Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL MASYARAKAT ASLI TENTANG OBAT DI INDONESIA DAULAY, ZAINUL
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge, especially protection traditional medicine, have been an academic debate in international forum. Research is aimed to find out: firstly, living norms protecting traditional konowledge of medicine in indigenous communities; secondly, comparing practices of developing countries in regulating Traditional Knowledge; and thirdly, identifying the current applicable concept in protection Traditional knowledge. The finding of the research comprises, firstly, as a valid owner of traditional knowledge, indigenous peoples have  reseonable rights to determine legal protection based on their perpectives.  Secondly, practices of medicinal knowledge arrangement in developing countries are variable and; thirdly defensive protection concept and positive protection involves intellectual property regime (patent, trademark and geographical indication) and legal regime sui generis to be applied in traditional knowledge, especially medicinal knowledge.Key Words: Traditional Knowledge; Indigenous Peoples; Ownership; Intellectual Property, Legal Protection.
Implication of Regulation Authorities on the Efforts to Accelerate the Eradication of Corruption Sukmareni, Sukmareni; Danil, Elwi; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Daulay, Zainul
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (450.349 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v4i3.1078

Abstract

Investigation of corruption, as an extra ordinary crime is granted to the three institutions, namely the Police, Attorney General and the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The granting of authority to these three institutions aims to accelerate the eradication of corruption, not only detrimental to the finances and the economy of the country but has damaged the joints of life of the nation and state. The research is descriptive and uses a normative juridical approach. Aiming to find out, and analyze qualitatively the implications of regulating investigative authority over the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. The study found that all three institutions that were given the authority to investigate corruption crimes were administratively separated, but functionally these three institutions should collaborate to accelerate the eradication of corruption, but in practice this was not the case, each institution tended to be shackled by fragmentary and institutional nature. centric that does not support the eradication of corruption. This is because the regulation of the authority of each institution has not been strictly regulated, then the arrangements are not synchronized and among the existing legislation, so that there is overlap of authority due to differences in interpretation between investigators, which results in investigations not going well.
TATAKELOLA PERLINDUNGAN PENGETAHUAN OBAT TRADISIONAL : Keberpihakan kepada Kepentingan Rakyat Banyak Zainul Daulay
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 2, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3456.632 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.2.2012.288-297

Abstract

Abstract Ironic, indeed, Indonesia with rich natural resources, cultural diversity, especially traditional medicinal knowledge has no protection management. As a result, valuable traditional medicinal knowledge brings no potential benefit for its owner, community and country in general. Compared to ASEAN countries, especially Phillipines, Thailand and Vietnam, indonesia is left 2 decades behind in organizing traditional medicinal knowledge. This writing is aimed to discuss, first, why traditional knowledge have to be protected and second, how management of  traditional medicinal knowledge stands on the side of interest and benefit for communities Key Words: Traditional Knowledge; Traditional Medicinal; Biodiversity, Legal Protection and Governance Abstrak   Ironis, memang, Indonesia yang kaya sumber daya hayati, keanekaragaman kultural khususnya Pengetahuan Obat Tradisional tidak mempunyai tatakelola perlindungan. Akibatnya, Pengetahuan Obat Tradisional yang demikian berharga tidak medatangkan sebesar-besarnya manfaat bagi pemiliknya, masyarakat, dan negara pada umumnya. Dibandingkan dengan negara-negara ASEAN, terutama Filipina, Thailand dan Vietnam, Indonesia telah tertinggal hampir dua dasawarsa dalam pengaturan perlindungan pengetahuan obat tradisional.Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas,  pertama, kenapa pengetahuan obat tradisional harus dilindungi dan kedua, bagaimana tatakelola perlindungan pengetahuan obat tradisional yang berpihak kepada kepentingan dan kemanfaatan bagi rakyat banyak.   Kata Kunci: Pengetahuan Tradisional, Obat Tradisional, Perlindungan, dan Tatakelola
KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL MASYARAKAT ASLI TENTANG OBAT DI INDONESIA ZAINUL DAULAY
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v19i2.99

Abstract

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge, especially protection traditional medicine, have been an academic debate in international forum. Research is aimed to find out: firstly, living norms protecting traditional konowledge of medicine in indigenous communities; secondly, comparing practices of developing countries in regulating Traditional Knowledge; and thirdly, identifying the current applicable concept in protection Traditional knowledge. The finding of the research comprises, firstly, as a valid owner of traditional knowledge, indigenous peoples have  reseonable rights to determine legal protection based on their perpectives.  Secondly, practices of medicinal knowledge arrangement in developing countries are variable and; thirdly defensive protection concept and positive protection involves intellectual property regime (patent, trademark and geographical indication) and legal regime sui generis to be applied in traditional knowledge, especially medicinal knowledge.Key Words: Traditional Knowledge; Indigenous Peoples; Ownership; Intellectual Property, Legal Protection.
PEMBATASAN JUMLAH AKTA NOTARIS BERDASARKAN KEWAJARAN DI KOTA PADANG Rionald Harris; Zainul Daulay; Beatrix Benni
UNES Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v2i2.110

Abstract

The Honorary Board of the Indonesian Notary Association as the organ of the Indonesian Notary Association issues a regulation regarding the Fairness of the Deed Making Certificate per Notary for 20 deeds per day. Based on pre-research, there are still many notaries who do not know about the regulation in Padang. Why a Notary is prohibited from making a deed exceeding the fairness limit, what factors becomes the reasons for a Notary in Padang to make a deed exceeding the fairness limit and the legal consequences of a deed exceeding the fairness limit will be the topic of discussion in this paper. The research method used is a type of empirical juridical research and the nature of analytical descriptive research; data collection is done by using data in the form of primary material as primary data, supported by secondary and tertiary materials. The data obtained are then processed, analyzed, and interpreted qualitatively. Compliance is a virtue that moves people to act rationally in using what is fair, it is important for Notary to be given reasonable limits on the deeds that they can make per day so that the Notary does not exceed their physical ability to make daily deeds. The Law of Notary Position does not limit the number of deeds that can be made by the Notary per day, so that there are still notaries who make the deed exceed the reasonable limits set especially Fiduciary deed in Padang. Notary Deed that exceeds the fairness limit determined by the Honorary Board of Notary will not be degraded to privately-made deed, provided that what is done by Notary in making the deed is in accordance with the Law of Notary Position. The reasonable limit of making a daily deed issued by the Indonesian Notary Association Honorary Board should be included in the Minister Law or Regulation because basically the DKP.INI 1 regulation in 2017 only binds members of the association. Had the notary been expelled from the association, it would not have had any effect on his position.
PEMBATALAN SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK OLEH KANTOR PERTANAHAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG TELAH BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DALAM PERKARA NOMOR:17/PDT.G/2009.PN.LB.BS Roni Roni; Zainul Daulay; Beatrix Benni
UNES Law Review Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v3i1.137

Abstract

One of the objectives of land registration is to provide legal certainty for land rights holders. Therefore, in order to make this happen, regulations regarding land registration are made, one of which is Article 32 paragraph (2) PP Number 24 of 1997. However, in reality there are still problems in terms of ownership of a parcel of land associated with this article, namely against a plot of land which has been controlled by a legal subject for years and has been equipped with a certificate. There are still outsiders demanding rights to the land with respect to the land. Until now, Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997, which should have been a solution to the above problems, still creates differences. Given the existence of this article is not in accordance with the negative publication system adopted by land registration in Indonesia, where a certificate is not an absolute evidence, but a certificate is strong evidence.
Implikasi Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Yang Didirikan Oleh Suami Istri Terhadap Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan Ermia Zanasri; Zainul Daulay; Busyra Azheri
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2019: Volume 5 Nomor 2 Juni 2019
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (490.329 KB) | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v5i2.142

Abstract

Perseroan Terbatas adalah badan hukum yang merupakan persekutuan modal serta didirikan berdasarkan perjanjian. Dari ketentuan diatas dapat diperhatikan bahwa dalam mendirikan Perseroan Terbatas harus ada paling sedikit 2 (dua) orang. Dalam prakteknya ditemukan pasangan suami istri mendirikan Perseroan Terbatas. Pada prinsipnya suami istri tidak dapat mendirikan Perseroan diantara mereka berdua saja, karena suami istri dalam suatu rumah tangga yang tidak adanya perjanjian kawin berada dalam satu kesatuan harta, dan mereka dianggap sebagai satu pihak saja. Permasalahan yang timbul adalah Bagaimana Keabsahan Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan oleh suami istri? Dan Bagaimana kedudukan harta suami istri dalam Perseroan Terbatas? metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dan teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan melakukan wawancara serta studi kepustakaan Yang dilakukan dengan cara mempelajari buku-buku literatur dan karya ilmiah yang berhubungan dengan masalah ini. Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas oleh suami istri tidak dilarang oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Asalkan suami istri yang akan mendirikan Perseroan Terbatas memenuhi syarat-syarat dari perjanjian. Karena Perseroan Terbatas merupakan persekutuan modal maka suami istri yang akan mendirikan Perseroan harus memisahkan hartanya dengan membuat perjanjian kawin sehingga mereka dapat bertindak sebagai 2 (dua) subjek hukum. implikasinya apabila suami istri tidak membuat perjanjian kawin, sehingga menjadikan suami istri sebagai satu subjek hukum, dan bertanggung jawab secara pribadi terhadap perikatan dan kerugian yang ditimbulkan oleh Perseroan serta menjadikan tanggungjawab PT menjadi tidak terbatas. Kedudukan harta suami istri pada Perseroan Terbatas adalah dari harta bersama yang telah dipisahkan, pemisahan hanya sebatas saham yang disetorkan sebagai modal awal pendirian Perseroan Terbatas. implikasinya terhadap terjadinya perceraian, maka saham akan tetap menjadi milik masing-masing dan tidak ada pembagiannya. Sedangkan apabila salah satu meninggal dunia akan terjadi pewarisan yang mana suami atau istri berhak atas setengah dari harta bersama, ditambah dengan hak suami atau istri dari harta warisan suami atau istri. Apabila kedua suami istri itu meninggal dunia maka terbuka pewarisan terhadap ahli waris suami atau istri. Kata Kunci : Impilkasi, Perseroan Terbatas, suami istri, harta bersama Abstract: Limited Liability Company is a legal entity which is a capital alliance and established under an agreement. From the above provisions it can be noted that in establishing a Limited Liability Company there must be at least 2 (two) people. In practice, a married couple founded a Limited Liability Company. In principle, a husband and wife cannot establish a company between them alone, because a husband and wife in a household that has no marriage agreement is in one unit of property, and they are considered as one party only. The problem that arises is how is the validity of a limited liability company established by a husband and wife? And what is the position of husband and wife assets in a Limited Liability Company? the approach method used in this study is normative juridical and data collection techniques used are by conducting interviews and literature studies conducted by studying literature books and scientific works related to this problem. The establishment of a Limited Liability Company by husband and wife is not prohibited by Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Provided that the husband and wife who will establish a Limited Liability Company fulfill the terms of the agreement. Since a Limited Liability Company is a capital alliance, the husband and wife who will establish the Company must separate their assets by making a marriage agreement so that they can act as 2 (two) legal subjects. the implication is that if the husband and wife do not make a marriage agreement, so that the husband and wife become one legal subject, and are personally responsible for the commitments and losses incurred by the Company and make the responsibility of the PT to be unlimited. The position of husband and wife property in a Limited Liability Company is from shared assets which have been separated, the separation is only limited to the shares deposited as the initial capital for the establishment of a Limited Liability Company. the implications for divorce, the shares will continue to be the property of each and there is no distribution. Whereas if one dies there will be inheritance in which the husband or wife has the right to half of the common property, plus the right of the husband or wife from the inheritance of the husband or wife. If both husband and wife die then inheritance is open to the heirs of the husband or wife. Daftar Pustaka Buku Abdurrahman, Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Akademika Presindo, 1992 Adrian Sutedi, Buku Pintar Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta:Raih Asa Sukses, 2015, Agus Budiarto, Kedudukan Hukum Tanggung Jawab Pendiri Perseroan Terbatas, Cet. I, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 2002 Ahmad Yani dan Gunawan Widjaja, Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000 Ardi Hanum Bratakusuma, Kedudukan Hukum Harta Bersama Suami Istri setelah putusan Pailit, 2016 Ahmad Rofiq, Hukum Islam Indonesia, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997 Ahmad Yani dan Gunawan Widjaja, Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000 Binoto Nadapdap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.40 Tahun 2007, Jakarta : Jala Permataaksara, 2016 Chidir Ali, Badan Hukum, Bandung : Alumni, 1991 Kurniawan, Tanggung JawabPemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum Positif, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Universitas Mataram Kurniawan, Hukum Perusahaan (Karakteristik Badan usaha Berbadan Hukum dan tidak Berbadan Hukum di Indonesia) Rachmadi Usman, Dimensi Hukum Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas Riduan Syahrani, Cetakan I :Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata, Bandung :Alumni, 1985 Rosnidar Sembiring, Hukum Keluarga Harta-Harta Benda Dalam Perkawinan, Jakarta, Raja Garfindo Persada, 2016 Rudhi Prasetya, Kedudukan Mandiri Perseroan Terbatas disertai dengan ulasan menurut UU No.1 tahun 1995 tentang Perseroan Terbatas,Cet ke I, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1995 Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Perusahaan tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Bandung:CV Nuansa Aulia, 2012 Yahya Harahap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015 Jurnal Ardi Hanum Bratakusuma, Kedudukan Hukum Harta Bersama Suami Istri setelah putusan Pailit, 2016, Jurnal Diponegoro Law Review Christiana Tri Budhayati, Mengenal Hukum Perdata di Indonesia, Fakultas hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, 2017 Internet http://www.gultomlawconsultants.com/prosedur-formil-pengalihan-saham-karena-pewarisan/ (diakses Pada tanggal 30 Januari 2019, Pada jam 14.00 wib) https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/cl1057/suami-istri-mendirikan-pt, (dikunjungi pada tanggal 28 Januari 2019, jam 17.00 wib http://old.presidentpost.id/2013/04/01/kedudukan-suami-istri-dalam-hukum-perusahaan (dikunjungi pada tanggal 14 januari 2019, jam 17.00)
Legal Politics of Protection and Ownership of Communal Intellectual Property: A Study of Traditional Medicine Knowledge Zainul Daulay
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/elg.2.2.5764.123-131

Abstract

The protection of cultural property can have two meanings. It depends on the perspective of whether the cultural wealth is seen as a cultural heritage or resource. In the event that cultural wealth is a cultural heritage, protection means preservation. The rsults shown that all KIK is a common heritage is based on generalizations and is a misguided conclusion rather than an accurate fact. It is recognized that many traditional communities have a strong and high ethos of sharing and giving (a strong sharing ethos). Although some KIK, knowledge of traditional medicine, for example, has been opened and disclosed, this knowledge is protected by customary law practices which view traditional knowledge as knowledge that cannot be accessed and used freely by everyone. This is in accordance with the theory of ownership where private property is in the middle between the commons and the anticommons. Therefore, the holder of the right to private property can be the state, the community collective and individuals. The legal politics of protection and ownership of communal intellectual property must reflect and rely on Pancasila as the basis of the state, constitution and sociological facts in indigenous peoples. There must be a balance between individual interests and the interests of the common or communal groups of owners of traditional knowledge. The regulation of KIK should be specifically regulated (sui generis) in a complete statutory regulation by taking into account the ideal policy of protecting the ownership of Indigenous Peoples.
PENGATURAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP PENYIMPANAN MINUTA AKTA FIDUSIA DI KOTA PEKANBARU Khekhe Nadea; Zainul Daulay; Rembrandt Rembrandt
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 5 (2023): April
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.810

Abstract

A notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other authorities including those referred to in UUJN. One of the Notary's authorities is to make a fiduciary guaranteed deed, which has been explained in Article 5 UUJF. In connection with this authority, the Notary is required to keep the minutes of the fiduciary deed, one of which is the deposit of the minutes of the fiduciary deed. The problem that occurs at this time is that some Notaries experience difficulties in storing minutes of fiduciary deeds, because there are no clear rules relating to these deposits. With the number of deeds that are made and keeping the minutes of the deed as a Notary protocol can cause problems. The notary may violate existing rules regarding the making of a fiduciary deed and experience problems in storing the number of minuta of this fiduciary deed. Based on this, the authors formulate the problem, namely first, how are the arrangements and responsibilities of a Notary for the storage of minutes of fiduciary deeds, secondly, what are the obstacles in storing the number of minutes of fiduciary deeds. This study uses a juridical-empirical approach. Based on the results of research on the arrangements and responsibilities of a Notary for the safekeeping of minutes of fiduciary deeds, it has been proven that many Notaries violate the rules regarding limiting the number of deed made per day and the Notary is only responsible to the extent of keeping the deed as a Notary protocol, so that if the guarantee time in the deed runs out, The notary keeps it and it is one of the factors in the accumulation of minutes of the deed. In storing the minutes of the fiduciary deed there are several obstacles such as the quality of paper that is easily damaged, making a special cupboard and a large room.
Konflik Israel vs. Palestina Memanas, Individu Mana yang Harus Bertanggungjawab? Ilhamda Fattah Kaloko; Zainul Daulay; Syofirman Syofyan; Mustika Sukma Utari; Harmelia Harmelia
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : CV. Ridwan Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.63 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i12.11279

Abstract

Perseteruan dan hal-hal yang tidak dapat dihindari oleh negara. Konflik antara Israel dan Palestina berulang kali terjadi, namun realisasi pertanggungjawaban internasional belum sesuai dengan aturan yang ada. Adanya peristiwa yang mengakibatkan jatuhnya korban dalam perang tersebut harus dipertanggung jawabkan oleh Israel sebagai Negara, serta individu-individu yang terlibat. Akibat tindakan ini, para pelaku kejahatan perang harus dimintai pertanggungjawaban di bawah hukum internasional. Rumusan masalah Apa tanggung jawab individu pihak Israel terhadap Palestina karena melanggar hukum perang? Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah: Konflik Israel-Palestina telah memenuhi unsur-unsur kejahatan internasional, sudah selayaknya orang yang melakukan hal tersebut harus dihukum. Namun dalam kasus pelanggaran ini, Israel dianggap tidak mau dan tidak mampu menangani kasus tersebut, sehingga PBB berhak mendesak dewan keamanan untuk membentuk pengadilan ad hoc agar kasus tersebut dapat diselesaikan dan pelakunya dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban. untuk tindakan mereka.