Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

TANGGUNGJAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP AKTA PPJB DAN AKTA KUASA UNTUK MENJUAL SEBAGAI JAMINAN TERJADINYA UTANG PIUTANG Raymond Aristyo; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 12 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (521.024 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i12.p13

Abstract

Tujuan studi ini untuk mengetahui suatu kepastian hukum bagi suatu akta yang di batalkan oleh pengadilan dan untuk mendapat pengetahuan mengenai akibat hukum dan pertanggungjawaban serta sanksi bagi notaris atas pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB), Akta Kuasa untuk Menjual, dan Akta Perjanjian Pengosongan yang dibuat sebagai jaminan terjadinya ikatan utang piutang yang dibatalkan oleh pengadilan. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji dan menelaah norma hukum tertulis dengan merujuk pada ketentuan hukum terkait dengan menggunakan data primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa notaris wajib bertanggung jawab atas kesesuaian akta otentik yang dibuatnya demi menghindari kerugian para pihak terhadap akta yang dibuatnya dan notaris dikenai sanksi dalam membayar biaya perkara dan dikenai tanggung jawab secara administratif. The purpose of this research is to understand a legal certaintly for a deed that is canceled by the court and to gain knowledge about the legal consequences and liability as well as sanctions for the notary for the making of PPJB, the power of attorney to sell, and the employment agreement deed made as collateral for a debt bond that is canceled by the court. This research uses empirical juridical method, namely research conducted by reviewing and examining written legal norms by referring to related legal provisions using primary and secondary data. The results of this study that the notary is obliged to be responsible for the suitability of the authentic deed he made in order to avoid losses to the parties to the deed he made and the notary is subject to sanctions in paying court fees and is administratively responsible.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Klien Atas Pembuatan Akta Di Hadapan Notaris Pengganti Yang Tidak Sah I Gede Yudi Arsawan; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 03 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i03.p6

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to find out how the legal consequences of making a deed by an unauthorized substitute notary and the form of legal protection for the parties as clients of the injured substitute notary. This study uses a normative legal research method that uses a law approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the Surabaya Court Decision Number 728/PDT/P/2020/PN. Sby. The results of this study indicate that the making of a deed by a substitute notary that is not valid results in the deed being downgraded to under the hand based on Article 44 in conjunction with Article 84 UUJN and Article 1869 of the Civil Code. The degradation of the power of proof of the deed results in the aggrieved client being able to claim damages from the party who caused the loss. Abstrak Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana akibat hukum dari pembuatan akta oleh notaris pengganti yang tidak sah serta bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak selaku klien dari notaris pengganti yang dirugikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis Penetapan Pengadilan Surabaya Nomor 728/PDT/P/2020/PN. Sby. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pembuatan akta oleh notaris pengganti yang tidak sah berakibat akta tersebut turun derajatnya menjadi di bawah tangan berdasarkan Pasal 44 jo Pasal 84 UUJN dan Pasal 1869 KUHPerdata. Degradasi kekuatan pembuktian akta tersebut mengakibatkan klien yang dirugikan dapat menuntut kerugian kepada pihak yang menyebabkan kerugian tersebut.
KEABSAHAN DAN AKIBAT HUKUM PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI YANG TIDAK MEMENUHI SYARAT ALTERNATIF (Analisis Penetapan Nomor 682/Pdt.P/2016/Pn.Dps) I Gede Yudi Arsawan; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Maleo Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Oktober 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31934/mlj.v5i2.1670

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marriage is the beginning of a new life for a person, because since there is an agreement between two individuals to marry, there is a change in the roles and responsibilities towards oneself, their partner, and their environment. Even though the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage adheres to the principle of monogamy, cases can occur where marriages occur in a polygamous manner, but to carry out a polygamous marriage, the conditions that must be met at least consist of 1 (one) alternative and 3 (three) conditions. cumulative conditions. However, there are cases where in the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 682/Pdt.P/2016/PN a husband is given permission by the Panel of Judges to practice polygamy even though there are no alternative requirements for a polygamous marriage to be fulfilled. Keywords: Marriage, Polygamy, Legal Terms of Marriage
Power of Attorney to Install Mortgages Made by Notaries in The Process of Charging Mortgage Guarantees on Ships Arum Sekar Ayurani; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (398.432 KB)

Abstract

The Mortgage Deed in the process of guaranteeing ship mortgages based on Law number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping becomes the authority of the Registrar and Registrar of Ship Transfers (hereinafter referred to as P3BK). However, the mortgage deed product issued by P3BK is considered less protective and representative of the interests of the parties, namely creditors and debtors and has the potential to cause legal problems, it is necessary for a Notary to make a Power of Attorney to Install a Mortgage (hereinafter referred to as SKMH) using an authentic deed in accordance with Article 1171 of the Civil Code. The importance of making SKMH itself is basically to represent and protect the interests of the parties and as a means of reflecting the wishes of the parties. The existence of SKMH in the process of guaranteeing ship mortgages is the choice of the parties. The function of the SKMH made currently is not only used limitedly because the parties are in a different place from the registered ship, or because the parties are unable to be present at the time the guarantee binding is carried out, but the SKMH is made because it is desired by the parties in the Mortgage binding agreement to get more benefits. special protection that is felt to be able to bridge their desires that are not fulfilled by the P3BK mortgage deed.
Peer to Peer Lending Sebagai Alternatif Penyaluran Pembiayaan Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Trinov Gira Thimoteus Sihite; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (434.527 KB) | DOI: 10.38043/jah.v5i1.3488

Abstract

The regulation and supervision of the distribution of capital in a Microfinance Institution is currently still not running optimally considering that there are still many entities that have limited operational capital to develop their businesses. This encourages an innovation for those who are careful in seeing economic opportunities, one of which is Fintech Lending. Fintech as one of the digital pioneers that can accelerate economic turnover and facilitate financial transactions, including access to funding for the public. It is hoped that the disruption of technology can increase competition among financial services business players in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the presence and function of Fintech Lending as an alternative source of financing solutions for Microfinance Institutions who are experiencing capital difficulties to do business, and to provide understanding to Microfinance Institutions regarding preventive and repressive legal protection if one day a Microfinance Institution enter into a cooperation agreement to conduct a microfinance project. The research method used is normative, namely through literature review/legal documents. The results of the study show that Fintech Lending can collaborate with Microfinance Institutions to realize equitable distribution of the people's economy.
PERAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PERJANJIAN DALAM BAHASA ASING BERDASARKAN PASAL 1338 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Abiandri Fikri Akbar; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 7, No 3 (2021): Volume 7, Nomor 3 Juli-September 2021
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1147.688 KB) | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v7i2.4098

Abstract

ABSTRAKNotaris berperan sebagai pejabat umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat perjanjian dalam bentuk akta otentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna. Akta notaris umumnya wajib dibuat dalam bahasa Indonesia, namun seiring dengan meningkatnya perkembangan hubungan antara subjek hukum warga negara yang berbeda timbul kebutuhan untuk membuat perjanjian dalam bahasa asing guna memberikan kenyamanan dan kepastian dalam membuat perjanjian karena perbedaan Bahasa kewarganegaraan. Oleh sebab itu, guna memenuhi kebutuhan tersebut sesuai dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 02 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris mengatur ketentuan tentang dapatnya suatu akta notaris dibuat dalam Bahasa asing jika Para Pihak menghendaki dan Notaris mengerti Bahasa asing tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yaitu mengkaji hukum yang dikonsepkan sebagai norma atau kaidah yang berlaku dalam masyarakat dan menjadi acuan perilaku setiap orang. Penelitian terhadap masalah hukum kemudian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan atau regulasi.Kata Kunci: Notaris, Perjanjian Dalam Bahasa Asing dan dokumen hukumABSTRACTNotaries act as public officials who have the authority to make an agreement in the form of an authentic deed that has perfect evidentiary power. Notary deeds are generally required to be made in Indonesian, but along with the growing relationship between legal subjects of different citizens, it is necessary to make an agreement in a foreign language in order to provide comfort and certainty in making agreements due to differences in national languages. Therefore, to fulfill this need, in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract, Article 1338 of the Civil Code and Law Number 02 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions regulates provisions regarding the ability of a notary deed to be drawn up. made in a foreign language if the parties wish and the notary understands the foreign language. The research method used is normative juridical, namely examining the law which is conceptualized as a norm or rule that applies in society and becomes a reference for everyone's behavior. Research on legal issues then uses a statutory or regulatory approach.Keywords: Notary, Foreign language agreements and Legal Documents.
SISTEM PELAPORAN AKTA BERBASIS CYBER NOTARY SEBAGAI SARANA PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN NOTARIS Johan Rahmanda Andhira; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 7, No 3 (2021): Volume 7, Nomor 3 Juli-September 2021
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (849.023 KB) | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v7i2.4211

Abstract

Abstrak Cyber Notary seharusnya tidak hanya terbatas dalam pembuatan akta secara digital, tetapi juga kepada peran pengawasan, kontrol dan penyuluhan yang memberikan manfaat bagi Organisasi Notaris Indonesia. Pasal 4 angka 16 Kode Etik 2015 menyatakan bahwa Notaris wajib membuat akta dalam jumlah batas yang wajar sebagai perwujudan pelaksanaan Undang-Undang. Namun pelanggaran pasal ini masih sering ditemukan. Terdapat banyak faktor penyebab kerap terjadinya pelanggaran. Seharusnya pelanggaran ini dapat dihentikan dengan pengawasan, tetapi pengawasan terhadap hal tersebut belum dapat berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Dengan bentuk yuridis normatif, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan solusi pengawasan Majelis Pengawas atas keterbatasan jarak, waktu dan tenaga manusia dari tingkat wilayah hingga pusat. Sebagai sistem cyber notary yang komprehensif, sudah selayaknya ada sistem database akta berbasis aplikasi / website yang didukung peraturan perundang-undangan khusus dengan komitmen peningkatan kualitas pelayanan kepada para pengguna jasa Notaris. Kata kunci: Cyber Notary, Sistem Database Akta, Pengawasan Abstract Cyber Notary should have not been limited to digital acts, but also towards means of surveillance, control, and information which benefits to Indonesian Notary Organization. Article 4 clause 16 Ethical Code of 2015 stated that Notary obliged on making a certain allowable number of acts in comply to the Law. However, the surveillance in this matter hasn’t yet performed as it should be. There are a lot of factors that affects how this violation keeps happening. Every breach in regulations should have been managed by proper supervision. But given the current conditions, supervisions were  inadequate.  With normative juridical study, the purpose of this research is to provide The Overseer Assembly a solution regarding adversaries such as distance, time, and manpower from regional to national on performing their authority. Consequently, as a comprehensive cyber notary system, the need of deed database system should be supported by specific regulations and rules as a commitment in improving service quality to the Notary service users. Keywords: Cyber Notary, Deed Database System, Surveillance
Insurance Policy Closure As The Implication of The Utmost Good Faith Principle in Life Insurance Claim Filing Jessica Petra N Sianipar; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 22, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3206

Abstract

The risk transfer mechanism from the insured to the insurer in insurance happens when both parties have fulfilled what has been agreed in insurance agreement along with obligatory insurance principle like the utmost good faith principle and the regulation regarding the insurance procedure. In the South Jakarta District Court Decision number: 16/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel, Panel of Judges excluded what has been agreed by both parties on the basis of fulfillment of utmost good faith principle by the plaintiff. The excluded matter was regarding the written notification obligation that has been agreed by both parties, but the plaintiff did not notify it in writing but orally instead. Law No. 40 of 2014 does not clearly regulate claim notification, thus causing difficulty in determining whether certain notification is the application of the utmost good faith principle or not. Some foreign legislations regulate that matter, so they can become a reference for Indonesian regulators in perfecting the existing regulation.Keywords: insurance; the principle of utmost good faith; insurance policy closure; insurance claim; life insurance
Analysis of TheVadility of A Cession Over A Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement That Was Subject to an Invalid Novation Bella Fabiola; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol 21, No 1 (2022): PENA JUSTISIA
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (301.192 KB) | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i1.1904

Abstract

In order to guarantee smooth capital turnover, banks would often "withdraw" their capital even if the receivables (often from credit) that they currently own are not yet payable, by selling their receivables, followed by cession. However, in practice this is often problematic. Most of the problems revolving around this practice is that the cession that follows the selling of receivables is conducted not in accordance with applicable laws regarding cession and could therefore backfire and become a problem for the bank in question. The cession of Permata Bank on Debt Assignment Deed (Cession) Number 85 dated 5 May 2017, as stated in the Central Jakarta Commercial Court Decision Number 131/Pdt.SUS-PKPU/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst is one of such problematic cessions. On this matter, the assignment of receivables was done through Debt Assignment Deed (Cession) Number 85 dated 5 May 2017, related to a Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement that was novated and then amended. This article uses a normative juridical research method. The research specifications used in this study are descriptive analytical. The secondary data used by the author in this study consisted of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis method used is normative qualitative. The Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement is carried out without the transfer of ownership with cession, so that the ownership has not yet been transferred to the buyer. The Novation and Amendment To the Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement is also invalid because it was carried out without involving the debtor. So, it can be concluded that the cession of the Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement which was later novated and amended is null and void because the cession was made under a receivables sale and purchase agreement that was invalidly novated. Key Words: Cessie, Novasi, Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement
Legalitas Hibah oleh Warga Negara Asing Atas Objek Tanah di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Safira Ayudiatri; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 1: April - September 2022
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i1.131

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the legality of granting by Singaporean citizens to Indonesian citizens before the Notary Public of Singapore on land objects located in the territory of Indonesia based on Decision No. 912/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Jmb. In addition, this study further analyzes the laws and regulations that should apply in handling grants case based on international civil law. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive specifications. The literature study was used to obtain the legal materials needed in this research. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute and case approach. The results show that the legality of granting the object of land wills in Indonesia from former Indonesian citizens who have become foreign citizens to Indonesian citizens based on Decision No. 912/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Jmb is invalid and void by law. This case is contrary to Article 21 section (3) of Law No. 5 of 1960 and Article 37 section (1) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997. Based on the concept of International Civil Law, that action can be categorized as law smuggling, namely an act committed in a foreign country and recognized as legal in that foreign country. As for immovable objects, the general principle accepted in international civil law has stated that immovable objects in their status are based on the principle of lex situs or lex rei sitae. Therefore, it is recommended that every foreign citizen who has land rights or other property rights in Indonesia must relinquish the right of ownership within one year. The granting of land rights or property rights must be made in the grant agreement before the Land Deed Official of Indonesia. Furthermore, the registration of the transfer of land rights will be carried out at the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, land rights or property rights will get guarantees, protection, and legal certainty to avoid disputes in the future.