cover
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 540 Documents
Eksistensi dan Urgensi Peraturan Menteri dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Sistem Presidensial Ridwan Ridwan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (469.784 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1845

Abstract

This research aims to analyze Ministerial Regulations in Indonesian governmental affairs. It is normative legal research with the statute and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show in a presidential system, the position of ministry is a president’s assistant. Thus, they could not be granted attributed authorities through an act. However, the ministerial regulations remain necessary in governmental affairs, especially as a technical law for governmental and presidential regulations. They regulate and operate certain sectors of each ministry. In addition, specific governmental sectors could not be regulated proportionally by using either presidential or even governmental regulations because a governmental regulation has specific legal aims as technical provisions of acts.
Urgensi Shared Responsibility System dalam Manajemen Hakim Rizti Aprillia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (505.208 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk18410

Abstract

Discourse regarding the management of judges in Indonesia continues to emerge, especially triggered by the change of judge status from originally civil servants to state officials. In addition, the one-stop-system factor which still leaves a lot of problems gives birth to new ideas, namely the Shared Responsibility System concept or distribution of authority in judge management which the Draft is now being formulated by the DPR in the form of a draft bill on the position of judges. In many countries, the concept is commonly practiced and in line with the theory of checks and balances between state institutions in order to realize justice accountability. The research used to discuss these problems is juridical normative with a prescriptive research typology. The type of data used in this study is secondary data. The study results concluded that it is necessary to think of a way out as a new concept in improving judicial management. The solution offered was that the management of judges to be no longer carried out by one institution, but requires the involvement of other institutions.
Konstitusionalitas Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Idul Rishan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (53.157 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1833

Abstract

This research try to disscus the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of Article 28J paragraph (2) of the constitution 1945; and the reasons used by constitutional court in declaring an human right limitation unconstitutional. This research is a normative legal research conducted on 19 decisions of constitutional court which contain unconstitutional human right limitation. This research conclude 4 reasons that cause unconstitutional human right limitation, there are; a) To violate the principle of human rights respectation; b) To contain element of discrimination; c) To violate the principle of legal certain; d) Not based on the strong, valid, rational, and proportional reason, and being exessif. Those reasons are alternative, which means that constitutional court can declare an human rights limitation on legislation as the unconstitutional norm only by one from that reasons.
Kebijakan Impor Indonesia Atas Produk Hewan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 129/PUU-XIII/2015 Irna Nurhayati; Aminoto Aminoto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1917

Abstract

This article examines on how Indonesia’s import policy on animal products after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 129/PUU-XIII/2015 should be improved in accordance with the legislation formation and international trade rule. This article was based on normative juridical research supported by interviews with several officials of the Indonesian Ministry of Trade in Jakarta, and focus group discussion with some academics of the Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed qualitatively using inductive approach. This article concludes that this Indonesia’s import policy is consistent with the formal principle of regulation formation, but does not fully comply with the substantive principle. This Indonesia’s import policy is in accordance with the regionalization and harmonization principles of the WTO SPS Agreement. However, it seems to be inconsistent with Article XI.1 GATT, because it requires certain conditions categorized as quantitative restrictions.
Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi Bagus Surya Prabowo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1914

Abstract

This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated principles. The study results show that the Constitutional Court often uses judicial activism as in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court Number 5/PUU-V/2007 and Number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Based on the two decisions, there are at least three considerations of the Constitutional Court in implementing judicial activism that has been fulfilled in cases of presidential threshold, namely, 1) political discrimination, 2) violations of constitutional rights, and 3) a socio-political emergency occurs. Therefore, the Constitutional Court has a basis for testing the threshold that violates morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. Thus, the Constitutional Court should use judicial activism to give appreciation for substantial justice to revive the value of expediency and justice in society.
Kegagalan Peraturan Penanganan Covid-19 di Indonesia Fikri Hadi; Farina Gandryani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1912

Abstract

COVID-19's occurrence in Indonesia requires the use of a variety of legal instruments related to COVID-19 in Indonesia. In practice, the existence of various legislative laws creates new legal concerns, such as failure to implement in connection to the original handling of COVID-19. Both Lon Fuller's concept of legal failure and Emergency Constitutional Law can be used to explain this failure. According to this article, failure to implement COVID-19 handling manifests itself in a variety of ways: First, laws and regulations have yet to incorporate the concept of an outbreak as a disaster. Second, the government neglected to adopt legislative rules through the provisions of the Health Authenticity Acts. Third, the failure to establish consistent and evolving regulations was not caused by the controlled medications or the regulations in place. According to this article, the regulation failed because the government did not declare a state of emergency prior to its enactment.
Calon Tunggal Pilkada: Krisis Kepemimpinan dan Ancaman Bagi Demokrasi Rofi Aulia Rahman; Iwan Satriawan; Marchethy Riwani Diaz
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1913

Abstract

The single candidate became a political phenomenon in Indonesia. However, the phenomenon rarely happens, consistently increasing the number of single candidates in the local election. This research aims to analyze whether this political phenomenon alerts democracy decadency or a typical circumstance in a democratic state. The method used in this research is doctrinal legal research. The result shows several reasons the single candidate consistently increases from event-to-event sort of an epidemic virus that could spread across the province. Some factors supporting the rise of the single-candidate phenomenon, for instance, the local parliamentary threshold of proposing the candidate, public distrust to the political parties, disfunction of a political party to giving a political education for its members and constituents, and the political parties tend to avoid the political risks of losing (incumbent). Finally, this single candidate phenomenon is a bad alert for democracy development, notably in the local area.
Menakar Transformasi Bawaslu Menjadi Lembaga Independen Peradilan Pemilukada Aprilian Sumodiningrat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1918

Abstract

Since Law Number 12 of 2008, there has been a change in the regulation of the institution's power that settles Regional Election disputes. The Constitutional Court was given jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding Regional Election results due to this reform. By judgment number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court revoked this power. In response to this judgment, the President and the House of Representatives of Republic of Indonesia issued Law No.8 of 2015, which stated that the Constitutional Court would redetermine the Regional Election results until a special election court was established. The fundamental issue addressed in this paper is the necessity of converting Bawaslu into a special election court and the form and scope of Bawaslu after it has been changed. A normative legal research technique is used in this work. The study's findings show that Bawaslu actuality as a quasi-judicial entity that works as an investigator and public prosecutor in electoral crime cases supports the argument for its transition into an independent election special court. 
Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman; Jayus Jayus; A'an Efendi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1916

Abstract

The problem of broadcasting is very complex, consisting of the definition and supervision of broadcasting which is still unclear and the authority of KPI is still weak to supervise digital media. The research objectives are: First, to look at the legal problems of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission in supervising Digital Media. Second, the concept and practice of broadcasters on digital media surveillance in other countries. Third, the design of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission's supervision of digital media supervision. The results of the study show that first, there are still legal problems with the position of KPI on digital media supervision. Second, digital media surveillance in Germany and Australia has been quite advanced which has strictly regulated broadcasting in digital with an integrated system. Third, the design is carried out by strengthening KPI institutions, institutional integration, and the "legislative convergence" approach.
Peninjauan Hukum Menurut Hukum Adat Kampar: Sumbangan dalam Mewujudkan Hukum yang Responsif Haniah Ilhami
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk19110

Abstract

The development of Indonesian constitutional law, especially judicial review, is influenced by the liberal continental and Anglo-Saxon legal systems. Meanwhile, Kampar customary law already has a legal review system with the philosophy "Adat tali bapilin tigo, tigo tunggku sajoghangan" with the ultimate goal "Adat bersendi syara’, syara’ bersendi Kitabullah". This paper examines legal review under Kampar customary law, using qualitative analysis, historical approaches, and the identification of unwritten laws. The concept presented is based on the concept of reasoning for the formation of a norm system that combines three elements, namely religion, custom, and government (the Trinity). The coherence of this concept should be a new offering in the expanded power of judicial review. The review of the legal norms should extend to the level of the ethical review. The expansion can be done by adopting the concept of legal testing reasoning according to Kampar customary law according to the moral system.