cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Vit Ardhyantama
Contact Email
vit.10276@gmail.com
Phone
+6285932141099
Journal Mail Official
jpppacitan@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Cut Nyak Dien No.4-A, Kebon, Ploso, Kec. Pacitan, Kabupaten Pacitan, Jawa Timur 63515
Location
Kab. pacitan,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Pacitan
ISSN : 20850581     EISSN : 24775851     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education,
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan adalah jurnal peer-review yang diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan PGRI Pacitan. Dipublikasikan dua kali setahun pada bulan Juni dan Desember. Jurnal ini menerbitkan makalah penelitian dan kajian di bidang pendidikan (semua jenjang, tahapan dan proses) seperti manajemen pendidikan, pendidikan sekolah dasar, pendidikan lanjut, praktik terbaik pendidikan, kurikulum, penilaian pendidikan, kebijakan pendidikan, teknologi pendidikan, pengajaran bahasa, pendidikan jasmani, pendidikan sejarah, dll.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue " Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan" : 16 Documents clear
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA STKIP PGRI PACITAN PADA MATA KULIAH PENGANTAR DASAR MATEMATIKA POKOK BAHASAN LOGIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF MAHASISWA Irawan, Edi; ., Riyadi; ., Triyanto
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Misconception is a notion which is contradictory with the scientific one or the idea claimed by experts in a certain Field; the notion is inaccurate upon a concept, the concept use is false, its exemplifications are wrong, the different concepts are confusing, and the hierarchical relation of the concepts is wrong. Therefore, information about misconception is required so as to avoid a continuous misconception. One of the factors which affect the mastery of concept by the students deals with their cognitive style. The objective of this research is to identify and describe the existence of misconception in the subject matter of Basic Introduction to Mathematics with the topic of discussion of Logics viewed from the students’ cognitive style.This research used a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach. The subjects of the research were the first semester students of the Study Program of Mathematics Education of STKIP PGRI Pacitan, Year 2011. The samples of the research were taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The identification of the existence of misconception was done by using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) developed by Saleem Hasan, and the identification of the students’ cognitive style was conducted by using the instrument of Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) developed by Witkin. The data of the research were analyzed by using the model claimed by Miles and Huberman.The results of the research show that the proportion of misconception by the students with the cognitive style of Field dependent (FD) is higher than that of students with the cognitive style of Field independent (FI). The students with FD undergo more misconceptions in inversion, conversion, and contraposition (38%) whereas the students with FI undergo more misconceptions in plural statement negations and in negations with quantifiers (32%). The misconceptions by the students with FD are largely caused by their wrong pre-conception and low ability. Meanwhile, the misconceptions by the students with FI are mostly due to their wrong simplification and intuition. Keywords: Misconception, cognitive style, CRI and GEFT.
A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF SENTENCE CONNECTORS IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE ENGLISH STUDENT OF THE ACADEMY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES OF ‘IPK’ YOGYAKARTA Saputro, Sigit Cahyo
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is aimed to find out the error of compositions made by fifth semester students. He is completely aware that the students of English Department of the Academy of Foreign Languages of “IPK” still find difficulties in choosing the exact sentence connectors to be applied in their compositions. . Besides that, the writer wants to practice his ability in using English that be has learned in his study at the Academy of Foreign Languages of “IPK”. He is completely aware that the students of the English Department of the Academy of Foreign Languages of “IPK” still find difficulties in choosing the exact sentence connectors to be applied in their compositionsFrom the composition teacher, the writer got the students’ compositions from which he collected data. At the later stage, he analyzed the data. He also quotes some pieces of information from the grammar books especially those discussing the sentence connectors and in which position they should be applied in order that his analysis can be justified and considered valid. Also, he compares theories about sentences connectors from the reference books one by one. Eventually, he tries to find out whether or not the sentence connectors are applied in the students’ compositions.The result of the discussion is that there are many students that still make the errors in their compositions related to the sentence connectors. The student of the English Department of the Academy of Foreign Languages of IPK Yogyakarta does not have a lot of intentions to use the sentence connectors in their composition ; so, it is hoped for them to comprehend them and should not make the necessary mistakes anymoreKeyword: Sentence Connector, Adverbs, Paragraph
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI POKOK PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Suprapto, Edi; Sujadi, Iman; Roswitha, Mania
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to know the difference of influlence in learning models, creativity, and its interaction toward student’s learning achievement on the subject matter: equations of a straight line. This research is a quasi experimental research with factorial design of 3x3. The population is eight grade students of Junior high School in Madiun. The samples are taken using stratified cluster random technic. Sample of the research is 283 students. The collecting data instruments is a questionnaire on creativity and learning mathematics achievement test. The trial test of instrument of the questionnaire includes the content validity, the internal consistency, and realibility. The trial test on the achievement of learning on mathematics includes the content validity, the difficulty level, the discrimination power, and realibility coefficient. The Data analysis technique used consists of: balance, precondition analysis (Normality and Homogenity). Hypothesis analysis test uses two-ways variant analysis with different cells.The results of the research are: (1) The students who are learning with cooperative model of STAD have better achievement than the students who are given conventional learning, and the students who are given cooperative model of STAD have the same achievement with the students who are given cooperative model of TPS; (2) The students with high creativity have better achievement than the students who have lower creativity (middle and low), the students with middle creativity  have the same achievement with the students who have low creativity, (3) On students with high creativity, implementation learning models  of STAD, TPS, and conventional give the same effect; On students with middle creativity, implementation of cooperative learning with STAD model gives the same effect as good as the TPS model, implementation of cooperative learning with STAD models provides a better effect than conventional learning, and implementation of cooperative learning with TPS model gives a better effect than conventional learning; On students with low creativity, implementation of cooperative learning with STAD and TPS models give the same effect, implementation of cooperative learning with STAD model and conventional learning also provide the same effect, and implementation of cooperative learning with TPS model gives a better effect than conventional learning. Key words:    Learning Models, Student Teams Achievement Divisions, Think-Pair-Share, Conventional, Creativity.
NILAI DAN PENDIDIKAN NILAI Amirin, Tatang M
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are several definitions about value, most of them define value as a principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable. Value differs from moral, although both speak about good and bad, right and wrong, should and shouldn’t. Moral is stronger than value; people usually judge others more strongly on morals than values. Value also differs from character. Character is the complex of mental and ethical traits marking and often individualizing a person, group, or nation. So to say, character education is not the same as value education.  There are three stages or periods of value development, i.e. the imprint period, the modeling period, and the socialization period. The traditional model of values education has placed greater emphasis on the content of values instead of on the valuer, the one choosing and acting on the values. In the humanistic model, however, there is a shift. The stress is from content- to process-based, values- to valuer-focused and teacher- to student-centred orientation. Socio-cultural environment is the great value educator for the children. Recently we need more moralistic models performed by public figures. Key Word: Value, caracter and value Education.
ANALISIS KOMPARATIF VOKAL BAHASA ARAB DAN BAHASA INGGRIS Irawati, Iisrohli; Oktiasari, Lini
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Every language has own structure and unic. Every language is also different between one and others. This study is compare between English and Arabic vocal. This study to accomodate who wants to know more about English and Arabic.This study use comparative analysis and study of phonology. English vowel sounds are described according to criteria which are: frontness – backness, closeness – openness, and lip – rounding. and contrast, in Arabic phonetics we describe sounds according to criteria which are: fathah, dhammah dan kasrah and long vowal like ma>d, alif, wau and ya’ Key words : English, Arabic, and vowal.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW TERMODIFIKASI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KABUPATEN NGANJUK Asngari, Imam; ., Budiyono; ., Suyono
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The experimentation of mathematics learning by using Cooperative Learning Model of Modification Jigsaw Type And Jigsaw is viewed from the Learning Creativity of Junior Students in Nganjuk Regency. The objectives of Research are (1) to find out the differences of Mathematics Learning Achievement for students who use cooperative learning model of modification Jigsaw type, Jigsaw Cooperative Learning and Conventional Learning. (2) to find out the differences of Mathematics Learning Achievement for the students have the different Learning Creativity Grade.(3) to find out the differences of Mathematics Learning Achievement for the students on application of cooperative learning model of modification Jigsaw Type, Jigsaw Cooperative Learning and Convensional Learning have a different learning creativity grade.The concluclusion of research are that: (1) The students’ mathemetics learning result that be taught with Modification Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model is better  than that be taught with Jigsaw Learning, the students’ mathematics learning result that be taught with modification jigsaw cooperative learning model is better than that be taught with conventional learning and the students’ mathematics learning result that be taught with jigsaw cooperative learning model is better than that be taught with conventional learning. (2) The students’ learning result who have a high learning creativity as good as with the students have a medium learning creativity, the students’ learning result who have a high learning creativity is better than the students have a low learning creativity and the students’ learning result who have a medium learning creativity as good as with the students have a low learning creativity. (3a) On every learning model, the students with a high learning creativity, the students’ mathematics learning result equal the students who have a medium learning creativity, the students with a high learning creativity, the students’ mathematics learning result is better than the students with a low learning creativity and the students with a medium learning creativity, the students’ learning result equal the students who have a low learning creativity. (3b) On every creativity grade, mathematics learning result with modification jigsaw cooperative learning model is better than jigsaw learning model, mathematics learning result with jigsaw cooperative learning model is better than conventional learning model and mathematics learning result with modification jigsaw cooperative learning model is better than conventional learning model.Keyword: Modification Jigsaw, Jigsaw, conventional, learning creativity, learning result.
PEMBERDAYAAN MADRASAH; UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN ISLAM Murtadho, Ali
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the history of Moslem education, the history of Islamic Schools development will always be atractive to be analized critically. The study is being urgent because it is expected that the Islamic schools will have some roles in the Moslem education development objectively and comprehensively. It is regarded as the important one because in every phase of Islamic schools’ development is always found some efforts to be better, the innovation, and other improvements. Islamic school is one of the Islamic isntitutions of education in Indonesia. The islamic school has  long cronology on its development. Since it is formed until now, there are some improvements which are trasforming the Islamic education institutions to be qualified which are supported by the Moslem reformers. The lack of the awareness of the Moslem education importance in Indonesia in the beginning of Islamic schools’ development is felt by the Moslem doers of education. That is why, the Islamic schools should be forceful.
KONSEP PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS MULTIKULTURAL ALA KI HADJAR DEWANTARA ., Mukodi
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP PGRI PACITAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are two points in this research. First, there are lot of violence phenomena and the strained situation between the members of religious community in the society recently. Second, it has not found the way to solve the conflicts which is relevant to the Indonesians character. Related to the problems, the results of this study show that; 1) through multicultural teaching and learning method, the unique of human beings, such as the differences of religion or belief, race, culture, sex, physical aspects and peoples’ economic status can be placed on the same level.2) the multicultural educational concept of education in three centers of education by Ki Hajar Dewantara as one of the alternative application methods.  Trough familial education, the parents teach their children for understanding the importance of having equal right among the ones who have different ethnic group, race, religion, belief, culture, social strata, and humanism values. At school, the teachers and academic staffs can teach the multicultural values of education which are systematic, academic, and controlled. In the society, the citizen or the members of the society can implement the feeling of awareness in the real life, related to the importance of seeing the differences of people without differencing the religion, belief, culture, sex, physical aspects and peoples’ social status.Key words: Multicultural education, three centers of education, Ki Hadjar Dewantoro and James Banks.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA STKIP PGRI PACITAN PADA MATA KULIAH PENGANTAR DASAR MATEMATIKA POKOK BAHASAN LOGIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF MAHASISWA Irawan, Edi; ., Riyadi; ., Triyanto
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : LPPM STKIP PGRI Pacitan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Misconceptionis a notion which is contradictory with the scientific one or the idea claimed by expertsin a certain Field; the notion is inaccurateup on a concept, the concept use is false, it sex emplification sare wrong, the different concept sare confusing, and the hierarchi calrelation of the concepts is wrong. Therefore, information about misconception is required so as to avoid a continuous misconception. One of the factors which affect the mastery of concept by the students deals with their cognitive style. The objective of this research is to identify and describe the existence of misconception in the subject matter of Basic Introduction to Mathematics with the topic of discussion of Logics viewed from the students’ cognitive style. This research used a descriptive qualitative methodwith a casestudyapproach. The subjects of theresearchwerethefirst semester students of the Study Program of Mathematics Education of STKIP PGRI Pacitan, Year 2011. The samples of theresearchweretakenbyusingthepurposive sampling technique. The identification of theexistence of misconceptionwasdonebyusingtheCertainty of ResponseIndex (CRI) developedbySaleem Hasan, andtheidentification of thestudents’ cognitivestylewasconductedbyusingtheinstrument of Group EmbeddedFigures Test (GEFT) developedbyWitkin. The data of theresearchwereanalyzedbyusingthe model claimedbyMilesandHuberman.  The results of theresearchshowthattheproportion of misconceptionbythestudentswiththecognitivestyle of Fielddependent (FD) ishigherthanthat of studentswiththecognitivestyle of Fieldindependent (FI). The studentswith FD undergomoremisconceptionsininversion, conversion, andcontraposition (38%) whereasthestudentswith FI undergomoremisconceptionsin plural statementnegationsandinnegationswithquantifiers (32%). The misconceptionsbythestudentswith FD arelargelycausedbytheirwrongpre-conceptionandlowability. Meanwhile, themisconceptionsbythestudentswith FI aremostlyduetotheirwrongsimplificationandintuition. Keywords:Misconception, cognitivestyle, CRI and GEFT.
KONSEP PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS MULTIKULTURAL ALA KI HADJAR DEWANTARA ., Mukodi
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
Publisher : LPPM STKIP PGRI Pacitan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are two points in this research. First, there are lot of violence phenomena and the strained situation between the members of religious community in the society recently. Second, it has not found the way to solve the conflicts which is relevant to the Indonesians character. Related to the problems, the results of this study show that; 1) through multicultural teaching and learning method, the unique of human beings, such as the differences of religion or belief, race, culture, sex, physical aspects and peoples’ economic status can be placed on the same level.2) the multicultural educational concept of education in three centers of education by Ki Hajar Dewantara as one of the alternative application methods.  Trough familial education, the parents teach their children for understanding the importance of having equal right among the ones who have different ethnic group, race, religion, belief, culture, social strata, and humanism values. At school, the teachers and academic staffs can teach the multicultural values of education which are systematic, academic, and controlled. In the society, the citizen or the members of the society can implement the feeling of awareness in the real life, related to the importance of seeing the differences of people without differencing the religion, belief, culture, sex, physical aspects and peoples’ social status. Key words:Multicultural education, three centers of education, Ki Hadjar Dewantoro and James Banks.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 13 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 12 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 11 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 11 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 10 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 10 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 10 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 9 No 2 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 9 No 2 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 9 No 1 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 8 No 2 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 8 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 7 No 2 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 7, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 7 No 1 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 6 No 2 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 6, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 5, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 5 No 2 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 5, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 4 No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 3 No 2 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 3, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 3 No 1 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 3, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 2 No 2 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 2, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 2, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 2 No 1 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 1 No 2 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 1, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 1, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol 1 No 1 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan More Issue