Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
', Eliwarti
Unknown Affiliation
Education

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
THE PRODUCTION OF ADJACENCY PAIRS AND PREFERENCE ORGANIZATION BY SECOND YEARS STUDENTS OF MAN 1 PEKANBARU Sonnevil, Gianini Sonnevil; ', Eliwarti; Maria, Desri Maria
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 2, No 1 (2015): wisuda februari 2015
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This descriptive research discusses conversation analysis among senior high school students. It was conducted based on the importance of adjacency pairs and preference organization in speaking; these two aspects covered the appropriateness between preceding and proceeding talk, the pattern of preferred and dispreferred response. The participants of this research was second years students of MAN 1 Pekanbaru. The data was collected by giving topics to peer of student and recorded by the researcher. Then, the recording was transcribed based on Gail Jefferson’s transcription. The research was analyzed by considering three aspects (1) the type and adequacy of students’ initiating and responding,(2) student’s ability in constructing 4 types of adjacency pairs; Question-Answer, Greeting-greeting, Telling-acceptance and invitation-refusal or acceptance,(3) preference organization: preference for agreement and preference for contiguity. Based on the data analysis, 86 % students produced Question-answer, 7.3 % of students produced Greeting-greeting, 5 % of students produced Telling-acceptance and 2 % produced invitation-acceptance or refusal.   Based on the students’ ability in producing preference organizations, 83 % of students gave positive response and 4.2 % gave negative to positive question while students gave 3.3 % positive responses and 4.2 % negative response to negative question. Based on the adequacy of students’ response 21.6 % of students gave adequate plus response, 69.1 % gave adequate response, 5.8 % gave inadequate response and 0.16 % gave ambiguous response. There was also tendency that students produced more transactional question rather than interactional questions. Keyword: conversation analysis, adjacency pairs, preference organization. Students’ Speaking Ability, descriptive Research
THE EFFECT OF ROUND TABLE TECHNIQUE ON THE WRITING ABILITY IN RECOUNT TEXT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 KUBU Fitri, Auliana; Azhar, Fadly; ', Eliwarti
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Wisuda Oktober 2017
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to find out whether there is an effect of Round Table Technique on the students’ writing ability in recount text of SMPN 1 Kubu. This research was applied by using one-group-pretest-posttest design. In conducting this research, a single group was selected to be a sample by using Cluster Random Sampling. There are 33 students as the sample. In order to know the difference between the pre-test and the post-test and to analyse the hypothesis, t-test formula was used. After analysing the data, the writer found that t-obs score was 11.738 while the value of t-table is 2.037. Since t-obs (11.738) was higher than t-table (2.037), it can be concluded that null hypothesis was rejected. It means that there is a significant effect of Round Table Technique on the students’ writing ability at SMPN 1 Kubu in writing recount text. Based on the research findings, it is recommended that teachers use Round Table Technique to help the students to generate their ideas in writing a recount text.Key Words: Effect, Round Table Technique, Writing Ability, Recount Text
Co-Authors ', Afrianto ', M. Syarfi ', Marzuki ', Masyhur Andani, Siska Desri Maria Maria, Desri Maria Fadly Azhar Fakhri Ras Fitri, Auliana Gianini Sonnevil Sonnevil, Gianini Sonnevil Hikmah, Alfi Mahdum, Mahdum Ningrum, Nurdwi Ayu Setia Nurikawati, Lia Putri, Mentari Eka Ramadani, Rezki Mediana Rumiri Aruan Septiani, Riri Suci, Aliffiona Yulisda, Nuraina Zennet Jacenda, Zennet