cover
Contact Name
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Contact Email
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Phone
+6281916412362
Journal Mail Official
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Pulau Bali No.1 Denpasar
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Kertha Patrika
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 0215899X     EISSN : 25799487     DOI : 10.24843
Core Subject : Social,
Focus in Scope Jurnal Kertha Patrika terbit tiga (3) kali setahun: yaitu bulan April, Agustus, dan Desember. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal yang bertemakan Ilmu Hukum, dengan manfaat dan tujuan bagi perkembangan Ilmu Hukum, dengan mengedepankan sifat orisinalitas, kekhususan dan kemutakhiran artikel pada setiap terbitannya. Tujuan dari publikasi Jurnal ini adalah untuk memberikan ruang mempublikasikan pemikiran kritis hasil penelitian orisinal, maupun gagasan konseptual dari para akademisi, peneliti, maupun praktisi yang belum pernah dipublikasikan pada media lainnya. Fokus dan lingkup penulisan (Focus & Scope) dalam Jurnal ini meliputi: Hukum Tata Negara; Hukum Administrasi; Hukum Pidana; Hukum Perdata; Hukum Internasional; Hukum Acara; Hukum Adat; Hukum Bisnis; Hukum Kepariwisataan; Hukum Lingkungan; Hukum Dan Masyarakat; Hukum Informasi Teknologi Dan Transaksi Elektronik; Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia; Hukum Kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 45 No 2 (2023)" : 7 Documents clear
Penggunaan Asas Derogasi dalam Penyelesaian Disharmonisasi Inventarisasi Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Kristian Vincent Gunawan; Raden Mas Gatot Prasetyo Soemartono
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p05

Abstract

Disharmonization of regulations in the positive legal system in Indonesia often occurs in various types of regulations. One of the disharmonizations is regulations that regulate the inventory of traditional cultural expressions that aim to protect traditional cultural expressions against acts of misuse, deception, fraud, or false statements (misinterpretation), and theft or piracy (misappropriation). Inventory has a vital role as a basis for carrying out defensive protection of traditional cultural expressions. Therefore, the legal basis for an inventory of traditional cultural expressions must be clear, not disharmony. This research answers questions as to why disharmony occurs between various regulations regulating the inventory of traditional cultural expressions and how the use of the principle of derogation can resolve disharmony between regulations. Normative legal studies are the research method used in this research. The research found the disharmonization of traditional cultural expressions happened because several regulations regulate the same object, namely traditional cultural expressions, and deal with the same thing, namely inventory for defensive protection, but differently. The disharmony began from the different institutions at the central government level and the procedures for submitting data, databases, and materials. The derogation principle helps resolve the disharmony of regulations, which overrule the enforceability of regulation. In this case, the lex posterior derogate legi priori principle is used to fix the problem of disharmony in the inventory of traditional cultural expressions.
Legal Protection Against Registered Marks Due to Actions Trademarks Squatting Based on Good Faith in Indonesia Putu Tissya Poppy Aristiani; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p02

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to examine, analyze, and elaborate on the concept of trademark squatting actions and legal protection for registered trademarks due to trademark squatting actions based on good faith in Indonesia. This study is written using normative research methods using statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and analytical approaches. This study's results shows that the concept of Trademarks Squatting is not regulated in the provisions of the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, but at the international level, WIPO explains that trademark squatting is the act of registering or using a mark which is generally a well-known foreign brand, where the mark has not been registered in a country or the mark has been registered but has never been used by the owner of the mark concerned. As well as, the legal protection of registered trademarks due to trademark squatting in Indonesia, in particular, the possibility of taking legal action against other parties who illegally use a Mark that is essentially similar in terms of rules or its wholeness for similar products or services in the form of a claim for compensations; and/or Termination of all actions related to the use of said Mark based on the stipulations of Article 83 point (1) of the Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications.
Urgensi dalam Meratifikasi Convention On Cybercrime sebagai Pemenuhan HAM di Indonesia Ida Ayu Agung Rasmi Wulan; Ni Luh Gede Astariyani
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p06

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the provisions of Indonesian legislation governing the protection of personal data relating to cybercrime or cybercrime and conduct an analysis with international instruments in the field of Cybercrime, namely the Convention on Cybercrime which has not been ratified by Indonesia and the urgency of ratifying this Convention for the harmonization of Indonesian national law. Researchers used normative legal research in this study. Researchers use laws and regulations, articles, scientific journals, and books as sources of information and library materials so that legal research is known as formative law. This study used a statutory approach and a case approach. The study findings show that Indonesia already has several types of personal data protection arrangements spread across several regulations and laws. But in fact, this does not make cases of personal data leakage in Indonesia subside. Therefore, the strategy that Indonesia must take is to first ratify or access the Convention on Cybercrime, Budapest, 2001, so that the cooperation mechanism stipulated in the convention ultimately benefits and helps Indonesia in eradicating borderless cybercrime.
Hak Cipta dan Kepemilikan Hak Cipta atas Street Art yang Melekat Pada Properti Milik Orang Lain: Sebuah Dualisme Hukum Jennifer Moniq Sutanto; Mas Rahmah; Xavier Nugraha
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p01

Abstract

Street art is a work of art on the streets, which is usually in the form of graffiti or murals. Street art is generally made on other people's property without permission. This is what raises the problem of copyright protection and ownership of street art because there is a conflict between copyright and property rights and making street art without permission is a form of vandalism. Therefore, there is still debate about copyright protection for street art and there is still legal dualism in this regard. This paper aims, firstly to provide an analysis regarding copyright protection for illegal street art and secondly to analyze the ownership of street art attached to the property of other people. The research method of this paper is normative using statutory, comparative, case, and conceptual approaches. The results of this article are first, even though street art is an illegal act because it is vandalism, there is still copyright protection in it. Second, even though it is related to copyright ownership of street art, it remains with the Street Art Artists because it is their copyright, but the property rights of the owner of the property must also be protected.
Karakteristik Sistem Pembayaran Transaksi Elektronik melalui Layanan Self-Service: Studi Terrace Abah Choi Muhammad Asrul Maulana; Kurnia Ningsih Kolopita; Citra Sonia; Emy Rosnawati
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p07

Abstract

This research will focus on analyzing the law of Electronic Payment System Operators through Supermarkets to find legal certainty for electronic agreements, and the practice of electronic agreements at Cafe Abah Choi, so that they can find solutions in the form of optimizing payment systems for electronic transactions through Supermarkets. This study employs an empirical (Sociolegal) method with a conflict approach. The results of this study are that the optimization of the electronic transaction system at the Abah Choi cafe can be implemented in the form of additions that must be equipped with a reliable security system, such as data encryption and strong user authentication. To further increase the sophistication of electronic self-service systems, new features can be developed in the future, such as payments using mobile payment technology or NFC (Near Field Communication). As well as the role of AI (Artificial Intelligence) technology can be used to manage electronic self-service systems automatically, such as monitoring inventory, analyzing customer data, or providing real-time customer service.
Hak Untuk Dilupakan Sebagai Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Korban Cyberbullying (Studi Komparatif Indonesia dengan Korea Selatan) Zahrani Salsabila; Aji Lukman Ibrahim
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p03

Abstract

This study aims to determine legal policies regarding cyberbullying in Indonesia dan South Korea, forms of legal protection, fulfillment of the right to be forgotten and so that Indonesia can have legal arguments that side with victims as a form of protection for victims of cyberbullying. This normative juridical law research is complemented by interviews and uses comparative, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia has not been able to exercise the right to be forgotten in dealing with cyberbullying because there needs to be a precise mechanism in its legal policies. In addition, the lack of socialization regarding the implementation of the right to be forgotten for victims of cyberbullying causes low public awareness in reporting. Therefore, strategic steps are needed, such as issuing a Ministerial Regulation regarding the mechanism for deletion, the existence of a particular complaint, contacting persons, and conducting outreach and education to the public. Hence, they want to report on acts of cyberbullying.
Perbandingan Konsep Recidive dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dengan Criminal Act of South Korea Busthomi Arifin; Rayhan Afief Arfarizky; Rusmilawati Windari
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p04

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore the concept of criminal recidivism between Indonesia and South Korea. The research method employed is normative research using a statute approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. The research findings reveal that Indonesia and South Korea regulate recidivism with distinct approaches that correspond to the characteristics of each country. In Indonesia, the regulations on recidivism are stipulated in Article 23 of the Indonesian Penal Code, while in South Korea, they are found in Articles 35-36 of the Criminal Act of South Korea. A notable difference is that in South Korea, an individual is considered a recidivist if they repeat a criminal offense that is punishable by imprisonment or a more severe penalty, such as penal servitude or the death penalty. In Indonesia, the aggravation of punishment for recidivism is limited to a one-third increase from the initial penalty, whereas in South Korea, it can be escalated up to twice the initial penalty. Recommendations that can be considered based on the comparison between the two countries include a fair evaluation of recidivism cases, an effective rehabilitation system, a focus on prevention efforts, proportional punishment, as well as enhanced research and monitoring.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7