Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.971
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia QUANTUM: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains Edukasia : Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Borneo Borneo Journal of Biology Education (BJBE) Biopedagogia
Zulfadli Zulfadli
Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Borneo Tarakan
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemistry Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia

 1 
Developing cognitive test based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy on the structure and cell function material for XI grade students in senior high school of Tarakan city Zulfadli Zulfadli
JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): JULY
Publisher : University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.3973

Abstract

This research was to develop a cognitive test tool based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study aimed to determine the quality of the test based on experts assessment, to measure the level of validity, reliability, and to determine the difficulty levels of the questions, discrimination power, and distractors. This research employed Research and Development (R&D) method. The development test model used was the 4D procedure which was modified into three steps: define, design, and develop. The subjects were the Science students of XI grade at SMAN 2 Tarakan and SMA Muhammadiyah Tarakan.  The results of the study were: (1) the experts validation analysis showed that the cognitive test has been categorized as  valid which the value was 4.28 (2) The quality of cognitive test  were: (A) the 90% items were valid, while 10% were invalid. (B) the reliability value was 0.79 (highly reliable) (C) the levels of difficulty were: easy (27%), moderate (53%), difficult (20%). (D)the test discrimination index were: weak (10%), sufficient (33%), good (53%), and either once (3%). (E) distractors effectiveness: effective category (85%), ineffective (15%). Assessment results from expert validators and empirical tests indicate that this cognitive test device is feasible to use and apply. The uniformity of this level of difficulty makes the quality of items were good to use. The discrimination power of these test tool, which has good value, indicate that the high diversity of items is able to measure students' abilities.
Co-Authors Abdul Wahab Aidil Adhani Anca Rizki Febriansyah Bella Anggraini Darius Rupa Endiik Deni Nugroho Endik Deni Nugroho Ferryansyah, Ferryansyah Ibrahim Ibrahim Kamelia Kamelia Mardhiyah Noor Arifah Nadila Nadila Nuraini Nuraini Nurshakila Nurshakila Parada Agus Resti Mantang Sari Kurniati Sesa Sesa Siska Siska Sudarsih Sudarsih Tio Vani Simorangkir Vlorensius Vlorensius Wijarini, Fitri Yoga Noval Kurniawan Yoga Noval Kurniawan