol 3, No 1 (2022) Vol 2, No 2 (2021) Vol 2, No 1 (2021) Vol 1, No 2 (2020) Vol 1, No 1 (2020)